Normalized to: Lowski, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.01011 [pdf] - 1582337
Comparison of Pulsar Positions from Timing and Very Long Baseline
Astrometry
Wang, J. B.;
Coles, W. A.;
Hobbs, G.;
Shannon, R. M.;
Manchester, R. N.;
Kerr, M.;
Yuan, J. P.;
Wang, N.;
Bailes, M.;
Bhat, N. D. R.;
Dempsey, S. Dai J.;
Keith, M. J.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Levin, Y.;
lowski, S. Os;
Ravi, V.;
Reardon, D. J.;
Rosado, P A.;
Russell, C. J.;
Spiewak, R.;
van Straten, W.;
Toomey, L.;
Wen, L.;
You, X. -P.;
Zhu, X. -J.
Submitted: 2017-03-31
Pulsar positions can be measured with high precision using both pulsar timing
methods and very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI). Pulsar timing positions
are referenced to a solar-system ephemeris, whereas VLBI positions are
referenced to distant quasars. Here we compare pulsar positions from published
VLBI measurements with those obtained from pulsar timing data from the Nanshan
and Parkes radio telescopes in order to relate the two reference frames. We
find that the timing positions differ significantly from the VLBI positions
(and also differ between different ephemerides). A statistically significant
change in the obliquity of the ecliptic of $2.16\pm0.33$\,mas is found for the
JPL ephemeris DE405, but no significant rotation is found in subsequent JPL
ephemerides. The accuracy with which we can relate the two frames is limited by
the current uncertainties in the VLBI reference source positions and in
matching the pulsars to their reference source. Not only do the timing
positions depend on the ephemeris used in computing them, but also different
segments of the timing data lead to varying position estimates. These
variations are mostly common to all ephemerides, but slight changes are seen at
the 10$\mu$as level between ephemerides.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.1809 [pdf] - 1041176
A sub-Saturn Mass Planet, MOA-2009-BLG-319Lb
Miyake, N.;
Sumi, T.;
Dong, Subo;
Street, R.;
Mancini, L.;
Gould, A.;
Bennett, D. P.;
Tsapras, Y.;
Yee, J. C.;
Albrow, M. D.;
Bond, I. A.;
Fouque, P.;
Browne, P.;
Han, C.;
Snodgrass, C.;
Finet, F.;
Furusawa, K.;
Harpsoe, K.;
Allen, W.;
Hundertmark, M.;
Freeman, M.;
Suzuki, D.;
Abe, F.;
Botzler, C. S.;
Douchin, D.;
Fukui, A.;
Hayashi, F.;
Hearnshaw, J. B.;
Hosaka, S.;
Itow, Y.;
Kamiya, K.;
Kilmartin, P. M.;
Korpela, A.;
Lin, W.;
Ling, C. H.;
Makita, S.;
Masuda, K.;
Matsubara, Y.;
Muraki, Y.;
Nagayama, T.;
Nishimoto, K.;
Ohnishi, K.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Rattenbury, N.;
Saito, To.;
Skuljan, L.;
Sullivan, D. J.;
Sweatman, W. L.;
Tristram, P. J.;
Wada, K.;
Yock, P. C. M.;
Collaboration, The MOA;
Bolt, G.;
Bos, M.;
Christie, G. W.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Drummond, J.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Gaudi, B. S.;
Gorbikov, E.;
Higgins, D.;
Janczak, K. -H. Hwang J.;
Kaspi, S.;
Lee, C. -U.;
Koo, J. -R.;
lowski, S. Koz;
Lee, Y.;
Mallia, F.;
Maury, A.;
Maoz, D.;
McCormick, J.;
Monard, L. A. G.;
Moorhouse, D.;
Mu~noz, J. A.;
Natusch, T.;
Ofek, E. O.;
Pogge, R. W.;
Polishook, D.;
Santallo, R.;
Shporer, A.;
Spector, O.;
Thornley, G.;
Collaboration, The Micro FUN;
Allan, A.;
Bramich, D. M.;
Horne, K.;
Kains, N.;
Steele, I.;
Collaboration, The RoboNet;
Bozza, V.;
Burgdorf, M. J.;
Novati, S. Calchi;
Dominik, M.;
Dreizler, S.;
Glitrup, M.;
Hessman, F. V.;
Hinse, T. C.;
Jorgensen, U. G.;
Liebig, C.;
Maier, G.;
Mathiasen, M.;
Rahvar, S.;
Ricci, D.;
Scarpetta, G.;
Skottfelt, J.;
Southworth, J.;
Surdej, J.;
Wambsganss, J.;
Zimmer, F.;
Consortium, The MiNDSTEp;
Batista, V.;
Beaulieu, J. P.;
Brillant, S.;
Cassan, A.;
Cole, A.;
Corrales, E.;
Coutures, Ch.;
Dieters, S.;
Greenhill, J.;
Kubas, D.;
Menzies, J.;
Collaboration, The PLANET
Submitted: 2010-10-09, last modified: 2010-12-10
We report the gravitational microlensing discovery of a sub-Saturn mass
planet, MOA-2009-BLG-319Lb, orbiting a K or M-dwarf star in the inner Galactic
disk or Galactic bulge. The high cadence observations of the MOA-II survey
discovered this microlensing event and enabled its identification as a high
magnification event approximately 24 hours prior to peak magnification. As a
result, the planetary signal at the peak of this light curve was observed by 20
different telescopes, which is the largest number of telescopes to contribute
to a planetary discovery to date. The microlensing model for this event
indicates a planet-star mass ratio of q = (3.95 +/- 0.02) x 10^{-4} and a
separation of d = 0.97537 +/- 0.00007 in units of the Einstein radius. A
Bayesian analysis based on the measured Einstein radius crossing time, t_E, and
angular Einstein radius, \theta_E, along with a standard Galactic model
indicates a host star mass of M_L = 0.38^{+0.34}_{-0.18} M_{Sun} and a planet
mass of M_p = 50^{+44}_{-24} M_{Earth}, which is half the mass of Saturn. This
analysis also yields a planet-star three-dimensional separation of a =
2.4^{+1.2}_{-0.6} AU and a distance to the planetary system of D_L =
6.1^{+1.1}_{-1.2} kpc. This separation is ~ 2 times the distance of the snow
line, a separation similar to most of the other planets discovered by
microlensing.