Normalized to: Loose, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.01399 [pdf] - 2042494
A bright, high rotation-measure FRB that skewers the M33 halo
Connor, Liam;
van Leeuwen, Joeri;
Oostrum, L. C.;
Petroff, E.;
Maan, Yogesh;
Adams, E. A. K.;
Attema, J. J.;
Bast, J. E.;
Boersma, O. M.;
Dénes, H.;
Gardenier, D. W.;
Hargreaves, J. E.;
Kooistra, E.;
Pastor-Marazuela, I.;
Schulz, R.;
Sclocco, A.;
Smits, R.;
Straal, S. M.;
van der Schuur, D.;
Vohl, Dany;
Adebahr, B.;
de Blok, W. J. G.;
van Cappellen, W. A.;
Coolen, A. H. W. M.;
Damstra, S.;
van Diepen, G. N. J.;
Frank, B. S.;
Hess, K. M.;
Hut, B.;
Loose, G. Marcel;
Lucero, D. M.;
Mika, Á.;
Moss, V. A.;
Mulder, H.;
Oosterloo, T. A.;
Ruiter, M.;
Vedantham, H.;
Vermaas, N. J.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Ziemke, J.
Submitted: 2020-02-04
We report the detection of a bright fast radio burst, FRB\,191108, with
Apertif on the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT). The interferometer
allows us to localise the FRB to a narrow $5\arcsec\times7\arcmin$ ellipse by
employing both multibeam information within the Apertif phased-array feed (PAF)
beam pattern, and across different tied-array beams. The resulting sight line
passes close to Local Group galaxy M33, with an impact parameter of only
18\,kpc with respect to the core. It also traverses the much larger
circumgalactic medium of M31, the Andromeda Galaxy. We find that the shared
plasma of the Local Group galaxies could contribute $\sim$10\% of its
dispersion measure of 588\,pc\,cm$^{-3}$, but not detectable scintillation,
temporal scattering, or significant Faraday rotation in this case. FRB\,191108
has a Faraday rotation measure of +474\,$\pm\,3$\,rad\,m$^{-2}$, which is too
large to be explained by either the Milky Way or the intergalactic medium. This
indicates a dense local magneto-ionic environment in the source host
galaxy---as has been argued for other FRBs. We found no accompanying persistent
radio sources in the Apertif imaging survey data.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.12217 [pdf] - 2061637
Repeating fast radio bursts with WSRT/Apertif
Oostrum, L. C.;
Maan, Y.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
Connor, L.;
Petroff, E.;
Attema, J. J.;
Bast, J. E.;
Gardenier, D. W.;
Hargreaves, J. E.;
Kooistra, E.;
van der Schuur, D.;
Sclocco, A.;
Smits, R.;
Straal, S. M.;
ter Veen, S.;
Vohl, D.;
Adams, E. A. K.;
Adebahr, B.;
de Blok, W. J. G.;
Brink, R. H. van den;
van Cappellen, W. A.;
Coolen, A. H. W. M.;
Damstra, S.;
van Diepen, G. N. J.;
Frank, B. S.;
Hess, K. M.;
van der Hulst, J. M.;
Hut, B.;
Ivashina, M. V.;
Loose, G. M.;
Lucero, D. M.;
Mika, Á.;
Morganti, R. H.;
Moss, V. A.;
Mulder, H.;
Norden, M. J.;
Oosterloo, T. A.;
Orrú, E.;
de Reijer, J. P. R.;
Ruiter, M.;
Vermaas, N. J.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Ziemke, J.
Submitted: 2019-12-27, last modified: 2020-01-28
Repeating fast radio bursts (FRBs) present excellent opportunities to
identify FRB progenitors and host environments, as well as decipher the
underlying emission mechanism. Detailed studies of repeating FRBs might also
hold clues to the origin of FRBs as a population. We aim to detect the first
two repeating FRBs: FRB 121102 (R1) and FRB 180814.J0422+73 (R2), and
characterise their repeat statistics. We also want to significantly improve the
sky localisation of R2. We use the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope to
conduct extensive follow-up of these two repeating FRBs. The new phased-array
feed system, Apertif, allows covering the entire sky position uncertainty of R2
with fine spatial resolution in one pointing. We characterise the energy
distribution and the clustering of detected R1 bursts. We detected 30 bursts
from R1. Our measurements indicate a dispersion measure of 563.5(2) pc
cm$^{-3}$, suggesting a significant increase in DM over the past few years. We
place an upper limit of 8% on the linear polarisation fraction of the brightest
burst. We did not detect any bursts from R2. A single power-law might not fit
the R1 burst energy distribution across the full energy range or widely
separated detections. Our observations provide improved constraints on the
clustering of R1 bursts. Our stringent upper limits on the linear polarisation
fraction imply a significant depolarisation, either intrinsic to the emission
mechanism or caused by the intervening medium, at 1400 MHz that is not observed
at higher frequencies. The non-detection of any bursts from R2 implies either a
highly clustered nature of the bursts, a steep spectral index, or a combination
of both. Alternatively, R2 has turned off completely, either permanently or for
an extended period of time.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.04834 [pdf] - 1691543
Cobalt: A GPU-based correlator and beamformer for LOFAR
Submitted: 2018-01-15, last modified: 2018-04-30
For low-frequency radio astronomy, software correlation and beamforming on
general purpose hardware is a viable alternative to custom designed hardware.
LOFAR, a new-generation radio telescope centered in the Netherlands with
international stations in Germany, France, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Sweden and
the UK, has successfully used software real-time processors based on IBM Blue
Gene technology since 2004. Since then, developments in technology have allowed
us to build a system based on commercial off-the-shelf components that combines
the same capabilities with lower operational cost. In this paper we describe
the design and implementation of a GPU-based correlator and beamformer with the
same capabilities as the Blue Gene based systems. We focus on the design
approach taken, and show the challenges faced in selecting an appropriate
system. The design, implementation and verification of the software system
shows the value of a modern test-driven development approach. Operational
experience, based on three years of operations, demonstrates that a general
purpose system is a good alternative to the previous supercomputer-based system
or custom-designed hardware.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.02133 [pdf] - 1507610
LBCS: the LOFAR Long-Baseline Calibrator Survey
Jackson, N.;
Tagore, A.;
Deller, A.;
Moldón, J.;
Varenius, E.;
Morabito, L.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Carozzi, T.;
Conway, J.;
Drabent, A.;
Kapinska, A.;
Orrù, E.;
Brentjens, M.;
Blaauw, R.;
Kuper, G.;
Sluman, J.;
Schaap, J.;
Vermaas, N.;
Iacobelli, M.;
Cerrigone, L.;
Shulevski, A.;
ter Veen, S.;
Fallows, R.;
Pizzo, R.;
Sipior, M.;
Anderson, J.;
Avruch, M.;
Bell, M.;
van Bemmel, I.;
Bentum, M.;
Best, P.;
Bonafede, A.;
Breitling, F.;
Broderick, J.;
Brouw, W.;
Brüggen, M.;
Ciardi, B.;
Corstanje, A.;
de Gasperin, F.;
de Geus, E.;
Eislöffel, J.;
Engels, D.;
Falcke, H.;
Garrett, M.;
Griessmeier, J.;
Gunst, A.;
van Haarlem, M.;
Heald, G.;
Hoeft, M.;
Hörandel, J.;
Horneffer, A.;
Intema, H.;
Juette, E.;
Kuniyoshi, M.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
Loose, G.;
Maat, P.;
McFadden, R.;
McKay-Bukowski, D.;
McKean, J.;
Mulcahy, D.;
Munk, H.;
Pandey-Pommier, M.;
Polatidis, A.;
Reich, W.;
Röttgering, H.;
Rowlinson, A.;
Scaife, A.;
Schwarz, D.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Swinbank, J.;
Thoudam, S.;
Toribio, M.;
Vermeulen, R.;
Vocks, C.;
van Weeren, R.;
Wise, M.;
Yatawatta, S.;
Zarka, P.
Submitted: 2016-08-06, last modified: 2016-09-09
(abridged). We outline LBCS (the LOFAR Long-Baseline Calibrator Survey),
whose aim is to identify sources suitable for calibrating the
highest-resolution observations made with the International LOFAR Telescope,
which include baselines >1000 km. Suitable sources must contain significant
correlated flux density (50-100mJy) at frequencies around 110--190~MHz on
scales of a few hundred mas. At least for the 200--300-km international
baselines, we find around 1 suitable calibrator source per square degree over a
large part of the northern sky, in agreement with previous work. This should
allow a randomly selected target to be successfully phase calibrated on the
international baselines in over 50% of cases. Products of the survey include
calibrator source lists and fringe-rate and delay maps of wide areas --
typically a few degrees -- around each source. The density of sources with
significant correlated flux declines noticeably with baseline length over the
range 200--600~km, with good calibrators on the longest baselines appearing
only at the rate of 0.5 per square degree. Coherence times decrease from 1--3
minutes on 200-km baselines to about 1 minute on 600-km baselines, suggesting
that ionospheric phase variations contain components with scales of a few
hundred kilometres. The longest median coherence time, at just over 3 minutes,
is seen on the DE609 baseline, which at 227km is close to being the shortest.
We see median coherence times of between 80 and 110 seconds on the four longest
baselines (580--600~km), and about 2 minutes for the other baselines. The
success of phase transfer from calibrator to target is shown to be influenced
by distance, in a manner that suggests a coherence patch at 150-MHz of the
order of 1 degree.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.01594 [pdf] - 1399729
A large light-mass component of cosmic rays at 10^{17} - 10^{17.5} eV
from radio observations
Buitink, S.;
Corstanje, A.;
Falcke, H.;
Hörandel, J. R.;
Huege, T.;
Nelles, A.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rossetto, L.;
Schellart, P .;
Scholten, O.;
ter Veen, S.;
Thoudam, S.;
Trinh, T. N. G.;
Anderson, J.;
Asgekar, A.;
Avruch, I. M.;
Bell, M. E.;
Bentum, M. J.;
Bernardi, G.;
Best, P.;
Bonafede, A.;
Breitling, F.;
Broderick, J. W.;
Brouw, W. N.;
Brüggen, M.;
Butcher, H. R.;
Carbone, D.;
Ciardi, B.;
Conway, J. E.;
de Gasperin, F.;
de Geus, E.;
Deller, A.;
Dettmar, R. -J.;
van Diepen, G.;
Duscha, S.;
Eislöffel, J.;
Engels, D.;
Enriquez, J. E.;
Fallows, R. A.;
Fender, R.;
Ferrari, C.;
Frieswijk, W.;
Garrett, M. A.;
Griessmeier, J. M.;
Gunst, A. W.;
van Haarlem, M. P.;
Hassall, T. E.;
Heald, G.;
Hessels, J. W. T.;
Hoeft, M.;
Horneffer, A.;
Iacobelli, M.;
Intema, H.;
Juette, E.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Kondratiev, V. I.;
Kramer, M.;
Kuniyoshi, M.;
Kuper, G.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
Loose, G. M.;
Maat, P.;
Mann, G.;
Markoff, S.;
McFadden, R.;
McKay-Bukowski, D.;
McKean, J. P.;
Mevius, M.;
Mulcahy, D. D.;
Munk, H.;
Norden, M. J.;
Orru, E.;
Paas, H.;
Pandey-Pommier, M.;
Pandey, V. N.;
Pietka, M.;
Pizzo, R.;
Polatidis, A. G.;
Reich, W.;
Röttgering, H. J. A.;
Scaife, A. M. M.;
Schwarz, D. J.;
Serylak, M.;
Sluman, J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Stappers, B. W.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Stewart, A.;
Swinbank, J.;
Tagger, M.;
Tang, Y.;
Tasse, C.;
Toribio, M. C.;
Vermeulen, R.;
Vocks, C.;
Vogt, C.;
van Weeren, R. J.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Wise, M. W.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Yatawatta, S.;
Zarka, P.;
Zensus, J. A.
Submitted: 2016-03-04, last modified: 2016-05-01
Cosmic rays are the highest energy particles found in nature. Measurements of
the mass composition of cosmic rays between 10^{17} eV and 10^{18} eV are
essential to understand whether this energy range is dominated by Galactic or
extragalactic sources. It has also been proposed that the astrophysical
neutrino signal comes from accelerators capable of producing cosmic rays of
these energies. Cosmic rays initiate cascades of secondary particles (air
showers) in the atmosphere and their masses are inferred from measurements of
the atmospheric depth of the shower maximum, Xmax, or the composition of shower
particles reaching the ground. Current measurements suffer from either low
precision, or a low duty cycle and a high energy threshold. Radio detection of
cosmic rays is a rapidly developing technique, suitable for determination of
Xmax with a duty cycle of in principle nearly 100%. The radiation is generated
by the separation of relativistic charged particles in the geomagnetic field
and a negative charge excess in the shower front. Here we report radio
measurements of Xmax with a mean precision of 16 g/cm^2 between
10^{17}-10^{17.5} eV. Because of the high resolution in $Xmax we can determine
the mass spectrum and find a mixed composition, containing a light mass
fraction of ~80%. Unless the extragalactic component becomes significant
already below 10^{17.5} eV, our measurements indicate an additional Galactic
component dominating at this energy range.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1204.3864 [pdf] - 530593
Wide-band Simultaneous Observations of Pulsars: Disentangling Dispersion
Measure and Profile Variations
Hassall, T. E.;
Stappers, B. W.;
Hessels, J. W. T.;
Kramer, M.;
Alexov, A.;
Anderson, K.;
Coenen, T.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Keane, E. F.;
Kondratiev, V. I.;
Lazaridis, K.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
Noutsos, A.;
Serylak, M.;
Sobey, C.;
Verbiest, J. P. W.;
Weltevrede, P.;
Zagkouris, K.;
Fender, R.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Bahren, L.;
Bell, M. E.;
Broderick, J. W.;
Corbel, S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Dhillon, V. S.;
Eisloffel, J.;
Falcke, H.;
Griessmeier, J. -M.;
Jonker, P.;
Law, C.;
Markoff, S.;
Miller-Jones, J. C. A.;
Osten, R.;
Rol, E.;
Scaife, A. M. M.;
Scheers, B.;
Schellart, P.;
Spreeuw, H.;
Swinbank, J.;
ter Veen, S.;
Wise, M. W.;
Wijnands, R.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Zarka, P.;
Asgekar, A.;
Bell, M. R.;
Bentum, M. J.;
Bernardi, G.;
Best, P.;
Bonafede, A.;
Boonstra, A. J.;
Brentjens, M.;
Brouw, W. N.;
Bruggen, M.;
Butcher, H. R.;
Ciardi, B.;
Garrett, M. A.;
Gerbers, M.;
Gunst, A. W.;
van Haarlem, M. P.;
Heald, G.;
Hoeft, M.;
Holties, H.;
de Jong, A.;
Koopmans, L. V. E.;
Kuniyoshi, M.;
Kuper, G.;
Loose, G. M.;
Maat, P.;
Masters, J.;
McKean, J. P.;
Meulman, H.;
Mevius, M.;
Munk, H.;
Noordam, J. E.;
Orru, E.;
Paas, H.;
Pandey-Pommier, M.;
Pandey, V. N.;
Pizzo, R.;
Polatidis, A.;
Reich, W.;
Rottgering, H.;
Sluman, J.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Sterks, C. G. M.;
Tagger, M.;
Tang, Y.;
Tasse, C.;
Vermeulen, R.;
van Weeren, R. J.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Yatawatta, S.
Submitted: 2012-04-17, last modified: 2012-05-30
Dispersion in the interstellar medium is a well known phenomenon that follows
a simple relationship, which has been used to predict the time delay of
dispersed radio pulses since the late 1960s. We performed wide-band
simultaneous observations of four pulsars with LOFAR (at 40-190 MHz), the 76-m
Lovell Telescope (at 1400 MHz) and the Effelsberg 100-m Telescope (at 8000 MHz)
to test the accuracy of the dispersion law over a broad frequency range. In
this paper we present the results of these observations which show that the
dispersion law is accurate to better than 1 part in 100000 across our observing
band. We use this fact to constrain some of the properties of the ISM along the
line-of-sight and use the lack of any aberration or retardation effects to
determine upper limits on emission heights in the pulsar magnetosphere. We also
discuss the effect of pulse profile evolution on our observations, and the
implications that it could have for precision pulsar timing projects such as
the detection of gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays.