sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Lonappan, Anto I.

Normalized to: Lonappan, A.

3 article(s) in total. 8 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1911.07824  [pdf] - 2037437
Cosmological Simulation of Galaxy Groups and Clusters-I: Global Effect of Feedback from Active Galactic Nuclei
Comments: 11 pages, 8 figures, Accepted for publication at Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2019-11-18
In this study we quantify the properties of the gas and dark matter around active galactic nuclei (AGN) in simulated galaxy groups and clusters and analyze the effect of AGN feedback on the surrounding intra-cluster (group) medium. Our results suggest downsizing of AGN luminosity with host halo mass, supporting the results obtained from clustering studies of AGN. By examining the temperature and density distribution of the gas in the vicinity of AGN we show that due to feedback from the central engine, the gas gets displaced from the centre of the group/cluster resulting in a reduction of the density but an enhancement of temperature. We show that these effects are pronounced at both high and low redshifts and propose new observables to study the effect of feedback in higher redshift galaxies. We also show that the average stellar mass is decreased in halos in the presence of AGN feedback confirming claims from previous studies. Our work for the first time uses a fully cosmological-hydrodynamic simulation to evaluate the global effects of AGN feedback on their host dark matter halos as well as galaxies at scales of galaxy groups and clusters.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.00603  [pdf] - 1639179
Bayesian Evidences for Dark Energy models in light of current obsevational data
Comments: Revised version. Analysis done with updated data. Results modified
Submitted: 2017-07-03, last modified: 2017-11-23
We do a comprehensive study of the Bayesian evidences for a large number of dark energy models using a combination of latest cosmological data from SNIa, CMB, BAO, Strong lensing time delay, Growth measurements, measurements of Hubble parameter at different redshifts and measurements of angular diameter distance by Megamaser Cosmology Project . We consider a variety of scalar field models with different potentials as well as different parametrisations for the dark energy equation of state. Among 21 models that we consider in our study, we do not find strong evidences in favour of any evolving dark energy model compared to $\Lambda$CDM. For the evolving dark energy models, we show that purely non-phantom models have much better evidences compared to those models that allow both phantom and non-phantom behaviours. Canonical scalar field with exponential and tachyon field with square potential have highest evidences among all the models considered in this work. We also show that a combination of low redshift measurements decisively favours an accelerating $\Lambda$CDM model compared to a non-accelerating power law model.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1705.07336  [pdf] - 1583672
Is it time to go beyond $\Lambda$CDM universe?
Comments: 13 pages, LateX style, 1 table, 6 eps figures. New References and figures added. Conclusions remain the same
Submitted: 2017-05-20, last modified: 2017-06-13
Concordance $\Lambda$CDM universe is the simplest model that is consistent with a large variety of cosmological observations till date. But few recent observations indicate inconsistencies in $\Lambda$CDM model. In this paper, we consider the combination of recent SnIa+Bao+Cmb+Growth+$H(z)$+$H_{0}$ measurements to revisit the constraints on the dark energy evolution using the widely studied CPL parametrisation for the dark energy equation of state. Although the reconstructed behaviour for the dark energy equation of state confirms the inconsistency of $\Lambda$CDM at $95\%$ confidence level, the reconstructed $Om$ diagnostic which is a {\it null test} for $\Lambda$CDM, still allows the concordance $\Lambda$CDM behaviour with a lower range of $\Omega_{m0}$ than that obtained by Planck-2015. {\it This confirms that $\Lambda$CDM is still the best choice for the dark energy model}. We also measure the parameter $S = \sigma_{8}\sqrt{\Omega_{m0}/0.3} = 0.728 \pm 0.023$ which is consistent with its recent measurement by KiDS survey. The confidence contour in the $\Omega_{m0}-\sigma_{8}$ parameter plane is also fully consistent with KiDS survey measurement.