Normalized to: Lognonné, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.08959 [pdf] - 2080121
On-deck seismology: Lessons from InSight for future planetary seismology
Panning, Mark P.;
Pike, W. Tom;
Lognonné, Philippe;
Banerdt, W. Bruce;
Murdoch, Naomi;
Banfield, Don;
Charalambous, Constantinos;
Kedar, Sharon;
Lorenz, Ralph D.;
Marusiak, Angela G.;
McClean, John B.;
Nunn, Ceri;
Stähler, Simon C.;
Stott, Alexander E.;
Warren, Tristram
Submitted: 2020-03-19
Before deploying to the surface of Mars, the short-period (SP) seismometer of
the InSight mission operated on deck for a total of 48 hours. This dataset can
be used to understand how deck-mounted seismometers can be used in future
landed missions to Mars, Europa, and other planetary bodies. While operating on
deck, the SP seismometer showed signals comparable to the Viking-2 seismometer
near 3 Hz where the sensitivity of the Viking instrument peaked. Wind
sensitivity showed similar patterns to the Viking instrument, although
amplitudes on InSight were ~80% larger for a given wind velocity. However,
during the low wind evening hours the instrument noise levels at frequencies
between 0.1 and 1 Hz were comparable to quiet stations on Earth, although
deployment to the surface below the Wind and Thermal Shield lowered
installation noise by roughly 40 dB in acceleration power. With the observed
noise levels and estimated seismicity rates for Mars, detection probability for
quakes for a deck-mounted instrument are low enough that up to years of on-deck
recordings may be necessary to observe an event. Because the noise is dominated
by wind acting on the lander, though, deck-mounted seismometers may be more
practical for deployment on airless bodies, and it is important to evaluate the
seismicity of the target body and the specific design of the lander. Detection
probabilities for operation on Europa reach over 99% for some proposed
seismicity models for a similar duration of operation if noise levels are
comparable to low-wind time periods on Mars.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.05664 [pdf] - 1565389
Estimations of the seismic pressure noise on Mars determined from Large
Eddy Simulations and demonstration of pressure decorrelation techniques for
the InSight mission
Submitted: 2017-04-19
The atmospheric pressure fluctuations on Mars induce an elastic response in
the ground that creates a ground tilt, detectable as a seismic signal on the
InSight seismometer SEIS. The seismic pressure noise is modeled using Large
Eddy Simulations of the wind and surface pressure at the InSight landing site
and a Green's function ground deformation approach that is subsequently
validated via a detailed comparison with two other methods based on Sorrells'
theory (Sorrels 1971; Sorrels et al. 1971). The horizontal acceleration as a
result of the ground tilt due to the LES turbulence-induced pressure
fluctuations are found to be typically ~2 - 40 nm/s^2 in amplitude, whereas the
direct horizontal acceleration is two orders of magnitude smaller and is thus
negligible in comparison. The vertical accelerations are found to be ~0.1 - 6
nm/s^2 in amplitude.
We show that under calm conditions, a single-pressure measurement is
representative of the large-scale pressure field (to a distance of several
kilometers), particularly in the prevailing wind direction. However, during
windy conditions, small-scale turbulence results in a reduced correlation
between the pressure signals, and the single-pressure measurement becomes less
representative of the pressure field. Nonetheless, the correlation between the
seismic signal and the pressure signal is found to be higher for the windiest
period because the seismic pressure noise reflects the atmospheric structure
close to the seismometer. In the same way that we reduce the atmospheric
seismic signal by making use of a pressure sensor that is part of the InSight
APSS (Auxiliary Payload Sensor Suite), we also the use the synthetic noise data
obtained from the LES pressure field to demonstrate a decorrelation strategy.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.04308 [pdf] - 1533347
Evaluating the wind-induced mechanical noise on the InSight seismometers
Submitted: 2016-12-13
The SEIS (Seismic Experiment for Interior Structures) instrument onboard the
InSight mission to Mars is the critical instrument for determining the interior
structure of Mars, the current level of tectonic activity and the meteorite
flux. Meeting the performance requirements of the SEIS instrument is vital to
successfully achieve these mission objectives. Here we analyse in-situ wind
measurements from previous Mars space missions to understand the wind
environment that we are likely to encounter on Mars, and then we use an elastic
ground deformation model to evaluate the mechanical noise contributions on the
SEIS instrument due to the interaction between the Martian winds and the
InSight lander. Lander mechanical noise maps that will be used to select the
best deployment site for SEIS once the InSight lander arrives on Mars are also
presented. We find the lander mechanical noise may be a detectable signal on
the InSight seismometers. However, for the baseline SEIS deployment position,
the noise is expected to be below the total noise requirement >97% of the time
and is, therefore, not expected to endanger the InSight mission objectives.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.06580 [pdf] - 1342933
Seismometer Detection of Dust Devil Vortices by Ground Tilt
Submitted: 2015-11-20
We report seismic signals on a desert playa caused by convective vortices and
dust devils. The long-period (10-100s) signatures, with tilts of ~10$^{-7}$
radians, are correlated with the presence of vortices, detected with nearby
sensors as sharp temporary pressure drops (0.2-1 mbar) and solar obscuration by
dust. We show that the shape and amplitude of the signals, manifesting
primarily as horizontal accelerations, can be modeled approximately with a
simple quasi-static point-load model of the negative pressure field associated
with the vortices acting on the ground as an elastic half space. We suggest the
load imposed by a dust devil of diameter D and core pressure {\Delta}Po is
~({\pi}/2){\Delta}PoD$^2$, or for a typical terrestrial devil of 5 m diameter
and 2 mbar, about the weight of a small car. The tilt depends on the inverse
square of distance, and on the elastic properties of the ground, and the large
signals we observe are in part due to the relatively soft playa sediment and
the shallow installation of the instrument. Ground tilt may be a particularly
sensitive means of detecting dust devils. The simple point-load model fails for
large dust devils at short ranges, but more elaborate models incorporating the
work of Sorrells (1971) may explain some of the more complex features in such
cases, taking the vortex winds and ground velocity into account. We discuss
some implications for the InSight mission to Mars.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.05747 [pdf] - 1323351
The EChO science case
Tinetti, Giovanna;
Drossart, Pierre;
Eccleston, Paul;
Hartogh, Paul;
Isaak, Kate;
Linder, Martin;
Lovis, Christophe;
Micela, Giusi;
Ollivier, Marc;
Puig, Ludovic;
Ribas, Ignasi;
Snellen, Ignas;
Allard, Bruce Swinyard. France;
Barstow, Joanna;
Cho, James;
Coustenis, Athena;
Cockell, Charles;
Correia, Alexandre;
Decin, Leen;
de Kok, Remco;
Deroo, Pieter;
Encrenaz, Therese;
Forget, Francois;
Glasse, Alistair;
Griffith, Caitlin;
Guillot, Tristan;
Koskinen, Tommi;
Lammer, Helmut;
Leconte, Jeremy;
Maxted, Pierre;
Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo;
Nelson, Richard;
North, Chris;
Pallé, Enric;
Pagano, Isabella;
Piccioni, Guseppe;
Pinfield, David;
Selsis, Franck;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Stixrude, Lars;
Tennyson, Jonathan;
Turrini, Diego;
Beaulieu, Mariarosa Zapatero-Osorio. Jean-Philippe;
Grodent, Denis;
Guedel, Manuel;
Luz, David;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, Hans Ulrik;
Ray, Tom;
Rickman, Hans;
Selig, Avri;
Banaszkiewicz, Mark Swain. Marek;
Barlow, Mike;
Bowles, Neil;
Branduardi-Raymont, Graziella;
Foresto, Vincent Coudé du;
Gerard, Jean-Claude;
Gizon, Laurent;
Hornstrup, Allan;
Jarchow, Christopher;
Kerschbaum, Franz;
Kovacs, Géza;
Lagage, Pierre-Olivier;
Lim, Tanya;
Lopez-Morales, Mercedes;
Malaguti, Giuseppe;
Pace, Emanuele;
Pascale, Enzo;
Vandenbussche, Bart;
Wright, Gillian;
Adriani, Gonzalo Ramos Zapata. Alberto;
Azzollini, Ruymán;
Balado, Ana;
Bryson, Ian;
Burston, Raymond;
Colomé, Josep;
Foresto, Vincent Coudé du;
Crook, Martin;
Di Giorgio, Anna;
Griffin, Matt;
Hoogeveen, Ruud;
Ottensamer, Roland;
Irshad, Ranah;
Middleton, Kevin;
Morgante, Gianluca;
Pinsard, Frederic;
Rataj, Mirek;
Reess, Jean-Michel;
Savini, Giorgio;
Schrader, Jan-Rutger;
Stamper, Richard;
Abe, Berend Winter. L.;
Abreu, M.;
Achilleos, N.;
Ade, P.;
Adybekian, V.;
Affer, L.;
Agnor, C.;
Agundez, M.;
Alard, C.;
Alcala, J.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Floriano, F. J. Alonso;
Altieri, F.;
Iglesias, C. A. Alvarez;
Amado, P.;
Andersen, A.;
Aylward, A.;
Baffa, C.;
Bakos, G.;
Ballerini, P.;
Banaszkiewicz, M.;
Barber, R. J.;
Barrado, D.;
Barton, E. J.;
Batista, V.;
Bellucci, G.;
Avilés, J. A. Belmonte;
Berry, D.;
Bézard, B.;
Biondi, D.;
Błęcka, M.;
Boisse, I.;
Bonfond, B.;
Bordé, P.;
Börner, P.;
Bouy, H.;
Brown, L.;
Buchhave, L.;
Budaj, J.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Burleigh, M.;
Cabral, A.;
Capria, M. T.;
Cassan, A.;
Cavarroc, C.;
Cecchi-Pestellini, C.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chadney, J.;
Chamberlain, S.;
Charnoz, S.;
Jessen, N. Christian;
Ciaravella, A.;
Claret, A.;
Claudi, R.;
Coates, A.;
Cole, R.;
Collura, A.;
Cordier, D.;
Covino, E.;
Danielski, C.;
Damasso, M.;
Deeg, H. J.;
Delgado-Mena, E.;
Del Vecchio, C.;
Demangeon, O.;
De Sio, A.;
De Wit, J.;
Dobrijévic, M.;
Doel, P.;
Dominic, C.;
Dorfi, E.;
Eales, S.;
Eiroa, C.;
Contreras, M. Espinoza;
Esposito, M.;
Eymet, V.;
Fabrizio, N.;
Fernández, M.;
Castella, B. Femenía;
Figueira, P.;
Filacchione, G.;
Fletcher, L.;
Focardi, M.;
Fossey, S.;
Fouqué, P.;
Frith, J.;
Galand, M.;
Gambicorti, L.;
Gaulme, P.;
López, R. J. García;
Garcia-Piquer, A.;
Gear, W.;
Gerard, J. -C.;
Gesa, L.;
Giani, E.;
Gianotti, F.;
Gillon, M.;
Giro, E.;
Giuranna, M.;
Gomez, H.;
Gomez-Leal, I.;
Hernandez, J. Gonzalez;
Merino, B. González;
Graczyk, R.;
Grassi, D.;
Guardia, J.;
Guio, P.;
Gustin, J.;
Hargrave, P.;
Haigh, J.;
Hébrard, E.;
Heiter, U.;
Heredero, R. L.;
Herrero, E.;
Hersant, F.;
Heyrovsky, D.;
Hollis, M.;
Hubert, B.;
Hueso, R.;
Israelian, G.;
Iro, N.;
Irwin, P.;
Jacquemoud, S.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, H.;
Justtanont, K.;
Kehoe, T.;
Kerschbaum, F.;
Kerins, E.;
Kervella, P.;
Kipping, D.;
Koskinen, T.;
Krupp, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Laken, B.;
Lanza, N.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leto, G.;
Goldaracena, J. Licandro;
Lithgow-Bertelloni, C.;
Liu, S. J.;
Cicero, U. Lo;
Lodieu, N.;
Lognonné, P.;
Lopez-Puertas, M.;
Lopez-Valverde, M. A.;
Rasmussen, I. Lundgaard;
Luntzer, A.;
Machado, P.;
MacTavish, C.;
Maggio, A.;
Maillard, J. -P.;
Magnes, W.;
Maldonado, J.;
Mall, U.;
Marquette, J. -B.;
Mauskopf, P.;
Massi, F.;
Maurin, A. -S.;
Medvedev, A.;
Michaut, C.;
Miles-Paez, P.;
Montalto, M.;
Rodríguez, P. Montañés;
Monteiro, M.;
Montes, D.;
Morais, H.;
Morales, J. C.;
Morales-Calderón, M.;
Morello, G.;
Martín, A. Moro;
Moses, J.;
Bedon, A. Moya;
Alcaino, F. Murgas;
Oliva, E.;
Orton, G.;
Palla, F.;
Pancrazzi, M.;
Pantin, E.;
Parmentier, V.;
Parviainen, H.;
Ramírez, K. Y. Peña;
Peralta, J.;
Perez-Hoyos, S.;
Petrov, R.;
Pezzuto, S.;
Pietrzak, R.;
Pilat-Lohinger, E.;
Piskunov, N.;
Prinja, R.;
Prisinzano, L.;
Polichtchouk, I.;
Poretti, E.;
Radioti, A.;
Ramos, A. A.;
Rank-Lüftinger, T.;
Read, P.;
Readorn, K.;
López, R. Rebolo;
Rebordão, J.;
Rengel, M.;
Rezac, L.;
Rocchetto, M.;
Rodler, F.;
Béjar, V. J. Sánchez;
Lavega, A. Sanchez;
Sanromá, E.;
Santos, N.;
Forcada, J. Sanz;
Scandariato, G.;
Schmider, F. -X.;
Scholz, A.;
Scuderi, S.;
Sethenadh, J.;
Shore, S.;
Showman, A.;
Sicardy, B.;
Sitek, P.;
Smith, A.;
Soret, L.;
Sousa, S.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stolarski, M.;
Strazzulla, G.;
Tabernero, H. M;
Tanga, P.;
Tecsa, M.;
Temple, J.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tessenyi, M.;
Testi, L.;
Thompson, S.;
Thrastarson, H.;
Tingley, B. W.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Torres, J. Martín;
Tozzi, A.;
Turrini, D.;
Varley, R.;
Vakili, F.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Valdivieso, M. L.;
Venot, O.;
Villaver, E.;
Vinatier, S.;
Viti, S.;
Waldmann, I.;
Waltham, D.;
Ward-Thompson, D.;
Waters, R.;
Watkins, C.;
Watson, D.;
Wawer, P.;
Wawrzaszk, A.;
White, G.;
Widemann, T.;
Winek, W.;
Wiśniowski, T.;
Yelle, R.;
Yung, Y.;
Yurchenko, S. N.
Submitted: 2015-02-19
The discovery of almost 2000 exoplanets has revealed an unexpectedly diverse
planet population. Observations to date have shown that our Solar System is
certainly not representative of the general population of planets in our Milky
Way. The key science questions that urgently need addressing are therefore:
What are exoplanets made of? Why are planets as they are? What causes the
exceptional diversity observed as compared to the Solar System?
EChO (Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory) has been designed as a
dedicated survey mission for transit and eclipse spectroscopy capable of
observing a large and diverse planet sample within its four-year mission
lifetime. EChO can target the atmospheres of super-Earths, Neptune-like, and
Jupiter-like planets, in the very hot to temperate zones (planet temperatures
of 300K-3000K) of F to M-type host stars. Over the next ten years, several new
ground- and space-based transit surveys will come on-line (e.g. NGTS, CHEOPS,
TESS, PLATO), which will specifically focus on finding bright, nearby systems.
The current rapid rate of discovery would allow the target list to be further
optimised in the years prior to EChO's launch and enable the atmospheric
characterisation of hundreds of planets. Placing the satellite at L2 provides a
cold and stable thermal environment, as well as a large field of regard to
allow efficient time-critical observation of targets randomly distributed over
the sky. A 1m class telescope is sufficiently large to achieve the necessary
spectro-photometric precision. The spectral coverage (0.5-11 micron, goal 16
micron) and SNR to be achieved by EChO, thanks to its high stability and
dedicated design, would enable a very accurate measurement of the atmospheric
composition and structure of hundreds of exoplanets.