Normalized to: Litvak, M.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.00313 [pdf] - 1743675
New estimation of non-thermal electron energetics in the giant solar
flare on 28 October 2003 based on Mars Odyssey observations
Submitted: 2018-04-01, last modified: 2018-09-03
A new estimation of the total number and energy of the non-thermal electrons
produced in the giant ($>\text{X}17$) solar flare on 2003 October 28 is
presented based on the analysis of the observations of the hard X-ray (HXR)
emission by the High Energy Neutron Detector (HEND) onboard the Mars Odyssey
spacecraft orbiting Mars. Previous estimations of the non-thermal electron
energy based on the Reuven Ramaty High-Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager
(RHESSI) data were incomplete since RHESSI missed the peak of the flare
impulsive phase. In contrast, HEND observed the whole flare. We used two models
to estimate the energy of the non-thermal electrons: the cold thick target
model and the warm thick target model. We found that, depending on the model
used and the low-energy cutoff ($E_\mathrm{c}$) of the non-thermal electrons,
the estimate of their total energy in the entire flare can vary from $2.3
\times 10^{32}$ to $6.2 \times 10^{33}$ ergs. The lowest estimate, $2.3 \times
10^{32}$ ergs, obtained within the cold thick target model and fixed
$E_\mathrm{c}=43$ keV, is consistent with the previous estimate. In this case,
non-thermal electrons accelerated in the peak of the flare impulsive phase
missed by RHESSI contained approximately $40\%$ of the total energy of
non-thermal electrons of the entire flare. The highest value, $6.2 \times
10^{33}$ ergs, obtained with the cold thick target model and fixed
$E_\mathrm{c}=10$ keV, looks abnormally high, since it exceeds the total
non-potential magnetic energy of the parent active region and the total
bolometric energy radiated in the flare. Our estimates also show that the total
number and energetics of the HXR-producing electrons in the flare region is a
few orders of magnitude higher than of the population of energetic electrons
injected into interplanetary space.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.10103 [pdf] - 1989528
Radio, Hard X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Emissions Associated with a Far-Side
Solar Event
Grechnev, V. V.;
Kiselev, V. I.;
Kashapova, L. K.;
Kochanov, A. A.;
Zimovets, I. V.;
Uralov, A. M.;
Nizamov, B. A.;
Grigorieva, I. Yu.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Sanin, A. B.
Submitted: 2018-08-29
The SOL2014-09-01 far-side solar eruptive event produced hard electromagnetic
and radio emissions observed with detectors at near-Earth vantage points.
Especially challenging was a long-duration >100 MeV $\gamma$-ray burst probably
produced by accelerated protons exceeding 300 MeV. This observation raised a
question of how high-energy protons could reach the Earth-facing solar surface.
Some preceding studies discussed a scenario in which protons accelerated by a
CME-driven shock high in the corona return to the solar surface. We continue
with the analysis of this challenging event, involving radio images from the
Nan\c{c}ay Radioheliograph and hard X-ray data from the High Energy Neutron
Detector (HEND) of the Gamma-Ray Spectrometer onboard the Mars Odyssey space
observatory located near Mars. HEND recorded unocculted flare emission. The
results indicate that the emissions observed from the Earth's direction were
generated by flare-accelerated electrons and protons trapped in static long
coronal loops. Their reacceleration is possible in these loops by a shock wave,
which was excited by the eruption, being initially not CME-driven. The results
highlight the ways to address remaining questions.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.07947 [pdf] - 1580686
Search for Gravitational Waves Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts During
the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run and Implications for the Origin of GRB
150906B
LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
Virgo Collaboration;
IPN Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Belgin, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Canepa, M.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
D'alya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devenson, J.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Douglas, R.;
'Alvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etienne, Z.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Galiana, A. Fern'andez;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fries, E. M.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, Whansun;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klein, B.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kr"amer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
London, L. T.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lovelace, G.;
L"uck, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGrath, C.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muniz, E. A. M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newport, J. M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Noack, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Page, J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poe, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, E.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tippens, T.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, S. J.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.
Submitted: 2016-11-23, last modified: 2017-06-21
We present the results of the search for gravitational waves (GWs) associated
with $\gamma$-ray bursts detected during the first observing run of the
Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). We find no
evidence of a GW signal for any of the 41 $\gamma$-ray bursts for which LIGO
data are available with sufficient duration. For all $\gamma$-ray bursts, we
place lower bounds on the distance to the source using the optimistic
assumption that GWs with an energy of $10^{-2}M_\odot c^2$ were emitted within
the $16$-$500\,$Hz band, and we find a median 90% confidence limit of 71$\,$Mpc
at 150$\,$Hz. For the subset of 19 short/hard $\gamma$-ray bursts, we place
lower bounds on distance with a median 90% confidence limit of 90$\,$Mpc for
binary neutron star (BNS) coalescences, and 150 and 139$\,$Mpc for neutron
star-black hole coalescences with spins aligned to the orbital angular momentum
and in a generic configuration, respectively. These are the highest distance
limits ever achieved by GW searches. We also discuss in detail the results of
the search for GWs associated with GRB 150906B, an event that was localized by
the InterPlanetary Network near the local galaxy NGC 3313, which is at a
luminosity distance of 54$\,$Mpc ($z=0.0124$). Assuming the $\gamma$-ray
emission is beamed with a jet half-opening angle $\leq 30^{\circ}$, we exclude
a BNS and a neutron star-black hole in NGC 3313 as the progenitor of this event
with confidence $>99$%. Further, we exclude such progenitors up to a distance
of 102$\,$Mpc and 170$\,$Mpc, respectively.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.01116 [pdf] - 1584223
Catalog of Hard X-ray Solar Flares Detected with Mars Odyssey/HEND from
the Mars Orbit in 2001-2016
Livshits, M. A.;
Zimovets, I. V.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Nizamov, B. A.;
Vybornov, V. I.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Tretyakov, V. I.
Submitted: 2017-06-04
The study of nonstationary processes in the Sun is of great interest, and
lately, multiwavelength observations and registration of magnetic fields are
carried out by means of both ground-based telescopes and several specialized
spacecraft (SC) on near-Earth orbits. However the acquisition of the new
reliable information on their hard X-ray radiation remains demanded, in
particular if the corresponding SC provide additional information, e.g. in
regard to the flare observations from the directions other than the Sun-Earth
direction. In this article we present a catalog of powerful solar flares
registered by the High Energy Neutron Detector (HEND) device designed in the
Space Research Institute (IKI) of Russian Academy of Sciences. HEND is mounted
onboard the 2001 Mars Odyssey spacecraft. It worked successfully during the
flight to Mars and currently operates in the near-Mars orbit. Besides neutrons,
the HEND instrument is sensitive to the hard X-ray and gamma radiation. This
radiation is registered by two scintillators: the outer one is sensitive to the
photons above 40 keV and the inner one to the photons above 200 keV. The
catalog was created with the new procedure of the data calibration. For most
powerful 60 solar flares on the visible and on the far sides of the Sun (in
respect to a terrestrial observer), we provide time profiles of flare
radiation, summed over all the channels of X-ray and in some cases of gamma-ray
bands as well as the spectra and characteristics of their power law
approximation. We briefly discuss the results of the previous articles on the
study of the Sun with HEND instrument and the potential of the further use of
these data.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6336 [pdf] - 1154767
A Missing-Link in the Supernova-GRB Connection: The Case of SN 2012ap
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Kamble, Atish;
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Hurley, Kevin;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Bietenholz, Michael;
Brunthaler, Andreas;
Pignata, Giuliano;
Pian, Elena;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Fransson, Claes;
Bartel, Norbert;
Hamuy, Mario;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Dittmann, Jason;
Krauss, Miriam;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Takahashi, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Savchenko, V.
Submitted: 2014-02-25, last modified: 2015-04-22
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are characterized by ultra-relativistic outflows,
while supernovae are generally characterized by non-relativistic ejecta. GRB
afterglows decelerate rapidly usually within days, because their low-mass
ejecta rapidly sweep up a comparatively larger mass of circumstellar material.
However supernovae, with heavy ejecta, can be in nearly free expansion for
centuries. Supernovae were thought to have non-relativistic outflows except for
few relativistic ones accompanied by GRBs. This clear division was blurred by
SN 2009bb, the first supernova with a relativistic outflow without an observed
GRB. Yet the ejecta from SN 2009bb was baryon loaded, and in nearly-free
expansion for a year, unlike GRBs. We report the first supernova discovered
without a GRB, but with rapidly decelerating mildly relativistic ejecta, SN
2012ap. We discovered a bright and rapidly evolving radio counterpart driven by
the circumstellar interaction of the relativistic ejecta. However, we did not
find any coincident GRB with an isotropic fluence of more than a sixth of the
fluence from GRB 980425. This shows for the first time that central engines in
type Ic supernovae, even without an observed GRB, can produce both relativistic
and rapidly decelerating outflows like GRBs.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5734 [pdf] - 755152
The ultraluminous GRB 110918A
Frederiks, D. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Mangano, V.;
Oates, S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, Ph. P.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Kokomov, A. V.;
Cline, T. L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Pagani, C.;
Sbarufatti, B.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
Starr, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Goldstein, J.
Submitted: 2013-11-22
GRB 110918A is the brightest long GRB detected by Konus-WIND during its 19
years of continuous observations and the most luminous GRB ever observed since
the beginning of the cosmological era in 1997. We report on the final IPN
localization of this event and its detailed multiwavelength study with a number
of space-based instruments. The prompt emission is characterized by a typical
duration, a moderare $E_{peak}$ of the time-integrated spectrum, and strong
hard-to-soft evolution. The high observed energy fluence yields, at z=0.984, a
huge isotropic-equivalent energy release $E_{iso}=(2.1\pm0.1)\times10^{54}$
erg. The record-breaking energy flux observed at the peak of the short, bright,
hard initial pulse results in an unprecedented isotropic-equivalent luminosity
$L_{iso}=(4.7\pm0.2)\times10^{54}$erg s$^{-1}$. A tail of the soft gamma-ray
emission was detected with temporal and spectral behavior typical of that
predicted by the synchrotron forward-shock model. Swift/XRT and Swift/UVOT
observed the bright afterglow from 1.2 to 48 days after the burst and revealed
no evidence of a jet break. The post-break scenario for the afterglow is
preferred from our analysis, with a hard underlying electron spectrum and
ISM-like circumburst environment implied. We conclude that, among multiple
reasons investigated, the tight collimation of the jet must have been a key
ingredient to produce this unusually bright burst. The inferred jet opening
angle of 1.7-3.4 deg results in reasonable values of the collimation-corrected
radiated energy and the peak luminosity, which, however, are still at the top
of their distributions for such tightly collimated events. We estimate a
detection horizon for a similar ultraluminous GRB of $z\sim7.5$ for Konus-WIND,
and $z\sim12$ for Swift/BAT, which stresses the importance of GRBs as probes of
the early Universe.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3740 [pdf] - 702249
IPN localizations of Konus short gamma-ray bursts
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Connaughton, V.;
Boer, M.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Amati, L.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Del Monte, E.;
Costa, E.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Pacciani, L.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Soffitta, P.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Labanti, C.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.
Submitted: 2013-01-16, last modified: 2013-08-05
Between the launch of the \textit{GGS Wind} spacecraft in 1994 November and
the end of 2010, the Konus-\textit{Wind} experiment detected 296 short-duration
gamma-ray bursts (including 23 bursts which can be classified as short bursts
with extended emission). During this period, the IPN consisted of up to eleven
spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations of 271 bursts were
obtained. We present the most comprehensive IPN localization data on these
events. The short burst detection rate, $\sim$18 per year, exceeds that of many
individual experiments.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3522 [pdf] - 1159075
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog of Cosmic
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Ohno, M.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Smith, D. M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-15, last modified: 2013-06-21
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) data for the gamma-ray bursts in the
first Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) catalog. Of the 491 bursts in that
catalog, covering 2008 July 12 to 2010 July 11, 427 were observed by at least
one other instrument in the 9-spacecraft IPN. Of the 427, the localizations of
149 could be improved by arrival time analysis (or triangulation). For any
given burst observed by the GBM and one other distant spacecraft, triangulation
gives an annulus of possible arrival directions whose half-width varies between
about 0.4' and 32 degrees, depending on the intensity, time history, and
arrival direction of the burst, as well as the distance between the spacecraft.
We find that the IPN localizations intersect the 1 sigma GBM error circles in
only 52% of the cases, if no systematic uncertainty is assumed for the latter.
If a 6 degree systematic uncertainty is assumed and added in quadrature, the
two localization samples agree about 87% of the time, as would be expected. If
we then multiply the resulting error radii by a factor of 3, the two samples
agree in slightly over 98% of the cases, providing a good estimate of the GBM 3
sigma error radius. The IPN 3 sigma error boxes have areas between about 1
square arcminute and 110 square degrees, and are, on the average, a factor of
180 smaller than the corresponding GBM localizations. We identify two bursts in
the IPN/GBM sample that did not appear in the GBM catalog. In one case, the GBM
triggered on a terrestrial gamma flash, and in the other, its origin was given
as uncertain. We also discuss the sensitivity and calibration of the IPN.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.5203 [pdf] - 617260
GRB 080407: an ultra-long burst discovered by the IPN
Pal'shin, V.;
Hurley, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Boynton, W.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cummings, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Svinkin, D.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Rau, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Zhang, X.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Del Monte, E.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-22
We present observations of the extremely long GRB 080704 obtained with the
instruments of the Interplanetary Network (IPN). The observations reveal two
distinct emission episodes, separated by a ~1500 s long period of quiescence.
The total burst duration is about 2100 s. We compare the temporal and spectral
characteristics of this burst with those obtained for other ultra-long GRBs and
discuss these characteristics in the context of different models.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.4829 [pdf] - 616849
Extremely long hard bursts observed by Konus-Wind
Pal'shin, V.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Il'Inskii, V.;
Mazets, E.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Hurley, K.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Oleynik, P.;
Ulanov, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.
Submitted: 2013-01-21
We report the observations of the prompt emission of the extremely long hard
burst, GRB 060814B, discovered by Konus-Wind and localized by the IPN. The
observations reveal a smooth, hard, ~40-min long pulse followed by weaker
emission seen several hours after the burst onset. We also present the
Konus-Wind data on similar burst, GRB 971208, localized by BATSE/IPN. And
finally we discuss the different possible origins of these unusual events.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.0741 [pdf] - 1116376
Inverse Compton X-ray Emission from Supernovae with Compact Progenitors:
Application to SN2011fe
Margutti, R.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Chevalier, R.;
Hurley, K.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Foley, R. J.;
Hughes, J. P.;
Slane, P.;
Fransson, C.;
Moe, M.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Costa, E.;
Cummings, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Enos, H.;
Fellows, C.;
Feroci, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golovin, D.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Harshman, K.;
Krimm, H.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Makishima, K.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Murakami, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Starr, R.;
Svinkin, D.
Submitted: 2012-02-03
We present a generalized analytic formalism for the inverse Compton X-ray
emission from hydrogen-poor supernovae and apply this framework to SN2011fe
using Swift-XRT, UVOT and Chandra observations. We characterize the optical
properties of SN2011fe in the Swift bands and find them to be broadly
consistent with a "normal" SN Ia, however, no X-ray source is detected by
either XRT or Chandra. We constrain the progenitor system mass loss rate to be
lower than 2x10^-9 M_sun/yr (3sigma c.l.) for wind velocity v_w=100 km/s. Our
result rules out symbiotic binary progenitors for SN2011fe and argues against
Roche-lobe overflowing subgiants and main sequence secondary stars if >1% of
the transferred mass is lost at the Lagrangian points. Regardless of the
density profile, the X-ray non-detections are suggestive of a clean environment
(particle density < 150 cm-3) for (2x10^15<R<5x10^16) cm around the progenitor
site. This is either consistent with the bulk of material being confined within
the binary system or with a significant delay between mass loss and supernova
explosion. We furthermore combine X-ray and radio limits from Chomiuk et al.
2012 to constrain the post shock energy density in magnetic fields. Finally, we
searched for the shock breakout pulse using gamma-ray observations from the
Interplanetary Network and find no compelling evidence for a
supernova-associated burst. Based on the compact radius of the progenitor star
we estimate that the shock break out pulse was likely not detectable by current
satellites.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.6470 [pdf] - 431879
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog - An AO-2
and AO-3 Guest Investigator Project
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2011-10-28
In the first two years of operation of the Fermi GBM, the 9-spacecraft
Interplanetary Network (IPN) detected 158 GBM bursts with one or two distant
spacecraft, and triangulated them to annuli or error boxes. Combining the IPN
and GBM localizations leads to error boxes which are up to 4 orders of
magnitude smaller than those of the GBM alone. These localizations comprise the
IPN supplement to the GBM catalog, and they support a wide range of scientific
investigations.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.2709 [pdf] - 231069
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the HETE-2 Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalog
Hurley, K.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Barthelmy, K. Harshman S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, C. E.;
Rossi, F.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Goldsten, R. Starr J.;
Gold, R.
Submitted: 2009-07-15, last modified: 2010-09-22
Between 2000 November and 2006 May, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network (IPN) detected 226 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were
also detected by the FREGATE experiment aboard the HETE-II spacecraft. During
this period, the IPN consisted of up to nine spacecraft, and using
triangulation, the localizations of 157 bursts were obtained. We present the
IPN localization data on these events.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.1650 [pdf] - 1026226
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalogs
Hurley, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.
Submitted: 2010-04-09
Between 1996 July and 2002 April, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network detected 787 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were also
detected by the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor and/or Wide-Field X-Ray Camera
experiments aboard the BeppoSAX spacecraft. During this period, the network
consisted of up to six spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations
of 475 bursts were obtained. We present the localization data for these events.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.4294 [pdf] - 32118
Integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor into the 3rd
Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2009-12-21
We are integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) into the
Interplanetary Network (IPN) of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) detectors. With the GBM,
the IPN will comprise 9 experiments. This will 1) assist the Fermi team in
understanding and reducing their systematic localization uncertainties, 2)
reduce the sizes of the GBM and Large Area Telescope (LAT) error circles by 1
to 4 orders of magnitude, 3) facilitate the identification of GRB sources with
objects found by ground- and space-based observatories at other wavelengths,
from the radio to very high energy gamma-rays, 4) reduce the uncertainties in
associating some LAT detections of high energy photons with GBM bursts, and 5)
facilitate searches for non-electromagnetic GRB counterparts, particularly
neutrinos and gravitational radiation. We present examples and demonstrate the
synergy between Fermi and the IPN. This is a Fermi Cycle 2 Guest Investigator
project.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.2462 [pdf] - 1002894
A new analysis of the short-duration, hard-spectrum GRB 051103, a
possible extragalactic SGR giant flare
Hurley, K.;
Rowlinson, A.;
Bellm, E.;
Perley, D.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshmann, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Nakagawa, Y. E.;
Smith, D. M.;
Cline, T.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Wiersema, K.;
Rol, E.;
Levan, A.;
Rhoads, J.;
Fruchter, A.;
Bersier, D.;
Kavelaars, J. J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Duncan, R. C.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Ricker, G.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2009-07-14, last modified: 2009-11-23
GRB 051103 is considered to be a candidate soft gamma repeater (SGR)
extragalactic giant magnetar flare by virtue of its proximity on the sky to
M81/M82, as well as its time history, localization, and energy spectrum. We
have derived a refined interplanetary network localization for this burst which
reduces the size of the error box by over a factor of two. We examine its time
history for evidence of a periodic component, which would be one signature of
an SGR giant flare, and conclude that this component is neither detected nor
detectable under reasonable assumptions. We analyze the time-resolved energy
spectra of this event with improved time- and energy resolution, and conclude
that although the spectrum is very hard, its temporal evolution at late times
cannot be determined, which further complicates the giant flare association. We
also present new optical observations reaching limiting magnitudes of R > 24.5,
about 4 magnitudes deeper than previously reported. In tandem with
serendipitous observations of M81 taken immediately before and one month after
the burst, these place strong constraints on any rapidly variable sources in
the region of the refined error ellipse proximate to M81. We do not find any
convincing afterglow candidates from either background galaxies or sources in
M81, although within the refined error region we do locate two UV bright star
forming regions which may host SGRs. A supernova remnant (SNR) within the error
ellipse could provide further support for an SGR giant flare association, but
we were unable to identify any SNR within the error ellipse. These data still
do not allow strong constraints on the nature of the GRB 051103 progenitor, and
suggest that candidate extragalactic SGR giant flares will be difficult,
although not impossible, to confirm.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:0710.4590 [pdf] - 6373
Observations of the Prompt Gamma-Ray Emission of GRB 070125
Bellm, Eric C.;
Hurley, Kevin;
Pal'shin, Valentin;
Yamaoka, Kazutaka;
Bandstra, Mark S.;
Boggs, Steven E.;
Hong, Soojing;
Kodaka, Natsuki;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Nakagawa, Yujin E.;
Ohno, Masanori;
Onda, Kaori;
Sanin, A. B.;
Sugita, Satoshi;
Tashiro, Makoto;
Tretyakov, V. I.;
Urata, Yuji;
Wigger, Claudia
Submitted: 2007-10-24, last modified: 2008-07-28
The long, bright gamma-ray burst GRB 070125 was localized by the
Interplanetary Network. We present light curves of the prompt gamma-ray
emission as observed by Konus-WIND, RHESSI, Suzaku-WAM, and \textit{Swift}-BAT.
We detail the results of joint spectral fits with Konus and RHESSI data. The
burst shows moderate hard-to-soft evolution in its multi-peaked emission over a
period of about one minute. The total burst fluence as observed by Konus is
$1.79 \times 10^{-4}$ erg/cm$^2$ (20 keV--10 MeV). Using the spectroscopic
redshift $z=1.548$, we find that the burst is consistent with the ``Amati''
$E_{peak,i}-E_{iso}$ correlation. Assuming a jet opening angle derived from
broadband modeling of the burst afterglow, GRB 070125 is a significant outlier
to the ``Ghirlanda'' $E_{peak,i}-E_\gamma$ correlation. Its
collimation-corrected energy release $E_\gamma = 2.5 \times 10^{52}$ ergs is
the largest yet observed.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0508379 [pdf] - 75268
Mars Odyssey Joins The Third Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Grinkov, V.;
Charyshnikov, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Hamara, D.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2005-08-17
The Mars Odyssey spacecraft carries two experiments which are capable of
detecting cosmic gamma-ray bursts and soft gamma repeaters. Since April 2001
they have detected over 275 bursts and, in conjunction with the other
spacecraft of the interplanetary network, localized many of them rapidly and
precisely enough to allow sensitive multi-wavelength counterpart searches. We
present the Mars Odyssey mission and describe the burst capabilities of the two
experiments in detail. We explain how the spacecraft timing and ephemeris have
been verified in-flight using bursts from objects whose precise positions are
known by other means. Finally, we show several examples of localizations and
discuss future plans for the Odyssey mission and the network as a whole.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0309733 [pdf] - 59560
GRB 011121: A collimated outflow into wind-blown surroundings
Greiner, J.;
Klose, S.;
Salvato, M.;
Zeh, A.;
Schwarz, R.;
Hartmann, D. H.;
Masetti, N.;
Stecklum, B.;
Lamer, G.;
Lodieu, N.;
Scholz, R. D.;
Sterken, C.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Burud, I.;
Rhoads, J.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Grinkov, V.;
Andersen, M. I.;
Cerón, J. M. Castro;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Fruchter, A.;
Fynbo, J. U.;
Hjorth, J.;
Kaper, L.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Palazzi, E.;
Pian, E.;
Rol, E.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Vreeswijk, P. M.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Heuvel, E. van den
Submitted: 2003-09-26
We discover a break in the GRB 011121 afterglow light curve after 1.3 days,
which implies an initial jet opening angle of about 9 deg. The SED during the
first four days is achromatic, and supports the jet origin of this break. The
SED during the supernova bump can be best represented by a black body with a
temperature of 6000 K. The deduced parameters for the decay slope as well as
the spectral index favor a wind scenario, i.e. an outflow into a circum-burst
environment shaped by the stellar wind of a massive GRB progenitor. Due to its
low redshift of z=0.36, GRB 011121 has been the best example for the
GRB-supernova connection until GRB 030329, and provides compelling evidence for
a circum-burster wind region expected to exist if the progenitor was a massive
star.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0208008 [pdf] - 50824
Discovery of GRB 020405 and its Late Red Bump
Price, P. A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Berger, E.;
Fox, D. W.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Frail, D. A.;
Galama, T. J.;
Harrison, F. A.;
McCarthy, P.;
Reichart, D. E.;
Sari, R.;
Yost, S. A.;
Jerjen, H.;
Flint, K.;
Phillips, A.;
Warren, B. E.;
Axelrod, T. S.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Holtzman, J.;
Kimble, R. A.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Wheeler, J. C.;
Frontera, F.;
Costa, E.;
Piro, L.;
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Montanari, E.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Anfimov, D.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Ofek, E.;
Lipkin, Y.
Submitted: 2002-07-31, last modified: 2003-02-19
We present the discovery of GRB 020405 made with the Inter-Planetary Network
(IPN). With a duration of 60 s, the burst appears to be a typical long duration
event. We observed the 75-square acrminute IPN error region with the Mount
Stromlo Observatory's 50-inch robotic telescope and discovered a transient
source which subsequently decayed and was also associated with a variable radio
source. We identify this source as the afterglow of GRB 020405. Subsequent
observations by other groups found varying polarized flux and established a
redshift of 0.690 to the host galaxy. Motivated by the low redshift we
triggered observations with WFPC2 on-board the Hubble Space Telescope (HST).
Modeling the early ground-based data with a jet model, we find a clear red
excess over the decaying optical lightcurves that is present between day 10 and
day 141 (the last HST epoch). This `bump' has the spectral and temporal
features expected of an underlying supernova (SN). In particular, the red color
of the putative SN is similar to that of the SN associated with GRB 011121, at
late time. Restricting the sample of GRBs to those with z<0.7, a total of five
bursts, red bumps at late times are found in GRB 970228, GRB 011121, and GRB
020405. It is possible that the simplest idea, namely that all long duration
GRBs have underlying SNe with a modest dispersion in their properties
(especially peak luminosity), is sufficient to explain the non detections.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0206151 [pdf] - 49782
HETE-2 Localization and Observations of the Short, Hard Gamma-Ray Burst
GRB020531
Lamb, D. Q.;
Ricker, G. R.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Hurley, K.;
Kawai, N.;
Shirasaki, Y.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Tamagawa, T.;
Graziani, C.;
Olive, J. -F.;
Yoshida, A.;
Matsuoka, M.;
Torii, K.;
Fenimore, E. E.;
Galassi, M.;
Tavenner, T.;
Donaghy, T. Q.;
Boer, M.;
Dezalay, J. -P.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Crew, G.;
Doty, J.;
Monnelly, G.;
Villasenor, J.;
Butler, N.;
Jernigan, J. G.;
Levine, A.;
Martel, F.;
Morgan, E.;
Prigozhin, G.;
Woosley, S. E.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Anfimov, D.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.;
Braga, J.;
Manchanda, R.;
Pizzichini, G.;
Takagishi, K.;
Yamauchi, M.
Submitted: 2002-06-10, last modified: 2002-06-11
The {\it HETE-2} (hereafter \HETE) French Gamma Telescope (FREGATE) and the
Wide-field X-ray Monitor (WXM) instruments detected a short ($t_{50} = 360$
msec in the FREGATE 85-300 keV energy band), hard gamma-ray burst (GRB) that
occurred at 1578.72 SOD (00:26:18.72 UT) on 31 May 2002. The WXM flight
localization software produced a valid location in spacecraft (relative)
coordinates. However, since no on-board real-time star camera aspect was
available, an absolute localization could not be disseminated. A preliminary
localization was reported as a GCN Position Notice at 01:54:22 UT, 88 min after
the burst. Further ground analysis produced a refined localization, which can
be expressed as a 90% confidence rectangle that is 67 arcminutes in RA and 43
arcminutes in Dec (90% confidence region), centered at RA = +15$^{\rm h}$
14$^{\rm m}$ 45$^{\rm s}$, Dec = -19$^\circ$ 21\arcmin 35\arcsec (J2000). An
IPN localization of the burst was disseminated 18 hours after the GRB (Hurley
et al. 2002b). A refined IPN localization was disseminated $\approx$ 5 days
after the burst. This hexagonal-shaped localization error region is centered on
RA = 15$^{\rm h}$ 15$^{\rm m}$ 03.57$^{\rm s}$, -19$^\circ$ 24\arcmin
51.00\arcsec (J2000), and has an area of $\approx$ 22 square arcminutes (99.7%
confidence region). The prompt localization of this short, hard GRB by \HETE
and the anti-Sun pointing of the \HETE instruments, coupled with the refinement
of the localization by the IPN, has made possible rapid follow-up observations
of the burst at radio, optical, and X-ray wavelengths.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9906307 [pdf] - 107028
Average Emissivity Curve of BATSE Gamma-Ray Bursts with Different
Intensities
Submitted: 1999-06-18, last modified: 1999-06-22
Six intensity groups with ~150 BATSE gamma-ray bursts each are compared using
average emissivity curves. Time-stretch factors for each of the dimmer groups
are estimated with respect to the brightest group, which serves as the
reference, taking into account the systematics of counts-produced noise effects
and choice statistics. A stretching/intensity anti-correlation is found with
good statistical significance during the average back slopes of bursts. A
stretch factor ~2 is found between the 150 dimmest bursts, with peak flux
<0.45ph cm^{-2} s^{-1}, and the 147 brightest bursts, with peak flux >4.1 ph
cm^{-2} s^{-1}. On the other hand, while a trend of increasing stretching
factor may exist for rise fronts for burst with decreasing peak flux from >4.1
ph cm^{-2} s^{-1} down to 0.7 ph cm^{-2} s^{-1}, the magnitude of the
stretching factor is less than ~ 1.4 and is therefore inconsistent with
stretching factor of back slope.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9905039 [pdf] - 106365
Average Cosmological Invariant Parameters of Cosmic Gamma Ray Burst
Submitted: 1999-05-05
Average cosmological invariant parameters (ACIPs) are calculated for six
groups of BATSE cosmic gamma-ray bursts selected by their peak fluxes on the
1.024 s time scale. The ACIPs represent the average temporal and spectral
properties of these events equally in the observer frame of reference and in
the co-moving frames of outbursting emitters. The parameters are determined
separately for rise fronts and for back slopes of bursts, defined as the time
profiles before and after the main peaks, respectively. The ACIPs for the rise
fronts are found to be different for different intensity groups, while the
ACIPs for the back slopes show no significant dependence on intensity. We
conclude that emitters of bursts manifest standard average properties only
during the back slopes of bursts.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9707128 [pdf] - 97952
The Direct Test of Cosmological Model for Cosmic Gamma-Ray Bursts Based
on the Peak Alignment Averaging
Submitted: 1997-07-11
The cosmological origin of cosmic gamma-ray bursts is tested using the method
of peak alignment for the averaging of time profiles. The test is applied to
the basic cosmological model with standard sources, which postulates that
difference between bright and dim bursts results from different cosmological
red-shifts of their sources. The average emissivity curve (ACEbright) of the
group of bright BATSE bursts is approximated by a simple analytical function,
which takes into account the effect of squeezing of the time pulses with
increasing energy of photons. This function is used to build the model light
curve for ACEdim of dim BATSE bursts, which takes into account both the
cosmological time- stretching of bursts light curves and the red-shifting of
photons energies. Direct comparison between the model light curve and the
ACEdim of dim bursts is performed, which is based on the estimated
probabilities of differences between ACEs of randomly selected groups of
bursts. It shows no evidence for the predicted cosmological effects. The 3
sigma upper limit of the average red- shift Zdim of emitters of dim bursts is
estimated to be as small, as 0.1-0.5, which is not consistent with values 1
predicted by the known cosmological models of gamma-ray bursts.
