Normalized to: Lindegren, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07325 [pdf] - 2099691
GaiaNIR: Combining optical and Near-Infra-Red (NIR) capabilities with
Time-Delay-Integration (TDI) sensors for a future Gaia-like mission
Hobbs, David;
Høg, Erik;
Mora, Alcione;
Crowley, Cian;
McMillan, Paul;
Ranalli, Piero;
Heiter, Ulrike;
Jordi, Carme;
Hambly, Nigel;
Church, Ross;
Anthony, Brown;
Tanga, Paolo;
Chemin, Laurent;
Portell, Jordi;
Jiménez-Esteban, Fran;
Klioner, Sergei;
Mignard, Francois;
Fynbo, Johan;
Wyrzykowski, Łukasz;
Rybicki, Krzysztof;
Anderson, Richard I.;
Cellino, Alberto;
Fabricius, Claus;
Davidson, Michael;
Lindegren, Lennart
Submitted: 2016-09-23, last modified: 2020-05-22
ESA recently called for new "Science Ideas" to be investigated in terms of
feasibility and technological developments -- for technologies not yet
sufficiently mature. These ideas may in the future become candidates for M or L
class missions within the ESA Science Program.
With the launch of Gaia in December 2013, Europe entered a new era of space
astrometry following in the footsteps of the very successful Hipparcos mission
from the early 1990s. Gaia is the successor to Hipparcos, both of which
operated in optical wavelengths, and Gaia is two orders of magnitude more
accurate in the five astrometric parameters and is surveying four orders of
magnitude more stars in a vast volume of the Milky Way. The combination of the
Hipparcos/Tycho-2 catalogues with the first early Gaia data release will give
improved proper motions over a long ~25 year baseline. The final Gaia solution
will also establish a new optical reference frame by means of quasars, by
linking the optical counterparts of radio (VLBI) sources defining the
orientation of the reference frame, and by using the zero proper motion of
quasars to determine a non-rotating frame.
A weakness of Gaia is that it only operates at optical wavelengths. However,
much of the Galactic centre and the spiral arm regions, important for certain
studies, are obscured by interstellar extinction and this makes it difficult
for Gaia to deeply probe. Traditionally, this problem is overcome by switching
to the infra-red but this was not possible with Gaia's CCDs. Additionally, to
scan the entire sky and make global absolute parallax measurements the
spacecraft must have a constant rotation and this requires that the CCDs
operate in TDI mode, increasing their complexity.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.09827 [pdf] - 2095011
The Gaia reference frame for bright sources examined using VLBI
observations of radio stars
Submitted: 2019-06-24, last modified: 2020-05-14
Positions and proper motions of Gaia sources are expressed in a reference
frame that ideally should be non-rotating relative to distant extragalactic
objects, coincident with the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS),
and consistent across all magnitudes. For sources fainter than 16th magnitude
this is achieved thanks to Gaia's direct observations of quasars. At brighter
magnitudes it is difficult to validate the quality of the reference frame due
to the scarcity of comparison data. This paper examines the use of VLBI
observations of radio stars to determine the spin and orientation of the bright
reference frame of Gaia. Simultaneous estimation of the six spin and
orientation parameters makes optimal use of VLBI data and makes it possible to
include even single-epoch VLBI observations in the solution. The method is
applied to Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) using published VLBI data for 41 radio
stars. Results for the 26 best-fitting sources indicate that the bright
reference frame of Gaia DR2 is rotating relative to the faint quasars at a rate
of about 0.1 mas/yr, significant at 2-sigma level. This supports a similar
conclusion based on a comparison with stellar positions in the Hipparcos frame.
The accuracy is currently limited by the small number of radio sources used, by
uncertainties in the Gaia DR2 proper motions, and by the astrophysical nature
of the radio stars. While the origin of the indicated rotation is understood
and can be avoided in future data releases, it remains important to validate
the bright reference frame of Gaia by independent observations. This can be
achieved using VLBI astrometry, which may require re-observing the old sample
of radio stars as well as measuring new objects. The unique historical value of
positional measurements is stressed and VLBI observers are urged to ensure that
relevant positional information is preserved for the future.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.12535 [pdf] - 1924376
Voyage 2050 White Paper: All-Sky Visible and Near Infrared Space
Astrometry
Hobbs, David;
Brown, Anthony;
Høg, Erik;
Jordi, Carme;
Kawata, Daisuke;
Tanga, Paolo;
Klioner, Sergei;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Wyrzykowski, Łukasz;
Walton, Nic;
Vallenari, Antonella;
Makarov, Valeri;
Rybizki, Jan;
Jiménez-Esteban, Fran;
Caballero, José A.;
McMillan, Paul J.;
Secrest, Nathan;
Mor, Roger;
Andrews, Jeff J.;
Zwitter, Tomaž;
Chiappini, Cristina;
Fynbo, Johan P. U.;
Ting, Yuan-Sen;
Hestroffer, Daniel;
Lindegren, Lennart;
McArthur, Barbara;
Gouda, Naoteru;
Moore, Anna;
Gonzalez, Oscar A.;
Vaccari, Mattia
Submitted: 2019-07-26
A new all-sky visible and Near-InfraRed (NIR) space astrometry mission with a
wavelength cutoff in the K-band is not just focused on a single or small number
of key science cases. Instead, it is extremely broad, answering key science
questions in nearly every branch of astronomy while also providing a dense and
accurate visible-NIR reference frame needed for future astronomy facilities.
For almost 2 billion common stars the combination of Gaia and a new all-sky NIR
astrometry mission would provide much improved proper motions, answering key
science questions -- from the solar system and stellar systems, including
exoplanet systems, to compact galaxies, quasars, neutron stars, binaries and
dark matter substructures. The addition of NIR will result in up to 8 billion
newly measured stars in some of the most obscured parts of our Galaxy, and
crucially reveal the very heart of the Galactic bulge region. In this white
paper we argue that rather than improving on the accuracy, a greater overall
science return can be achieved by going deeper than Gaia and by expanding the
wavelength range to the NIR.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.08836 [pdf] - 1869907
All-Sky Near Infrared Space Astrometry
McArthur, Barbara;
Hobbs, David;
Høg, Erik;
Makarov, Valeri;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Brown, Anthony;
Martins, Alberto Krone;
Bartlett, Jennifer Lynn;
Tomsick, John;
Shao, Mike;
Benedict, Fritz;
Bendek, Eduardo;
Boehm, Celine;
Conroy, Charlie;
Fynbo, Johan Peter Uldall;
Gnedin, Oleg;
Hillenbrand, Lynne;
Lindegren, Lennart;
Rodriguez, David R.;
White, Rick;
Turyshev, Slava;
Unwin, Stephen;
Zhai, ChengXing
Submitted: 2019-04-18
Gaia is currently revolutionizing modern astronomy. However, much of the
Galactic plane, center and the spiral arm regions are obscured by interstellar
extinction, rendering them inaccessible because Gaia is an optical instrument.
An all-sky near infrared (NIR) space observatory operating in the optical NIR,
separated in time from the original Gaia would provide microarcsecond NIR
astrometry and millimag photometry to penetrate obscured regions unraveling the
internal dynamics of the Galaxy.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.02751 [pdf] - 2000167
Discovery of a Candidate Black Hole - Giant Star Binary System in the
Galactic Field
Thompson, Todd A.;
Kochanek, Christopher S.;
Stanek, Krzysztof Z.;
Badenes, Carles;
Post, Richard S.;
Jayasinghe, Tharindu;
Latham, David W.;
Bieryla, Allyson;
Esquerdo, Gilbert A.;
Berlind, Perry;
Calkins, Michael L.;
Tayar, Jamie;
Lindegren, Lennart;
Johnson, Jennifer A.;
Holoien, Thomas W. -S.;
Auchettl, Katie;
Covey, Kevin
Submitted: 2018-06-07, last modified: 2019-04-05
We report the discovery of the first likely black hole in a non-interacting
binary system with a field red giant. By combining radial velocity measurements
from the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) with
photometric variability data from the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae
(ASAS-SN), we identified the bright rapidly-rotating giant 2MASS
J05215658+4359220 as a binary system with a massive unseen companion.
Subsequent radial velocity measurements reveal a system with an orbital period
of 83 days and near-zero eccentricity. The photometric variability period of
the giant is consistent with the orbital period, indicative of star spots and
tidal synchronization. Constraints on the giant's mass and radius from its
luminosity, surface gravity, and temperature imply an unseen companion with
mass of $3.3^{+2.8}_{-0.7}$ M$_\odot$, indicating a low-mass black hole or an
exceedingly massive neutron star. Measurement of the astrometric binary motion
by {\it Gaia} will further characterize the system. This discovery demonstrates
the potential of massive spectroscopic surveys like APOGEE and all-sky,
high-cadence photometric surveys like ASAS-SN to revolutionize our
understanding of the compact object mass function, and to test theories of
binary star evolution and the supernova mechanism.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.08321 [pdf] - 1822775
Estimating stellar ages and metallicities from parallaxes and broadband
photometry - successes and shortcomings
Submitted: 2018-04-23, last modified: 2018-11-16
A deep understanding of the Milky Way galaxy, its formation and evolution
requires observations of huge numbers of stars. Stellar photometry, therefore,
provides an economical method to obtain intrinsic stellar parameters. With the
addition of distance information - deriving reliable ages from photometry is a
possibility. We have developed a Bayesian method that generates 2D probability
maps of a star's age and metallicity from photometry and parallax using
isochrones. Our synthetic tests show that including a near-UV passband enables
us to break the degeneracy between a star's age and metallicity for certain
evolutionary stages. It is possible to find well-constrained ages and
metallicities for turn-off and sub-giant stars with colours including a U band
and a parallax with uncertainty less than ~20%. Metallicities alone are
possible for the main sequence and giant branch. We find good agreement with
the literature when we apply our method to the Gaia benchmark stars,
particularly for turn-off and young stars. Further tests on the old open
cluster NGC 188, however, reveal significant limitations in the stellar
isochrones. The ages derived for the cluster stars vary with evolutionary
stage, such that turn-off ages disagree with those on the sub-giant branch, and
metallicities vary significantly throughout. Furthermore, the parameters vary
appreciably depending on which colour combinations are used in the derivation.
We identify the causes of these mismatches and show that improvements are
needed in the modelling of giant branch stars and in the creation and
calibration of synthetic near-UV photometry. Our results warn against applying
isochrone fitting indiscriminately. In particular, the uncertainty on the
stellar models should be quantitatively taken into account. Further efforts to
improve the models will result in significant advancements in our ability to
study the Galaxy.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02829 [pdf] - 1767744
Benchmark ages for the Gaia benchmark stars
Submitted: 2018-10-05
In the era of large-scale surveys of stars in the Milky Way, stellar ages are
crucial for studying the evolution of the Galaxy. But determining ages of field
stars is notoriously difficult; therefore, we attempt to determine benchmark
ages for the extensively studied Gaia benchmark stars which can be used for
validation purposes. By searching the literature for age estimates from
different methods and deriving new ages based on Bayesian isochrone fitting, we
are able to put reliable limits on the ages of 16 out of the 33 benchmark
stars. The giants with well-defined ages are all young, and an expansion of the
sample to include older giants with asteroseismic ages would be beneficial.
Some of the stars have surface parameters inconsistent with isochrones younger
than 16 Gyr. Including $\alpha$-enhancement in the models when relevant
resolves some of these cases, but others clearly highlight discrepancies
between the models and observations. We test the impact of atomic diffusion on
the age estimates by fitting to the actual surface metallicity of the models
instead of the initial value and find that the effect is negligible except for
a single turn-off star. Finally, we show that our ability to determine
isochrone-based ages for large spectroscopic surveys largely mirrors our
ability to determine ages for these benchmark stars, except for stars with
$\log g \gtrsim 4.4$ dex since their location in the HR diagram is almost age
insensitive. Hence, isochrone fitting does not constrain their ages given the
typical uncertainties of spectroscopic stellar parameters.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.11638 [pdf] - 1759302
20 years of photometric microlensing events predicted by Gaia DR2:
Potential planet-hosting lenses within 100 pc
Submitted: 2018-05-29, last modified: 2018-07-10
Context. Gaia DR2 offers unparalleled precision on stars' parallaxes and
proper motions. This allows the prediction of microlensing events for which the
lens stars (and any planets they possess) are nearby and may be well studied
and characterised. Aims. We identify a number of potential microlensing events
that will occur before the year 2035.5, 20 years from the Gaia DR2 reference
epoch. Methods. We query Gaia DR2 for potential lenses within 100 pc, extract
parallaxes and proper motions of the lenses and background sources, and
identify potential lensing events. We estimate the lens masses from Priam
effective temperatures, and use these to calculate peak magnifications and the
size of the Einstein radii relative to the lens stars' habitable zones.
Results. We identify 7 future events with a probability > 10% of an alignment
within one Einstein radius. Of particular interest is DR2 5918299904067162240
(WISE J175839.20-583931.6), magnitude G = 14.9, which will lens a G = 13.9
background star in early 2030, with a median 23% net magnification. Other pairs
are typically fainter, hampering characterisation of the lens (if the lens is
faint) or the ability to accurately measure the magnification (if the source is
much fainter than the lens). Of timely interest is DR2 4116504399886241792
(2MASS J17392440-2327071), which will lens a background star in July 2020,
albeit with weak net magnification (0.03%). Median magnifications for the other
5 high-probability events range from 0.3% to 5.3%. The Einstein radii for these
lenses are 1-10 times the radius of the habitable zone, allowing these lensing
events to pick out cold planets around the ice line, and filling a gap between
transit and current microlensing detections of planets around very low-mass
stars. Conclusions. We provide a catalogue of the predicted events to aid
future characterisation efforts... [abridged]
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09381 [pdf] - 1736361
Gaia Data Release 2: Kinematics of globular clusters and dwarf galaxies
around the Milky Way
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-06-18
The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the outstanding quality of the
second data release of the Gaia mission and its power for constraining many
different aspects of the dynamics of the satellites of the Milky Way. We focus
here on determining the proper motions of 75 Galactic globular clusters, nine
dwarf spheroidal galaxies, one ultra-faint system, and the Large and Small
Magellanic Clouds. Using data extracted from the Gaia archive, we derived the
proper motions and parallaxes for these systems, as well as their
uncertainties. We demonstrate that the errors, statistical and systematic, are
relatively well understood. We integrated the orbits of these objects in three
different Galactic potentials, and characterised their properties. We present
the derived proper motions, space velocities, and characteristic orbital
parameters in various tables to facilitate their use by the astronomical
community. Our limited and straightforward analyses have allowed us for example
to (i) determine absolute and very precise proper motions for globular
clusters; (ii) detect clear rotation signatures in the proper motions of at
least five globular clusters; (iii) show that the satellites of the Milky Way
are all on high-inclination orbits, but that they do not share a single plane
of motion; (iv) derive a lower limit for the mass of the Milky Way of
9.8^{+6.7}_{-2.7} x 10^{11} Msun based on the assumption that the Leo I dwarf
spheroidal is bound; (v) derive a rotation curve for the Large Magellanic Cloud
based solely on proper motions that is competitive with line-of-sight velocity
curves, now using many orders of magnitude more sources; and (vi) unveil the
dynamical effect of the bar on the motions of stars in the Large Magellanic
Cloud. All these results highlight the incredible power of the Gaia astrometric
mission, and in particular of its second data release.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09377 [pdf] - 1993934
Gaia Data Release 2: The Celestial reference frame (Gaia-CRF2)
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The second release of Gaia data (Gaia DR2) contains the astrometric
parameters for more than half a million quasars. This set defines a
kinematically non-rotating reference frame in the optical domain referred to as
the Gaia-CRF2. The Gaia-CRF2 is the first realisation of a non-rotating global
optical reference frame that meets the ICRS prescriptions, meaning that it is
built only on extragalactic sources. It consists of the positions of a sample
of 556 869 sources in Gaia DR2, obtained from a positional cross-match with the
ICRF3-prototype and AllWISE AGN catalogues. The sample constitutes a clean,
dense, and homogeneous set of extragalactic point sources in the magnitude
range G from 16 to 21 mag with accurately known optical positions. The median
positional uncertainty is 0.12 mas for G < 18 mag and 0.5 mas at G = 20 mag.
Large-scale systematics are estimated to be in the range 20 to 30 muas. The
accuracy claims are supported by the parallaxes and proper motions of the
quasars in Gaia DR2. The optical positions for a subset of 2820 sources in
common with the ICRF3-prototype show very good overall agreement with the radio
positions, but several tens of sources have significantly discrepant positions.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.02493 [pdf] - 1697872
Astrometry and exoplanets in the Gaia era: a Bayesian approach to
detection and parameter recovery
Submitted: 2017-04-08, last modified: 2018-01-31
(abridged) We develop Bayesian methods and detection criteria for orbital
fitting, and revise the detectability of exoplanets in light of the in-flight
properties of Gaia. Limiting ourselves to one-planet systems as a first step of
the development, we simulate Gaia data for exoplanet systems over a grid of
S/N, orbital period, and eccentricity. The simulations are then fit using
Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. We investigate the detection rate according
to three information criteria and the delta chi^2. For the delta chi^2, the
effective number of degrees of freedom depends on the mission length. We find
that the choice of the Markov chain starting point can affect the quality of
the results; we therefore consider two limit possibilities: an ideal case, and
a very simple method that finds the starting point assuming circular orbits.
Using Jeffreys' scale of evidence, the fraction of false positives passing a
strong evidence criterion is < ~0.2% (0.6%) when considering a 5 yr (10 yr)
mission and using the Akaike information criterion or the Watanabe-Akaike
information criterion, and <0.02% (<0.06%) when using the Bayesian information
criterion. We find that there is a 50% chance of detecting a planet with a
minimum S/N=2.3 (1.7). This sets the maximum distance to which a planet is
detectable to ~70 pc and ~3.5 pc for a Jupiter-mass and Neptune-mass planet,
respectively, assuming a 10 yr mission, a 4 au semi-major axis, and a 1 M_sun
star. The period is the orbital parameter that can be determined with the best
accuracy, with a median relative difference between input and output periods of
4.2% (2.9%) assuming a 5 yr (10 yr) mission. The median accuracy of the
semi-major axis of the orbit can be recovered with a median relative error of
7% (6%). The eccentricity can also be recovered with a median absolute accuracy
of 0.07 (0.06).
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.04786 [pdf] - 1582585
Impact of basic angle variations on the parallax zero point for a
scanning astrometric satellite
Submitted: 2017-04-16
Determination of absolute parallaxes by means of a scanning astrometric
satellite such as Hipparcos or Gaia relies on the short-term stability of the
so-called basic angle between the two viewing directions. Uncalibrated
variations of the basic angle may produce systematic errors in the computed
parallaxes. We examine the coupling between a global parallax shift and
specific variations of the basic angle, namely those related to the satellite
attitude with respect to the Sun. The changes in observables produced by small
perturbations of the basic angle, attitude, and parallaxes are calculated
analytically. We then look for a combination of perturbations that has no net
effect on the observables. In the approximation of infinitely small fields of
view, it is shown that certain perturbations of the basic angle are
observationally indistinguishable from a global shift of the parallaxes. If
such perturbations exist, they cannot be calibrated from the astrometric
observations but will produce a global parallax bias. Numerical simulations of
the astrometric solution, using both direct and iterative methods, confirm this
theoretical result. For a given amplitude of the basic angle perturbation, the
parallax bias is smaller for a larger basic angle and a larger solar aspect
angle. In both these respects Gaia has a more favourable geometry than
Hipparcos. In the case of Gaia, internal metrology is used to monitor basic
angle variations. Additionally, Gaia has the advantage of detecting numerous
quasars, which can be used to verify the parallax zero point.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07255 [pdf] - 1523853
Gaia Data Release 1: The reference frame and the optical properties of
ICRF sources
Mignard, F.;
Klioner, S.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Bombrun, A.;
Hernandez, J.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Biermann, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmueller, H.;
Andrei, A.;
Bourda, G.;
Charlot, P.
Submitted: 2016-09-23
As part of the data processing for Gaia Data Release~1 (Gaia DR1) a special
astrometric solution was computed, the so-called auxiliary quasar solution.
This gives positions for selected extragalactic objects, including radio
sources in the second realisation of the International Celestial Reference
Frame (ICRF2) that have optical counterparts bright enough to be observed with
Gaia. A subset of these positions was used to align the positional reference
frame of Gaia DR1 with the ICRF2. We describe the properties of the Gaia
auxiliary quasar solution for a subset of sources matched to ICRF2, and compare
their optical and radio positions at the sub-mas level. Their formal standard
errors are better than 0.76~milliarcsec (mas) for 50% of the sources and better
than 3.35~mas for 90%. Optical magnitudes are obtained in Gaia's unfiltered
photometric G band. The comparison with the radio positions of the defining
sources shows no systematic differences larger than a few tenths of a mas. The
fraction of questionable solutions, not readily accounted for by the
statistics, is less than 6%. Normalised differences have extended tails
requiring case-by-case investigations for around 100 sources, but we have not
seen any difference indisputably linked to an optical-radio offset in the
sources.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04240 [pdf] - 1480663
On-orbit performance of the Gaia CCDs at L2
Crowley, C.;
Kohley, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Davidson, M.;
Abreu, A.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Seabroke, G.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Short, A.;
Lindegren, L.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Sarri, G.;
Gare, P.;
Prusti, T.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Mora, A.;
Martin-Fleitas, J.;
Raison, F.;
Lammers, U.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Jansen, F.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
The European Space Agency's Gaia satellite was launched into orbit around L2
in December 2013 with a payload containing 106 large-format scientific CCDs.
The primary goal of the mission is to repeatedly obtain high-precision
astrometric and photometric measurements of one thousand million stars over the
course of five years. The scientific value of the down-linked data, and the
operation of the onboard autonomous detection chain, relies on the high
performance of the detectors. As Gaia slowly rotates and scans the sky, the
CCDs are continuously operated in a mode where the line clock rate and the
satellite rotation spin-rate are in synchronisation. Nominal mission operations
began in July 2014 and the first data release is being prepared for release at
the end of Summer 2016.
In this paper we present an overview of the focal plane, the detector system,
and strategies for on-orbit performance monitoring of the system. This is
followed by a presentation of the performance results based on analysis of data
acquired during a two-year window beginning at payload switch-on. Results for
parameters such as readout noise and electronic offset behaviour are presented
and we pay particular attention to the effects of the L2 radiation environment
on the devices. The radiation-induced degradation in the charge transfer
efficiency (CTE) in the (parallel) scan direction is clearly diagnosed;
however, an extrapolation shows that charge transfer inefficiency (CTI) effects
at end of mission will be approximately an order of magnitude less than
predicted pre-flight. It is shown that the CTI in the serial register
(horizontal direction) is still dominated by the traps inherent to the
manufacturing process and that the radiation-induced degradation so far is only
a few per cent. Finally, we summarise some of the detector effects discovered
on-orbit which are still being investigated.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04303 [pdf] - 1523840
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million
proper motions and parallaxes
Lindegren, L.;
Lammers, U.;
Bastian, U.;
Hernández, J.;
Klioner, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Bombrun, A.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Abbas, U.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anton, S.;
Bach, N.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Berthier, J.;
Bianchi, L.;
Biermann, M.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Carlucci, T.;
Castañeda, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Clotet, M.;
Crosta, M.;
Davidson, M.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Geyer, R.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hauser, M.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Löffler, W.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Portell, J.;
Riva, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Serraller, I.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R.;
Spagna, A.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Zschocke, S.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Gracia, G.;
Raison, F.;
Lister, T.;
Marchant, J.;
Messineo, R.;
Soffel, M.;
Osorio, J.;
de Torres, A.;
O'Mullane, W.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1
billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by
the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give
a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the
model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in
common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric
single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from
the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by
neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an
analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison
with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down
to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to
Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors
depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond
(mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to
~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is
aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than
0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03
mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the
Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the
nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the
quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what
is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent
a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical
definition of the optical reference frame.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.00045 [pdf] - 1460034
Gaia: focus, straylight and basic angle
Mora, A.;
Biermann, M.;
Bombrun, A.;
Boyadian, J.;
Chassat, F.;
Corberand, P.;
Davidson, M.;
Doyle, D.;
Escolar, D.;
Gielesen, W. L. M.;
Guilpain, T.;
Hernandez, J.;
Kirschner, V.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Koeck, C.;
Laine, B.;
Lindegren, L.;
Serpell, E.;
Tatry, P.;
Thoral, P
Submitted: 2016-07-29, last modified: 2016-08-21
The Gaia all-sky astrometric survey is challenged by several issues affecting
the spacecraft stability. Amongst them, we find the focus evolution, straylight
and basic angle variations
Contrary to pre-launch expectations, the image quality is continuously
evolving, during commissioning and the nominal mission. Payload
decontaminations and wavefront sensor assisted refocuses have been carried out
to recover optimum performance. Straylight and basic angle variations several
orders of magnitude greater than foreseen were found and studied during
commissioning by the Gaia scientists (payload experts). Building on their
investigations, an ESA-Airbus DS working group was established during the early
nominal mission and worked on a detailed root cause analysis. In parallel, Gaia
scientists have also continued analysing the data, most notably comparing the
BAM signal to global astrometric solutions, with remarkable agreement.
In this contribution, a status review of these issues will be provided, with
emphasis on the mitigation schemes and the lessons learned for future space
missions where extreme stability is a key requirement.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.08917 [pdf] - 1416773
Gaia reference frame amid quasar variability and proper motion patterns
in the data
Submitted: 2015-12-30, last modified: 2016-06-02
Gaia's very accurate astrometric measurements will allow the International
Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to be improved by a few orders of magnitude in
the optical. Several sets of quasars are used to define a kinematically stable
non-rotating reference frame with the barycentre of the Solar System as its
origin. Gaia will also observe a large number of galaxies which could obtain
accurate positions and proper motions although they are not point-like. The
optical stability of the quasars is critical and we investigate how accurately
the reference frame can be recovered. Various proper motion patterns are also
present in the data, the best known is caused by the acceleration of the Solar
System Barycentre, presumably, towards the Galactic centre. We review some
other less-well-known effects that are not part of standard astrometric models.
We model quasars and galaxies using realistic sky distributions, magnitudes and
redshifts. Position variability is introduced using a Markov chain model. The
reference frame is determined using the algorithm developed for the Gaia
mission which also determines the acceleration of the Solar System. We also
test a method to measure the velocity of the Solar System barycentre in a
cosmological frame. We simulate the recovery of the reference frame and the
acceleration of the Solar System and conclude that they are not significantly
disturbed in the presence of quasar variability which is statistically
averaged. However, the effect of a non-uniform sky distribution of the quasars
can result in a correlation between the reference frame and acceleration which
degrades the solution. Our results suggest that an attempt should be made to
astrometrically determine the redshift dependent apparent drift of galaxies due
to our velocity relative to the CMB, which in principle could allow the
determination of the Hubble parameter.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.01896 [pdf] - 1347600
Quasars can be used to verify the parallax zero-point of the Tycho-Gaia
Astrometric Solution
Submitted: 2015-11-05, last modified: 2015-11-17
Context. The Gaia project will determine positions, proper motions, and
parallaxes for more than one billion stars in our Galaxy. It is known that
Gaia's two telescopes are affected by a small but significant variation of the
basic angle between them. Unless this variation is taken into account during
data processing, e.g. using on-board metrology, it causes systematic errors in
the astrometric parameters, in particular a shift of the parallax zero-point.
Previously, we suggested an early reduction of Gaia data for the subset of
Tycho-2 stars (Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution; TGAS).
Aims. We aim to investigate whether quasars can be used to independently
verify the parallax zero-point already in early data reductions. This is not
trivially possible as the observation interval is too short to disentangle
parallax and proper motion for the quasar subset.
Methods. We repeat TGAS simulations but additionally include simulated Gaia
observations of quasars from ground-based surveys. All observations are
simulated with basic angle variations. To obtain a full astrometric solution
for the quasars in TGAS we explore the use of prior information for their
proper motions.
Results. It is possible to determine the parallax zero-point for the quasars
with a few {\mu}as uncertainty, and it agrees to a similar precision with the
zero-point for the Tycho-2 stars. The proposed strategy is robust even for
quasars exhibiting significant fictitious proper motion due to a variable
source structure, or when the quasar subset is contaminated with stars
misidentified as quasars.
Conclusions. Using prior information about quasar proper motions we could
provide an independent verification of the parallax zero-point in early
solutions based on less than one year of Gaia data.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.02963 [pdf] - 1300227
Gaia astrometry for stars with too few observations - a Bayesian
approach
Submitted: 2015-07-10, last modified: 2015-08-22
Gaia's astrometric solution aims to determine at least five parameters for
each star, together with appropriate estimates of their uncertainties and
correlations. This requires at least five distinct observations per star. In
the early data reductions the number of observations may be insufficient for a
five-parameter solution, and even after the full mission many stars will remain
under-observed, including faint stars at the detection limit and transient
objects. In such cases it is reasonable to determine only the two position
parameters. Their formal uncertainties would however grossly underestimate the
actual errors, due to the neglected parallax and proper motion. We aim to
develop a recipe to calculate sensible formal uncertainties that can be used in
all cases of under-observed stars. Prior information about the typical ranges
of stellar parallaxes and proper motions is incorporated in the astrometric
solution by means of Bayes' rule. Numerical simulations based on the Gaia
Universe Model Snapshot (GUMS) are used to investigate how the prior influences
the actual errors and formal uncertainties when different amounts of Gaia
observations are available. We develop a criterion for the optimum choice of
priors, apply it to a wide range of cases, and derive a global approximation of
the optimum prior as a function of magnitude and galactic coordinates. The
feasibility of the Bayesian approach is demonstrated through global astrometric
solutions of simulated Gaia observations. With an appropriate prior it is
possible to derive sensible positions with realistic error estimates for any
number of available observations. Even though this recipe works also for
well-observed stars it should not be used where a good five-parameter
astrometric solution can be obtained without a prior. Parallaxes and proper
motions from a solution using priors are always biased and should not be used.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.02614 [pdf] - 1579612
The Gaia Basic angle: measurement and variations
Submitted: 2015-03-09
The ESA Gaia mission uses two telescopes to create the most ambitious survey
of the Galaxy. The angle between them must be known with exquisite precision
and accuracy. An interferometer: the Basic Angle Monitoring system measures its
variations. High quality data have been retrieved and analysed for more than a
year. A summary of the in-orbit performance and some early results are
presented
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.8770 [pdf] - 929753
The Tycho-Gaia astrometric solution. How to get 2.5 million parallaxes
with less than one year of Gaia data
Submitted: 2014-12-30
Context. The first release of astrometric data from Gaia will contain the
mean stellar positions and magnitudes from the first year of observations, and
proper motions from the combination of Gaia data with Hipparcos prior
information (HTPM).
Aims. We study the potential of using the positions from the Tycho-2
Catalogue as additional information for a joint solution with early Gaia data.
We call this the Tycho-Gaia astrometric solution (TGAS).
Methods. We adapt Gaia's Astrometric Global Iterative Solution (AGIS) to
incorporate Tycho information, and use simulated Gaia observations to
demonstrate the feasibility of TGAS and to estimate its performance.
Results. Using six to twelve months of Gaia data, TGAS could deliver
positions, parallaxes and annual proper motions for the 2.5 million Tycho-2
stars, with sub-milliarcsecond accuracy. TGAS overcomes some of the limitations
of the HTPM project and allows its execution half a year earlier. Furthermore,
if the parallaxes from Hipparcos are not incorporated in the solution, they can
be used as a consistency check of the TGAS/HTPM solution.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.1173 [pdf] - 1223009
Astrometric exoplanet detection with Gaia
Submitted: 2014-11-05
We provide a revised assessment of the number of exoplanets that should be
discovered by Gaia astrometry, extending previous studies to a broader range of
spectral types, distances, and magnitudes. Our assessment is based on a large
representative sample of host stars from the TRILEGAL Galaxy population
synthesis model, recent estimates of the exoplanet frequency distributions as a
function of stellar type, and detailed simulation of the Gaia observations
using the updated instrument performance and scanning law. We use two
approaches to estimate detectable planetary systems: one based on the S/N of
the astrometric signature per field crossing, easily reproducible and allowing
comparisons with previous estimates, and a new and more robust metric based on
orbit fitting to the simulated satellite data.
With some plausible assumptions on planet occurrences, we find that some
21,000 (+/-6000) high-mass (1-15M_J) long-period planets should be discovered
out to distances of ~500pc for the nominal 5-yr mission (including at least
1000-1500 around M dwarfs out to 100pc), rising to some 70,000 (+/-20,000) for
a 10-yr mission. We indicate some of the expected features of this exoplanet
population, amongst them ~25-50 intermediate-period (P~2-3yr) transiting
systems.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.4664 [pdf] - 885119
Rigorous treatment of barycentric stellar motion: Perspective and
light-time effects in astrometric and radial velocity data
Submitted: 2014-07-17, last modified: 2014-08-13
High-precision astrometric and radial-velocity observations require accurate
modelling of stellar motions in order to extrapolate measurements over long
time intervals, and to detect deviations from uniform motion caused for example
by unseen companions. We aim to explore the simplest possible kinematic model
of stellar motions, namely that of uniform rectilinear motion relative to the
Solar System Barycentre, in terms of observable quantities including error
propagation. The apparent path equation for uniform rectilinear motion is
solved analytically in a classical (special-relativistic) framework, leading to
rigorous expressions which relate the (apparent) astrometric parameters and
radial velocity to the (true) kinematic parameters of the star in the
barycentric reference system. We present rigorous and explicit formulae for the
transformation of stellar positions, parallaxes, proper motions, and radial
velocities from one epoch to another, assuming uniform rectilinear motion and
taking into account light-time effects. The Jacobian matrix of the
transformation is also given, allowing accurate and reversible propagation of
errors over arbitrary time intervals. The light-time effects are generally very
small but exceeds 0.1 mas or 0.1 m/s over 100 yr for at least 33 stars in the
Hipparcos Catalogue. For high-velocity stars within a few tens of pc from the
Sun light-time effects are generally more important than the effects of the
curvature of their orbits in the Galactic potential.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.4025 [pdf] - 903562
Joint astrometric solution of Hipparcos and Gaia: A recipe for the
Hundred Thousand Proper Motions project
Submitted: 2014-07-15, last modified: 2014-07-29
The first release of astrometric data from Gaia is expected in 2016. It will
contain the mean stellar positions and magnitudes from the first year of
observations. For more than 100 000 stars in common with the Hipparcos
Catalogue it will be possible to compute very accurate proper motions due to
the time difference of about 24 years between the two missions. This Hundred
Thousand Proper Motions (HTPM) project will be part of the first release. Our
aim is to investigate how early Gaia data can be optimally combined with
information from the Hipparcos Catalogue in order to provide the most accurate
and reliable results for HTPM. The Astrometric Global Iterative Solution (AGIS)
was developed to compute the astrometric core solution based on the Gaia
observations and will be used for all releases of astrometric data from Gaia.
We adapt AGIS to process Hipparcos data in addition to Gaia observations, and
use simulations to verify and study the joint solution method. For the HTPM
stars we predict proper motion accuracies between 14 and 134 muas/yr, depending
on stellar magnitude and amount of Gaia data available. Perspective effects
will be important for a significant number of HTPM stars, and in order to treat
these effects accurately we introduce a scaled model of kinematics. We define a
goodness-of-fit statistic which is sensitive to deviations from uniform space
motion, caused for example by binaries with periods of 10-50 years. HTPM will
significantly improve the proper motions of the Hipparcos Catalogue well before
highly accurate Gaia- only results become available. Also, HTPM will allow us
to detect long period binary and exoplanetary candidates which would be
impossible to detect from Gaia data alone. The full sensitivity will not be
reached with the first Gaia release but with subsequent data releases.
Therefore HTPM should be repeated when more Gaia data become available.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.4270 [pdf] - 878447
Improving distances to nearby bright stars: Combining astrometric data
from Hipparcos, Nano-JASMINE and Gaia
Submitted: 2014-07-16
Starting in 2013, Gaia will deliver highly accurate astrometric data, which
eventually will supersede most other stellar catalogues in accuracy and
completeness. It is, however, lim- ited to observations from magnitude 6 to 20
and will therefore not include the brightest stars. Nano-JASMINE, an ultrasmall
Japanese astrometry satellite, will observe these bright stars, but with much
lower accuracy. Hence, the Hipparcos catalogue from 1997 will likely remain the
main source of accurate distances to bright nearby stars. We are investigating
how this might be improved by optimally combining data from all three missions
in a joint astrometric solu- tion. This would take advantage of the unique
features of each mission: the historic bright-star measurements of Hipparcos,
the updated bright-star observations of Nano-JASMINE, and the very accurate
reference frame of Gaia. The long temporal baseline between the missions pro-
vides additional benefits for the determination of proper motions and binary
detection, which indirectly improve the parallax determination further. We
present a quantitative analysis of the expected gains based on simulated data
for all three missions.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.3729 [pdf] - 1215653
Gaia on-board metrology: basic angle and best focus
Mora, A.;
Biermann, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Busonero, D.;
Carminati, L.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Chassat, F.;
Erdmann, M.;
Gielesen, W. L. M.;
Jordi, C.;
Katz, D.;
Kohley, R.;
Lindegren, L.;
Loeffler, W.;
Marchal, O.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Seabroke, G.;
Sahlmann, J.;
Serpell, E.;
Serraller, I.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
van Reeven, W.;
Dool, T. C. van den;
Vosteen, L. L. A.
Submitted: 2014-07-14
The Gaia payload ensures maximum passive stability using a single material,
SiC, for most of its elements. Dedicated metrology instruments are, however,
required to carry out two functions: monitoring the basic angle and refocusing
the telescope. Two interferometers fed by the same laser are used to measure
the basic angle changes at the level of $\mu$as (prad, micropixel), which is
the highest level ever achieved in space. Two Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors,
combined with an ad-hoc analysis of the scientific data are used to define and
reach the overall best-focus. In this contribution, the systems, data analysis,
procedures and performance achieved during commissioning are presented
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.0129 [pdf] - 1209868
The Gaia inertial reference frame and the tilting of the Milky Way disk
Submitted: 2014-06-01
While the precise relationship between the Milky Way disk and the symmetry
planes of the dark matter halo remains somewhat uncertain, a time-varying disk
orientation with respect to an inertial reference frame seems probable.
Hierarchical structure formation models predict that the dark matter halo is
triaxial and tumbles with a characteristic rate of ~2 rad/Hubble time (~30
muas/yr). These models also predict a time-dependent accretion of gas, such
that the angular momentum vector of the disk should be misaligned with that of
the halo. These effects, as well as tidal effects of the LMC, will result in
the rotation of the angular momentum vector of the disk population with respect
to the quasar reference frame. We assess the accuracy with which the positions
and proper motions from Gaia can be referred to a kinematically non-rotating
system, and show that the spin vector of the transformation from any rigid
self-consistent catalog frame to the quasi-inertial system defined by quasars
should be defined to better than 1 muas/yr. Determination of this inertial
frame by Gaia will reveal any signature of the disk orientation varying with
time, improve models of the potential and dynamics of the Milky Way, test
theories of gravity, and provide new insights into the orbital evolution of the
Sagittarius dwarf galaxy and the Magellanic Clouds.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.3409 [pdf] - 1165913
The case for high precision in elemental abundances of stars in the era
of large spectroscopic surveys
Submitted: 2013-04-11, last modified: 2013-04-26
A number of large spectroscopic surveys of stars in the Milky Way are under
way or are being planned. In this context it is important to discuss the extent
to which elemental abundances can be used as discriminators between different
(known and unknown) stellar populations in the Milky Way. We aim to establish
the requirements in terms of precision in elemental abundances, as derived from
spectroscopic surveys of the Milky Way's stellar populations, in order to
detect interesting substructures in elemental abundance space. We present a
simple relation between the minimum number of stars needed to detect a given
substructure and the precision of the measurements. The results are in
agreement with recent small- and large-scale studies, with high and low
precision, respectively. Large-number statistics cannot fully compensate for
low precision in the abundance measurements and each survey should carefully
evaluate what the main science drivers are for the survey and ensure that the
chosen observational strategy will result in the precision necessary to answer
the questions posed.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1302.3995 [pdf] - 628104
Maximum likelihood estimation of local stellar kinematics
Submitted: 2013-02-16
Context. Kinematical data such as the mean velocities and velocity
dispersions of stellar samples are useful tools to study galactic structure and
evolution. However, observational data are often incomplete (e.g., lacking the
radial component of the motion) and may have significant observational errors.
For example, the majority of faint stars observed with Gaia will not have their
radial velocities measured. Aims. Our aim is to formulate and test a new
maximum likelihood approach to estimating the kinematical parameters for a
local stellar sample when only the transverse velocities are known (from
parallaxes and proper motions). Methods. Numerical simulations using
synthetically generated data as well as real data (based on the
Geneva-Copenhagen survey) are used to investigate the statistical properties
(bias, precision) of the method, and to compare its performance with the much
simpler "projection method" described by Dehnen & Binney (1998). Results. The
maximum likelihood method gives more correct estimates of the dispersion when
observational errors are important, and guarantees a positive-definite
dispersion matrix, which is not always obtained with the projection method.
Possible extensions and improvements of the method are discussed.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.2849 [pdf] - 463778
Combining and comparing astrometric data from different epochs: A case
study with Hipparcos and Nano-JASMINE
Submitted: 2012-01-13
The Hipparcos mission (1989-1993) resulted in the first space-based stellar
catalogue including measurements of positions, parallaxes and annual proper
motions accurate to about one milli-arcsecond. More space astrometry missions
will follow in the near future. The ultra-small Japanese mission Nano-JASMINE
(launch in late 2013) will determine positions and annual proper motions with
some milli-arcsecond accuracy. In mid 2013 the next-generation ESA mission Gaia
will deliver some tens of micro-arcsecond accurate astrometric parameters.
Until the final Gaia catalogue is published in early 2020 the best way of
improving proper motion values is the combination of positions from different
missions separated by long time intervals. Rather than comparing positions from
separately reduced catalogues, we propose an optimal method to combine the
information from the different data sets by making a joint astrometric
solution. This allows to obtain good results even when each data set alone is
insufficient for an accurate reduction. We demonstrate our method by combining
Hipparcos and simulated Nano-JASMINE data in a joint solution. We show a
significant improvement over the conventional catalogue combination.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.4165 [pdf] - 453259
A conjugate gradient algorithm for the astrometric core solution of Gaia
Submitted: 2011-12-18
The ESA space astrometry mission Gaia, planned to be launched in 2013, has
been designed to make angular measurements on a global scale with
micro-arcsecond accuracy. A key component of the data processing for Gaia is
the astrometric core solution, which must implement an efficient and accurate
numerical algorithm to solve the resulting, extremely large least-squares
problem. The Astrometric Global Iterative Solution (AGIS) is a framework that
allows to implement a range of different iterative solution schemes suitable
for a scanning astrometric satellite. In order to find a computationally
efficient and numerically accurate iteration scheme for the astrometric
solution, compatible with the AGIS framework, we study an adaptation of the
classical conjugate gradient (CG) algorithm, and compare it to the so-called
simple iteration (SI) scheme that was previously known to converge for this
problem, although very slowly. The different schemes are implemented within a
software test bed for AGIS known as AGISLab, which allows to define, simulate
and study scaled astrometric core solutions. After successful testing in
AGISLab, the CG scheme has been implemented also in AGIS. The two algorithms CG
and SI eventually converge to identical solutions, to within the numerical
noise (of the order of 0.00001 micro-arcsec). These solutions are independent
of the starting values (initial star catalogue), and we conclude that they are
equivalent to a rigorous least-squares estimation of the astrometric
parameters. The CG scheme converges up to a factor four faster than SI in the
tested cases, and in particular spatially correlated truncation errors are much
more efficiently damped out with the CG scheme.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.4139 [pdf] - 453255
The astrometric core solution for the Gaia mission. Overview of models,
algorithms and software implementation
Submitted: 2011-12-18
The Gaia satellite will observe about one billion stars and other point-like
sources. The astrometric core solution will determine the astrometric
parameters (position, parallax, and proper motion) for a subset of these
sources, using a global solution approach which must also include a large
number of parameters for the satellite attitude and optical instrument. The
accurate and efficient implementation of this solution is an extremely
demanding task, but crucial for the outcome of the mission. We provide a
comprehensive overview of the mathematical and physical models applicable to
this solution, as well as its numerical and algorithmic framework. The
astrometric core solution is a simultaneous least-squares estimation of about
half a billion parameters, including the astrometric parameters for some 100
million well-behaved so-called primary sources. The global nature of the
solution requires an iterative approach, which can be broken down into a small
number of distinct processing blocks (source, attitude, calibration and global
updating) and auxiliary processes (including the frame rotator and selection of
primary sources). We describe each of these processes in some detail, formulate
the underlying models, from which the observation equations are derived, and
outline the adopted numerical solution methods with due consideration of
robustness and the structure of the resulting system of equations. Appendices
provide brief introductions to some important mathematical tools (quaternions
and B-splines for the attitude representation, and a modified Cholesky
algorithm for positive semidefinite problems) and discuss some complications
expected in the real mission data.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.1547 [pdf] - 1084711
The impact of CCD radiation damage on Gaia astrometry: I. Image location
estimation in the presence of radiation damage
Submitted: 2011-10-07
The Gaia mission has been designed to perform absolute astrometric
measurements with unprecedented accuracy; the end-of-mission parallax standard
error is required to be 30 micro-arcseconds for a G2V type star of magnitude
15. These requirements set a stringent constraint on the accuracy of the
estimation of the location of the stellar image on the CCD for each
observation: e.g., 0.3 milli-arseconds (mas) or 0.005 pixels for the same V=15
G2V star. However the Gaia CCDs will suffer from charge transfer inefficiency
(CTI) caused by radiation damage that will degrade the stellar image quality
and may degrade the astrometric performance of Gaia if not properly addressed.
For the first time at this level of detail, the potential impact of radiation
damage on the performance of Gaia is investigated. In this first paper we focus
on the evaluation of the CTI impact on the image location accuracy. We show
that CTI decreases the stellar image signal-to-noise ratio and irreversibly
degrades the image location estimation precision. As a consequence the location
estimation standard errors increase by up to 6% for a radiation damage level
equivalent to the end-of-mission. In addition the CTI-induced image distortion
introduces a systematic bias in the image location estimation (up to 0.05
pixels or 3 mas in the Gaia operating conditions). We present a novel approach
to CTI mitigation that enables, without correction of the raw data, the
unbiased estimation of the image location and flux from damaged observations.
Its implementation reduces the maximum measured location bias for the faintest
magnitude to 0.005 pixels (~4e-4 pixels at magnitude 15). In a second paper we
will investigate how the CTI effects affect the final astrometric accuracy of
Gaia by propagating residual errors through the astrometric solution.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.2206 [pdf] - 397309
Implementing the Gaia Astrometric Global Iterative Solution (AGIS) in
Java
Submitted: 2011-08-10
This paper provides a description of the Java software framework which has
been constructed to run the Astrometric Global Iterative Solution for the Gaia
mission. This is the mathematical framework to provide the rigid reference
frame for Gaia observations from the Gaia data itself. This process makes Gaia
a self calibrated, and input catalogue independent, mission. The framework is
highly distributed typically running on a cluster of machines with a database
back end. All code is written in the Java language. We describe the overall
architecture and some of the details of the implementation.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.2348 [pdf] - 1053321
Using Galactic Cepheids to verify Gaia parallaxes
Submitted: 2011-04-12
Context. The Gaia satellite will measure highly accurate absolute parallaxes
of hundreds of millions of stars by comparing the parallactic displacements in
the two fields of view of the optical instrument. The requirements on the
stability of the 'basic angle' between the two fields are correspondingly
strict, and possible variations (on the microarcsec level) are therefore
monitored by an on-board metrology system. Nevertheless, since even very small
periodic variations of the basic angle might cause a global offset of the
measured parallaxes, it is important to find independent verification methods.
Aims. We investigate the potential use of Galactic Cepheids as standard candles
for verifying the Gaia parallax zero point. Methods. We simulate the complete
population of Galactic Cepheids and their observations by Gaia. Using the
simulated data, simultaneous fits are made of the parameters of the
period-luminosity relation and a global parallax zero point. Results. The total
number of Galactic Cepheids is estimated at about 20 000, of which nearly half
could be observed by Gaia. In the most favourable circumstances, including
negligible intrinsic scatter and extinction errors, the determined parallax
zero point has an uncertainty of 0.2 microarcsec. With more realistic
assumptions the uncertainty is several times larger, and the result is very
sensitive to errors in the applied extinction corrections. Conclusions. The use
of Galactic Cepheids alone will not be sufficient to determine a possible
parallax zero-point error to the full potential systematic accuracy of Gaia.
The global verification of Gaia parallaxes will most likely depend on a
combination of many different methods, including this one.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.3630 [pdf] - 1052812
Electrode level Monte Carlo model of radiation damage effects on
astronomical CCDs
Submitted: 2011-03-18
Current optical space telescopes rely upon silicon Charge Coupled Devices
(CCDs) to detect and image the incoming photons. The performance of a CCD
detector depends on its ability to transfer electrons through the silicon
efficiently, so that the signal from every pixel may be read out through a
single amplifier. This process of electron transfer is highly susceptible to
the effects of solar proton damage (or non-ionizing radiation damage). This is
because charged particles passing through the CCD displace silicon atoms,
introducing energy levels into the semi-conductor bandgap which act as
localized electron traps. The reduction in Charge Transfer Efficiency (CTE)
leads to signal loss and image smearing. The European Space Agency's
astrometric Gaia mission will make extensive use of CCDs to create the most
complete and accurate stereoscopic map to date of the Milky Way. In the context
of the Gaia mission CTE is referred to with the complementary quantity Charge
Transfer Inefficiency (CTI = 1-CTE). CTI is an extremely important issue that
threatens Gaia's performances. We present here a detailed Monte Carlo model
which has been developed to simulate the operation of a damaged CCD at the
pixel electrode level. This model implements a new approach to both the charge
density distribution within a pixel and the charge capture and release
probabilities, which allows the reproduction of CTI effects on a variety of
measurements for a large signal level range in particular for signals of the
order of a few electrons. A running version of the model as well as a brief
documentation and a few examples are readily available at
http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/~prodhomme/cemga.php as part of the CEMGA java
package (CTI Effects Models for Gaia).
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.0378 [pdf] - 15886
Natural Transfer of Viable Microbes in Space from Planets in the
Extra-Solar Systems to a Planet in our Solar System and Vice-Versa
Valtonen, Mauri;
Nurmi, Pasi;
Zheng, Jia-Qing;
Cucinotta, Francis A.;
Wilson, John W.;
Horneck, Gerda;
Lindegren, Lennart;
Melosh, Jay;
Rickman, Hans;
Mileikowsky, Curt
Submitted: 2008-09-02
We investigate whether it is possible that viable microbes could have been
transported to Earth from the planets in extra-solar systems by means of
natural vehicles such as ejecta expelled by comet or asteroid impacts on such
planets. The probabilities of close encounters with other solar systems are
taken into account as well as the limitations of bacterial survival times
inside ejecta in space, caused by radiation and DNA decay. The conclusion is
that no potentially DNA/RNA life-carrying ejecta from another solar system in
the general Galactic star field landed on Earth before life already existed on
Earth, not even if microbial survival time in space is as long as tens of
millions of years. However, if the Sun formed initially as a part of a star
cluster, as is commonly assumed, we cannot rule out the possibility of transfer
of life from one of the sister systems to us. Likewise, there is a possibility
that some extra-solar planets carry life that originated in our solar system.
It will be of great interest to identify the members of the Sun's birth cluster
of stars and study them for evidence for planets and life on the planets. The
former step may be accomplished by the GAIA mission, the latter step by the SIM
and DARWIN missions. Therefore it may not be too long until we have
experimental knowledge on the question whether the natural transfer of life
from one solar system to another has actually taken place.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:0706.1646 [pdf] - 2122
Limits of ultra-high-precision optical astrometry: Stellar surface
structures
Submitted: 2007-06-12
We investigate the astrometric effects of stellar surface structures as a
practical limitation to ultra-high-precision astrometry, e.g. in the context of
exoplanet searches, and to quantify the expected effects in different regions
of the HR-diagram. Stellar surface structures are likely to produce
fluctuations in the integrated flux and radial velocity of the star, as well as
a variation of the observed photocentre, i.e. astrometric jitter, and closure
phase. We use theoretical considerations supported by Monte Carlo simulations
to derive statistical relations between the corresponding astrometric,
photometric, and radial-velocity effects. For most stellar types the
astrometric jitter due to stellar surface structures is expected to be of order
10 micro-AU or greater. This is more than the astrometric displacement
typically caused by an Earth-size exoplanet in the habitable zone, which is
about 1-4 micro-AU for long-lived main-sequence stars. Only for stars with
extremely low photometric variability (<0.5 mmag) and low magnetic activity,
comparable to that of the Sun, will the astrometric jitter be of order 1
micro-AU, suffcient to allow the astrometric detection of an Earth-sized planet
in the habitable zone. While stellar surface structure may thus seriously
impair the astrometric detection of small exoplanets, it has in general
negligible impact on the detection of large (Jupiter-size) planets and on the
determination of stellar parallax and proper motion. From the starspot model we
also conclude that the commonly used spot filling factor is not the most
relevant parameter for quantifying the spottiness in terms of the resulting
astrometric, photometric and radial-velocity variations.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0611885 [pdf] - 87271
Gaia Data Processing Architecture
O'Mullane, W.;
Lammers, U.;
Bailer-Jones, C.;
Bastian, U.;
Brown, A.;
Drimmel, R.;
Eyer, L.;
Huc, C.;
Jansen, F.;
Katz, D.;
Lindegren, L.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.
Submitted: 2006-11-29
Gaia is ESA's ambitious space astrometry mission the main objective of which
is to astrometrically and spectro-photometrically map 1000 Million celestial
objects (mostly in our galaxy) with unprecedented accuracy. The announcement of
opportunity for the data processing will be issued by ESA late in 2006. The
Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC) has been formed recently
and is preparing an answer. The satellite will downlink close to 100 TB of raw
telemetry data over 5 years. To achieve its required accuracy of a few 10s of
Microarcsecond astrometry, a highly involved processing of this data is
required.
In addition to the main astrometric instrument Gaia will host a Radial
Velocity instrument, two low-resolution dispersers for multi-color photometry
and two Star Mappers. Gaia is a flying Giga Pixel camera. The various
instruments each require relatively complex processing while at the same time
being interdependent. We describe the overall composition of the DPAC and the
envisaged overall architecture of the Gaia data processing system. We shall
delve further into the core processing - one of the nine, so-called,
coordination units comprising the Gaia processing system.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0603416 [pdf] - 80625
Broad-band photometric colors and effective temperature calibrations for
late-type giants. II. Z<0.02
Submitted: 2006-03-16
(Abridged) We investigate the effects of metallicity on the broad-band
photometric colors of late-type giants, and make a comparison of synthetic
colors with observed photometric properties of late-type giants over a wide
range of effective temperatures (T_eff=3500-4800 K) and gravities (log
g=0.0-2.5), at [M/H]=-1.0 and -2.0. The influence of metallicity on the
synthetic photometric colors is generally small at effective temperatures above
\~3800 K, but the effects grow larger at lower T_eff, due to the changing
efficiency of molecule formation which reduces molecular opacities at lower
[M/H]. To make a detailed comparison of the synthetic and observed photometric
colors of late type giants in the T_eff--color and color--color planes, we
derive a set of new T_eff--log g--color relations based on synthetic
photometric colors, at [M/H]=-0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0. While differences
between the new T_eff--color relations and those available from the literature
are typically well within ~100 K, effective temperatures predicted by the
scales based on synthetic colors tend to be slightly higher than those
resulting from the T_eff--color relations based on observations, with the
offsets up to ~100 K. This is clearly seen both at [M/H]=-1.0 and -2.0,
especially in the T_eff--(B-V) and T_eff--(V-K) planes. The consistency between
T_eff--log g--color scales based on synthetic colors calculated with different
stellar atmosphere codes is very good, with typical differences being well
within \Delta T_eff~70 K at [M/H]=-1.0 and \Delta T_eff~40 K at [M/H]=-2.0.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0512354 [pdf] - 78554
Photometric colors of late-type giants: theory versus observations
Submitted: 2005-12-13
To assess the current status in the theoretical modeling of the spectral
properties of late-type giants, we provide a comparison of synthetic
photometric colors of late-type giants (calculated with PHOENIX, MARCS and
ATLAS model atmospheres) with observations, at [M/H]=0.0 and -2.0. Overall,
there is a good agreement between observed and synthetic colors, and synthetic
colors and published Teff-color relations, both at [M/H]=0.0 and -2.0.
Deviations from the observed trends in Teff-color planes are generally within
\pm 150K (or less) in the effective temperature range Teff=3500-4800K.
Synthetic colors calculated with different stellar atmosphere models typically
agree to ~100K, within a large range of effective temperatures and gravities.
Some discrepancies are seen in the Teff-(B-V) plane below Teff~3800K at
[M/H]=0.0, due to difficulties in reproducing the 'turn-off' to the bluer
colors which is seen in the observed data at Teff~3600K. Note that at
[M/H]=-2.0 effective temperatures given by the scale of Alonso et al. (1999)
are generally lower than those resulting from other Teff-color relations based
both on observed and synthetic colors.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0512038 [pdf] - 78238
The design and performance of the Gaia photometric system
Jordi, C.;
Hoeg, E.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Knude, J.;
Straizys, V.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Claeskens, J. -F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Figueras, F.;
Grenon, M.;
Kolka, I.;
Perryman, M. A. C.;
Tautvaisiene, G.;
Vansevicius, V.;
Willemsen, P. G.;
Bridzius, A.;
Evans, D. W.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fiorucci, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Kaempf, T. A.;
Kazlauskas, A.;
Kucinskas, A.;
Malyuto, V.;
Munari, U.;
Reyle, C.;
Torra, J.;
Vallenari, A.;
Zdanavicius, K.;
Korakitis, R.;
Malkov, O.;
Smette, A.
Submitted: 2005-12-01
The European Gaia astrometry mission is due for launch in 2011. Gaia will
rely on the proven principles of ESA's Hipparcos mission to create an all-sky
survey of about one billion stars throughout our Galaxy and beyond, by
observing all objects down to 20th magnitude. Through its massive measurement
of stellar distances, motions and multi-colour photometry it will provide
fundamental data necessary for unravelling the structure, formation and
evolution of the Galaxy. This paper presents the design and performance of the
broad- and medium-band set of photometric filters adopted as the baseline for
Gaia. The nineteen selected passbands (extending from the ultraviolet to the
far-red), the criteria, and the methodology on which this choice has been based
are discussed in detail. We analyse the photometric capabilities for
characterizing the luminosity, temperature, gravity and chemical composition of
stars. We also discuss the automatic determination of these physical parameters
for the large number of observations involved, for objects located throughout
the entire Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Finally, the capability of the
photometric system to deal with the main Gaia science case is outlined.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510434 [pdf] - 76930
Broad-band photometric colors and effective temperature calibrations for
late-type giants. I. Z=0.02
Submitted: 2005-10-14
We present new synthetic broad-band photometric colors for late-type giants
based on synthetic spectra calculated with the PHOENIX model atmosphere code.
The grid covers effective temperatures T_eff=3000...5000K, gravities log
g=-0.5...+3.5, and metallicities [M/H]=+0.5...-4.0. We show that individual
broad-band photometric colors are strongly affected by model parameters such as
molecular opacities, gravity, microturbulent velocity, and stellar mass. Our
exploratory 3D modeling of a prototypical late-type giant shows that convection
has a noticeable effect on the photometric colors too, as it alters
significantly both the vertical and horizontal thermal structures in the outer
atmosphere. The differences between colors calculated with full 3D
hydrodynamical and 1D model atmospheres are significant (e.g., \Delta(V-K)~0.2
mag), translating into offsets in effective temperature of up to ~70K. For a
sample of 74 late-type giants in the Solar neighborhood, with interferometric
effective temperatures and broad-band photometry available in the literature,
we compare observed colors with a new PHOENIX grid of synthetic photometric
colors, as well as with photometric colors calculated with the MARCS and ATLAS
model atmosphere codes. (abridged)
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0503208 [pdf] - 71590
Theoretical modelling of late-type giant atmospheres: preparing for Gaia
Submitted: 2005-03-09
Late type giants (RGB/AGB stars) will be important tracers of the Galactic
morphology and evolution in the framework of Gaia, as they are intrinsically
bright and thus can probe distant stellar populations or those obscured by
interstellar extinction. A realistic representation of their atmospheres and
spectra with stellar atmosphere models is thus of crucial importance, both for
the design and optimization of Gaia instruments, as well as the interpretation
of provided astrophysical data. Our analysis of synthetic photometric colors of
late-type giants based on PHOENIX, MARCS and ATLAS model atmospheres indicates
a general agreement between the current theoretical predictions and
observations in the framework of stationary 1-D model atmospheres. Presently
available models allow temperature determinations of RGB/AGB stars to an
accuracy of ~\pm100 K. In an exploratory study we try to quantify possible
residual systematic effects due to the approximations made in 1-D models using
full 3-D hydrodynamical models. We find that differences in broad-band
photometric colors calculated with 1-D and 3-D models are significant,
translating to the offsets in effective temperature of up to ~70 K. Clearly,
full 3-D hydrodynamical models will help to alleviate such ambiguities in
current theoretical modeling. Additionally, they will allow to study new
phenomena, to open qualitatively new windows for stellar astrophysics in the
Gaia-era.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0503209 [pdf] - 71591
Beyond the Galaxy with Gaia: evolutionary histories of galaxies in the
Local Group
Submitted: 2005-03-09
Gaia will play an important role in providing information about star
formation histories, merging events, intergalactic streams etc., for nearby
galaxies of the Local Group. One of the most crucial contributions will be
proper motions, especially for stars in the outermost parts of the galaxies,
obtainable for stellar populations to ~150 kpc with RGB stars. Together with
radial velocities for the brightest giants <80 kpc, this will provide
membership information for individual stars and global kinematical picture of
the most nearby galaxies, including the Magellanic Clouds (MCs). Gaia will also
provide photometric metallicities (\sigma([M/H])<0.3) for individual giants
and/or supergiants in dwarf galaxies to ~200 kpc. MSTO ages will be possible
for the youngest stellar populations in the most nearby galaxies (e.g., MCs),
whereas stars on RGB/AGB may provide age estimates for populations to ~150 kpc.
Gaia will allow to study the outermost parts of the galaxies, which (because of
their large spatial extent) are difficult to assess from the ground. Apart from
allowing to clarify the structure and evolution of the dwarf galaxies, this
will also make it possible to investigate galactic tidal debris, thus providing
additional details for the global picture of formation and evolution of the
Milky Way Galaxy.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0409212 [pdf] - 67293
Wavelength Shifts in Solar-Type Spectra
Submitted: 2004-09-09
Spectral-line displacements away from the wavelengths naively expected from
the Doppler shift caused by stellar radial motion may originate as convective
shifts (correlated velocity and brightness patterns in the photosphere), as
gravitational redshifts, or perhaps be induced by wave motions. Absolute
lineshifts, in the past studied only for the Sun, are now accessible also for
other stars thanks to astrometric determination of stellar radial motion, and
spectrometers with accurate wavelength calibration.
Comparisons between spectroscopic apparent radial velocities and
astrometrically determined radial motions reveal greater spectral blueshifts in
F-type stars than in the Sun (as theoretically expected from their more
vigorous convection), further increasing in A-type stars (possibly due to
atmospheric shockwaves).
An important near-future development to enable a further analysis of stellar
surface structure will be the study of wavelength variations across spatially
resolved stellar disks, e.g., the center-to-limb wavelength changes along a
stellar diameter, and their spatially resolved time variability.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0309346 [pdf] - 59173
Intrinsic spectral blueshifts in rapidly rotating stars?
Submitted: 2003-09-12
Spectroscopic radial velocities for several nearby open clusters suggest that
spectra of (especially earlier-type) rapidly rotating stars are systematically
blueshifted by 3 km/s or more, relative to the spectra of slowly rotating ones.
Comparisons with astrometrically determined radial motions in the Hyades
suggests this to be an absolute blueshift, relative to wavelengths naively
expected from stellar radial motion and gravitational redshift. Analogous
trends are seen also in most other clusters studied (Pleiades, Coma Berenices,
Praesepe, Alpha Persei, IC 2391, NGC 6475, IC 4665, NGC 1976 and NGC 2516).
Possible mechanisms are discussed, including photospheric convection, stellar
pulsation, meridional circulation, and shock-wave propagation, as well as
effects caused by template mismatch in determining wavelength displacements.
For early-type stars, a plausible mechanism is shock-wave propagation upward
through the photospheric line-forming regions. Such wavelength shifts thus
permit studies of certain types of stellar atmospheric dynamics and -
irrespective of their cause - may influence deduced open-cluster membership
(when selected from common velocity) and deduced cluster dynamics (some types
of stars might show fortuitous velocity patterns).
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0303511 [pdf] - 1348098
GAIA: AGB stars as tracers of star formation histories in the Galaxy and
beyond
Submitted: 2003-03-22
We discuss the tracing of star formation histories with ESA's space
astrometry mission GAIA, emphasizing the advantages of AGB stars for this
purpose. GAIA's microarcsecond-level astrometry, multi-band photometry and
spectroscopy will provide individual distances, motions, effective
temperatures, gravities and metallicities for vast numbers of AGB stars in the
Galaxy and beyond. Reliable ages of AGB stars can be determined to distances of
\~200 kpc in a wide range of ages and metallicities, allowing star formation
histories to be studied in a diversity of astrophysical environments.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0303376 [pdf] - 55615
The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics and
metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement
Soffel, M.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Petit, G.;
Wolf, P.;
Kopeikin, S. M.;
Bretagnon, P.;
Brumberg, V. A.;
Capitaine, N.;
Damour, T.;
Fukushima, T.;
Guinot, B.;
Huang, T.;
Lindegren, L.;
Ma, C.;
Nordtvedt, K.;
Ries, J.;
Seidelmann, P. K.;
Vokrouhlicky, D.;
Will, C.;
Xu, Ch.
Submitted: 2003-03-17
This paper discusses the IAU Resolutions B1.3, B1.4, B1.5 and B1.9 (2000)
that were adopted during the 24th General Assembly in Manchester, 2000 and
provides details and explanations for these Resolutions. It is explained why
they present significant progress over the corresponding IAU 1991 Resolutions
and why they are necessary in the light of present accuracies in astrometry,
celestial mechanics and metrology. In fact most of these Resolutions are
consistent with astronomical models and software already in use.
The metric tensors and gravitational potentials of both the Barycentric
Celestial Reference System and Geocentric Celestial Reference System are
defined and discussed. The necessity and relevance of the two celestial
reference systems are explained. The transformations of coordinates and
gravitational potentials are discussed. Potential coefficients parameterizing
the post-Newtonian gravitational potentials are expounded. Simplified versions
of the time transformations suitable for modern clock accuracies are
elucidated. Various approximations used in the Resolutions are explicated and
justified. Some models (e.g. for higher spin moments) that serve the purpose
for estimating orders of magnitude have actually never been published before.
[54]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0302522 [pdf] - 363002
The fundamental definition of 'radial velocity'
Submitted: 2003-02-25
Accuracy levels of metres per second require the fundamental concept of
'radial velocity' for stars and other distant objects to be examined, both as a
physical velocity, and as measured by spectroscopic and astrometric techniques.
Aiming at definitions that are unambiguous at accuracy levels of 1 m/s, we
analyse different concepts of radial velocity and their interrelations. We
distinguish between the geometrically defined 'kinematic radial velocity' and
'astrometric radial velocity' on one hand, and the spectroscopically defined
'barycentric radial-velocity measure' on the other. The last two concepts are
defined by recent resolutions adopted by the International Astronomical Union
(IAU), the motives and consequences of which are explained in this paper.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0212185 [pdf] - 53575
AGB Stars as Tracers of Star Formation Histories: Implications for GAIA
Photometry and Spectroscopy
Submitted: 2002-12-07
We argue that tracing star formation histories with ESA's space mission GAIA
using main sequence turn-off (MSTO) point dating will mainly be effective in
cases of mild interstellar extinction (E(B-V)<0.5). For higher reddenings the
MSTO approach will be severely limited both in terms of traceable ages (t<0.5
Gyr at 8 kpc; E(B-V)=1.0) and/or distances (d<2 kpc for t=15 Gyr; E(B-V)=1.0),
since the MSTO will be located at magnitudes too faint for GAIA. AGB stars may
alternatively provide precise population ages with GAIA for a wide range of
ages and metallicities, with traceable distances of up to 250 kpc at E(B-V)=0
(d=15 kpc if E(B-V)=2.0). It is essential however that effective temperatures
precise to 0.01 dex, metallicities to 0.2 dex, and E(B-V) to 0.03 are derived
for individual stars, in order to obtain their ages precise to 0.2 dex. This
task is quite challenging for GAIA photometry and spectroscopy, though
preliminary tests show that comparable precisions may be achieved with GAIA
medium band photometry.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0110617 [pdf] - 45674
Astrometric radial velocities III. Hipparcos measurements of nearby star
clusters and associations
Submitted: 2001-10-29
Radial motions of stars in nearby moving clusters are determined from
accurate proper motions and trigonometric parallaxes, without any use of
spectroscopy. Assuming that cluster members share the same velocity vector
(apart from a random dispersion), we apply a maximum-likelihood method on
astrometric data from Hipparcos to compute radial and space velocities (and
their dispersions) in the Ursa Major, Hyades, Coma Berenices, Pleiades, and
Praesepe clusters, and for the alpha Persei, Scorpius-Centaurus, and `HIP
98321' associations. The radial motion of the Hyades cluster is determined to
within 0.47 km/s (standard error), and that of its individual stars to within
0.6 km/s. For other clusters, Hipparcos data yield astrometric radial
velocities with typical accuracies of a few km/s. A comparison of these
astrometric values with spectroscopic radial velocities in the literature shows
a good general agreement and, in the case of the best-determined Hyades
cluster, also permits searches for subtle astrophysical differences, such as
evidence for enhanced convective blueshifts of F-dwarf spectra, and decreased
gravitational redshifts in giants. Similar comparisons for the Scorpius OB2
complex indicate some expansion of its associations, albeit slower than
expected from their ages. As a by-product from the radial-velocity solutions,
kinematically improved parallaxes for individual stars are obtained, enabling
Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams with unprecedented accuracy in luminosity. For the
Hyades (parallax accuracy 0.3 mas), its main sequence resembles a thin line,
possibly with wiggles in it.
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0101235 [pdf] - 40373
GAIA: Composition, Formation and Evolution of the Galaxy
Perryman, M. A. C.;
de Boer, K. S.;
Gilmore, G.;
Høg, E.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Pace, O.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.
Submitted: 2001-01-15
The GAIA astrometric mission has recently been approved as one of the next
two `cornerstones' of ESA's science programme, with a launch date target of not
later than mid-2012. GAIA will provide positional and radial velocity
measurements with the accuracies needed to produce a stereoscopic and kinematic
census of about one billion stars throughout our Galaxy (and into the Local
Group), amounting to about 1 per cent of the Galactic stellar population.
GAIA's main scientific goal is to clarify the origin and history of our Galaxy,
from a quantitative census of the stellar populations. It will advance
questions such as when the stars in our Galaxy formed, when and how it was
assembled, and its distribution of dark matter. The survey aims for
completeness to V=20 mag, with accuracies of about 10 microarcsec at 15 mag.
Combined with astrophysical information for each star, provided by on-board
multi-colour photometry and (limited) spectroscopy, these data will have the
precision necessary to quantify the early formation, and subsequent dynamical,
chemical and star formation evolution of our Galaxy. Additional products
include detection and orbital classification of tens of thousands of
extra-Solar planetary systems, and a comprehensive survey of some 10^5-10^6
minor bodies in our Solar System, through galaxies in the nearby Universe, to
some 500,000 distant quasars. It will provide a number of stringent new tests
of general relativity and cosmology. The complete satellite system was
evaluated as part of a detailed technology study, including a detailed payload
design, corresponding accuracy assesments, and results from a prototype data
reduction development.
[58]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9907184 [pdf] - 107409
The Hipparcos Transit Data: What, why and how?
Submitted: 1999-07-14
The Hipparcos Transit Data are a collection of partially reduced, fully
calibrated observations of (mostly) double and multiple stars obtained with the
ESA Hipparcos astrometry satellite. The data are publicly available, as part of
the CD-ROM set distributed with the Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues (ESA
SP--1200, 1997), for about a third of the Hipparcos Catalogue entries including
all confirmed or suspected non-single stars. The Transit Data consist of signal
modulation parameters derived from the individual transits of the targets
across the Hipparcos focal grid. The Transit Data permit re-reduction of the
satellite data for individual objects, using arbitrarily complex object models
in which time-variable photometric as well as geometric characteristics may be
taken into account. We describe the structure and contents of the Transit Data
files and give examples of how the data can be used. Some of the applications
use standard astronomical software: Difmap or AIPS for aperture synthesis
imaging, and GaussFit for detailed model fitting. Fortran code converting the
data into formats suitable for these application programs has been made public
in order to encourage and facilitate the use of Hipparcos Transit Data.
[59]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9907145 [pdf] - 107370
Astrometric radial velocities. I. Non-spectroscopic methods for
measuring stellar radial velocity
Submitted: 1999-07-12, last modified: 1999-07-14
High-accuracy astrometry permits the determination of not only stellar
tangential motion, but also the component along the line-of-sight. Such
non-spectroscopic (i.e. astrometric) radial velocities are independent of
stellar atmospheric dynamics, spectral complexity and variability, as well as
of gravitational redshift. Three methods are analysed: (1) changing annual
parallax, (2) changing proper motion and (3) changing angular extent of a
moving group of stars. All three have significant potential in planned
astrometric projects. Current accuracies are still inadequate for the first
method, while the second is marginally feasible and is here applied to 16
stars. The third method reaches high accuracy (<1 km/s) already with present
data, although for some clusters an accuracy limit is set by uncertainties in
the cluster expansion rate.
[60]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9805180 [pdf] - 1235217
GAIA: Origin and Evolution of the Milky Way
Gilmore, Gerry;
Perryman, Michael;
Lindegren, L;
Favata, F;
Hoeg, E;
Lattanzi, M;
Luri, X;
Mignard, F;
Roeser, S;
deZeeuw, P. T.
Submitted: 1998-05-13
GAIA is a short-listed candidate for the ESA Cornerstone mission C5, meeting
the ESA Survey Committee requirement for an observatory mission, dedicated to
astrometry, providing 10 micro-arcsecond accuracy at 15th magnitude. The GAIA
mission concept follows the dramatic success of the ESA HIPPARCOS mission,
utilising a continuously scanning spacecraft, accurately measuring 1-D
coordinates along great circles, in (at least) two simultaneous fields of view,
separated by a known angle. These 1-D relative coordinates are later converted
to the five astrometric parameters of position and motions in a global
analysis. GAIA will provide precise astrometry and multi-colour photometry for
all the one billion stars, quasars, and compact galaxies to I=20 on the sky.
GAIA will additionally provide the sixth phase-space parameter, radial
velocity, from a slitless spectroscopic survey of most stars brighter than
about magnitude 17. The technical challenges are considerable, but achievable.
The scientific returns are spectacular, with greatest impact in the study of
stellar populations and dynamical structure of the galaxies of our Local Group,
and in providing the first complete census of the stars and massive planets in
the Solar neighbourhood. GAIA will revolutionise our knowledge of the origin
and evolution of our Milky Way Galaxy, and of the distribution of planetary
systems around other stars.
[61]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9707040 [pdf] - 97864
Some Considerations in making full Use of the Hipparcos Catalogue
Submitted: 1997-07-03
This contribution is intended as a `rough guide' to the Hipparcos Catalogue
for the non-expert user. Some general aspects of the use of astrometric data
are discussed as well as Hipparcos-specific applications. We discuss when and
at what level one may expect systematic errors to occur in the Hipparcos
Catalogue. Next we discuss the question of the interpretation of the measured
parallaxes in terms of distances and luminosities of stars. What are the biases
one should be aware of and how can these be corrected? When using the
astrometric data to study the statistics of stars one should take the full
covariance matrix of the errors on the astrometric parameters into account. We
explain how to do this and discuss the specific case of a moving cluster.
Finally, we address the question of the correlation of astrometric parameters
over a given region of the sky. At present the Hipparcos Catalogue contains no
identified systematic errors.