Normalized to: Licquia, T.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.12896 [pdf] - 2038310
Milky Way Analogues in MaNGA: Multi-Parameter Homogeneity and Comparison
to the Milky Way
Boardman, Nicholas Fraser;
Zasowski, Gail;
Seth, Anil;
Newman, Jeff;
Andrews, Brett;
Bershady, Matt;
Bird, Jonathan;
Chiappini, Cristina;
Fielder, Catherine;
Fraser-McKelvie, Amelia;
Jones, Amy;
Licquia, Tim;
Masters, Karen;
Minchev, Ivan;
Schiavon, Ricardo;
Brownstein, Joel;
Drory, Niv;
Lane, Richard
Submitted: 2019-10-28, last modified: 2020-01-28
The Milky Way provides an ideal laboratory to test our understanding of
galaxy evolution, owing to our ability to observe our Galaxy over fine scales.
However, connecting the Galaxy to the wider galaxy population remains
difficult, due to the challenges posed by our internal perspective and to the
different observational techniques employed. Here, we present a sample of
galaxies identified as Milky Way Analogs (MWAs) on the basis of their stellar
masses and bulge-to-total ratios, observed as part of the Mapping Nearby
Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey. We analyse the galaxies in
terms of their stellar kinematics and populations as well as their ionised gas
contents. We find our sample to contain generally young stellar populations in
their outskirts. However, we find a wide range of stellar ages in their central
regions, and we detect central AGN-like or composite-like activity in roughly
half of the sample galaxies, with the other half consisting of galaxies with
central star-forming emission or emission consistent with old stars. We measure
gradients in gas metallicity and stellar metallicity that are generally flatter
in physical units than those measured for the Milky Way; however, we find far
better agreement with the Milky Way when scaling gradients by galaxies' disc
scale lengths. From this, we argue much of the discrepancy in metallicity
gradients to be due to the relative compactness of the Milky Way, with
differences in observing perspective also likely to be a factor.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.05180 [pdf] - 1900828
Predictably Missing Satellites: Subhalo Abundance in Milky Way-like
Halos
Submitted: 2018-07-13, last modified: 2019-06-17
On small scales there have been a number of claims of discrepancies between
the standard Cold Dark Matter (CDM) model and observations. The 'missing
satellites problem' infamously describes the overabundance of subhalos from CDM
simulations compared to the number of satellites observed in the Milky Way. A
variety of solutions to this discrepancy have been proposed; however, the
impact of the specific properties of the Milky Way halo relative to the typical
halo of its mass have yet to be explored. Motivated by recent studies that
identified ways in which the Milky Way is atypical (e.g., Licquia et al. 2015),
we investigate how the properties of dark matter halos with mass comparable to
our Galaxy's --- including concentration, spin, shape, and scale factor of the
last major merger --- correlate with the subhalo abundance. Using zoom-in
simulations of Milky Way-like halos, we build two models of subhalo abundance
as functions of host halo properties and conclude that the Milky Way should be
expected to have 22%-44% fewer subhalos with low maximum rotation velocities
($V_{\rm max}^{\rm sat} \sim 10$kms$^{-1}$) at the 95% confidence level and up
to 72% fewer than average subhalos with high rotation velocities ($V_{\rm
max}^{\rm sat} \gtrsim 30$kms$^{-1}$, comparable to the Magellanic Clouds) than
would be expected for a typical halo of the Milky Way's mass. Concentration is
the most informative single parameter for predicting subhalo abundance. Our
results imply that models tuned to explain the missing satellites problem
assuming typical subhalo abundances for our Galaxy will be over-correcting.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.05769 [pdf] - 1532132
Does the Milky Way Obey Spiral Galaxy Scaling Relations?
Submitted: 2016-10-18
It is crucial to understand how the Milky Way, the galaxy we can study in the
most intimate detail, fits in amongst other galaxies. Key examples include the
Tully-Fisher relation (TFR) --- i.e., the tight correlation between luminosity
($L$) and rotational velocity ($V_\textrm{rot}$) --- and the 3-dimensional
luminosity-velocity-radius ($LVR$) scaling relation. Several past studies have
characterized the MW as a 1--1.5$\sigma$ outlier to the TFR. This study
reexamines such comparisons using new estimates of MW properties that are
robust to many of the systematic uncertainties that have been a problem in the
past and are based on assumptions consistent with those used for other spiral
galaxies. Comparing to scaling relations derived from modern extragalactic
data, we find that our Galaxy's properties are in excellent agreement with TFRs
defined using any SDSS-filter absolute magnitude, stellar mass, or baryonic
mass as the $L$ proxy. We next utilize disk scale length ($R_\textrm{d}$)
measurements to extend this investigation to the $LVR$ relation. Here we find
that our Galaxy lies farther from the relation than $\sim$90\% of other spiral
galaxies, yielding $\sim$9.5$\sigma$ evidence that it is unusually compact for
its $L$ and $V_\textrm{rot}$ (based on MW errors alone), a result that holds
for all of the $L$ proxies considered. The expected $R_\textrm{d}$ for the MW
from the $LVR$ relation is $\sim$5 kpc, nearly twice as large as the observed
value, with error estimates placing the two in tension at the $\sim$1.4$\sigma$
level. The compact scale length of the Galactic disk could be related to other
ways in which the MW has been found to be anomalous.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.05281 [pdf] - 1509373
Sizing Up the Milky Way: A Bayesian Mixture Model Meta-Analysis of
Photometric Scale Length Measurements
Submitted: 2016-07-18, last modified: 2016-09-06
The exponential scale length ($L_d$) of the Milky Way's (MW's) disk is a
critical parameter for describing the global physical size of our Galaxy,
important both for interpreting other Galactic measurements and helping us to
understand how our Galaxy fits into extragalactic contexts. Unfortunately,
current estimates span a wide range of values and often are statistically
incompatible with one another. Here, we perform a Bayesian meta-analysis to
determine an improved, aggregate estimate for $L_d$, utilizing a mixture-model
approach to account for the possibility that any one measurement has not
properly accounted for all statistical or systematic errors. Within this
machinery we explore a variety of ways of modeling the nature of problematic
measurements, and then employ a Bayesian model averaging technique to derive
net posterior distributions that incorporate any model-selection uncertainty.
Our meta-analysis combines 29 different (15 visible and 14 infrared)
photometric measurements of $L_d$ available in the literature; these involve a
broad assortment of observational datasets, MW models and assumptions, and
methodologies, all tabulated herein. Analyzing the visible and infrared
measurements separately yields estimates for $L_d$ of $2.71^{+0.22}_{-0.20}$
kpc and $2.51^{+0.15}_{-0.13}$ kpc, respectively, whereas considering them all
combined yields $2.64\pm0.13$ kpc. The ratio between the visible and infrared
scale lengths determined here is very similar to that measured in external
spiral galaxies. We use these results to update the model of the Galactic disk
from our previous work, constraining its stellar mass to be
$4.8^{+1.5}_{-1.1}\times10^{10}$ $\textrm{M}_\odot$, and the MW's total stellar
mass to be $5.7^{+1.5}_{-1.1}\times10^{10}$ $\textrm{M}_\odot$.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.1078 [pdf] - 1264598
Improved Estimates of the Milky Way's Stellar Mass and Star Formation
Rate from Hierarchical Bayesian Meta-Analysis
Submitted: 2014-07-03, last modified: 2015-08-21
We present improved estimates of several global properties of the Milky Way,
including its current star formation rate (SFR), the stellar mass contained in
its disk and bulge+bar components, as well as its total stellar mass. We do so
by combining previous measurements from the literature using a hierarchical
Bayesian (HB) statistical method that allows us to account for the possibility
that any value may be incorrect or have underestimated errors. We show that
this method is robust to a wide variety of assumptions about the nature of
problems in individual measurements or error estimates. Ultimately, our
analysis yields a SFR for the Galaxy of $\dot{\mathrm{M}}_\star=1.65\pm0.19$
$\textrm{M}_\odot \textrm{yr}^{-1}$, assuming a Kroupa initial mass function
(IMF). By combining HB methods with Monte Carlo simulations that incorporate
the latest estimates of the Galactocentric radius of the Sun, $R_0$, the
exponential scale length of the disk, $L_d$, and the local surface density of
stellar mass, $\Sigma_\star(R_0)$, we show that the mass of the Galactic
bulge+bar is $\textrm{M}_\star^B=0.91\pm0.07\times10^{10}$ $\textrm{M}_\odot$,
the disk mass is $\textrm{M}_\star^D=5.17\pm1.11\times10^{10}$
$\textrm{M}_\odot$, and their combination yields a total stellar mass of
$\textrm{M}_\star=6.08\pm1.14\times10^{10}$ $\textrm{M}_\odot$ (assuming a
Kroupa IMF and an exponential disk profile). This analysis is based upon a new
compilation of literature bulge mass estimates, normalized to common
assumptions about the stellar initial mass function and Galactic disk
properties, presented herein. We additionally find a bulge-to-total mass ratio
for the Milky Way of $B/T=0.150^{+0.028}_{-0.019}$ and a specific star
formation rate of
$\dot{\mathrm{M}}_\star/\textrm{M}_\star=2.71\pm0.59\times10^{-11}
\textrm{yr}^{-1}$.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.04446 [pdf] - 1264910
Unveiling the Milky Way: A New Technique for Determining the Optical
Color and Luminosity of our Galaxy
Submitted: 2015-08-18
We demonstrate a new statistical method of determining the global photometric
properties of the Milky Way (MW) to an unprecedented degree of accuracy,
allowing our Galaxy to be compared directly to objects measured in
extragalactic surveys. Capitalizing on the high-quality imaging and
spectroscopy dataset from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we exploit the
inherent dependence of galaxies' luminosities and colors on their total stellar
mass, $\mathrm{M}_\star$, and star formation rate (SFR),
$\mathrm{\dot{M}}_\star$, by selecting a sample of $Milky$ $Way$ $analog$
$galaxies$ designed to reproduce the best Galactic $\mathrm{M}_\star$ and
$\mathrm{\dot{M}}_\star$ measurements, including all measurement uncertainties.
Making the Copernican assumption that the MW is not extraordinary amongst
galaxies of similar stellar mass and SFR, we then analyze the photometric
properties of this matched sample, constraining the characteristics of our
Galaxy without suffering interference from interstellar dust. We explore a
variety of potential systematic errors that could affect this method, and find
that they are subdominant to random uncertainties. We present both SDSS $ugriz$
absolute magnitudes and colors in both rest-frame $z$=0 and $z$=0.1 passbands
for the MW, which are in agreement with previous estimates but can have up to
$\sim$3$\times$ lower errors. We find the MW to have absolute magnitude
$^0\!M_r-5\log h=-21.00_{-0.37}^{+0.38}$ and integrated color
$^0(g-r)=0.682_{-0.056}^{+0.066}$, indicating that it may belong to the
green-valley region in color-magnitude space and ranking it amongst the
brightest and reddest of spiral galaxies. We also present new estimates of
global stellar mass-to-light ratios for our Galaxy. This work will help relate
our in-depth understanding of the Galaxy to studies of more distant objects.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.04478 [pdf] - 1422161
The SDSS-IV extended Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Luminous
Red Galaxy Target Selection
Prakash, Abhishek;
Licquia, Timothy C.;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Ross, Ashley J.;
Myers, Adam D.;
Dawson, Kyle S.;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Percival, Will J.;
Bautista, Julian E.;
Comparat, Johan;
Tinker, Jeremy L.;
Schlegel, David J.;
Tojeiro, Rita;
Ho, Shirley;
Lang, Dustin;
Rao, Sandhya M.;
McBride, Cameron K.;
Zhu, Guangtun Ben;
Brownstein, Joel R.;
Bailey, Stephen;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Delubac, Timothee;
Mariappan, Vivek;
Blanton, Michael R.;
Reid, Beth;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Prada, Francisco
Submitted: 2015-08-18
We describe the algorithm used to select the Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) sample
for the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) of the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV) using photometric data from both the SDSS and
the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE). LRG targets are required to
meet a set of color selection criteria and have z-band and i-band MODEL
magnitudes z < 19.95 and 19.9 < i < 21.8, respectively. Our algorithm selects
roughly 50 LRG targets per square degree, the great majority of which lie in
the redshift range 0.6 < z < 1.0 (median redshift 0.71). We demonstrate that
our methods are highly effective at eliminating stellar contamination and
lower-redshift galaxies. We perform a number of tests using spectroscopic data
from SDSS-III/BOSS to determine the redshift reliability of our target
selection and its ability to meet the science requirements of eBOSS. The SDSS
spectra are of high enough signal-to-noise ratio that at least 89% of the
target sample yields secure redshift measurements. We also present tests of the
uniformity and homogeneity of the sample, demonstrating that it should be clean
enough for studies of the large-scale structure of the universe at higher
redshifts than SDSS-III/BOSS LRGs reached.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.00963 [pdf] - 1449756
The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey:
Final Data from SDSS-III
Alam, Shadab;
Albareti, Franco D.;
Prieto, Carlos Allende;
Anders, F.;
Anderson, Scott F.;
Andrews, Brett H.;
Armengaud, Eric;
Aubourg, Éric;
Bailey, Stephen;
Bautista, Julian E.;
Beaton, Rachael L.;
Beers, Timothy C.;
Bender, Chad F.;
Berlind, Andreas A.;
Beutler, Florian;
Bhardwaj, Vaishali;
Bird, Jonathan C.;
Bizyaev, Dmitry;
Blake, Cullen H.;
Blanton, Michael R.;
Blomqvist, Michael;
Bochanski, John J.;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Bovy, Jo;
Bradley, A. Shelden;
Brandt, W. N.;
Brauer, D. E.;
Brinkmann, J.;
Brown, Peter J.;
Brownstein, Joel R.;
Burden, Angela;
Burtin, Etienne;
Busca, Nicolás G.;
Cai, Zheng;
Capozzi, Diego;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Carrera, Ricardo;
Chen, Yen-Chi;
Chiappini, Cristina;
Chojnowski, S. Drew;
Chuang, Chia-Hsun;
Clerc, Nicolas;
Comparat, Johan;
Covey, Kevin;
Croft, Rupert A. C.;
Cuesta, Antonio J.;
Cunha, Katia;
da Costa, Luiz N.;
Da Rio, Nicola;
Davenport, James R. A.;
Dawson, Kyle S.;
De Lee, Nathan;
Delubac, Timothée;
Deshpande, Rohit;
Dutra-Ferreira, Letícia;
Dwelly, Tom;
Ealet, Anne;
Ebelke, Garrett L.;
Edmondson, Edward M.;
Eisenstein, Daniel J.;
Escoffier, Stephanie;
Esposito, Massimiliano;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Fernández-Alvar, Emma;
Feuillet, Diane;
Ak, Nurten Filiz;
Finley, Hayley;
Finoguenov, Alexis;
Flaherty, Kevin;
Fleming, Scott W.;
Font-Ribera, Andreu;
Foster, Jonathan;
Frinchaboy, Peter M.;
Galbraith-Frew, J. G.;
García-Hernández, D. A.;
Pérez, Ana E. García;
Gaulme, Patrick;
Ge, Jian;
Génova-Santos, R.;
Ghezzi, Luan;
Gillespie, Bruce A.;
Girardi, Léo;
Goddard, Daniel;
Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A;
Hernández, Jonay I. González;
Grebel, Eva K.;
Grieb, Jan Niklas;
Grieves, Nolan;
Gunn, James E.;
Guo, Hong;
Harding, Paul;
Hasselquist, Sten;
Hawley, Suzanne L.;
Hayden, Michael;
Hearty, Fred R.;
Ho, Shirley;
Hogg, David W.;
Holley-Bockelmann, Kelly;
Holtzman, Jon A.;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Huehnerhoff, Joseph;
Jiang, Linhua;
Johnson, Jennifer A.;
Kinemuchi, Karen;
Kirkby, David;
Kitaura, Francisco;
Klaene, Mark A.;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Koenig, Xavier P.;
Lam, Charles R.;
Lan, Ting-Wen;
Lang, Dustin;
Laurent, Pierre;
Goff, Jean-Marc Le;
Leauthaud, Alexie;
Lee, Khee-Gan;
Lee, Young Sun;
Licquia, Timothy C.;
Liu, Jian;
Long, Daniel C.;
López-Corredoira, Martín;
Lorenzo-Oliveira, Diego;
Lucatello, Sara;
Lundgren, Britt;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Mack, Claude E.;
Mahadevan, Suvrath;
Maia, Marcio A. G.;
Majewski, Steven R.;
Malanushenko, Elena;
Malanushenko, Viktor;
Manchado, A.;
Manera, Marc;
Mao, Qingqing;
Maraston, Claudia;
Marchwinski, Robert C.;
Margala, Daniel;
Martell, Sarah L.;
Martig, Marie;
Masters, Karen L.;
McBride, Cameron K.;
McGehee, Peregrine M.;
McGreer, Ian D.;
McMahon, Richard G.;
Ménard, Brice;
Menzel, Marie-Luise;
Merloni, Andrea;
Mészáros, Szabolcs;
Miller, Adam A.;
Miralda-Escudé, Jordi;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Montero-Dorta, Antonio D.;
More, Surhud;
Morice-Atkinson, Xan;
Morrison, Heather L.;
Muna, Demitri;
Myers, Adam D.;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Neyrinck, Mark;
Nguyen, Duy Cuong;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Nidever, David L.;
Noterdaeme, Pasquier;
Nuza, Sebastián E.;
O'Connell, Julia E.;
O'Connell, Robert W.;
O'Connell, Ross;
Ogando, Ricardo L. C.;
Olmstead, Matthew D.;
Oravetz, Audrey E.;
Oravetz, Daniel J.;
Osumi, Keisuke;
Owen, Russell;
Padgett, Deborah L.;
Padmanabhan, Nikhil;
Paegert, Martin;
Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie;
Pan, Kaike;
Parejko, John K.;
Park, Changbom;
Pâris, Isabelle;
Pattarakijwanich, Petchara;
Pellejero-Ibanez, M.;
Pepper, Joshua;
Percival, Will J.;
Pérez-Fournon, Ismael;
Pérez-Ràfols, Ignasi;
Petitjean, Patrick;
Pieri, Matthew M.;
Pinsonneault, Marc H.;
de Mello, Gustavo F. Porto;
Prada, Francisco;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Price-Whelan, Adrian M.;
Raddick, M. Jordan;
Rahman, Mubdi;
Reid, Beth A.;
Rich, James;
Rix, Hans-Walter;
Robin, Annie C.;
Rockosi, Constance M.;
Rodrigues, Thaíse S.;
Rodríguez-Rottes, Sergio;
Roe, Natalie A.;
Ross, Ashley J.;
Ross, Nicholas P.;
Rossi, Graziano;
Ruan, John J.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rykoff, Eli S.;
Salazar-Albornoz, Salvador;
Salvato, Mara;
Samushia, Lado;
Sánchez, Ariel G.;
Santiago, Basílio;
Sayres, Conor;
Schiavon, Ricardo P.;
Schlegel, David J.;
Schmidt, Sarah J.;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Schultheis, Mathias;
Schwope, Axel D.;
Scóccola, C. G.;
Sellgren, Kris;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Shane, Neville;
Shen, Yue;
Shetrone, Matthew;
Shu, Yiping;
Sivarani, Thirupathi;
Skrutskie, M. F.;
Slosar, Anže;
Smith, Verne V.;
Sobreira, Flávia;
Stassun, Keivan G.;
Steinmetz, Matthias;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Streblyanska, Alina;
Swanson, Molly E. C.;
Tan, Jonathan C.;
Tayar, Jamie;
Terrien, Ryan C.;
Thakar, Aniruddha R.;
Thomas, Daniel;
Thompson, Benjamin A.;
Tinker, Jeremy L.;
Tojeiro, Rita;
Troup, Nicholas W.;
Vargas-Magaña, Mariana;
Vazquez, Jose A.;
Verde, Licia;
Viel, Matteo;
Vogt, Nicole P.;
Wake, David A.;
Wang, Ji;
Weaver, Benjamin A.;
Weinberg, David H.;
Weiner, Benjamin J.;
White, Martin;
Wilson, John C.;
Wisniewski, John P.;
Wood-Vasey, W. M.;
Yèche, Christophe;
York, Donald G.;
Zakamska, Nadia L.;
Zamora, O.;
Zasowski, Gail;
Zehavi, Idit;
Zhao, Gong-Bo;
Zheng, Zheng;
Zhou, Xu;
Zhou, Zhimin;
Zhu, Guangtun;
Zou, Hu
Submitted: 2015-01-05, last modified: 2015-05-21
The third generation of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III) took data
from 2008 to 2014 using the original SDSS wide-field imager, the original and
an upgraded multi-object fiber-fed optical spectrograph, a new near-infrared
high-resolution spectrograph, and a novel optical interferometer. All the data
from SDSS-III are now made public. In particular, this paper describes Data
Release 11 (DR11) including all data acquired through 2013 July, and Data
Release 12 (DR12) adding data acquired through 2014 July (including all data
included in previous data releases), marking the end of SDSS-III observing.
Relative to our previous public release (DR10), DR12 adds one million new
spectra of galaxies and quasars from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic
Survey (BOSS) over an additional 3000 sq. deg of sky, more than triples the
number of H-band spectra of stars as part of the Apache Point Observatory (APO)
Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE), and includes repeated accurate radial
velocity measurements of 5500 stars from the Multi-Object APO Radial Velocity
Exoplanet Large-area Survey (MARVELS). The APOGEE outputs now include measured
abundances of 15 different elements for each star. In total, SDSS-III added
2350 sq. deg of ugriz imaging; 155,520 spectra of 138,099 stars as part of the
Sloan Exploration of Galactic Understanding and Evolution 2 (SEGUE-2) survey;
2,497,484 BOSS spectra of 1,372,737 galaxies, 294,512 quasars, and 247,216
stars over 9376 sq. deg; 618,080 APOGEE spectra of 156,593 stars; and 197,040
MARVELS spectra of 5,513 stars. Since its first light in 1998, SDSS has imaged
over 1/3 of the Celestial sphere in five bands and obtained over five million
astronomical spectra.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.06328 [pdf] - 984482
Luminous Red Galaxies: Selection and classification by combining optical
and infrared photometry
Submitted: 2015-04-23
We describe a new method of combining optical and infrared photometry to
select Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) at redshifts $z > 0.6$. We explore this
technique using a combination of optical photometry from CFHTLS and HST,
infrared photometry from the WISE satellite, and spectroscopic or photometric
redshifts from the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey or COSMOS. We present a variety
of methods for testing the success of our selection, and present methods for
optimization given a set of rest-frame color and redshift requirements. We have
tested this selection in two different regions of the sky, the COSMOS and
Extended Groth Strip (EGS) fields, to reduce the effect of cosmic/sample
variance. We have used these methods to assemble large samples of LRGs for two
different ancillary programs as a part of the SDSS-III/ BOSS spectroscopic
survey. This technique is now being used to select $\sim$600,000 LRG targets
for SDSS-IV/eBOSS, which began observations in Fall 2014, and will be adapted
for the proposed DESI survey. We have found these methods can select
high-redshift LRGs efficiently with minimal stellar contamination; this is
extremely difficult to achieve with selections that rely on optical photometry
alone.