Normalized to: Lemos, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.3360 [pdf] - 718933
Luminosity function of GRBs
Submitted: 2013-09-12
The luminosity function (LF) statistics applied to the BATSE GRBs (sources of
GUSBAD catalog) is the theme approached in this work. The LF is a strong
statistical tool to extract useful information from astrophysical samples,
where the key point of this statistical analysis is in the detector
sensitivity, where we have performed careful analysis. We applied the tool of
the LF statistics to three GRB classes predicted by the Fireshell model. One of
the main differences between the Fireshell and Fireball models is the
explanation of the GRB prompt emission, where the first claims that it is
divided in two physical processes: 1) transparency of a optically thick
Freshell producing the P-GRB emission and 2) interaction of a relativistic
shell (composed by baryons electron-positron-photon) against the CBM
(circumburst medium), producing the emission so-called extended afterglow peak
(EAP). However, the Fireball model, the most quoted one, claims that the prompt
emission is caused by interactions among several relativistic shells (composed
by electron-positron-photon) with different Lorentz factors, a process called
internal shocks. The transparency produces a strong short emission in the
beginning, called P-GRB. Thus, to the Fireshell model, the prompt emission is
P-GRB plus EAP. We produced, by LF statistics, predicted distributions of: peak
flux, redshift and peak luminosity for the three GRB classes predicted by
Fireshell model, we also used three GRB rates. We looked for differences among
the distributions, and in fact we found. We performed a comparison between the
distributions predicted and observed (with and without redshifts), where we had
to build a list with 220 GRBs with known redshifts. We also estimated the
effects of the Malmquist bias in all samples, and we looked for a correlation
between the isotropic luminosity and the Band peak spectral energy.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.5517 [pdf] - 26881
The Blackholic energy and the canonical Gamma-Ray Burst IV: the "long",
"genuine short" and "fake - disguised short" GRBs
Ruffini, Remo;
Aksenov, Alexey G.;
Bernardini, Maria Grazia;
Bianco, Carlo Luciano;
Caito, Letizia;
Chardonnet, Pascal;
Dainotti, Maria Giovanna;
De Barros, Gustavo;
Guida, Roberto;
Izzo, Luca;
Patricelli, Barbara;
Lemos, Luis Juracy Rangel;
Rotondo, Michael;
Hernandez, Jorge Armando Rueda;
Vereshchagin, Gregory;
Xue, She-Sheng
Submitted: 2009-07-31
(Shortened) [...] After recalling the basic features of the "fireshell
model", we emphasize the following novel results: 1) the interpretation of the
X-ray flares in GRB afterglows as due to the interaction of the optically thin
fireshell with isolated clouds in the CircumBurst Medium (CBM); 2) an
interpretation as "fake - disguised" short GRBs of the GRBs belonging to the
class identified by Norris & Bonnell [...] consistent with an origin from the
final coalescence of a binary system in the halo of their host galaxies with
particularly low CBM density [...]; 3) the first attempt to study a genuine
short GRB with the analysis of GRB 050509B, that reveals indeed still an open
question; 4) the interpretation of the GRB-SN association in the case of GRB
060218 via the "induced gravitational collapse" process; 5) a first attempt to
understand the nature of the "Amati relation", a phenomenological correlation
between the isotropic-equivalent radiated energy of the prompt emission E_{iso}
with the cosmological rest-frame \nu F_{\nu} spectrum peak energy E_{p,i}. In
addition, recent progress on the thermalization of the electron-positron plasma
close to their formation phase, as well as the structure of the electrodynamics
of Kerr-Newman Black Holes are presented. An outlook for possible explanation
of high-energy phenomena in GRBs to be expected from the AGILE and the Fermi
satellites are discussed. As an example of high energy process, the work by
Enrico Fermi dealing with ultrarelativistic collisions is examined. It is clear
that all the GRB physics points to the existence of overcritical
electrodynamical fields. In this sense we present some progresses on a unified
approach to heavy nuclei and neutron stars cores, which leads to the existence
of overcritical fields under the neutron star crust.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.3336 [pdf] - 12842
Spatial and observational homogeneities of the galaxy distribution in
standard cosmologies
Submitted: 2008-05-21, last modified: 2008-06-26
This work discusses the possible empirical verification of the geometrical
concept of homogeneity of the standard relativistic cosmology considering its
various definitions of distance. We study the physical consequences of the
distinction between the usual concept of spatial homogeneity (SH), as defined
by the Cosmological Principle, and the concept of observational homogeneity
(OH), arguing that OH is in principle falsifiable by means of astronomical
observations, whereas verifying SH is only possible indirectly. Simulated
counts of cosmological sources are produced by means of a generalized
number-distance expression that can be specialized to produce either the counts
of the Einstein-de Sitter (EdS) cosmology, which has SH by construction, or
other types of counts, which do, or do not, have OH by construction.
Expressions for observational volumes and differential densities are derived
with the various cosmological distance definitions in the EdS model. Simulated
counts that have OH by construction do not always exhibit SH features. The
reverse situation is also true. Besides, simulated counts with no OH features
at low redshift start showing OH characteristics at high redshift. The comoving
distance seems to be the only distance definition where both SH and OH appear
simultaneously. The results show that observations indicating possible lack of
OH do not necessarily falsify the standard Friedmannian cosmology, meaning that
this cosmology will not necessarily always produce observable homogeneous
densities. The general conclusion is that the use of different cosmological
distances in the characterization of the galaxy distribution lead to
significant ambiguities in reaching conclusions about the behavior of the
large-scale galaxy distribution in the Universe.