Normalized to: Leiderschneider, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.06764 [pdf] - 1366256
On the maximal efficiency of the collisional Penrose process
Submitted: 2015-10-22, last modified: 2016-01-28
The center of mass (CM) energy in a collisional Penrose process - a collision
taking place within the ergosphere of a Kerr black hole - can diverge under
suitable extreme conditions (maximal Kerr, near horizon collision and suitable
impact parameters). We present an analytic expression for the CM energy,
refining expressions given in the literature. Even though the CM energy
diverges, we show that the maximal energy attained by a particle that escapes
the black hole's gravitational pull and reaches infinity is modest. We obtain
an analytic expression for the energy of an escaping particle resulting from a
collisional Penrose process, and apply it to derive the maximal energy and the
maximal efficiency for several physical scenarios: pair annihilation, Compton
scattering, and the elastic scattering of two massive particles. In all
physically reasonable cases (in which the incident particles initially fall
from infinity towards the black hole) the maximal energy (and the corresponding
efficiency) are only one order of magnitude larger than the rest mass energy of
the incident particles. The maximal efficiency found is ~ 13.92 and it is
obtained for the scattering of an outgoing massless particle by a massive
particle.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.01984 [pdf] - 919970
Super-Penrose collisions are inefficient - a Comment on: Black hole
fireworks: ultra-high-energy debris from super-Penrose collisions
Submitted: 2015-01-08
In a paper posted on the arXiv a few weeks ago Berti, Brito and Cardoso
\cite{Berti+14} suggest that ultra-high-energy particles can emerge from
collisions in a black hole's ergosphere. This can happen if the process
involves a particle on an outgoing trajectory very close to the black hole.
Clearly such a particle cannot emerge from the black hole. It is argued
\cite{Berti+14} that this particle can arise in another collision. Thus the
process involves two collisions: one in which an outgoing particle is produced
extremely close to the horizon, and a second one in which energy is gained. The
real efficiency of this process should take into account, therefore, the energy
needed to produce the first particle. We show here that while this process is
kinematically possible, it requires a deposition of energy that is divergently
large compared with the energy of the escaping particle. Thus, in contradiction
to claims of infinitely high efficiencies, the efficiency of the combined
process is in fact extremely small, approaching zero for very high output
energies. Even under more general conditions than those considered in
\cite{Berti+14} the total energy gain never diverges, and is larger only by a
factor of a few than the energy gain of the original collisional Penrose
process that takes place between two infalling particles
\cite{Piran+75,PiranShaham77,Bejger+12}