In 1981, a faint radio source (G') was detected near the center of the lensing galaxy of the famous "twin quasar" Q0957+561. It is still unknown whether this central radio source is a third quasar image or an active nucleus of the lensing galaxy, or a combination of both. In an attempt to resolve this ambiguity, we observed Q0957+561 at radio wavelengths of 13cm, 18cm, and 21cm, using the Very Long Baseline Array in combination with the phased Very Large Array and the Green Bank Telescope. We measured the spectrum of G' for the first time and found it to be significantly different from the spectra of the two bright quasar images. This finding suggests that the central component is primarily or entirely emission from the foreground lens galaxy, but the spectrum is also consistent with the hypothesis of a central quasar image suffering free-free absorption. In addition, we confirm the previously-reported VLBI position of G' just north of the optical center of the lens galaxy. The position slightly favors the hypothesis that G' originates in the lens, but is not conclusive. We discuss the prospects for further clarification of this issue.

The gravitational lens 0957+561 was monitored with the Very Large Array from 1979 to 1997. The 6 cm light curve data from 1995-1997 and the 4 cm data from 1990-1997 are reported here. At 4 cm, the intrinsic source variations occur earlier and are twice as large as the corresponding variations at 6 cm. The VLBI core and jet components have different magnification factors, leading to different flux ratios for the varying and non-varying portions of the VLA light curves. Using both the PRHQ and Dispersion statistical techniques, we determined the time delay, core flux ratio, and excess non-varying B image flux density. The fits were performed for the 4 cm and 6 cm light curves, both individually and jointly, and we used Gaussian Monte Carlo data to estimate 68% statistical confidence levels. The delay estimates from each individual wavelength were inconsistent given the formal uncertainties, suggesting that there are unmodeled systematic errors in the analysis. We roughly estimate the systematic uncertainty in the joint result from the difference between the 6 cm and 4 cm results, giving 409+-30 days for the PRHQ statistic and 397+-20 days for the Dispersion statistic. These results are consistent with the current optical time delay of 417+-3 days, reconciling the long-standing difference between the optical and radio light curves and between different statistical analyses. The unmodeled systematic effects may also corrupt light curves for other lenses, and we caution that multiple events at multiple wavelengths may be necessary to determine an accurate delay in any lens system. Now that consensus has been reached regarding the time delay in the 0957+561 system, the most pressing issue remaining for determining H_0 is a full understanding of the mass distribution in the lens.

We report the discovery of a binary quasar, MGC2214+3550 A,B, whose components have similar optical spectra at a redshift z=0.88. The quasars are separated on the sky by 3.0", and have a magnitude difference of Delta(m_I)=0.5 mag. The VLA radio map at 3.6 cm shows a single 47mJy radio source with a core-jet morphology that is coincident with the brighter optical quasar A. Gravitational lensing is ruled out by the lack of radio emission from quasar B, and the lack of any visible galaxies to act as the lens. We conclude that MGC 2214+3550 A and B are physically associated. With a projected separation of 12.7h^{-1} kpc (Omega_0=1), MGC 2214+3550 A,B is one of the smallest z>0.5 binary quasars.

We report on 15 years of VLA monitoring of the gravitational lens B0957+561 at 6 cm. Since our last report in 1992, there have been 32 additional observations, in which both images have returned to their quiescent flux density levels and the A image has brightened again. We estimate the time delay from the light curves using three different techniques: the chi-squared analysis of Press, Rybicki, & Hewitt (1992a,b), the dispersion analysis of Pelt et al. (1994, 1996), and the locally normalized discrete correlation function of Leh\'ar et al. (1992). Confidence intervals for these time delay estimates are found using Monte Carlo techniques. With the addition of the new observations, it has become obvious that five observations from Spring 1990 are not consistent with the statistical properties of the rest of the light curves, so we analyze the light curves with those points removed, as well as the complete light curves. The three statistical techniques applied to the two versions of the data set result in time delay values in the range 398 to 461 days (or 1.09 to 1.26 years, A leading B), each with ~5% formal uncertainty. The corresponding flux ratios (B/A) are in the range 0.698 to 0.704. Thus, the new features in the light curve show that the time delay is less than 500 days, in contrast with analysis of earlier versions of the radio light curves. The large range in the time delay estimates is primarily due to unfortunate coincidences of observing gaps with flux variations.