Normalized to: Legeza, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.00576 [pdf] - 1582310
Studying the photometric and spectroscopic variability of the magnetic
hot supergiant $\zeta$ Orionis Aa
Buysschaert, B.;
Neiner, C.;
Richardson, N. D.;
Ramiaramanantsoa, T.;
David-Uraz, A.;
Pablo, H.;
Oksala, M. E.;
Moffat, A. F. J.;
Mennickent, R. E.;
Legeza, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Kuschnig, R.;
Whittaker, G. N.;
Popowicz, A.;
Handler, G.;
Wade, G. A.;
Weiss, W. W.
Submitted: 2017-04-03
Massive stars play a significant role in the chemical and dynamical evolution
of galaxies. However, much of their variability, particularly during their
evolved supergiant stage, is poorly understood. To understand the variability
of evolved massive stars in more detail, we present a study of the O9.2Ib
supergiant $\zeta$ Ori Aa, the only currently confirmed supergiant to host a
magnetic field. We have obtained two-color space-based BRIght Target Explorer
photometry (BRITE) for $\zeta$ Ori Aa during two observing campaigns, as well
as simultaneous ground-based, high-resolution optical CHIRON spectroscopy. We
perform a detailed frequency analysis to detect and characterize the star's
periodic variability. We detect two significant, independent frequencies, their
higher harmonics, and combination frequencies: the stellar rotation period
$P_{\mathrm{rot}} = 6.82\pm0.18$ d, most likely related to the presence of the
stable magnetic poles, and a variation with a period of $10.0\pm0.3$ d
attributed to circumstellar environment, also detected in the H$\alpha$ and
several He I lines, yet absent in the purely photospheric lines. We confirm the
variability with $P_{\mathrm{rot}}$/4, likely caused by surface
inhomogeneities, being the possible photospheric drivers of the discrete
absorption components. No stellar pulsations were detected in the data. The
level of circumstellar activity clearly differs between the two BRITE observing
campaigns. We demonstrate that $\zeta$ Ori Aa is a highly variable star with
both periodic and non-periodic variations, as well as episodic events. The
rotation period we determined agrees well with the spectropolarimetric value
from the literature. The changing activity level observed with BRITE could
explain why the rotational modulation of the magnetic measurements was not
clearly detected at all epochs.