In this paper, the theoretical terms of contemporary cosmology are examined as intellectual artefacts. An ontology and methodology are introduced for this purpose, which includes defining the concept of a hypothetical object. Introducing a hypothetical object is contrasted with the modification of physical laws as alternative ways of explaining the discrepancy between observations and theoretical predictions. Historical examples of theory choice, which involved these alternatives, are discussed. This is followed by a study of theory choice in contemporary cosmology. In particular, the focus is on the case of dark matter and modified gravity as alternative explanations for observed mass discrepancies in galaxies and galaxy clusters. These alternatives are analyzed, and their similarities and differences to the historical examples are pointed out.