Calibration of the period-luminosity relation (PLR) for Cepheids has always been one of the biggest goals of stellar astronomy. Among a considerable number of different approaches, the Baade-Becker-Wesselink (BBW) method stands in the foreground as one of the most universal and precise methods. We present a new realization of the BBW method which is considered to be the generalization of surface brightness (\citealt{Barnes+Evans+1976}) and \cite{Balona+1977} approaches first proposed by \cite{Rastorguev+Dambis+2010} and described in \cite{Paper1}. One of the main features of this method is using measured effective temperature variations to determine the main parameters of Cepheid, such as distance, radius, luminosity, colour excess, intrinsic colour. We apply this method to 45 Cepheids of Northern sky, for which multiphase temperature data are available. We take into account the effect of shock waves, whose presence in stellar atmosphere distorts the observational data and the calibrations used in this work. Within $0.0-0.87$ phase interval we derived PL relation $<M_V>_I=-(2.67 \pm 0.17)\cdot logP - (1.58 \pm 0.16)$. It was used to calculate the distances, rotation curve and kinematical parameters of the sample of 435 Cepheids with GAIA DR2 proper motions.

A new version of the Baade--Becker--Wesselink (hereafter BBW) method is proposed, based on direct spectroscopic measurements of effective temperatures of 45 northern Cepheids, made in different pulsating phases. By comparing the temperature estimates obtained from the calibration of effective temperature by normal color with real temperature measurements we were able not only to determine the color excess with an accuracy of 0.01 mag, but also to derive new color calibration of the effective temperature immediately for all available measurements with taking into account the differences in [Fe/H] and log g values: log Teff = 3.88 - 0.20 (B-V)o + 0.026 (B-V)o^2 + 0.009 log g - 0.010 (B-V)o log g - 0.051 [Fe/H] + 0.051 (B-V)o [Fe/H], which is accurate to about 1.1%. We also showed the complete identity of the two main versions of the BBW technique: surface brightness method proposed by Barnes and Evans (1976) and maximum likelyhood method of Balona (1977), refined later by Rastorguev and Dambis (2010).