Normalized to: Lavagna, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.04197 [pdf] - 2012020
A parallel-GPU code for asteroid aggregation problems with angular
particles
Submitted: 2019-12-09
The paper presents a numerical implementation of the gravitational N-body
problem with contact interactions between non-spherically shaped bodies. The
work builds up on a previous implementation of the code and extends its
capabilities. The number of bodies handled is significantly increased through
the use of a CUDA/GPU-parallel octree structure. The implementation of the code
is discussed and its performance are compared against direct N$^2$ integration.
The code features both smooth (force-based) and non-smooth (impulse-based)
methods, as well as a visco-elastic non-smooth method, to handle contact
interaction between bodies. The numerical problem of simulating "rubble-pile"
asteroid gravitational aggregation processes is addressed. We discuss the
features of the problem and derive criteria to set up the numerical simulation
from the dynamical constraints of the combined gravitational-collisional
problem. Examples of asteroid aggregation scenarios that could benefit from
such implementation are finally presented.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.02432 [pdf] - 1795973
HERMES: An ultra-wide band X and gamma-ray transient monitor on board a
nano-satellite constellation
Fuschino, F.;
Campana, R.;
Labanti, C.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Feroci, M.;
Burderi, L.;
Fiore, F.;
Ambrosino, F.;
Baldazzi, G.;
Bellutti, P.;
Bertacin, R.;
Bertuccio, G.;
Borghi, G.;
Cirrincione, D.;
Cauz, D.;
Di Salvo, T.;
Ficorella, F.;
Fiorini, M.;
Gambino, A.;
Gandola, M.;
Grassi, M.;
Guzman, A.;
Iaria, R.;
La Rosa, G.;
Lavagna, M.;
Lunghi, P.;
Malcovati, P.;
Maselli, A.;
Menna, M. T.;
Morgante, G.;
Negri, B.;
Papitto, A.;
Pauletta, G.;
Piazzolla, R.;
Picciotto, A.;
Pirrotta, S.;
Pliego-Caballero, S.;
Puccetti, S.;
Rachevski, A.;
Rashevskaya, I.;
Riggio, A.;
Rignanese, L.;
Salatti, M.;
Sanna, A.;
Santangelo, A.;
Silvestrini, S.;
Sottile, G.;
Tenzer, C.;
Vacchi, A.;
Zampa, G.;
Zampa, N.;
Zorzi, N.
Submitted: 2018-12-06, last modified: 2018-12-11
The High Energy Modular Ensemble of Satellites (HERMES) project is aimed to
realize a modular X/gamma-ray monitor for transient events, to be placed
on-board of a CubeSat bus. This expandable platform will achieve a significant
impact on Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) science and on the detection of Gravitational
Wave (GW) electromagnetic counterparts: the recent LIGO/VIRGO discoveries
demonstrated that the high-energy transient sky is still a field of extreme
interest. The very complex temporal variability of GRBs (up to the millisecond
scale) combined with the spatial and temporal coincidence between GWs and their
electromagnetic counterparts suggest that upcoming instruments require sub-ms
time resolution combined with a transient localization accuracy lower than a
degree. The current phase of the ongoing HERMES project is focused on the
realization of a technological pathfinder with a small network (3 units) of
nano-satellites to be launched in mid 2020. We will show the potential and
prospects for short and medium-term development of the project, demonstrating
the disrupting possibilities for scientific investigations provided by the
innovative concept of a new "modular astronomy" with nano-satellites (e.g. low
developing costs, very short realization time). Finally, we will illustrate the
characteristics of the HERMES Technological Pathfinder project, demonstrating
how the scientific goals discussed are actually already reachable with the
first nano-satellites of this constellation. The detector architecture will be
described in detail, showing that the new generation of scintillators (e.g.
GAGG:Ce) coupled with very performing Silicon Drift Detectors (SDD) and low
noise Front-End-Electronics (FEE) are able to extend down to few keV the
sensitivity band of the detector. The technical solutions for FEE,
Back-End-Electronics (BEE) and Data Handling will be also described.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.04638 [pdf] - 1697940
The THESEUS space mission concept: science case, design and expected
performances
Amati, L.;
O'Brien, P.;
Goetz, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Tenzer, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Labanti, C.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Stratta, G.;
Tanvir, N.;
Willingale, R.;
Attina, P.;
Campana, R.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Contini, C.;
Fuschino, F.;
Gomboc, A.;
Hudec, R.;
Orleanski, P.;
Renotte, E.;
Rodic, T.;
Bagoly, Z.;
Blain, A.;
Callanan, P.;
Covino, S.;
Ferrara, A.;
Floch, E. Le;
Marisaldi, M.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Rosati, P.;
Vacchi, A.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Giommi, P.;
Gomboc, A.;
Piranomonte, S.;
Piro, L.;
Reglero, V.;
Rossi, A.;
Santangelo, A.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Vergani, S.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Briggs, M.;
Campolongo, E.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Connaughton, V.;
Cordier, B.;
Morelli, B.;
Orlandini, M.;
Adami, C.;
Argan, A.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balazs, L.;
Baldazzi, G.;
Basa, S.;
Basak, R.;
Bellutti, P.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Bertuccio, G.;
Braga, J.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brandt, S.;
Brocato, E.;
Budtz-Jorgensen, C.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Burderi, L.;
Camp, J.;
Capozziello, S.;
Caruana, J.;
Casella, P.;
Cenko, B.;
Chardonnet, P.;
Ciardi, B.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Dainotti, M. G.;
D'Elia, V.;
De Martino, D.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Della Valle, M.;
Drago, A.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Feroci, M.;
Finelli, F.;
Fiorini, M.;
Fynbo, J.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Gendre, B.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Grado, A.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Hafizi, M.;
Hanlon, L.;
Hjorth, J.;
Izzo, L.;
Kiss, L.;
Kumar, P.;
Kuvvetli, I.;
Lavagna, M.;
Li, T.;
Longo, F.;
Lyutikov, M.;
Maio, U.;
Maiorano, E.;
Malcovati, P.;
Malesani, D.;
Margutti, R.;
Martin-Carrillo, A.;
Masetti, N.;
McBreen, S.;
Mignani, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mundell, C.;
Nargaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Nicastro, L.;
Palazzi, E.;
Paltani, S.;
Panessa, F.;
Pareschi, G.;
Pe'er, A.;
Penacchioni, A. V.;
Pian, E.;
Piedipalumbo, E.;
Piran, T.;
Rauw, G.;
Razzano, M.;
Read, A.;
Rezzolla, L.;
Romano, P.;
Ruffini, R.;
Savaglio, S.;
Sguera, V.;
Schady, P.;
Skidmore, W.;
Song, L.;
Stanway, E.;
Starling, R.;
Topinka, M.;
Troja, E.;
van Putten, M.;
Vanzella, E.;
Vercellone, S.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.;
Yonetoku, D.;
Zampa, G.;
Zampa, N.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, B. B.;
Zhang, S.;
Zhang, S. -N.;
Antonelli, A.;
Bianco, F.;
Boci, S.;
Boer, M.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Boulade, O.;
Butler, C.;
Campana, S.;
Capitanio, F.;
Celotti, A.;
Chen, Y.;
Colpi, M.;
Comastri, A.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Dadina, M.;
De Luca, A.;
Dong, Y. -W.;
Ettori, S.;
Gandhi, P.;
Geza, E.;
Greiner, J.;
Guiriec, S.;
Harms, J.;
Hernanz, M.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hutchinson, I.;
Israel, G.;
Jonker, P.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Kawai, N.;
Wiersema, K.;
Korpela, S.;
Lebrun, V.;
Lu, F.;
MacFadyen, A.;
Malaguti, G.;
Maraschi, L.;
Melandri, A.;
Modjaz, M.;
Morris, D.;
Omodei, N.;
Paizis, A.;
Pata, P.;
Petrosian, V.;
Rachevski, A.;
Rhoads, J.;
Ryde, F.;
Sabau-Graziati, L.;
Shigehiro, N.;
Sims, M.;
Soomin, J.;
Szecsi, D.;
Urata, Y.;
Uslenghi, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vianello, G.;
Vojtech, S.;
Watson, D.;
Zicha, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-12, last modified: 2018-03-27
THESEUS is a space mission concept aimed at exploiting Gamma-Ray Bursts for
investigating the early Universe and at providing a substantial advancement of
multi-messenger and time-domain astrophysics. These goals will be achieved
through a unique combination of instruments allowing GRB and X-ray transient
detection over a broad field of view (more than 1sr) with 0.5-1 arcmin
localization, an energy band extending from several MeV down to 0.3 keV and
high sensitivity to transient sources in the soft X-ray domain, as well as
on-board prompt (few minutes) follow-up with a 0.7 m class IR telescope with
both imaging and spectroscopic capabilities. THESEUS will be perfectly suited
for addressing the main open issues in cosmology such as, e.g., star formation
rate and metallicity evolution of the inter-stellar and intra-galactic medium
up to redshift $\sim$10, signatures of Pop III stars, sources and physics of
re-ionization, and the faint end of the galaxy luminosity function. In
addition, it will provide unprecedented capability to monitor the X-ray
variable sky, thus detecting, localizing, and identifying the electromagnetic
counterparts to sources of gravitational radiation, which may be routinely
detected in the late '20s / early '30s by next generation facilities like
aLIGO/ aVirgo, eLISA, KAGRA, and Einstein Telescope. THESEUS will also provide
powerful synergies with the next generation of multi-wavelength observatories
(e.g., LSST, ELT, SKA, CTA, ATHENA).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.00693 [pdf] - 1490079
Computation and validation of two-dimensional PSF simulation based on
physical optics
Submitted: 2016-10-03
The Point Spread Function (PSF) is a key figure of merit for specifying the
angular resolution of optical systems and, as the demand for higher and higher
angular resolution increases, the problem of surface finishing must be taken
seriously even in optical telescopes. From the optical design of the
instrument, reliable ray-tracing routines allow computing and display of the
PSF based on geometrical optics. However, such an approach does not directly
account for the scattering caused by surface microroughness, which is
interferential in nature. Although the scattering effect can be separately
modeled, its inclusion in the ray-tracing routine requires assumptions that are
difficult to verify. In that context, a purely physical optics approach is more
appropriate as it remains valid regardless of the shape and size of the defects
appearing on the optical surface. Such a computation, when performed in
two-dimensional consideration, is memory and time consuming because it requires
one to process a surface map with a few micron resolution, and the situation
becomes even more complicated in case of optical systems characterized by more
than one reflection. Fortunately, the computation is significantly simplified
in far-field configuration, since the computation involves only a sequence of
Fourier Transforms. In this paper, we provide validation of the PSF simulation
with Physical Optics approach through comparison with real PSF measurement data
in the case of ASTRI-SST M1 hexagonal segments. These results represent a first
foundation stone for future development in a more advanced computation taking
into account microroughness and multiple reflection in optical systems.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.00723 [pdf] - 1490921
Roughness tolerances for Cherenkov telescope mirrors
Submitted: 2016-10-03
The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) is a forthcoming international
ground-based observatory for very high-energy gamma rays. Its goal is to reach
sensitivity five to ten times better than existing Cherenkov telescopes such as
VERITAS, H.E.S.S. or MAGIC and extend the range of observation to energies down
to few tens of GeV and beyond 100 TeV. To achieve this goal, an array of about
100 telescopes is required, meaning a total reflective surface of several
thousands of square meters. Thence, the optimal technology used for CTA mirrors
manufacture should be both low-cost (~1000 euros/m2) and allow high optical
performances over the 300-550 nm wavelength range. More exactly, a reflectivity
higher than 85% and a PSF (Point Spread Function) diameter smaller than 1 mrad.
Surface roughness can significantly contribute to PSF broadening and limit
telescope performances. Fortunately, manufacturing techniques for mirrors are
now available to keep the optical scattering well below the
geometrically-predictable effect of figure errors. This paper determines first
order surface finish tolerances based on a surface microroughness
characterization campaign, using Phase Shift Interferometry. That allows us to
compute the roughness contribution to Cherenkov telescope PSF. This study is
performed for diverse mirror candidates (MAGIC-I and II, ASTRI, MST) varying in
manufacture technologies, selected coating materials and taking into account
the degradation over time due to environmental hazards.