Normalized to: Laros, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9912234 [pdf] - 109897
Gamma-Ray Burst Arrival-Time Localizations: Simultaneous Observations by
Ulysses, Pioneer Venus Orbiter, SIGMA, WATCH, and PHEBUS
Hurley, K.;
Laros, J.;
Brandt, S.;
Fenimore, E.;
Klebesadel, R.;
Terrell, J.;
Cline, T.;
Barat, C.;
Boer, M.;
Dezalay, J. -P.;
Lund, N.;
Claret, A.;
Paul, J.;
Castro-Tirado, A.
Submitted: 1999-12-10
Between the launch of the Ulysses spacecraft in 1990 October and the entry of
Pioneer Venus Orbiter (PVO) into the atmosphere of Venus in 1992 October,
concurrent coverage by Ulysses, PVO, the WATCH experiments aboard the Granat
and EURECA spacecraft, and the SIGMA and PHEBUS experiments aboard the Granat
spacecraft was obtained for numerous gamma-ray bursts. 15 of them were detected
by 3 or more instruments on spacecraft separated by distances of several AU,
and could therefore be accurately localized by triangulation. In some cases
independent, accurate locations were obtained by SIGMA and/or WATCH. We present
these localizations, which range in area from 0.9 to 530 arcminutes$^2$.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9903385 [pdf] - 105789
A ROSAT Deep Survey of Four Small Gamma-Ray Burst Error Boxes
Hurley, K.;
Li, P.;
Boer, M.;
Cline, T.;
Fishman, G. J.;
Meegan, C.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Greiner, J.;
Laros, J.;
Luginbuhl, C.;
Vrba, F.;
Murakami, T.;
Pedersen, H.;
van Paradijs, J.
Submitted: 1999-03-24
We have used the ROSAT High Resolution Imager to search for quiescent X-ray
counterparts to four gamma-ray bursts which were localized to small (< 10 sq.
arcmin.) error boxes with the Interplanetary Network. The observations took
place years after the bursts, and the effective exposure times for each target
varied from ~16 - 23 ks. We have not found any X-ray sources inside any of the
error boxes. The 0.1 - 2.4 keV 3 sigma flux upper limits range from around 5 x
10^-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 to 6 x 10^-13 erg cm^-2 s^-1 depending on the burst and
the assumed shape of the quiescent spectrum. We consider four types of X-ray
emitting galaxies (normal, AGN, faint, and star-forming) and use the flux upper
limits to constrain their redshifts. We then use the GRB fluences to constrain
the total energies of the bursts.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9811451 [pdf] - 104077
No Evidence for Gamma-Ray Burst/Abell Cluster or Gamma- Ray
Burst/Radio-Quiet Quasar Correlations
Submitted: 1998-11-28
We examine the recent claims that cosmic gamma-ray bursts are associated with
either radio-quiet quasars or Abell clusters. These associations were based on
positional coincidences between cataloged quasars or Abell clusters, and
selected events from the BATSE 3B catalog of gamma-ray bursts. We use a larger
sample of gamma-ray bursts with more accurate positions, obtained by the 3rd
Interplanetary Network, to re-evaluate these possible associations. We find no
evidence for either.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9704278 [pdf] - 97240
Gamma-Ray Burster Counterparts: HST Blue and Ultraviolet Data
Submitted: 1997-04-28
The surest solution of the Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) mystery is to find an
unambiguous low-energy quiescent counterpart. However, to date no reasonable
candidates have been identified in the x-ray, optical, infrared, or radio
ranges. The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has now allowed for the first deep
ultraviolet searches for quiescent counterparts. This paper reports on
multiepoch ultraviolet searches of five GRB positions with HST. We found no
sources with significant ultraviolet excesses, variability, parallax, or proper
motion in any of the burst error regions. In particular, we see no sources
similar to that proposed as a counterpart to the GRB970228. While this negative
result is disappointing, it still has good utility for its strict limits on the
no-host-galaxy problem in cosmological models of GRBs. For most cosmological
models (with peak luminosity 6X10^50 erg/s), the absolute B magnitude of any
possible host galaxy must be fainter than -15.5 to -17.4. These smallest boxes
for some of the brightest bursts provide the most critical test, and our limits
are a severe problem for all published cosmological burst models.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9702192 [pdf] - 96711
Are Abell Clusters Correlated with Gamma-Ray Bursts?
Submitted: 1997-02-21
A recent study has presented marginal statistical evidence that gamma-ray
burst sources are correlated with Abell clusters, based on analyses of bursts
in the BATSE 3B catalog. Using precise localization information from the 3rd
Interplanetary Network, we have reanalyzed this possible correlation. We find
that most of the Abell clusters which are in the relatively large 3B error
circles are not in the much smaller IPN/BATSE error regions. We believe that
this argues strongly against an Abell cluster-gamma-ray burst correlation.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9606092 [pdf] - 94852
Rapid follow-up ROSAT observation of GRB 940301
Submitted: 1996-06-14
The strong GRB of March 1, 1994 was imaged by COMPTEL and found to have an
identical location within the errors as a burst which occurred on July 4, 1993.
This location coincidence had prompted speculations on a possible single source
origin for both bursts. We have performed a ROSAT PSPC mosaic observation
within four weeks of GRB 940301. The results of these observations and the
comparison of the intensities of the detected sources with those detected
during the ROSAT all-sky-survey in September 1990 are presented. We neither
find a flaring X-ray source in the April 1994 observation nor any variability
of the X-ray sources detected in the all-sky-survey. We discuss the
consequences of our negative result on both, the possibility of the location
coincidence being due to a repeating burst source as well as due to two
independent sources. In the former case the source could either be a Soft Gamma
Repeater similar to SGR 1806-20 and SGR 0525-66, or a sofar unknown classical
burst repeater. We conclude that a quiescent luminous X-ray source as is found
for the above mentioned Soft Gamma Repeaters is very unlikely to be present in
the case of GRB 930704 / GRB 940301.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9509142 [pdf] - 93355
The 1979, March 5 Gamma-Ray Transient: Was it a Classic Gamma-Ray Burst?
Submitted: 1995-09-27
The March 5th, 1979 gamma-ray transient has long been thought to be
fundamentally different from the classic gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). It had
recurrences, pulsations, and a soft spectral component unlike classic GRBs.
With the exception of the soft component reported from the Konus experiment,
the unusual characteristics of March 5th were detectable main peak differs
markedly from the published Konus spectrum. Rather than being dominated by a
soft component similar to that observed in the soft gamma repeaters (SGRs), the
ICE-PVO spectrum appears to be consistent with a classic GRB spectrum,
especially above 100 keV. We believe that, given the ICE-PVO spectral
observations, the March 5th transient would have been classified as a classic
GRB when it was discovered.
The SGRs and GRBs could be consanguineous: high-velocity neutron stars
initially produce SGR events (and, occasionally a GRB like March 5th) and when
they are older and in the galactic corona, they go through a GRB phase. The
March 5th event demonstrates that high-velocity neutron stars at distances of
tens kpc are capable of producing events like classic GRBs.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9405031 [pdf] - 91467
The X-ray Spectrum of Soft Gamma Repeater 1806-20
Submitted: 1994-05-12
Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGRs) are a class of rare, high-energy galactic
transients that have episodes of short (~0.1 sec), soft (~30 keV), intense
(~100 Crab), gamma-ray bursts. We report an analysis of the x-ray emission from
95 SGR1806-20 events observed by the International Cometary Explorer. The
spectral shape remains remarkably constant for bursts that differ in intensity
by a range of 50. Below 15 keV the number spectrum falls off rapidly such that
we can estimate the total intensity of the events. Assuming that SGR1806-20 is
associated with the supernova remnant G10.0-0.3 (Kulkarni and Frail, Murakami
\etal), the brightest events had a total luminosity of ~1.8 x 10^42 erg sec^-1,
a factor of 2 x 10^4 above the Eddington limit. A third of the emission was
above 30 keV. There are at least three processes that are consistent with the
spectral rollover below 15 keV. (1)The rollover is consistent with some forms
of self absorption. Typical thermal temperatures are ~20 keV and require an
emitting surface with a radius between 10 and 50 km. The lack of spectral
variability implies that only the size of the emitting surface varies between
events. If the process is thermal synchrotron the required magnetic field might
be too small to confine the plasma against the super Eddington flux. (2)The low
energy rollover could be due to photoelectric absorption by ~10^24 Hydrogen
atoms cm^-2 of neutral material with a cosmic abundance assuming a continuum
similar to TB with T= ~22 keV. (3) Emission in the two lowest harmonics from a
1.3 x 10^12 Gauss field would appear as Doppler broadened lines and fall off
rapidly below 15 keV.