Normalized to: LaParola, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0909.2820 [pdf] - 901733
A strong excess in the 20-100 keV emission of NGC 1365
Risaliti, G.;
Braito, V.;
Laparola, V.;
Bianchi, S.;
Elvis, M.;
Fabbiano, G.;
Maiolino, R.;
Matt, G.;
Reeves, J.;
Salvati, M.;
Wang, J.
Submitted: 2009-09-15
We present a new Suzaku observation of the obscured AGN in NGC 1365,
revealing an unexpected excess of X-rays above 20 keV of at least a factor ~2
with respect to the extrapolation of the best-fitting 3-10 keV model.
Additional Swift-BAT and Integral-IBIS observations show that the 20-100 keV is
concentrated within ~1.5 arcmin from the center of the galaxy, and is not
significantly variable on time scales from days to years. A comparison of this
component with the 3-10 keV emission, which is characterized by a rapidly
variable absorption, suggests a complex structure of the circumnuclear medium,
consisting of at least two distinct components with rather different physical
properties, one of which covering >80% of the source with a column density
NH~3-4x10^24 cm^(-2). An alternative explanation is the presence of a double
active nucleus in the center of NGC 1365.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0708.2988 [pdf] - 4191
The in-flight spectroscopic performance of the Swift XRT CCD camera
during 2006-2007
Godet, O.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Page, K. L.;
Tyler, L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Evans, P.;
Starling, R.;
Wells, A. A.;
Angelini, L.;
Campana, S.;
Chincarini, G.;
Citterio, O.;
Cusumano, G.;
Giommi, P.;
Hill, J. E.;
Kennea, J.;
LaParola, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mineo, T.;
Moretti, A.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Pagani, C.;
Perri, M.;
Capalbi, M.;
Romano, P.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tamburelli, F.
Submitted: 2007-08-22
The Swift X-ray Telescope focal plane camera is a front-illuminated MOS CCD,
providing a spectral response kernel of 135 eV FWHM at 5.9 keV as measured
before launch. We describe the CCD calibration program based on celestial and
on-board calibration sources, relevant in-flight experiences, and developments
in the CCD response model. We illustrate how the revised response model
describes the calibration sources well. Comparison of observed spectra with
models folded through the instrument response produces negative residuals
around and below the Oxygen edge. We discuss several possible causes for such
residuals. Traps created by proton damage on the CCD increase the charge
transfer inefficiency (CTI) over time. We describe the evolution of the CTI
since the launch and its effect on the CCD spectral resolution and the gain.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701855 [pdf] - 260861
Swift Observations of GRB 051109B
Submitted: 2007-01-30
We present Swift observations of GRB 051109B, a soft long burst triggered by
the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT). The soft photon index of the prompt emission
suggest it is a X-ray Flash (XRF) or, at least, a X-ray Rich (XRR) burst. The
X-ray lightcurve displays the canonical shape of many other GRBs, a double b
roken power law with a small flare superimposed at ~T_0+1500 s, and its
extrapolation to early times smoothly joins with the BAT lightcurve. On the
basis of the derived optical to X-ray flux ratio, it cannot be classified as a
dark burst.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601125 [pdf] - 133739
The early X-ray emission from GRBs
O'Brien, P. T.;
Willingale, R.;
Osborne, J.;
Goad, M. R.;
Page, K. L.;
Vaughan, S.;
Rol, E.;
Beardmore, A.;
Godet, O.;
Hurkett, C.;
Wells, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Kobayashi, S.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Kennea, J. A.;
Falcone, A.;
Grupe, D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Cummings, J.;
Hill, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Chincarini, G.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Campana, S.;
Moretti, A.;
Giommi, P.;
Perri, M.;
Mangano, V.;
LaParola, V.
Submitted: 2006-01-06, last modified: 2006-06-30
We present observations of the early X-ray emission for a sample of 40
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) obtained using the Swift satellite for which the
narrow-field instruments were pointed at the burst within 10 minutes of the
trigger. Using data from the Burst Alert and X-Ray Telescopes, we show that the
X-ray light curve can be well described by an exponential that relaxes into a
power law, often with flares superimposed. The transition time between the
exponential and the power law provides a physically defined timescale for the
burst duration. In most bursts the power law breaks to a shallower decay within
the first hour, and a late emission "hump" is observed which can last for many
hours. In other GRBs the hump is weak or absent. The observed variety in the
shape of the early X-ray light curve can be explained as a combination of three
components: prompt emission from the central engine; afterglow; and the late
hump. In this scenario, afterglow emission begins during or soon after the
burst and the observed shape of the X-ray light curve depends on the relative
strengths of the emission due to the central engine and that of the afterglow.
There is a strong correlation such that those GRBs with stronger afterglow
components have brighter early optical emission. The late emission hump can
have a total fluence equivalent to that of the prompt phase. GRBs with the
strongest late humps have weak or no X-ray flares.