Normalized to: Laneuville, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.11035 [pdf] - 2030631
Estimating Planetary Mass with Deep Learning
Submitted: 2019-11-25
While thousands of exoplanets have been confirmed, the known properties about
individual discoveries remain sparse and depend on detection technique. To
utilize more than a small section of the exoplanet dataset, tools need to be
developed to estimate missing values based on the known measurements. Here, we
demonstrate the use of a neural network that models the density of planets in a
space of six properties that is then used to impute a probability distribution
for missing values. Our results focus on planetary mass which neither the
radial velocity nor transit techniques for planet identification can provide
alone. The neural network can impute mass across the four orders of magnitude
in the exoplanet archive, and return a distribution of masses for each planet
that can inform about trends in the underlying dataset. The average error on
this mass estimate from a radial velocity detection is a factor of 1.5 of the
observed value, and 2.7 for a transit observation. The mass of Proxima Centauri
b found by this method is $1.6^{\rm +0.46}_{\rm -0.36}$ M$_\oplus$, where the
upper and lower bounds are derived from the root mean square deviation from the
log mass probability distribution. The network can similarly impute the other
potentially missing properties, and we use this to predict planet radius for
radial velocity measurements, with an average error of a factor 1.4 of the
observed value. The ability of neural networks to search for patterns in
multidimensional data means that such techniques have the potential to greatly
expand the use of the exoplanet catalogue.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.03792 [pdf] - 1717184
Subduction and atmospheric escape of Earth's seawater constrained by
hydrogen isotopes
Submitted: 2018-06-10
The hydrogen isotopic (D/H) ratio reflects the global cycling and evolution
of water on Earth as it fractionates through planetary processes. We model the
water cycle taking seafloor hydrothermal alteration, chemical alteration of
continental crust, slab subduction, hydrogen escape from the early Earth, and
degassing at mid-ocean ridges, hot spots, and arcs into account. The
differences in D/H ratios between present-day oceans, oceanic and continental
crust, and mantle are thought to reflect isotopic fractionation through
seafloor alteration, chemical alteration, and slab dehydration. However, if the
speed of plate tectonics has been nearly constant through out Earth's history,
the degassing and regassing rates are too small to reach the present-day D/H
ratios. We show that (a) hydrogen escape from reduced early atmosphere, (b)
secular net regassing, or (c) faster plate tectonics on early Earth is needed
to reproduce the present-day D/H ratios of the water reservoirs. The low D/H
ratio of Archean seawater at 3.8 Ga has previously been interpreted as a
signature of (a) hydrogen escape, but we find it can also be explained either
by (b) secular net regassing or by (c) faster plate tectonics on early Earth.
The rates of hydrogen escape from early Earth and secular regassing on
present-day Earth are constrained to be lower than 2.1 x 10^11 kg/yr and 3.9 x
10^11 kg/yr. Consequently, the volume of water in the present-day mantle could
result entirely from the regassing through Earth's history. In that case, the
volume of initial oceans could be 2 to 3 times larger than that of current
Earth. We suggest that, in addition to the D/H ratio of Archean seawater,
identifying the D/H ratios of both seawater and mantle throughout Earth's
history would allow to distinguish these evolutionary scenarios.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01363 [pdf] - 1586760
The language of exoplanet ranking metrics needs to change
Tasker, Elizabeth;
Tan, Joshua;
Heng, Kevin;
Kane, Stephen;
Spiegel, David;
Brasser, Ramon;
Casey, Andrew;
Desch, Steven;
Dorn, Caroline;
Houser, Christine;
Hernlund, John;
Lasbleis, Marine;
Laneuville, Matthieu;
Libert, Anne-Sophie;
Noack, Lena;
Unterborn, Cayman;
Wicks, June
Submitted: 2017-08-03
We have found many Earth-sized worlds but we have no way of determining if
their surfaces are Earth-like. This makes it impossible to quantitatively
compare habitability, and pretending we can risks damaging the field.