Normalized to: Lam, T.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.12907 [pdf] - 1973647
GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers
Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abraham, S.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, G.;
Allocca, A.;
Aloy, M. A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Amato, A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Angelova, S. V.;
Antier, S.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arène, M.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aubin, F.;
Aufmuth, P.;
AultONeal, K.;
Austin, C.;
Avendano, V.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Badaracco, F.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Bae, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Banagiri, S.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barkett, K.;
Barnum, S.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Bawaj, M.;
Bayley, J. C.;
Bazzan, M.;
Bécsy, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Bell, A. S.;
Beniwal, D.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bernuzzi, S.;
Bero, J. J.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bidler, J.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Bilgili, S. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Biscoveanu, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bode, N.;
Boer, M.;
Boetzel, Y.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonilla, E.;
Bonnand, R.;
Booker, P.;
Boom, B. A.;
Booth, C. D.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bossie, K.;
Bossilkov, V.;
Bosveld, J.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Bramley, A.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Briggs, J. H.;
Brighenti, F.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brunett, S.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Rosell, M. J. Bustamante;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campbell, W. A.;
Canepa, M.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Carney, M. F.;
Carullo, G.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cerdá-Durán, P.;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chakravarti, K.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chase, E. A.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chatterjee, D.;
Chaturvedi, M.;
Chatziioannou, K.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Cheong, C. K.;
Chia, H. Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, G.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, K. W.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Ciobanu, A. A.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Cipriano, F.;
Cirone, A.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clearwater, P.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Cohen, D.;
Colgan, R.;
Colleoni, M.;
Collette, C. G.;
Collins, C.;
Cominsky, L. R.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corban, P.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cordero-Carrión, I.;
Corley, K. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Cotesta, R.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Croquette, M.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Dálya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Datrier, L. E. H.;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
DeBra, D.;
Deenadayalan, M.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
DeMarchi, L. M.;
Demos, N.;
Dent, T.;
De Pietri, R.;
Derby, J.;
De Rosa, R.;
De Rossi, C.;
DeSalvo, R.;
de Varona, O.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M. C.;
Dietrich, T.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Ding, B.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Renzo, F.;
Dmitriev, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducoin, J. -G.;
Dupej, P.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Easter, P. J.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenmann, M.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Estelles, H.;
Estevez, D.;
Etienne, Z. B.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fazio, M.;
Fee, C.;
Feicht, J.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feng, F.;
Fernandez-Galiana, A.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferreira, T. A.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fishbach, M.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Fishner, J. M.;
Fitz-Axen, M.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Flynn, E.;
Fong, H.;
Font, J. A.;
Forsyth, P. W. F.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H. A.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Ganija, M. R.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garcia, A.;
García-Quirós, C.;
Garufi, F.;
Gateley, B.;
Gaudio, S.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, D.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giacomazzo, B.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Giordano, G.;
Glover, L.;
Godwin, P.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Goncharov, B.;
González, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Grassia, P.;
Gray, C.;
Gray, R.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Green, R.;
Gretarsson, E. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Gruning, P.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Gulati, H. K.;
Guo, Y.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Haegel, L.;
Halim, O.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, E. Z.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hannuksela, O. A.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Haris, K.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayes, F. J.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Vivanco, Francisco Hernandez;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hinderer, T.;
Hoak, D.;
Hochheim, S.;
Hofman, D.;
Holgado, A. M.;
Holland, N. A.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horst, C.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hoy, C. G.;
Hreibi, A.;
Huang, Y.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Hulko, M.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idzkowski, B.;
Iess, A.;
Ingram, C.;
Inta, R.;
Intini, G.;
Irwin, B.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jadhav, S. J.;
Jani, K.;
Janthalur, N. N.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jenkins, A. C.;
Jiang, J.;
Johnson, D. S.;
Johnson-McDaniel, N. K.;
Jones, A. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kamai, B.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kapadia, S. J.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kashyap, R.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsanevas, S.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kawabe, K.;
Keerthana, N. V.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, H.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Khursheed, M.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, W. S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimball, C.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinley-Hanlon, M.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klika, J. H.;
Klimenko, S.;
Knowles, T. D.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koekoek, G.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Koper, N.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnendu, N.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kumar, S.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Kwang, S.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Lai, K. H.;
Lam, T. L.;
Landry, M.;
Lane, B. B.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lecoeuche, Y. K.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, H. W.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, J.;
Li, K. J. L.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Li, X.;
Lin, F.;
Linde, F.;
Linker, S. D.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Liu, X.;
Lo, R. K. L.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
London, L. T.;
Longo, A.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lousto, C. O.;
Lovelace, G.;
Lower, M. E.;
Lück, H.;
Lumaca, D.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macas, R.;
Macfoy, S.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Macquet, A.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Zertuche, L. Magaña;
Magee, R. M.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malik, A.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markakis, C.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Markowitz, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marquina, A.;
Marsat, S.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Massera, E.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matas, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCann, J. J.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McCuller, L.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Mehta, A. K.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Mereni, L.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Millhouse, M.;
Mills, J. C.;
Milovich-Goff, M. C.;
Minazzoli, O.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mishkin, A.;
Mishra, C.;
Mistry, T.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Mo, G.;
Moffa, D.;
Mogushi, K.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morisaki, S.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muñiz, E. A.;
Muratore, M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nagar, A.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Neilson, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Ng, K. Y.;
Ng, S.;
Nguyen, P.;
Nichols, D.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
North, C.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Obergaulinger, M.;
Oberling, J.;
O'Brien, B. D.;
O'Dea, G. D.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Ohta, H.;
Okada, M. A.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ormiston, R. G.;
Ortega, L. F.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ossokine, S.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Pagano, G.;
Page, M. A.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, Huang-Wei;
Pang, B.;
Pang, P. T. H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parida, A.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patil, M.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedersen, C.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perego, A.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Phukon, K. S.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pirello, M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Pong, D. Y. T.;
Ponrathnam, S.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E. K.;
Powell, J.;
Prajapati, A. K.;
Prasad, J.;
Prasai, K.;
Prasanna, R.;
Pratten, G.;
Prestegard, T.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quinonez, P. J.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Radkins, H.;
Radulescu, N.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rajbhandari, B.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramirez, K. E.;
Ramos-Buades, A.;
Rana, Javed;
Rao, K.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ren, W.;
Ricci, F.;
Richardson, C. J.;
Richardson, J. W.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Riemenschneider, G. M.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romanelli, M.;
Romano, R.;
Romel, C. L.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rose, K.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rosofsky, S. G.;
Ross, M. P.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Rutins, G.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salafia, O.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sanchez, L. E.;
Sanchis-Gual, N.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Santiago, K. A.;
Sarin, N.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Schale, P.;
Scheel, M.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schönbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schulte, B. W.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seidel, E.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sennett, N.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaner, M. B.;
Shao, L.;
Sharma, P.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shen, H.;
Shink, R.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
ShyamSundar, S.;
Siellez, K.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, N.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Sitmukhambetov, S.;
Skliris, V.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slaven-Blair, T. J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Somala, S.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Sowell, E.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Srivastava, V.;
Staats, K.;
Stachie, C.;
Standke, M.;
Steer, D. A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stocks, D.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D. J.;
Strain, K. A.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Strunk, A.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Sudhir, V.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Suresh, J.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepańczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Tait, S. C.;
Talbot, C.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tápai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Tasson, J. D.;
Taylor, R.;
Thies, F.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thondapu, S. R.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, Shubhanshu;
Tiwari, Srishti;
Tiwari, V.;
Toland, K.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torres-Forné, A.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Töyrä, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trovato, A.;
Trozzo, L.;
Trudeau, R.;
Tsang, K. W.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Tsukada, L.;
Tsuna, D.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ueno, K.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walet, R.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, J. Z.;
Wang, W. H.;
Wang, Y. F.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warden, Z. A.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wellmann, F.;
Wen, L.;
Wessel, E. K.;
Weßels, P.;
Westhouse, J. W.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
White, L. V.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Wilken, D. M.;
Williams, D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Wofford, J. K.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wysocki, D. M.;
Xiao, L.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, L.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yazback, M.;
Yeeles, D. W.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yuen, S. H. R.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A. K.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zappa, F.;
Zelenova, T.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, J.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zimmerman, A. B.;
Zlochower, Y.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-30, last modified: 2019-10-04
We present the results from three gravitational-wave searches for coalescing
compact binaries with component masses above 1$\mathrm{M}_\odot$ during the
first and second observing runs of the Advanced gravitational-wave detector
network. During the first observing run (O1), from September $12^\mathrm{th}$,
2015 to January $19^\mathrm{th}$, 2016, gravitational waves from three binary
black hole mergers were detected. The second observing run (O2), which ran from
November $30^\mathrm{th}$, 2016 to August $25^\mathrm{th}$, 2017, saw the first
detection of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, in
addition to the observation of gravitational waves from a total of seven binary
black hole mergers, four of which we report here for the first time: GW170729,
GW170809, GW170818 and GW170823. For all significant gravitational-wave events,
we provide estimates of the source properties. The detected binary black holes
have total masses between $18.6_{-0.7}^{+3.2}\mathrm{M}_\odot$, and
$84.4_{-11.1}^{+15.8} \mathrm{M}_\odot$, and range in distance between
$320_{-110}^{+120}$ Mpc and $2840_{-1360}^{+1400}$ Mpc. No neutron star - black
hole mergers were detected. In addition to highly significant
gravitational-wave events, we also provide a list of marginal event candidates
with an estimated false alarm rate less than 1 per 30 days. From these results
over the first two observing runs, which include approximately one
gravitational-wave detection per 15 days of data searched, we infer merger
rates at the 90% confidence intervals of $110\, -\, 3840$
$\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{y}^{-1}$ for binary neutron stars and $9.7\, -\,
101$ $\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{y}^{-1}$ for binary black holes assuming fixed
population distributions, and determine a neutron star - black hole merger rate
90% upper limit of $610$ $\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{y}^{-1}$.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.5694 [pdf] - 1231808
Using cosmic voids to distinguish f(R) gravity in future galaxy surveys
Submitted: 2014-11-20, last modified: 2015-06-22
We use properties of void populations identified in $N$-body simulations to
forecast the ability of upcoming galaxy surveys to differentiate models of f(R)
gravity from \lcdm~cosmology. We analyze multiple simulation realizations,
which were designed to mimic the expected number densities, volumes, and
redshifts of the upcoming Euclid satellite and a lower-redshift ground-based
counterpart survey, using the public {\tt VIDE} toolkit. We examine void
abundances, ellipicities, radial density profiles, and radial velocity profiles
at redshifts 1.0 and 0.43. We find that stronger f(R) coupling strengths
eliminates small voids and produces voids up to $\sim 20\%$ larger in radius,
leading to a significant tilt in the void number function. Additionally, under
the influence of modified gravity, voids at all scales tend to be measurably
emptier with correspondingly higher compensation walls. The velocity profiles
reflect this, showing increased outflows inside voids and increased inflows
outside voids. Using the void number function as an example, we forecast that
future surveys can constrain the modified gravity coupling strength to $\sim 3
\times 10^{-5}$ using voids.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.5338 [pdf] - 1055687
Voids in Modified Gravity Reloaded: Eulerian Void Assignment
Submitted: 2014-08-22
We revisit the excursion set approach to calculate void abundances in
chameleon-type modified gravity theories, which was previously studied by
Clampitt, Cai and Li (2013). We focus on properly accounting for the
void-in-cloud effect, i.e., the growth of those voids sitting in over-dense
regions may be restricted by the evolution of their surroundings. This effect
may change the distribution function of voids hence affect predictions on the
differences between modified gravity and GR. We show that the thin-shell
approximation usually used to calculate the fifth force is qualitatively good
but quantitatively inaccurate. Therefore, it is necessary to numerically solve
the fifth force in both over-dense and under-dense regions. We then generalise
the Eulerian void assignment method of Paranjape, Lam and Sheth (2012) to our
modified gravity model. We implement this method in our Monte Carlo simulations
and compare its results with the original Lagrangian methods. We find that the
abundances of small voids are significantly reduced in both modified gravity
and GR due to the restriction of environments. However, the change in void
abundances for the range of void radii of interest for both models is similar.
Therefore, the difference between models remains similar to the results from
the Lagrangian method, especially if correlated steps of the random walks are
used. As Clampitt, Cai and Li (2013), we find that the void abundance is much
more sensitive to modified gravity than halo abundances. Our method can then be
a faster alternative to N-body simulations for studying the qualitative
behaviour of a broad class of theories. We also discuss the limitations and
other practical issues associated with its applications.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.5548 [pdf] - 701810
Modeling the Phase-Space Distribution around Massive Halos
Submitted: 2013-05-23
The comparison between dynamical mass and lensing mass provides a targeted
test for a wide range of modified gravity models. In our previous paper we
showed, through numerical simulations, that the measurement of the
line-of-sight velocity dispersion around stacked massive clusters whose lensing
masses are known allows for stringent constraints on modified gravity on scales
of 2 - 15 Mpc/h. In this work we develop a semi-analytical approach based on
the halo model to describe the phase-space distribution and the line-of-sight
velocity dispersion for different tracers. The model distinguishes
contributions from the halo pairwise velocity and the virial velocity within
halos. We also discuss observational complications, in particular the
contribution from Hubble flow, and show how our model can incorporate these
complications. We then incorporate the effects of modified gravity
(specifically, f(R) and braneworld models), and show that the model predictions
are in excellent agreement with modified gravity simulations. More broadly, the
phase-space distribution provides a sensitive test of our understanding of
hierarchical structure formation when confronted with observations via this
model.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.0059 [pdf] - 667095
Excursion set theory for modified gravity: correlated steps, mass
functions and halo bias
Submitted: 2012-04-30, last modified: 2012-07-19
We show how correlated steps introduces significant contributions to the
modification of the halo mass function in modified gravity models, taking the
chameleon models as an example, in the framework of the excursion set approach.
This correction applies to both Lagrangian and Eulerian environments discussed
in previous studies. Correlated steps also enhances the modifications due to
the fifth force in the conditional mass function as well as the halo bias. We
found that abundance and clustering measurements from different environments
can provide strong constraints on the chameleon models.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.4501 [pdf] - 672983
Testing Gravity with the Stacked Phase Space around Galaxy Clusters
Submitted: 2012-02-20, last modified: 2012-06-27
In General Relativity, the average velocity field of dark matter around
galaxy clusters is uniquely determined by the mass profile. The latter can be
measured through weak lensing. We propose a new method of measuring the
velocity field (phase space density) by stacking redshifts of surrounding
galaxies from a spectroscopic sample. In combination with lensing, this yields
a direct test of gravity on scales of 1-30 Mpc. Using N-body simulations, we
show that this method can improve upon current constraints on f(R) and DGP
model parameters by several orders of magnitude when applied to upcoming
imaging and redshift surveys.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.0058 [pdf] - 667094
Excursion set theory for modified gravity: Eulerian versus Lagrangian
environments
Submitted: 2012-04-30, last modified: 2012-06-25
We have revisited the extended excursion set theory in modified gravity
models, taking the chameleon model as an example. Instead of specifying their
Lagrangian size, here we define the environments by the Eulerian size, chosen
to be of the same order of the Compton length of the scalar field by physical
arguments. We find that the Eulerian and Lagrangian environments have very
different environmental density contrast probability distributions, the former
more likely to have high matter density, which in turn suppressing the effect
of the fifth force in matter clustering and halo formation. The use of Eulerian
environments also evades the unphysical restriction of having an upper mass
limit in the case of Lagrangian environments.Two methods of computing the
unconditional mass functions, numerical integration and Monte Carlo simulation,
are discussed and found to give consistent predictions.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.0899 [pdf] - 1521896
Very Early Photometry of SN 1998S: Physical Parameters and Date of
Explosion
Submitted: 2011-09-05, last modified: 2012-02-27
Context. We present very early optical lightcurves beginning 10 days before
maximum of the Type IIn supernova 1998S, covering the first four months after
discovery. Aims. We examine the light evolution and try to compare the
lightcurves to two analytical models(Nakar & Sari(2010) and Rabinak &
Waxman(2011)) for a red supergiant star. Methods. The photometry was carried at
the 60-cm telescope of the Xinglong Station of China. Broadband filters
Johnsons B, V and Cousins R were used. Results. The magnitude rose for the
first few days and then dropped slowly afterwards. The two different models we
use can fit the early lightcurves very well. The explosion date derived from
the models is within the range of 1998 March 1.34 - 2.64(JD 2450873.84 - JD
2450875.14.) The radius of the progenitor is found to be ~ 300 Rsun and ~ 2000
Rsun for the model of Nakar & Sari(2010) and Rabinak & Waxman(2011)
respectively. The constraint on mass and energy is not strong. The ranges of
these two parameters are within that of a red supergiant.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.2041 [pdf] - 480017
A hierarchy of voids: More ado about nothing
Submitted: 2011-06-10, last modified: 2011-11-08
We extend earlier work on the problem of estimating the void-volume function
-- the abundance and evolution of large voids which grow gravitationally in an
expanding universe -- in two ways. The first removes an ambiguity about how the
void-in-cloud process, which erases small voids, should be incorporated into
the excursion set approach. The main technical change here is to think of voids
within a fully Eulerian, rather than purely Lagrangian, framework. The second
accounts for correlations between different spatial scales in the initial
conditions. We provide numerical and analytical arguments showing how and why
both changes modify the predicted abundances substantially. In particular, we
show that the predicted importance of the void-in-cloud process depends
strongly on whether or not one accounts for correlations between scales. With
our new formulation, the void-in-cloud process dramatically reduces the
predicted abundances of voids if such correlations are ignored, but only
matters for the smallest voids in the more realistic case in which the spatial
correlations are included.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.1990 [pdf] - 480012
Halo abundances and counts-in-cells: The excursion set approach with
correlated steps
Submitted: 2011-05-10, last modified: 2011-11-03
The Excursion Set approach has been used to make predictions for a number of
interesting quantities in studies of nonlinear hierarchical clustering. These
include the halo mass function, halo merger rates, halo formation times and
masses, halo clustering, analogous quantities for voids, and the distribution
of dark matter counts in randomly placed cells. The approach assumes that all
these quantities can be mapped to problems involving the first crossing
distribution of a suitably chosen barrier by random walks. Most analytic
expressions for these distributions ignore the fact that, although different
k-modes in the initial Gaussian field are uncorrelated, this is not true in
real space: the values of the density field at a given spatial position, when
smoothed on different real-space scales, are correlated in a nontrivial way. As
a result, the problem is to estimate first crossing distribution by random
walks having correlated rather than uncorrelated steps. In 1990, Peacock &
Heavens presented a simple approximation for the first crossing distribution of
a single barrier of constant height by walks with correlated steps. We show
that their approximation can be thought of as a correction to the distribution
associated with what we call smooth completely correlated walks. We then use
this insight to extend their approach to treat moving barriers, as well as
walks that are constrained to pass through a certain point before crossing the
barrier. For the latter, we show that a simple rescaling, inspired by bivariate
Gaussian statistics, of the unconditional first crossing distribution,
accurately describes the conditional distribution, independently of the choice
of analytical prescription for the former. In all cases, comparison with
Monte-Carlo solutions of the problem shows reasonably good agreement.
(Abridged)
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.2596 [pdf] - 647432
Optimizing weak lensing mass estimates for cluster profile uncertainty
Submitted: 2011-04-13, last modified: 2011-06-17
Weak lensing measurements of cluster masses are necessary for calibrating
mass-observable relations (MORs) to investigate the growth of structure and the
properties of dark energy. However, the measured cluster shear signal varies at
fixed mass M_200m due to inherent ellipticity of background galaxies,
intervening structures along the line of sight, and variations in the cluster
structure due to scatter in concentrations, asphericity and substructure. We
use N-body simulated halos to derive and evaluate a weak lensing circular
aperture mass measurement M_ap that minimizes the mass estimate variance <(M_ap
- M_200m)^2> in the presence of all these forms of variability. Depending on
halo mass and observational conditions, the resulting mass estimator improves
on M_ap filters optimized for circular NFW-profile clusters in the presence of
uncorrelated large scale structure (LSS) about as much as the latter improve on
an estimator that only minimizes the influence of shape noise. Optimizing for
uncorrelated LSS while ignoring the variation of internal cluster structure
puts too much weight on the profile near the cores of halos, and under some
circumstances can even be worse than not accounting for LSS at all. We briefly
discuss the impact of variability in cluster structure and correlated
structures on the design and performance of weak lensing surveys intended to
calibrate cluster MORs.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.0406 [pdf] - 1034052
The pairwise velocity probability density function in models with local
primordial non-Gaussianity
Submitted: 2010-08-02, last modified: 2011-01-19
We study how primordial non-Gaussianity affects the pairwise velocity
probability density function (PDF) using an analytical model and cosmological
N-body simulations. We adopt the local type non-Gaussian models characterized
by f_{nl}, and examine both the linear velocity difference PDF and the linear
pairwise velocity PDF. We show explicitly how f_{nl} induces correlations
between originally independent velocities along the parallel and the
perpendicular to the line of separation directions. We compare the model
results with measurements from N-body simulations of the non-Gaussian models.
Linear theory fails to predict the PDF in the f_{nl} models. Therefore we
develop an analytic model based on the Zeldovich approximation to describe the
evolution of the velocity PDF. Our analytical model and simulation results show
remarkably good agreement in both the parallel and the perpendicular directions
for the PDF profiles, as well as the change in the PDF due to primordial
non-Gaussianity. The agreement is particularly good for relatively small
separations (< 10 h^{-1} Mpc). The inclusion of the evolution of the velocity
PDF is important to obtain a good description on the signature of primordial
non-Gaussianity in the PDF. Our model provides the foundation to constrain
f_{nl} using the peculiar velocity in future surveys.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.2285 [pdf] - 1003482
The nonlinear redshift space probability distribution function in models
with local primordial non-Gaussianity
Submitted: 2009-08-17, last modified: 2010-08-02
We use the ellipsoidal collapse approximation to investigate the nonlinear
redshift space evolution of the density field with primordial non-Gaussianity
of the local f_{nl}-type. We utilize the joint distribution of eigenvalues of
the initial non-Gaussian shear field and evaluate the evolved redshift space
probability distribution function (PDF). It is shown that, similar to the real
space analysis, the underdense tail of the nonlinear redshift space PDF differs
significantly from that for Gaussian initial conditions. We also derive the
lowest order correction of the Kaiser's formulain the presence of a non-zero
f_{nl}.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.1706 [pdf] - 1002185
The initial shear field in models with primordial local non-Gaussianity
and implications for halo and void abundances
Submitted: 2009-05-11, last modified: 2009-08-01
We generalize Doroshkevich's celebrated formulae for the eigenvalues of the
initial shear field associated with Gaussian statistics to the local
non-Gaussian f_{nl} model. This is possible because, to at least second order
in f_{nl}, distributions at fixed overdensity are unchanged from the case
f_{nl}=0. We use this generalization to estimate the effect of f_{nl}\ne 0 on
the abundance of virialized halos. Halo abundances are expected to be related
to the probability that a certain quantity in the initial fluctuation field
exceeds a threshold value, and we study two choices for this variable: it can
either be the sum of the eigenvalues of the initial deformation tensor (the
initial overdensity), or its smallest eigenvalue. The approach based on a
critical overdensity yields results which are in excellent agreement with
numerical measurements. We then use these same methods to develop
approximations describing the sensitivity of void abundances on f_{nl}. While a
positive f_{nl} produces more extremely massive halos, it makes fewer extremely
large voids. Its effect thus is qualitatively different from a simple rescaling
of the normalisation of the density fluctuation field \sigma_8. Therefore, void
abundances furnish complementary information to cluster abundances, and a joint
comparison of both might provide interesting constraints on primordial
non-Gaussianity.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.1702 [pdf] - 1002184
Halo abundances in the f_{nl} model
Submitted: 2009-05-11, last modified: 2009-08-01
We show how the excursion set moving barrier model for halo abundances may be
generalized to the local non-Gaussian f_{nl} model. Our estimate assumes that
the distribution of step sizes depends on f_{nl}, but that they are otherwise
uncorrelated. Our analysis is consistent with previous results for the case of
a constant barrier, and highlights some implicit assumptions. It also clarifies
the basis of an approximate analytic solution to the moving barrier problem in
the Gaussian case, and shows how it might be improved.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.2253 [pdf] - 19423
The nonlinear probability distribution function in models with local
primordial non-Gaussianity
Submitted: 2008-12-11
We use the spherical evolution approximation to investigate nonlinear
evolution from the non-Gaussian initial conditions characteristic of the local
f_nl model. We provide an analytic formula for the nonlinearly evolved
probability distribution function of the dark matter which shows that the
under-dense tail of the nonlinear PDF in the f_nl model should differ
significantly from that for Gaussian initial conditions. Measurements of the
under-dense tail in numerical simulations may be affected by discreteness
effects, and we use a Poisson counting model to describe this effect. Once this
has been accounted for, our model is in good quantitative agreement with the
simulations.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.1238 [pdf] - 12460
Ellipsoidal collapse and the redshift space probability distribution
function of dark matter
Submitted: 2008-05-08, last modified: 2008-08-05
We use the physics of ellipsoidal collapse to model the probability
distribution function of the smoothed dark matter density field in real and
redshift space. We provide a simple approximation to the exact collapse model
which shows clearly how the evolution can be thought of as a modification of
the spherical evolution model as well as of the Zeldovich Approximation. In
essence, our model specifies how the initial smoothed overdensity and shear
fields can be used to determine the shape and size of the region at later
times. We use our parametrization to extend previous work on the real-space PDF
so that it predicts the redshift space PDF as well. Our results are in good
agreement with measurements of the PDF in simulations of clustering from
Gaussian initial conditions down to scales on which the rms fluctuation is
slightly greater than unity. We also show how the highly non-Gaussian
non-linear redshifted density field in a numerical simulation can be
transformed so that it provides an estimate of the shape of the initial
real-space PDF. When applied to our simulations, our method recovers the
initial Gaussian PDF, provided the variance in the nonlinear smoothed field is
less than 4.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.4288 [pdf] - 10535
The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO survey: evolution of the clustering of luminous
red galaxies since z = 0.6
Wake, David A.;
Sheth, Ravi K.;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Baugh, Carlton M.;
Bland-Hawthorn, Joss;
Cannon, Russell;
Colless, Matthew;
Couch, Warrick J.;
Croom, Scott M.;
De Propris, Roberto;
Drinkwater, Michael J.;
Edge, Alastair C.;
Loveday, Jon;
Lam, Tsz Yan;
Pimbblet, Kevin A.;
Roseboom, Isaac G.;
Ross, Nicholas P.;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Shanks, Tom;
Sharp, Robert G.
Submitted: 2008-02-28, last modified: 2008-05-19
We present an analysis of the small-to-intermediate scale clustering of
samples of Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and
the 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO (2SLAQ) survey carefully matched to have the same
rest-frame colours and luminosity. We study the spatial two-point
auto-correlation function in both redshift-space and real-space of a combined
sample of over 10,000 LRGs, which represent the most massive galaxies in the
universe with stellar masses > 10^11 h^-1 M_sun and space densities 10^-4 h^-3
Mpc^-3. We find no significant evolution in the amplitude r_0 of the
correlation function with redshift, but do see a slight decrease in the slope
with increasing redshift over 0.19 < z < 0.55 and scales of 0.32 < r < 32 h^-1
Mpc. We compare our measurements with the predicted evolution of dark matter
clustering and use the halo model to interpret our results. We find that our
clustering measurements are inconsistent (>99.9% significance) with a passive
model whereby the LRGs do not merge with one another; a model with a merger
rate of 7.5 +/- 2.3% from z = 0.55 to z = 0.19 (i.e. an average rate of 2.4%
Gyr^-1) provides a better fit to our observations. Our clustering and number
density measurements are consistent with the hypothesis that the merged LRGs
were originally central galaxies in different haloes which, following the
merger of these haloes, merged to create a single Brightest Cluster Galaxy. In
addition, we show that the small-scale clustering signal constrains the scatter
in halo merger histories. When combined with measurements of the luminosity
function, our results suggest that this scatter is sub-Poisson. While this is a
generic prediction of hierarchical models, it has not been tested before.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.5029 [pdf] - 7606
Perturbation theory and excursion set estimates of the probability
distribution function of dark matter, and a method for reconstructing the
initial distribution function
Submitted: 2007-11-30, last modified: 2008-03-18
Nonlinear evolution can sometimes be modelled by a deterministic mapping from
initial to final of the local smoothed overdensity. Perturbation theory methods
base on this deterministic and local mapping and ignore the 'cloud-in-cloud'
effect, while the excursion set approach methods take this nonlocality into
account. We compared these methods using the spherical collapse mapping and
showed that, on scales where the rms fluctuation is small, both models give
similar results and they are in good agreement with numerical simulations. If
the deterministic mapping depends on quantities other than overdensity, this
will also manifest as stochasticity if the other quantities are ignored. We
considered the Zeldovich approximation and Ellipsoidal Collapse model, both
include the tidal field in the evolution. Our anaylsis shows that the change in
cell shape effect should be included on scales where the rms is of order of
unity or larger. On scales where the rms is less than 2 methods based on the
spherical collapse model allow a rather accurate reconstruction of the shape of
the initial distribution from the nonlinear field. This can be used as the
basis for constraining the statistical properties of the initial fluctuation
field. (Abridge)
