Normalized to: Lakhlani, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.04425 [pdf] - 1634141
What is Neptune's D/H ratio really telling us about its water abundance
?
Submitted: 2017-09-13, last modified: 2018-01-26
We investigate the deep water abundance of Neptune using a simple 2-component
(core + envelope) toy model. The free parameters of the model are the total
mass of heavy elements in the planet (Z), the mass fraction of Z in the
envelope (f_env), and the D/H ratio of the accreted building blocks (D/H_build
). We systematically search the allowed parameter space on a grid and constrain
it using Neptune's bulk carbon abundance, D/H ratio, and interior structure
models. Assuming solar C/O ratio and cometary D/H for the accreted building
blocks forming the planet, we can fit all of median ~ 7%), and the rest the
constraints if less than ~ 15% of Z is in the envelope (f_env is locked in a
solid core. This model predicts a maximum bulk oxygen abundance in Neptune of
65 \times solar value. If we assume a C/O of 0.17, corresponding to
clathrate-hydrates building blocks, we predict a maximum oxygen abundance of
200 times solar value with a median value of ~ 140. Thus, both cases lead to an
oxygen abundance significantly lower than the preferred value of Cavali\'e et
al. (2017) (~ 540 times solar), inferred from model dependent deep CO
observations. Such high water abundances are excluded by our simple but robust
model. We attribute this discrepancy to our imperfect understanding of either
the interior structure of Neptune or the chemistry of the primordial protosolar
nebula.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.09066 [pdf] - 1588904
Line-Intensity Mapping: 2017 Status Report
Kovetz, Ely D.;
Viero, Marco P.;
Lidz, Adam;
Newburgh, Laura;
Rahman, Mubdi;
Switzer, Eric;
Kamionkowski, Marc;
Aguirre, James;
Alvarez, Marcelo;
Bock, James;
Bond, J. Richard;
Bower, Goeffry;
Bradford, C. Matt;
Breysse, Patrick C.;
Bull, Philip;
Chang, Tzu-Ching;
Cheng, Yun-Ting;
Chung, Dongwoo;
Cleary, Kieran;
Corray, Asantha;
Crites, Abigail;
Croft, Rupert;
Doré, Olivier;
Eastwood, Michael;
Ferrara, Andrea;
Fonseca, José;
Jacobs, Daniel;
Keating, Garrett K.;
Lagache, Guilaine;
Lakhlani, Gunjan;
Liu, Adrian;
Moodley, Kavilan;
Murray, Norm;
Pénin, Aurélie;
Popping, Gergö;
Pullen, Anthony;
Reichers, Dominik;
Saito, Shun;
Saliwanchik, Ben;
Santos, Mario;
Somerville, Rachel;
Stacey, Gordon;
Stein, George;
Villaescusa-Navarro, Francesco;
Visbal, Eli;
Weltman, Amanda;
Wolz, Laura;
Zemcov, Micheal
Submitted: 2017-09-26
Following the first two annual intensity mapping workshops at Stanford in
March 2016 and Johns Hopkins in June 2017, we report on the recent advances in
theory, instrumentation and observation that were presented in these meetings
and some of the opportunities and challenges that were identified looking
forward. With preliminary detections of CO, [CII], Lya and low-redshift 21cm,
and a host of experiments set to go online in the next few years, the field is
rapidly progressing on all fronts, with great anticipation for a flood of new
exciting results. This current snapshot provides an efficient reference for
experts in related fields and a useful resource for nonspecialists. We begin by
introducing the concept of line-intensity mapping and then discuss the broad
array of science goals that will be enabled, ranging from the history of star
formation, reionization and galaxy evolution to measuring baryon acoustic
oscillations at high redshift and constraining theories of dark matter,
modified gravity and dark energy. After reviewing the first detections reported
to date, we survey the experimental landscape, presenting the parameters and
capabilities of relevant instruments such as COMAP, mmIMe, AIM-CO, CCAT-p,
TIME, CONCERTO, CHIME, HIRAX, HERA, STARFIRE, MeerKAT/SKA and SPHEREx. Finally,
we describe recent theoretical advances: different approaches to modeling line
luminosity functions, several techniques to separate the desired signal from
foregrounds, statistical methods to analyze the data, and frameworks to
generate realistic intensity map simulations.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.07794 [pdf] - 1583706
Possible formation pathways for the low density Neptune-mass planet
HAT-P-26b
Submitted: 2017-05-22, last modified: 2017-09-11
We investigate possible pathways for the formation of the low density
Neptune-mass planet HAT-P-26b. We use two formation different models based on
pebbles and planetesimals accretion, and includes gas accretion, disk migration
and simple photoevaporation. The models tracks the atmospheric oxygen
abundance, in addition to the orbital period, and mass of the forming planets,
that we compare to HAT-P-26b. We find that pebbles accretion can explain this
planet more naturally than planetesimals accretion that fails completely unless
we artificially enhance the disk metallicity significantly. Pebble accretion
models can reproduce HAT-P-26b with either a high initial core mass and low
amount of envelope enrichment through core erosion or pebbles dissolution, or
the opposite, with both scenarios being possible. Assuming a low envelope
enrichment factor as expected from convection theory and comparable to the
values we can infer from the D/H measurements in Uranus and Neptune, our most
probable formation pathway for HAT-P-26b is through pebble accretion starting
around 10 AU early in the disk's lifetime.