sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Lakhlani, Gunjan

Normalized to: Lakhlani, G.

3 article(s) in total. 48 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.04425  [pdf] - 1634141
What is Neptune's D/H ratio really telling us about its water abundance ?
Comments: 6 pages, 5 figures, Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-09-13, last modified: 2018-01-26
We investigate the deep water abundance of Neptune using a simple 2-component (core + envelope) toy model. The free parameters of the model are the total mass of heavy elements in the planet (Z), the mass fraction of Z in the envelope (f_env), and the D/H ratio of the accreted building blocks (D/H_build ). We systematically search the allowed parameter space on a grid and constrain it using Neptune's bulk carbon abundance, D/H ratio, and interior structure models. Assuming solar C/O ratio and cometary D/H for the accreted building blocks forming the planet, we can fit all of median ~ 7%), and the rest the constraints if less than ~ 15% of Z is in the envelope (f_env is locked in a solid core. This model predicts a maximum bulk oxygen abundance in Neptune of 65 \times solar value. If we assume a C/O of 0.17, corresponding to clathrate-hydrates building blocks, we predict a maximum oxygen abundance of 200 times solar value with a median value of ~ 140. Thus, both cases lead to an oxygen abundance significantly lower than the preferred value of Cavali\'e et al. (2017) (~ 540 times solar), inferred from model dependent deep CO observations. Such high water abundances are excluded by our simple but robust model. We attribute this discrepancy to our imperfect understanding of either the interior structure of Neptune or the chemistry of the primordial protosolar nebula.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.09066  [pdf] - 1588904
Line-Intensity Mapping: 2017 Status Report
Comments: 99 pages, 48 figures; Endorsement and any comments welcome; To be submitted to Physics Reports
Submitted: 2017-09-26
Following the first two annual intensity mapping workshops at Stanford in March 2016 and Johns Hopkins in June 2017, we report on the recent advances in theory, instrumentation and observation that were presented in these meetings and some of the opportunities and challenges that were identified looking forward. With preliminary detections of CO, [CII], Lya and low-redshift 21cm, and a host of experiments set to go online in the next few years, the field is rapidly progressing on all fronts, with great anticipation for a flood of new exciting results. This current snapshot provides an efficient reference for experts in related fields and a useful resource for nonspecialists. We begin by introducing the concept of line-intensity mapping and then discuss the broad array of science goals that will be enabled, ranging from the history of star formation, reionization and galaxy evolution to measuring baryon acoustic oscillations at high redshift and constraining theories of dark matter, modified gravity and dark energy. After reviewing the first detections reported to date, we survey the experimental landscape, presenting the parameters and capabilities of relevant instruments such as COMAP, mmIMe, AIM-CO, CCAT-p, TIME, CONCERTO, CHIME, HIRAX, HERA, STARFIRE, MeerKAT/SKA and SPHEREx. Finally, we describe recent theoretical advances: different approaches to modeling line luminosity functions, several techniques to separate the desired signal from foregrounds, statistical methods to analyze the data, and frameworks to generate realistic intensity map simulations.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1705.07794  [pdf] - 1583706
Possible formation pathways for the low density Neptune-mass planet HAT-P-26b
Comments: 8 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-05-22, last modified: 2017-09-11
We investigate possible pathways for the formation of the low density Neptune-mass planet HAT-P-26b. We use two formation different models based on pebbles and planetesimals accretion, and includes gas accretion, disk migration and simple photoevaporation. The models tracks the atmospheric oxygen abundance, in addition to the orbital period, and mass of the forming planets, that we compare to HAT-P-26b. We find that pebbles accretion can explain this planet more naturally than planetesimals accretion that fails completely unless we artificially enhance the disk metallicity significantly. Pebble accretion models can reproduce HAT-P-26b with either a high initial core mass and low amount of envelope enrichment through core erosion or pebbles dissolution, or the opposite, with both scenarios being possible. Assuming a low envelope enrichment factor as expected from convection theory and comparable to the values we can infer from the D/H measurements in Uranus and Neptune, our most probable formation pathway for HAT-P-26b is through pebble accretion starting around 10 AU early in the disk's lifetime.