sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Laflamme, R.

Normalized to: Laflamme, R.

4 article(s) in total. 6 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9506127  [pdf] - 92917
Ising Model formulation of Large Scale Dynamics: Universality in the Universe
Comments: Uses RevTeX 3.0
Submitted: 1995-06-27
The partition function of a system of galaxies in gravitational interaction can be cast in an Ising Model form, and this reformulated via a Hubbard--Stratonovich transformation into a three dimensional stochastic and classical scalar field theory, whose critical exponents are calculable and known. This allows one to {\it compute\/} the galaxy to galaxy correlation function, whose non--integer exponent is predicted to be between 1.530 and 1.862, to be compared with the phenomenological value of 1.6 to 1.8.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9411002  [pdf] - 91984
The Least Action Method, CDM and $\Omega$
Comments: 8 pages, Plain Tex, 3 figures
Submitted: 1994-11-01
Peebles has suggested an interesting method to trace back in time positions of galaxies called the least action method. This method applied on the Local Group galaxies seems to indicate that we live in an $\Omega\approx 0.1$ Universe. We have studied a CDM N-body simulation with $\Omega=0.2$ and $H=50 kms^{-1}/Mpc$ and compare trajectories traced back from the Least Action Principle and the center of mass of the particle forming CDM halos. We show that the agreement between these set of trajectories is at best qualitative. We also show that the line of sight peculiar velocities are underestimated. This discrepancy is due to orphans, CDM particles which do not end up in halos. By varying the density parameter $\Omega$ in the least action principle we show that using this method we would underestimate the density of the Universe by a factor of 4-5.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9302007  [pdf] - 1234119
The Least Action Principle And The Spin Of Galaxies In The Local Group
Comments: 16 pages (5 figures available on request), plain TeX, IoA-93-01-AMD
Submitted: 1993-02-10
Using Peebles' least action principle, we determine trajectories for the galaxies in the Local Group and the more massive galaxies in the Local Neighbourhood. We deduce the resulting angular momentum for the whole of the Local Group and study the tidal force acting on the Local Group and its galaxies. Although Andromeda and the Milky Way dominate the tidal force acting on each other during the present epoch, we show that there is a transition time at $z\approx 1$ before which the tidal force is dominated by galaxies outside the Local Group in each case. This shows that the Local Group can not be considered as an isolated system as far as the tidal forces are concerned. We integrate the tidal torques acting on the Milky Way and Andromeda and derive their spin angular momenta, obtaining results which are comparable with observation.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/9301017  [pdf] - 112570
The Origin of Time Asymmetry
Comments: 41 pages, DAMTP R92/20
Submitted: 1993-01-18
It is argued that the observed Thermodynamic Arrow of Time must arise from the boundary conditions of the universe. We analyse the consequences of the no boundary proposal, the only reasonably complete set of boundary conditions that has been put forward. We study perturbations of a Friedmann model containing a massive scalar field but our results should be independent of the details of the matter content. We find that gravitational wave perturbations have an amplitude that remains in the linear regime at all times and is roughly time symmetric about the time of maximum expansion. Thus gravitational wave perturbations do not give rise to an Arrow of Time. However density perturbations behave very differently. They are small at one end of the universe's history, but grow larger and become non linear as the universe gets larger. Contrary to an earlier claim, the density perturbations do not get small again at the other end of the universe's history. They therefore give rise to a Thermodynamic Arrow of Time that points in a constant direction while the universe expands and contracts again. The Arrow of Time does not reverse at the point of maximum expansion. One has to appeal to the Weak Anthropic Principle to explain why we observe the Thermodynamic Arrow to agree with the Cosmological Arrow, the direction of time in which the universe is expanding.