Laflamme, R.
Normalized to: Laflamme, R.
4 article(s) in total. 6 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9506127 [pdf] - 92917
Ising Model formulation of Large Scale Dynamics: Universality in the
Universe
Submitted: 1995-06-27
The partition function of a system of galaxies in gravitational interaction
can be cast in an Ising Model form, and this reformulated via a
Hubbard--Stratonovich transformation into a three dimensional stochastic and
classical scalar field theory, whose critical exponents are calculable and
known. This allows one to {\it compute\/} the galaxy to galaxy correlation
function, whose non--integer exponent is predicted to be between 1.530 and
1.862, to be compared with the phenomenological value of 1.6 to 1.8.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9411002 [pdf] - 91984
The Least Action Method, CDM and $\Omega$
Submitted: 1994-11-01
Peebles has suggested an interesting method to trace back in time positions
of galaxies called the least action method. This method applied on the Local
Group galaxies seems to indicate that we live in an $\Omega\approx 0.1$
Universe. We have studied a CDM N-body simulation with $\Omega=0.2$ and $H=50
kms^{-1}/Mpc$ and compare trajectories traced back from the Least Action
Principle and the center of mass of the particle forming CDM halos. We show
that the agreement between these set of trajectories is at best qualitative. We
also show that the line of sight peculiar velocities are underestimated. This
discrepancy is due to orphans, CDM particles which do not end up in halos. By
varying the density parameter $\Omega$ in the least action principle we show
that using this method we would underestimate the density of the Universe by a
factor of 4-5.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9302007 [pdf] - 1234119
The Least Action Principle And The Spin Of Galaxies In The Local Group
Submitted: 1993-02-10
Using Peebles' least action principle, we determine trajectories for the
galaxies in the Local Group and the more massive galaxies in the Local
Neighbourhood. We deduce the resulting angular momentum for the whole of the
Local Group and study the tidal force acting on the Local Group and its
galaxies. Although Andromeda and the Milky Way dominate the tidal force acting
on each other during the present epoch, we show that there is a transition time
at $z\approx 1$ before which the tidal force is dominated by galaxies outside
the Local Group in each case. This shows that the Local Group can not be
considered as an isolated system as far as the tidal forces are concerned. We
integrate the tidal torques acting on the Milky Way and Andromeda and derive
their spin angular momenta, obtaining results which are comparable with
observation.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/9301017 [pdf] - 112570
The Origin of Time Asymmetry
Submitted: 1993-01-18
It is argued that the observed Thermodynamic Arrow of Time must arise from
the boundary conditions of the universe. We analyse the consequences of the no
boundary proposal, the only reasonably complete set of boundary conditions that
has been put forward. We study perturbations of a Friedmann model containing a
massive scalar field but our results should be independent of the details of
the matter content. We find that gravitational wave perturbations have an
amplitude that remains in the linear regime at all times and is roughly time
symmetric about the time of maximum expansion. Thus gravitational wave
perturbations do not give rise to an Arrow of Time. However density
perturbations behave very differently. They are small at one end of the
universe's history, but grow larger and become non linear as the universe gets
larger. Contrary to an earlier claim, the density perturbations do not get
small again at the other end of the universe's history. They therefore give
rise to a Thermodynamic Arrow of Time that points in a constant direction while
the universe expands and contracts again. The Arrow of Time does not reverse at
the point of maximum expansion. One has to appeal to the Weak Anthropic
Principle to explain why we observe the Thermodynamic Arrow to agree with the
Cosmological Arrow, the direction of time in which the universe is expanding.