Lafaurie, Javier Silva
Normalized to: Lafaurie, J.
3 article(s) in total. 4 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 3,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.13436 [pdf] - 2085325
Does jackknife scale really matter for accurate large-scale structure
covariances?
Submitted: 2020-04-28
The jackknife method gives an internal covariance estimate for large-scale
structure surveys and allows model-independent errors on cosmological
parameters. Using the SDSS-III BOSS CMASS sample, we study how the jackknife
size and number of resamplings impact the precision of the covariance estimate
on the correlation function multipoles and the error on the inferred baryon
acoustic scale. We compare the measurement with log-normal mock galaxy
catalogues with the same survey geometry. We build several jackknife
configurations that vary in size and number of resamplings. We find that it is
useful to apply the tapering scheme to estimate the precision matrix from a
limited number of jackknife resamplings. The results from CMASS and mock
catalogues show that the error estimate of the baryon acoustic scale does not
depend on the jackknife scale. For the shift parameter $\alpha$, we find an
average error of 1.6% and 1.2%, respectively from CMASS and mock jackknife
covariances, consistent with pre-reconstruction analyses. However, when
relatively few resamplings are used, the jackknife error estimate becomes
unreliable. Future large-scale structure surveys will map even greater volumes
allowing percent-level estimation of the covariance matrix using a jackknife
approach.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.06155 [pdf] - 2014491
Cosmological constraints from galaxy multi-tracers in the nearby
Universe
Submitted: 2019-12-12
The Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) scale in the clustering of galaxies is
a powerful standard ruler to measure cosmological distances and determine the
geometry of the Universe. Past surveys have detected the BAO feature in the
clustering of different galaxy samples, most of them composed of redder,
quiescent galaxies and bluer, star-forming ones out to redshift $z\sim1$.
Besides these targets, new upcoming surveys will observe high-redshift galaxies
with bright nebular emission lines out to $z\sim2$, quasars and Lyman-$\alpha$
quasars at $z\gt 2$. All these different galaxy targets will be used as
multi-tracers of the same underlying dark matter field. By combining them over
wide cosmological volumes, we will be able to beat cosmic variance and measure
the growth of structure with unprecedented accuracy. In this work, we measure
the BAO scale in the two-point auto- and cross-correlation functions of three
independent populations of multi-tracers extracted from the SDSS DR7 Main
galaxy sample at redshift $0.02\lt z\lt 0.22$. Combining their covariances, we
find accurate constraints on the shift parameter $\alpha=1.00\pm 0.04$ and
$D_{\rm{V}}(z=0.1)/r_{\rm{s}}=2.92\pm0.12$.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.05660 [pdf] - 1734767
Comparing Dark Energy models with Hubble versus Growth Rate data
Submitted: 2018-08-16
In this work we perform an analysis on the recently proposed conjoined cosmic
growth and cosmic expansion diagram [1] to compare several dark energy models
using the Figure of Merit showed in [2], which consists in the inverse of the
$1\sigma$ confidence region in the $f\sigma_8(z)-H(z)$ plot. Our analysis also
consists of comparing the models by performing different statistical criteria:
Bayes factor [3], the Bayesian Information Criteria [4] and the Akaike
Information Criterion [5]. We also developed a 3-dimensional Figure of Merit to
account simultaneously for the errors on the growth rate and the Hubble
parameter. The main idea is to consider several cosmological models and compare
them with the different statistical criteria in order to highlight the
differences and the accuracies of each single criterion.