Normalized to: Kuusk, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.02356 [pdf] - 1530986
Post-Newtonian parameter $\gamma$ for multiscalar-tensor gravity with a
general potential
Submitted: 2016-07-08, last modified: 2017-01-11
We compute the parametrized post-Newtonian parameter $\gamma$ in the case of
a static point source for multiscalar-tensor gravity with completely general
nonderivative couplings and potential in the Jordan frame. Similarly to the
single massive field case $\gamma$ depends exponentially on the distance from
the source and is determined by the length of a vector of non-minimal coupling
in the space of scalar fields and its orientation relative to the mass
eigenvectors. Using data from the Cassini tracking experiment, we estimate
bounds on a general theory with two scalar fields. Our formalism can be
utilized for a wide range of models, which we illustrate by applying it to
nonminimally coupled Higgs SU(2) doublet, general hybrid metric-Palatini
gravity, linear ($\Box^{-1}$) and quadratic ($\Box^{-2}$) nonlocal gravity.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.09166 [pdf] - 1334228
The formalism of invariants in scalar-tensor and multiscalar-tensor
theories of gravitation
Submitted: 2015-12-30
We give a brief summary of the formalism of invariants in general
scalar-tensor and multiscalar-tensor gravities without derivative couplings. By
rescaling of the metric and reparametrization of the scalar fields, the theory
can be presented in different conformal frames and parametrizations. Due to
this freedom in transformations, the scalar fields themselves do not carry
independent physical meaning (in a generic parametrization). However, there are
functions of the scalar fields and their derivatives which remain invariant
under the transformations, providing a set of physical variables for the
theory. We indicate how to construct such invariants and show how the
observables like parametrized post-Newtonian parameters and characteristics of
Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker cosmology can be neatly expressed in terms
of the invariants.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.0031 [pdf] - 787672
Post-Newtonian parameters gamma and beta of scalar-tensor gravity with a
general potential
Submitted: 2013-08-30, last modified: 2014-02-24
We calculate the PPN parameters gamma and beta for scalar-tensor gravity with
a generic coupling function omega and scalar potential V in the Jordan
conformal frame in the case of a static spherically symmetric source. Since the
potential generally introduces a radial dependence to the effective
gravitational constant as well as to gamma and beta, we discuss the issue of
defining these PPN parameters and compare our expressions with previous
calculations in simpler cases. We confront our results with current
observational constraints on the values of gamma and beta and thus draw
restrictions on the form of the functions omega and V around their asymptotic
background values.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.5308 [pdf] - 1092583
Scalar-tensor cosmologies with dust matter in the general relativity
limit
Submitted: 2011-12-22
We consider flat Friedmann-Lema\^{\i}tre-Robertson-Walker cosmological models
in the framework of general scalar-tensor theories of gravity with arbitrary
coupling functions, set in the Jordan frame, in the cosmological epoch when the
energy density of the ordinary dust matter dominates over the energy density of
the scalar potential. Motivated by cosmological observations, we apply an
approximation scheme in the regime close to the so-called limit of general
relativity. The ensuing nonlinear approximate equations for the scalar field
and the Hubble parameter can be solved analytically in cosmological time. This
allows us to distinguish the theories with solutions that asymptotically
converge to general relativity and draw some implications about the
cosmological dynamics near this limit.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1006.1246 [pdf] - 287010
Scalar-tensor cosmologies with a potential in the general relativity
limit: time evolution
Submitted: 2010-06-07
We consider Friedmann-Lema\^{\i}tre-Robertson-Walker flat cosmological models
in the framework of general Jordan frame scalar-tensor theories of gravity with
arbitrary coupling function and potential. For the era when the cosmological
energy density of the scalar potential dominates over the energy density of
ordinary matter, we use a nonlinear approximation of the decoupled scalar field
equation for the regime close to the so-called limit of general relativity
where the local weak field constraints are satisfied. We give the solutions in
cosmological time with a particular attention to the classes of models
asymptotically approaching general relativity. The latter can be subsumed under
two types: (i) exponential convergence, and (ii) damped oscillations around
general relativity. As an illustration we present an example of oscillating
dark energy.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.1686 [pdf] - 170340
Potential dominated scalar-tensor cosmologies in the general relativity
limit: phase space view
Submitted: 2010-03-08
We consider the potential dominated era of
Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker flat cosmological models in the framework
of general Jordan frame scalar-tensor theories of gravity with arbitrary
coupling functions, and focus upon the phase space of the scalar field. To
study the regime suggested by the local weak field tests (i.e. close to the
so-called limit of general relativity) we propose a nonlinear approximation
scheme, solve for the phase trajectories, and provide a complete classification
of possible phase portraits. We argue that the topology of trajectories in the
nonlinear approximation is representative of those of the full system, and thus
can tell for which scalar-tensor models general relativity functions as an
attractor.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0810.5038 [pdf] - 17903
Scalar-tensor cosmologies: general relativity as a fixed point of the
Jordan frame scalar field
Submitted: 2008-10-28
We study the evolution of homogeneous and isotropic, flat cosmological models
within the general scalar-tensor theory of gravity with arbitrary coupling
function and potential and scrutinize its limit to general relativity. Using
the methods of dynamical systems for the decoupled equation of the Jordan frame
scalar field we find the fixed points of flows in two cases: potential
domination and matter domination. We present the conditions on the mathematical
form of the coupling function and potential which determine the nature of the
fixed points (attractor or other). There are two types of fixed points, both
are characterized by cosmological evolution mimicking general relativity, but
only one of the types is compatible with the Solar System PPN constraints.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.2159 [pdf] - 14490
Scalar-tensor cosmologies: fixed points of the Jordan frame scalar field
Submitted: 2008-07-14, last modified: 2008-10-28
We study the evolution of homogeneous and isotropic, flat cosmological models
within the general scalar-tensor theory of gravity with arbitrary coupling
function and potential. After introducing the limit of general relativity we
describe the details of the phase space geometry. Using the methods of
dynamical systems for the decoupled equation of the Jordan frame scalar field
we find the fixed points of flows in two cases: potential domination and matter
domination. We present the conditions on the mathematical form of the coupling
function and potential which determine the nature of the fixed points
(attractor or other). There are two types of fixed points, both are
characterized by cosmological evolution mimicking general relativity, but only
one of the types is compatible with the Solar System PPN constraints. The phase
space structure should also carry over to the Einstein frame as long as the
transformation between the frames is regular which however is not the case for
the latter (PPN compatible) fixed point.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:0705.4644 [pdf] - 1777
Scalar-tensor cosmology at the general relativity limit: Jordan vs
Einstein frame
Submitted: 2007-05-31, last modified: 2008-07-14
We consider the correspondence between the Jordan frame and the Einstein
frame descriptions of scalar-tensor theory of gravitation. We argue that since
the redefinition of the scalar field is not differentiable at the limit of
general relativity the correspondence between the two frames is lost at this
limit. To clarify the situation we analyse the dynamics of the scalar field in
different frames for two distinct scalar-tensor cosmologies with specific
coupling functions and demonstrate that the corresponding scalar field phase
portraits are not equivalent for regions containing the general relativity
limit. Therefore the answer to the question whether general relativity is an
attractor for the theory depends on the choice of the frame.