sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Kutsenko, A. S.

Normalized to: Kutsenko, A.

8 article(s) in total. 12 co-authors, from 1 to 7 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.07081  [pdf] - 2020497
Improvements of the longitudinal magnetic field measurement at the HSOS/SMFT
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-04-15, last modified: 2019-12-23
The weak-field approximation implying linear relationship between Stokes $V/I$ and longitudinal magnetic field, $B_{\Vert}$, often suffers from the saturation observed in strong magnetic field regions such as sunspot umbra. In this work we intend to improve the magnetic field observations carried out by the \textit{Solar Magnetic Field Telescope} (SMFT) at the Huairou Solar Observing Station, China. We propose to use non-linear relationship between Stokes $V/I$ and $B_{\Vert}$ to derive magnetic field. To determine the form of the relationship we perform cross-calibration of SMFT data and magnetograms provided by the \textit{Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager} on board the \textit{Solar Dynamics Observatory}. The algorithm of the magnetic field deriving is described in details. We show that using non-linear relationship between Stokes $V/I$ and $B_{\Vert}$ allows eliminating the magnetic field saturation inside sunspot umbra.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1912.07032  [pdf] - 2050302
Distributed Electric Currents in Solar Active Regions
Comments: Solar Physics, accepted
Submitted: 2019-12-15
Using magnetographic data provided by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory, we analyzed the structure of magnetic fields and vertical electric currents in six active regions (ARs) with different level of flare activity. We found that electric currents are well balanced over the entire AR: for all of them the current imbalance is below 0.1%, which means that any current system is closed within an AR. Decomposition of the transverse magnetic field vector into two components allowed us to reveal the existence of large-scale vortex structures of the azimuthal magnetic field component around main sunspots of ARs. In each AR, we found a large-scale electric current system occupying a vast area of an AR, which we call distributed electric current. For ARs obeying the Hale polarity law and the hemispheric helicity sign rule, the distributed current is directed upward in the leading part of an AR and it appears to be closing back to the photosphere in the following part of an AR through the corona and chromosphere. Our analysis of the time variations of the magnitude of the distributed electric currents showed that low-flaring ARs exhibit small variations of the distributed currents in the range of $\pm 20 \times 10^{12}$ A, whereas the highly flaring ARs exhibited significant slow variations of the distributed currents in the range of $30-95 \times 10^{12}$ A. Intervals of the enhanced flaring appear to be co-temporal with smooth enhancements of the distributed electric current.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1907.07952  [pdf] - 1945864
Magnetic Power Spectra of Emerging Active Regions
Comments: accepted by Solar Physics
Submitted: 2019-07-18
Magnetic field data provided by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory were utilized to explore the changes in the magnetic energy of four active regions (ARs) during their emergence. We found that at the very early stage of the magnetic flux emergence, an abrupt steepening of the magnetic power spectrum takes place leading to rapid increase of the absolute value of the negative spectra power index $\alpha$ in $E(k)$ $\sim$ $k^{\alpha}$. As the emergence proceeds, the energy increases at all scales simultaneously implying that elements of all sizes do appear in the photosphere. Meanwhile, the energy gain at scales larger than $\approx$10 Mm prevails as compared to that at smaller scales. Both direct (i.e., fragmentation of large structures into smaller ones) and inverse (i.e., merging of small magnetic features into larger elements) cascades are readily observed during the emergence. However, in the case of inverse cascade, the total energy gained at large scales exceeds the energy loss at smaller scales assuming simultaneous appearance of large-scale magnetic entities from beneath the photosphere. We conclude that most of the time the energy may grow at all scales. We also cannot support the point of view regarding the dominant role of the inverse cascade in the formation of an AR. Although the coalescence of small magnetic elements into larger pores and sunspots is observed, our analysis shows that the prevailed energy contribution to an AR comes from emergence of large-scale structures.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.12089  [pdf] - 1834139
Extended statistical analysis of emerging solar active regions
Comments: Accepted by MNRAS
Submitted: 2018-11-29
We use observations of line-of-sight magnetograms from Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board of Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) to investigate polarity separation, magnetic flux, flux emergence rate, twist and tilt of solar emerging active regions. Functional dependence of polarity separation and maximum magnetic flux of an active region is in agreement with a simple model of flux emergence as the result of buoyancy forces. Our investigation did not reveal any strong dependence of emergence rate on twist properties of active regions.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1802.02323  [pdf] - 1732579
Intermittency spectra of current helicity in solar active regions
Comments: accepted by MNRAS
Submitted: 2018-02-07, last modified: 2018-08-01
We analyse the spatial distribution of current helicity in solar active regions. A comparison of current helicity maps derived from three different instruments (Helioseismic and Magnetc Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory, SDO/HMI, Spectro-Polarimeter on board the Hinode, and Solar Magnetic Field Telescope at the Huairou Solar Observing Station, China, HSOS/SMFT) is carried out. The comparison showed an excellent correlation between the maps derived from the spaceborne instruments and moderate correlation between the maps derived from SDO/HMI and HSOS/SMFT vector magnetograms. The results suggest that the obtained maps characterize real spatial distribution of current helicity over an active region. To analyse intermittency of current helicity, we traditionally use the high-order structure functions and flatness function approach. The slope of a flatness function within some range of scales - the flatness exponent - is a measure of the degree of intermittency. SDO/HMI vector magnetograms for 3 ARs (NOAA 11158, 12494, and 12673) were used to calculate the flatness exponent time variations. All three ARs exhibited emergence of a new magnetic flux during the observational interval. The flatness exponent indicated the increase of intermittency 12-20 hours before the emergence of a new flux. We suppose that this behaviour can indicate subphotospheric fragmentation or distortion of the pre-existed electric current system by emerging magnetic flux.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.05971  [pdf] - 1586104
Contribution to the Solar Mean Magnetic Field from Different Solar Regions
Comments: Solar Physics, accepted
Submitted: 2017-07-19
Seven-year long seeing-free observations of solar magnetic fields with the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) were used to study the sources of the solar mean magnetic field, SMMF, defined as the net line-of-sight magnetic flux divided over the solar disk area. To evaluate the contribution of different regions to the SMMF, we separated all the pixels of each SDO/HMI magnetogram into three subsets: weak (B_W), intermediate (B_I), and strong (B_S) fields. The B_W component represents areas with magnetic flux densities below the chosen threshold; the B_I component is mainly represented by network fields, remains of decayed active regions (ARs), and ephemeral regions. The B_S component consists of magnetic elements in ARs. To derive the contribution of a subset to the total SMMF, the linear regression coefficients between the corresponding component and the SMMF were calculated. We found that: i) when the threshold level of 30 Mx cm^-2 is applied, the B_I and B_S components together contribute from 65% to 95% of the SMMF, while the fraction of the occupied area varies in a range of 2-6% of the disk area; ii) as the threshold magnitude is lowered to 6 Mx cm^-2, the contribution from B_I+B_S grows to 98%, and the fraction of the occupied area reaches the value of about 40% of the solar disk. In summary, we found that regardless of the threshold level, only a small part of the solar disk area contributes to the SMMF. This means that the photospheric magnetic structure is an intermittent, inherently porous medium, resembling a percolation cluster. These findings suggest that the long-standing concept that continuous vast unipolar areas on the solar surface are the source of the SMMF may need to be reconsidered.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1703.00739  [pdf] - 1561197
Analysis of the flux growth rate in emerging active regions on the Sun
Comments: Solar Physics; accepted 16 pages, 8 figures, 1 table
Submitted: 2017-03-02
We studied the emergence process of 42 active region (ARs) by analyzing the time derivative, R(t), of the total unsigned flux. Line-of-sight magnetograms acquired by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) onboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) were used. A continuous piecewise linear fitting to the R(t)-profile was applied to detect an interval, dt_2, of nearly-constant R(t) covering one or several local maxima. The averaged over dt_2 magnitude of R(t) was accepted as an estimate of the maximal value of the flux growth rate, R_MAX, which varies in a range of (0.5-5)x10^20 Mx hour^-1 for active regions with the maximal total unsigned flux of (0.5-3)x10^22 Mx. The normalized flux growth rate, R_N, was defined under an assumption that the saturated total unsigned flux, F_MAX, equals unity. Out of 42 ARs in our initial list, 36 event were successfully fitted and they form two subsets (with a small overlap of 8 events): the ARs with a short (<13 hours) interval dt_2 and a high (>0.024 hour^-1) normalized flux emergence rate, R_N, form the "rapid" emergence event subset. The second subset consists of "gradual" emergence events and it is characterized by a long (>13 hours) interval dt_2 and a low R_N (<0.024 hour^-1). In diagrams of R_MAX plotted versus F_MAX, the events from different subsets are not overlapped and each subset displays an individual power law. The power law index derived from the entire ensemble of 36 events is 0.69+-0.10. The "rapid" emergence is consistent with a "two-step" emergence process of a single twisted flux tube. The "gradual" emergence is possibly related to a consecutive rising of several flux tubes emerging at nearly the same location in the photosphere.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1606.03710  [pdf] - 1458588
Using SDO/HMI magnetograms as a source of the solar mean magnetic field data
Comments: 13 pages, 9 figures
Submitted: 2016-06-12
The solar mean magnetic field (SMMF) provided by the Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO) is compared with the SMMF acquired by the \textit{Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager} (HMI) onboard the \textit{Solar Dynamic Observatory} (SDO). We found that despite the different spectral lines and measurement techniques used in both instruments the Pearson correlation coefficient between these two datasets equals 0.86 while the conversion factor is very close to unity: B(HMI) = 0.99(2)B(WSO). We also discuss artifacts of the SDO/HMI magnetic field measurements, namely the 12 and 24-hour oscillations in SMMF and in sunspots magnetic fields that might be caused by orbital motions of the spacecraft. The artificial harmonics of SMMF reveal significant changes in amplitude and the nearly stable phase. The connection between the 24-hour harmonic amplitude of SMMF and the presence of sunspots is examined. We also found that opposite phase artificial 12 and/or 24-hour oscillations exist in sunspots of opposite polarities.