We consider black hole formation in failed supernovae when a dense circumstellar medium (CSM) is present around the massive star progenitor. By utilizing radiation hydrodynamical simulations, we calculate the mass ejection of blue supergiants and Wolf-Rayet stars in the collapsing phase and the radiative shock occurring between the ejecta and the ambient CSM. We find that the resultant emission is redder and dimmer than normal supernovae (bolometric luminosity of $\sim 10^{40}-10^{41}\ {\rm erg\ s^{-1}}$, effective temperature of $\sim 5\times 10^3$ K, and timescale of 10-100 days) and shows a characteristic power-law decay, which may comprise a fraction of intermediate luminosity red transients (ILRTs) including AT 2017be. In addition to searching for the progenitor star in the archival data, we encourage X-ray follow-up observations of such ILRTs $\sim$ 1-10 yr after the collapse, targeting the fallback accretion disk.

Some massive stars experience episodic and intense mass loss phases with fluctuations in the luminosity. Ejected material forms circumstellar matter (CSM) around the star, and the subsequent core-collapse results in a type IIn supernova which is characterized by interaction between supernova ejecta and the CSM. The energy source which triggers these mass eruptions and dynamics of the outflow have not been clearly explained. Moreover, the mass eruption itself can alter the density structure of the envelope and affect the dynamics of the subsequent mass eruption if these events repeat. In fact, a large amount of observational evidence suggests multiple mass eruptions prior to core-collapse. We investigate the density structure of the envelope altered by the first mass eruption and the nature of the subsequent second mass eruption event in comparison with the first one. We deposited an extra energy twice at the bottom of the hydrogen envelope and calculate the time evolution by our radiation hydrodynamical simulation code. We do not deal with the origin of the energy source but focus on the dynamics of repeated mass eruptions from a single massive star. There are significant differences between the first and second mass eruptions in terms of the luminosity, color, amount of produced CSM. The second eruption leads to a redder burst event with the associated brightening phase lasting longer than the first one. The amount of ejected matter is different even with the same deposited energy in the first and second event, but the difference depends on the density structure of the progenitor star. Upcoming high cadence and deep transient surveys will provide us a lot of detailed pre-supernova activities, and some of them would show multi-peaked light curves. They should be interpreted taking the effect of density structure altered by the preceding outburst events into consideration.

Observations suggest that some massive stars experience violent and eruptive mass loss associated with significant brightening that cannot be explained by hydrostatic stellar models. This event seemingly forms dense circumstellar matter (CSM). The mechanism of eruptive mass loss has not been fully explained. We focus on the fact that the timescale of nuclear burning gets shorter than the dynamical timescale of the envelope a few years before core collapse for some massive stars. To reveal the properties of the eruptive mass loss, we investigate its relation to the energy injection at the bottom of the envelope supplied by nuclear burning taking place inside the core. In this study, we do not specify the actual mechanism for transporting energy from the site of nuclear burning to the bottom of the envelope. Instead, we parameterize the amount of injected energy and the injection time and try to extract information on these parameters from comparisons with observations. We carried out 1-D radiation hydrodynamical simulations for progenitors of red, yellow, and blue supergiants, and Wolf-Rayet stars. We calculated the evolution of the progenitors with a public stellar evolution code. We obtain the light curve associated with the eruption, the amount of ejected mass, and the CSM distribution at the time of core-collapse. The energy injection at the bottom of the envelope of a massive star within a period shorter than the dynamical timescale of the envelope could reproduce some observed optical outbursts prior to the core-collapse and form the CSM, which can power an interaction supernova (SN) classified as type IIn.