Normalized to: Krishak, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.05096 [pdf] - 2129184
An independent search for annual modulation and its significance in
ANAIS-112 data
Submitted: 2019-10-11, last modified: 2020-07-06
We perform an independent search for sinusoidal-based modulation in the
recently released ANAIS-112 data, which could be induced by dark matter
scatterings. We then evaluate this hypothesis against the null hypothesis that
the data contains only background, using four different model comparison
techniques. These include frequentist, Bayesian, and two information
theory-based criteria (AIC and BIC). This analysis was done on both the
residual data (by subtracting the exponential fit obtained from the ANAIS-112
Collaboration) as well as the total (non-background subtracted) data. We find
that according to the Bayesian model comparison test, the null hypothesis of no
modulation is decisively favored over a cosine-based annual modulation for the
non-background subtracted dataset in 2-6 keV energy range. None of the other
model comparison tests decisively favor any one hypothesis over another. This
is the first application of Bayesian and information theory techniques to test
the annual modulation hypothesis in ANAIS-112 data, extending our previous work
on the DAMA/LIBRA and COSINE-100 data. Our analysis codes have also been made
publicly available.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.10127 [pdf] - 2126767
Model Comparison tests of modified gravity from the E\"ot-Wash
experiment
Submitted: 2020-03-23, last modified: 2020-06-07
Perivolaropoulos et al (arXiv:1904.09462) (P19) have argued that the residual
torque data in the E\"ot-Wash experiment is consistent with an oscillating
signal. This could either be a signature of non-local modified gravity theories
or some other systematic error in the data. We independently assess the
viability of such an oscillating signal in the same data using Bayesian and
information theoretical criterion, to complement the frequentist analysis in
P19. We fit this data to three different parametrizations (an offset Newtonian,
Yukawa, and an oscillating model), and assess the significance of the
oscillating model using AIC, BIC, WAIC, and Bayes factor. All these techniques
provide decisive evidence for the oscillating model compared to the Newtonian
model, provided the phase is fixed to the same value as in P19. If the phase is
allowed to vary, then significance from BIC, WAIC, and Bayes based tests
reduces to strong evidence, whereas only AIC still shows decisive evidence. Our
analysis codes have been made publicly available.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.05726 [pdf] - 2045178
Robust model comparison tests of DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation
Submitted: 2019-06-13, last modified: 2020-01-27
We evaluate the statistical significance of the DAMA/LIBRA claims for annual
modulation using three independent model comparison techniques, viz
frequentist, information theory, and Bayesian analysis. We fit the data from
the DAMA/LIBRA experiment to both cosine and a constant model, and carry out
model comparison by choosing the constant model as the null hypothesis. For the
frequentist test, we invoke Wilk's theorem and calculate the significance using
$\Delta \chi^2$ between the two models. For information theoretical tests, we
calculate the difference in Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian
Information criterion (BIC) between the two models. We also compare the two
models in a Bayesian context by calculating the Bayes factor. We also search
for higher harmonics in the DAMA/LIBRA data using generalized Lomb-Scargle
periodogram. We finally test the sensitivity of these model comparison
techniques in discriminating between pure noise and a cosine signal using
synthetic data. This is the first proof of principles application of AIC, BIC
as well as Bayes factor to the DAMA data. All our analysis codes along with the
data used in this work have been made publicly available.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.07199 [pdf] - 2015029
An independent assessment of significance of annual modulation in
COSINE-100 data
Submitted: 2019-07-16, last modified: 2019-12-10
We perform an independent search for annual modulation caused by dark
matter-induced scatterings in the recently released COSINE-100 data. We test
the hypothesis that the data contains a sinusoidal modulation against the null
hypothesis that the data consists of only background. We compare the
significance using frequentist, information theoretic techniques (such as AIC
and BIC), and also using the Bayesian model comparison technique. The
information theory-based tests mildly prefer a constant background over a
sinusoidal signal with the same period as that found by the DAMA collaboration.
The Bayesian test however strongly prefers a background model. This is the
first proof of principles demonstration of application of Bayesian and
information theory based techniques to COSINE-100 data to assess the
significance of annual modulation.