Normalized to: Krechmer, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01026 [pdf] - 1224306
A Calibration of NICMOS Camera 2 for Low Count-Rates
Rubin, D.;
Aldering, G.;
Amanullah, R.;
Barbary, K.;
Dawson, K. S.;
Deustua, S.;
Faccioli, L.;
Fadeyev, V.;
Fakhouri, H. K.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Gladders, M. D.;
de Jong, R. S.;
Koekemoer, A.;
Krechmer, E.;
Lidman, C.;
Meyers, J.;
Nordin, J.;
Perlmutter, S.;
Ripoche, P.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Spadafora, A.;
Suzuki, N.;
Project, The Supernova Cosmology
Submitted: 2015-02-03, last modified: 2015-02-08
NICMOS 2 observations are crucial for constraining distances to most of the
existing sample of z > 1 SNe Ia. Unlike the conventional calibration programs,
these observations involve long exposure times and low count rates. Reciprocity
failure is known to exist in HgCdTe devices and a correction for this effect
has already been implemented for high and medium count-rates. However
observations at faint count-rates rely on extrapolations. Here instead, we
provide a new zeropoint calibration directly applicable to faint sources. This
is obtained via inter-calibration of NIC2 F110W/F160W with WFC3 in the low
count-rate regime using z ~ 1 elliptical galaxies as tertiary calibrators.
These objects have relatively simple near-IR SEDs, uniform colors, and their
extended nature gives superior signal-to-noise at the same count rate than
would stars. The use of extended objects also allows greater tolerances on PSF
profiles. We find ST magnitude zeropoints (after the installation of the NICMOS
cooling system, NCS) of 25.296 +- 0.022 for F110W and 25.803 +- 0.023 for
F160W, both in agreement with the calibration extrapolated from count-rates
1,000 times larger (25.262 and 25.799). Before the installation of the NCS, we
find 24.843 +- 0.025 for F110W and 25.498 +- 0.021 for F160W, also in agreement
with the high-count-rate calibration (24.815 and 25.470). We also check the
standard bandpasses of WFC3 and NICMOS 2 using a range of stars and galaxies at
different colors and find mild tension for WFC3, limiting the accuracy of the
zeropoints. To avoid human bias, our cross-calibration was "blinded" in that
the fitted zeropoint differences were hidden until the analysis was finalized.