Normalized to: Krasiński, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.11044 [pdf] - 2080889
Gamma radiation from areal radius minima in a quasi-spherical Szekeres
metric
Submitted: 2019-09-24, last modified: 2020-02-25
In previous papers it was shown that in a quasi-spherical Szekeres (QSS)
metric, impulses of gamma radiation can arise that have several properties in
common with the observed gamma-ray bursts. This happens when the bang-time
function $t_B(r)$ has a gate-shaped hump around the origin of the QSS region.
The gamma rays arise along two preferred directions of the QSS geometry
(coincident with dipole extrema when axially symmetric, otherwise unrelated).
In these directions, the rays of the relic radiation are blueshifted rather
than redshifted. The blueshift is generated in a thin region between the Big
Bang (BB) and the extremum-redshift hypersurface (ERH). But the Szekeres models
can describe the real Universe only forward in time from the last-scattering
hypersurface (LSH) because the matter in them has zero pressure. The ERH is
tangent to the BB at the origin, so in a neighbourhood thereof the ERH lies
earlier than the LSH and no blueshift is generated in the physical region. The
question thus arose whether the BB and ERH can be ``unglued'' if the QSS region
has no origin, but the areal radius function $\Phi$ has a local maximum or
minimum somewhere. In the present paper it is demonstrated that this is indeed
the case. If the hump in $t_B(r)$ is centered around the minimum of $\Phi$,
then the BB and ERH in general do not coincide there and a stronger blueshift
is generated on rays passing nearby. It follows that a lower and narrower hump
on the BB set can generate sufficient blueshift to move the initial frequencies
of the relic radiation to the gamma range. These facts are demonstrated by
numerical calculations in an explicit example of a QSS region.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.08145 [pdf] - 1659503
Properties of blueshifted light rays in quasispherical Szekeres metrics
Submitted: 2017-04-26, last modified: 2018-03-30
This paper is a follow-up on two previous ones, in which properties of
blueshifted rays were investigated in Lema\^{\i}tre - Tolman (L-T) and
quasispherical Szekeres (QSS) spacetimes. In the present paper, an axially
symmetric QSS deformation is superposed on such an L-T background that was
proved, in the first paper, to mimic several properties of gamma-ray bursts.
The present model makes $z$ closer to $-1$ than in the background L-T
spacetime, and, as implied by the second paper, strong blueshifts exist in it
only along two opposite directions. The QSS region is matched into a Friedmann
background. The Big Bang (BB) function $t_B(r)$, which is constant in the
Friedmann region, has a gate-shaped hump in the QSS region. Since a QSS island
generates stronger blueshifts than an L-T island, the BB hump can be made lower
- then it is further removed from the observer and implies a smaller observed
angular radius of the source. Consequently, more sources can be fitted into the
sky - all these facts are confirmed by numerical computations. Null geodesics
reaching present observers from different directions relative to the BB hump
are numerically calculated. Patterns of redshift across the image of the source
and along the rays are displayed.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.02003 [pdf] - 1451884
Existence of blueshifts in quasi-spherical Szekeres spacetimes
Submitted: 2016-04-07, last modified: 2016-08-09
In Lema\^{\i}tre -- Tolman (L--T) models, light rays emitted
\textit{radially} at the Big Bang (BB) at such radial coordinates $r$ where the
bang-time function $t_B(r)$ has $\dril {t_B} r \neq 0$ reach every observer
with \textit{infinite blueshift}, $z = -1$. Consequently, there exist rays,
emitted soon after the BB, that will reach later observers with finite
blueshift ($-1 < z < 0$). But in spacetimes without symmetry there are no
radial directions. The question thus arises whether blueshifts can exist at all
in the Szekeres models that contain L--T as a limit, but in general have no
symmetry. The aim of the present paper is to show that strong blueshifts can be
generated in quasi-spherical Szekeres (QSS) models. It is shown that in an
axially symmetric QSS model, infinite blueshift can appear only on axial rays,
which intersect every space orthogonal to the dust flow on the symmetry axis.
In an exemplary QSS model it is numerically shown that if such a ray is emitted
from the Big Bang where $\dril {t_B} r \neq 0$, then indeed observers see it
with $z \approx -1$. Rays emitted shortly after the BB and running close to the
symmetry axis will reach the observers with a strong blueshift, too. Then, in a
toy QSS model that has no symmetry, it was shown by numerical calculations that
two null lines exist such that rays in their vicinity have redshift profiles
similar to those in a vicinity of the axial rays in the axially symmetric case.
This indicates that rays generating infinite blueshifts exist in general QSS
spacetimes and are concentrated around two directions.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.06316 [pdf] - 1362583
Cosmological blueshifting may explain the gamma ray bursts
Submitted: 2015-09-21, last modified: 2016-02-17
It is shown that the basic observed properties of the gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
are accounted for if one assumes that the GRBs arise by blueshifting the
emission radiation of hydrogen and helium generated during the last scattering
epoch. The blueshift generator for a single GRB is a region with a nonconstant
bang-time function $t_B(r)$ (described by a Lema\^{\i}tre -- Tolman (L--T)
exact solution of Einstein's equations) matched into a homogeneous and
isotropic (Friedmann) background. Blueshift visible to the present observer
arises \textit{only on those rays that are emitted radially in an L--T region}.
The paper presents three L--T models with different Big Bang profiles, adapted
for the highest and the lowest end of the GRB frequency range. The models
account for: (1) The observed frequency range of the GRBs; (2) Their limited
duration; (3) The afterglows; (4) Their hypothetical collimation into narrow
jets; (5) The large distances to their sources; (6) The multitude of the
observed GRBs. Properties (2), (3) and (6) are accounted for only
qualitatively. With a small correction of the parameters of the model, the
implied perturbations of the CMB radiation will be consistent with those
actually caused by the GRBs. A complete model of the Universe would consist of
many L--T regions with different $t_B(r)$ profiles, matched into the same
Friedmann background. This paper is meant to be an initial exploration of the
possibilities offered by models of this kind; the actual fitting of all
parameters to observational results requires fine-tuning of several
interconnected variables and is left for a separate study.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.00506 [pdf] - 1280790
Gamma ray bursts may be blueshifted bundles of the relic radiation
Submitted: 2015-02-02, last modified: 2015-09-22
A hypothesis is proposed that the gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) may arise by
blueshifting the emission radiation of hydrogen and helium generated during the
last scattering epoch. The blueshift mechanism is provided by such a Lema\^itre
-- Tolman (L--T) model, in which the bang-time function $t_B(r)$ is not
everywhere constant. Blueshift arises on \textit{radial} rays that are emitted
over regions where $\dril{t_B} r \neq 0$. The paper presents an L--T model
adapted for this purpose and shows how it accounts for the observed properties
of the GRBs, some properties are accounted for only qualitatively.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.5377 [pdf] - 929164
Blueshifts in the Lema\^{\i}tre -- Tolman models
Submitted: 2014-09-18, last modified: 2014-11-21
In the Lema\^{\i}tre -- Tolman (L--T) models that have nonconstant bang-time
function $t_B(r)$, light emitted close to those points of the Big Bang where
$\dril {t_B} r \neq 0$ is blueshifted at the receiver position. The blueshifted
rays are expected to perturb the temperature of the cosmic microwave background
(CMB) radiation along the lines of sight of the present central observer. It is
shown here that, in a general L--T model, the $t_B(r)$ can be chosen so that
the blueshift-generating region is hidden before the recombination time, where
the L--T model does not apply. The rest of the paper is devoted to
investigating blueshifts in one specific L--T model, called L--T$(t_B)$ -- the
one that duplicates the luminosity distance vs. redshift relation of the
$\Lambda$CDM model using nonconstant $t_B(r)$ alone. The location of the
blueshift-generating region in the L--T$(t_B)$ spacetime is determined.
Profiles of redshift/blueshift along several rays intersecting the past light
cone of the present central observer are calculated. The L--T$(t_B)$ model
matched to Friedmann is considered, and profiles of redshift/blueshift in such
a composite model are calculated. The requirement of invisibility of blueshifts
makes the L--T$(t_B)$ model astrophysically unacceptable if it should apply
back to the recombination time, but does not "rule out" a general L--T model --
it only puts limits on $\dril {t_B} r$.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.4368 [pdf] - 799113
Accelerating expansion or inhomogeneity? A comparison of the
$\Lambda$CDM and Lema\^{\i}tre - Tolman models
Submitted: 2013-09-17, last modified: 2014-03-19
It is shown how certain observations interpreted in the background of the
Friedmann model with $\Lambda < 0 = k$ (the $\Lambda$CDM model) can be
re-interpreted using the $\Lambda = 0$ Lema\^{\i}tre - Tolman (L-T) model so as
to do away with the "dark energy". The purpose of the paper is to clarify the
underlying geometrical relations by doing the calculations as much as possible
analytically or by very simple numerical programs. In the first part of the
paper (fictitious) observations of the distribution of expansion velocity along
the past light cone of the observer are considered. It is shown that the whole
past light cone of the $\Lambda$CDM observer can be reproduced in the L-T model
with $\Lambda = 0 = E$. This is a geometric exercise that has the advantage of
being free of numerical complications. In the second part, the luminosity
distance - redshift relation of the $\Lambda$CDM model is duplicated using the
L-T model with $-k = 2E/r^2 =$ constant $> 0$. The value of $k$ and the
function $t_B(r)$ are determined by the $\Lambda$CDM parameters. General
properties of this L-T model are described. Difficulties of carrying the
numerical calculations through the apparent horizon are presented in detail and
mostly solved. The second model is a counterexample to the claim that an L-T
model mimicking $\Lambda$CDM must contain a void around the center - it has a
peak of density at $R = 0$.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.5970 [pdf] - 672986
Apparent horizons in the quasi-spherical Szekeres models
Submitted: 2012-02-27, last modified: 2012-06-12
The notion of an apparent horizon (AH) in a collapsing object can be carried
over from the Lema\^{\i}tre -- Tolman (L--T) to the quasispherical Szekeres
models in three ways: 1. Literally by the definition -- the AH is the boundary
of the region, in which every bundle of null geodesics has negative expansion
scalar. 2. As the locus, at which null lines that are as nearly radial as
possible are turned toward decreasing areal radius $R$. These lines are in
general nongeodesic. The name "absolute apparent horizon" (AAH) is proposed for
this locus. 3. As the boundary of a region, where null \textit{geodesics} are
turned toward decreasing $R$. The name "light collapse region" (LCR) is
proposed for this region (which is 3-dimensional in every space of constant
$t$); its boundary coincides with the AAH. The AH and AAH coincide in the L--T
models. In the quasispherical Szekeres models, the AH is different from (but
not disjoint with) the AAH. Properties of the AAH and LCR are investigated, and
the relations between the AAH and the AH are illustrated with diagrams using an
explicit example of a Szekeres metric. It turns out that an observer who is
already within the AH is, for some time, not yet within the AAH. Nevertheless,
no light signal can be sent through the AH from the inside. The analogue of the
AAH for massive particles is also considered.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.5307 [pdf] - 1453877
Formation of Gyrs old black holes in the center of galaxies within the
Lema\^{\i}tre--Tolman model
Submitted: 2011-01-27, last modified: 2012-01-06
In this article we present a model of formation of a galaxy with a black hole
in the center. It is based on the Lema\^{\i}tre--Tolman solution and is a
refinement of an earlier model. The most important improvement is the choice of
the interior geometry of the black hole allowing for the formation of Gyrs old
black holes. Other refinements are the use of an arbitrary Friedmann model as
the background (unperturbed) initial state and the adaptation of the model to
an arbitrary density profile of the galaxy. Our main interest was the M87
galaxy (NGC 4486), which hosts a supermassive black hole of mass $3.2\cdot
10^{9}M_{\odot}$. It is shown that for this particular galaxy, within the
framework of our model and for the initial state being a perturbation of the
$\Lambda$CDM model, the age of the black hole can be up to 12.7 Gyrs. The
dependence of the model on the chosen parameters at the time of last scattering
was also studied. The maximal age of the black hole as a function of the
$\Omega_m$ and $\Omega_\Lambda$ parameters for the M87 galaxy can be 3.717 or
12.708 Gyr.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.4897 [pdf] - 1078182
The charged dust solution of Ruban -- matching to Reissner--Nordstr\"om
and shell crossings
Submitted: 2011-07-25, last modified: 2012-01-02
The maximally extended Reissner--Nordstr\"om (RN) manifold with $e^2 < m^2$
begs for attaching a material source to it that would preserve the infinite
chain of asymptotically flat regions and evolve through the wormhole between
the RN singularities. So far, the attempts were discouraging. Here we try one
more possible source -- a solution found by Ruban in 1972 that is a charged
generalisation of an inhomogeneous Kantowski--Sachs-type dust solution. It can
be matched to the RN solution, and the matching surface must stay all the time
between the two RN event horizons. However, shell crossings do not allow even
half a cycle of oscillation between the maximal and the minimal size.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.1828 [pdf] - 446626
Cosmological models and misunderstandings about them
Submitted: 2011-10-09, last modified: 2011-12-02
Advantages of inhomogeneous cosmological models that are exact solutions of
Einstein's equations over linearised perturbations of homogeneous models are
presented. Examples of effects that can be described in the inhomogeneous ones
are given: the non-repeatable light paths, the observed anisotropies in the
cosmic microwave background, the redshift drift and the maximum diameter
distance. Criticisms of inhomogeneous models that are based on
misunderstandings or fallacious reasonings are pointed out and corrected; these
include the "weak singularity", the positivity of deceleration "theorem", the
"pathology" of redshift behaviour at the "critical point" and the alleged
necessity of the bang time to be constant.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1102.1449 [pdf] - 425607
Inhomogeneous cosmological models: exact solutions and their
applications
Submitted: 2011-02-07, last modified: 2011-10-13
Recently, inhomogeneous generalisations of the
Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker cosmological models have gained interest in
the astrophysical community and are more often employed to study cosmological
phenomena. However, in many papers the inhomogeneous cosmological models are
treated as an alternative to the FLRW models. In fact, they are not an
alternative, but an exact perturbation of the latter, and are gradually
becoming a necessity in modern cosmology. The assumption of homogeneity is just
a first approximation introduced to simplify equations. So far this assumption
is commonly believed to have worked well, but future and more precise
observations will not be properly analysed unless inhomogeneities are taken
into account. This paper reviews recent developments in the field and shows the
importance of an inhomogeneous framework in the analysis of cosmological
observations.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.1299 [pdf] - 400885
Repeatable light paths in the shearfree normal cosmological models
Submitted: 2011-05-06, last modified: 2011-08-22
Conditions for the existence of repeatable light paths (RLPs) in the
shearfree normal cosmological models are investigated. It is found that in the
conformally nonflat models the only RLPs are radial null geodesics (in the
spherical case) and their analogues in the plane- and hyperbolically symmetric
cases. In the conformally flat Stephani models, there exist special
spherically-, plane- and hyperbolically symmetric subcases, in which all null
geodesics are RLPs. They are slightly more general than the Friedmann --
Lema\^{\i}tre -- Robertson -- Walker (FLRW) models of the corresponding
symmetries: their curvature index function $k(t)$ and the scale factor $R(t)$
are expressed through a single function of time. In addition to that, there
exist special cases of the Stephani solution in which some of the null
geodesics are RLPs. All these special cases are identified.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:0906.0905 [pdf] - 228306
A (giant) void is not mandatory to explain away dark energy with a
Lemaitre - Tolman model
Submitted: 2009-06-04, last modified: 2010-06-09
Lema\^itre - Tolman (L--T) toy models with a central observer have been used
to study the effect of large scale inhomogeneities on the SN Ia dimming. Claims
that a giant void is mandatory to explain away dark energy in this framework
are currently dominating. Our aim is to show that L-T models exist that
reproduce a few features of the $\Lambda$CDM model, but do not contain the
giant cosmic void. We propose to use two sets of data - the angular diameter
distance together with the redshift-space mass-density and the angular diameter
distance together with the expansion rate - both defined on the past null cone
as functions of the redshift. We assume that these functions are of the same
form as in the $\Lambda$CDM model. Using the Mustapha-Hellaby-Ellis algorithm,
we numerically transform these initial data into the usual two L-T arbitrary
functions and solve the evolution equation to calculate the mass distribution
in spacetime. For both models, we find that the current density profile does
not exhibit a giant void, but rather a giant hump. However, this hump is not
directly observable, since it is in a spacelike relation to a present observer.
The alleged existence of the giant void was a consequence of the L-T models
used earlier because their generality was limited a priori by needless
simplifying assumptions, like, for example, the bang-time function being
constant. Instead, one can feed any mass distribution or expansion rate history
on the past light cone as initial data to the L-T evolution equation. When a
fully general L-T metric is used, the giant void is not implied.