Normalized to: Kosturkiewicz, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.02429 [pdf] - 1590882
Against the biases in spins and shapes of asteroids
Marciniak, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Urakawa, S.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Tychoniec, Ł.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Kamiński, K.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Nadolny, J.;
Nishiyama, K.;
Okumura, S.;
Polińska, M.;
Richard, F.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Stachowski, G.;
Trela, P.
Submitted: 2017-11-07
Physical studies of asteroids depend on an availability of lightcurve data.
Targets that are easy to observe and analyse naturally have more data
available, so their synodic periods are confirmed from multiple sources. Also,
thanks to availability of data from a number of apparitions, their spin and
shape models can often be obtained.
Almost half of bright (H<=11 mag) main-belt asteroid population with known
lightcurve parameters have rotation periods considered long (P>12 hours) and
are rarely chosen for photometric observations. There is a similar selection
effect against asteroids with low lightcurve amplitudes (a_max<=0.25 mag). As a
result such targets, though numerous in this brightness range, are
underrepresented in the sample of spin and shape modelled asteroids. In the
range of fainter targets such effects are stronger. These selection effects can
influence what is now known about asteroid spin vs. size distribution, on
asteroid internal structure and densities and on spatial orientation of
asteroid spin axes.
To reduce both biases at the same time, we started a photometric survey of a
substantial sample of those bright main-belt asteroids that displayed both
features: periods longer than 12 hours, and amplitudes that did not exceed 0.25
magnitude. First we aim at finding synodic periods of rotation, and after a few
observed apparitions, obtaining spin and shape models.
As an initial result of our survey we found that a quarter of the studied
sample (8 out of 34 targets) have rotation periods different from those widely
accepted. We publish here these newly found period values with the lightcurves.
The size/frequency plot might in reality look different in the long-period
range. Further studies of asteroid spins, shapes, and structure should take
into account serious biases that are present in the parameters available today.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.01893 [pdf] - 1590799
Photometric survey, modelling, and scaling of long-period and
low-amplitude asteroids
Marciniak, A.;
Bartczak, P.;
Müller, T.;
Sanabria, J. J.;
Alí-Lagoa, V.;
Antonini, P.;
Behrend, R.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bronikowska, M.;
Bąk, M. Butkiewicz -;
Cikota, A.;
Crippa, R.;
Ditteon, R.;
Dudziński, G.;
Duffard, R.;
Dziadura, K.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Geier, S.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Hren, M.;
Jerosimic, L.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Korlevic, P.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Kudak, V.;
Manzini, F.;
Morales, N.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pilcher, F.;
Polakis, T.;
Poncy, R.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Siwak, M.;
Skiff, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Stoss, R.;
Żejmo, M.;
Żukowski, K.
Submitted: 2017-11-06
The available set of spin and shape modelled asteroids is strongly biased
against slowly rotating targets and those with low lightcurve amplitudes. As a
consequence of these selection effects, the current picture of asteroid spin
axis distribution, rotation rates, or radiometric properties, might be affected
too.
To counteract these selection effects, we are running a photometric campaign
of a large sample of main belt asteroids omitted in most previous studies. We
determined synodic rotation periods and verified previous determinations. When
a dataset for a given target was sufficiently large and varied, we performed
spin and shape modelling with two different methods.
We used the convex inversion method and the non-convex SAGE algorithm,
applied on the same datasets of dense lightcurves. Unlike convex inversion, the
SAGE method allows for the existence of valleys and indentations on the shapes
based only on lightcurves.
We obtained detailed spin and shape models for the first five targets of our
sample: (159) Aemilia, (227) Philosophia, (329) Svea, (478) Tergeste, and (487)
Venetia. When compared to stellar occultation chords, our models obtained an
absolute size scale and major topographic features of the shape models were
also confirmed. When applied to thermophysical modelling, they provided a very
good fit to the infrared data and allowed their size, albedo, and thermal
inertia to be determined.
Convex and non-convex shape models provide comparable fits to lightcurves.
However, some non-convex models fit notably better to stellar occultation
chords and to infrared data in sophisticated thermophysical modelling (TPM). In
some cases TPM showed strong preference for one of the spin and shape
solutions. Also, we confirmed that slowly rotating asteroids tend to have
higher-than-average values of thermal inertia.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07422 [pdf] - 1449873
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data
from a large collaboration network
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D. A.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Delbo', M.;
Adam, O.;
Afonina, V.;
Anquetin, R.;
Antonini, P.;
Arnold, L.;
Audejean, M.;
Aurard, P.;
Bachschmidt, M.;
Badue, B.;
Barbotin, E.;
Barroy, P.;
Baudouin, P.;
Berard, L.;
Berger, N.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bosch, J-G.;
Bouley, S.;
Bozhinova, I.;
Brinsfield, J.;
Brunetto, L.;
Canaud, G.;
Caron, J.;
Carrier, F.;
Casalnuovo, G.;
Casulli, S.;
Cerda, M.;
Chalamet, L.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Chinaglia, B.;
Cikota, A.;
Colas, F.;
Coliac, J-F.;
Collet, A.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Conseil, E.;
Costa, R.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Debackere, A.;
Decock, A.;
Déhais, Q.;
Déléage, T.;
Delmelle, S.;
Demeautis, C.;
Dróżdż, M.;
Dubos, G.;
Dulcamara, T.;
Dumont, M.;
Durkee, R.;
Dymock, R.;
del Valle, A. Escalante;
Esseiva, N.;
Esseiva, R.;
Esteban, M.;
Fauchez, T.;
Fauerbach, M.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Forné, E.;
Fournel, C.;
Fradet, D.;
Garlitz, J.;
Gerteis, O.;
Gillier, C.;
Gillon, M.;
Giraud, R.;
Godard, J-P.;
Goncalves, R.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hay, K.;
Hellmich, S.;
Heterier, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Hodosan, G.;
Hren, M.;
Hygate, A.;
Innocent, N.;
Jacquinot, H.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jehin, E.;
Jerosimic, L.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, W.;
Korlevic, P.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Krafft, P.;
Krugly, Y.;
Kugel, F.;
Labrevoir, O.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Lehký, M.;
Leroy, A.;
Lesquerbault, B.;
Lopez-Gonzales, M. J.;
Lutz, M.;
Mallecot, B.;
Manfroid, J.;
Manzini, F.;
Marciniak, A.;
Martin, A.;
Modave, B.;
Montaigut, R.;
Montier, J.;
Morelle, E.;
Morton, B.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Peyrot, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Pirenne, J-F.;
Piron, P.;
Polinska, M.;
Polotto, M.;
Poncy, R.;
Previt, J. P.;
Reignier, F.;
Renauld, D.;
Ricci, D.;
Richard, F.;
Rinner, C.;
Risoldi, V.;
Robilliard, D.;
Romeuf, D.;
Rousseau, G.;
Roy, R.;
Ruthroff, J.;
Salom, P. A.;
Salvador, L.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Scholz, A.;
Séné, G.;
Skiff, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sogorb, P.;
Soldán, F.;
Spiridakis, A.;
Splanska, E.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stephens, R.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J-P.;
Tumolo, G.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Vanoutryve, B.;
Vugnon, J. M.;
Warner, B. D.;
Waucomont, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Winiarski, M.;
Wolf, M.
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive
dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This
amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt
asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of
asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input
for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in
different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical
modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar
occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density
estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models
of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e.,
classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a
large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements
from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive
3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and
orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that
one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available
databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass
estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be
most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies,
which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission.
This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for
the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model
determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth
asteroids.