Normalized to: Kolb, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.04293 [pdf] - 1924899
Superheavy dark matter through Higgs portal operators
Submitted: 2017-08-14, last modified: 2019-07-29
The WIMPzilla hypothesis is that the dark matter is a
super-weakly-interacting and super-heavy particle. Conventionally, the
WIMPzilla abundance is set by gravitational particle production during or at
the end of inflation. In this study we allow the WIMPzilla to interact directly
with Standard Model fields through the Higgs portal, and we calculate the
thermal production (freeze-in) of WIMPzilla dark matter from the annihilation
of Higgs boson pairs in the plasma. The two particle-physics model parameters
are the WIMPzilla mass and the Higgs-WIMPzilla coupling. The two cosmological
parameters are the reheating temperature and the expansion rate of the universe
at the end of inflation. We delineate the regions of parameters space where
either gravitational or thermal production is dominant, and within those
regions we identify the parameters that predict the observed dark matter relic
abundance. Allowing for thermal production opens up the parameter space, even
for Planck-suppressed Higgs-WIMPzilla interactions.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0708.1199 [pdf] - 3842
A Thousand Invisible Cords Binding Astronomy and High-Energy Physics
Submitted: 2007-08-09
The traditional realm of astronomy is the observation and study of the
largest objects in the Universe, while the traditional domain of high-energy
physics is the study of the smallest things in nature. But these two sciences
concerned with opposite ends of the size spectrum are, in Muir's words, bound
fast by a thousand invisible cords that cannot be broken. In this essay I
propose that collaborations of astronomers and high-energy physicists on common
problems are beneficial for both fields, and that both astronomy and
high-energy physics can advance by this close and still growing relationship.
Dark matter and dark energy are two of the binding cords I will use to
illustrate how collaborations of astronomers and high-energy physicists on
large astronomical projects can be good for astronomy, and how discoveries in
astronomy can guide high-energy physicists in their quest for understanding
nature on the smallest scales. Of course, the fields have some different
intellectual and collaborative traditions, neither of which is ideal. The
cultures of the different fields cannot be judged to be right or wrong; they
either work or they don't. When astronomers and high-energy physicists work
together, the binding cords can either encourage or choke creativity. The
challenge facing the astronomy and high-energy physics communities is to adopt
the best traditions of both fields. It is up to us to choose wisely.