Normalized to: Kilston, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.0941 [pdf] - 542628
Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST): A
Technology Roadmap for the Next Decade
Postman, Marc;
Argabright, Vic;
Arnold, Bill;
Aronstein, David;
Atcheson, Paul;
Blouke, Morley;
Brown, Tom;
Calzetti, Daniela;
Cash, Webster;
Clampin, Mark;
Content, Dave;
Dailey, Dean;
Danner, Rolf;
Doxsey, Rodger;
Ebbets, Dennis;
Eisenhardt, Peter;
Feinberg, Lee;
Fruchter, Andrew;
Giavalisco, Mauro;
Glassman, Tiffany;
Gong, Qian;
Green, James;
Grunsfeld, John;
Gull, Ted;
Hickey, Greg;
Hopkins, Randall;
Hraba, John;
Hyde, Tupper;
Jordan, Ian;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Kendrick, Steve;
Kilston, Steve;
Koekemoer, Anton;
Korechoff, Bob;
Krist, John;
Mather, John;
Lillie, Chuck;
Lo, Amy;
Lyon, Rick;
McCullough, Peter;
Mosier, Gary;
Mountain, Matt;
Oegerle, Bill;
Pasquale, Bert;
Purves, Lloyd;
Penera, Cecelia;
Polidan, Ron;
Redding, Dave;
Sahu, Kailash;
Saif, Babak;
Sembach, Ken;
Shull, Mike;
Smith, Scott;
Sonneborn, George;
Spergel, David;
Stahl, Phil;
Stapelfeldt, Karl;
Thronson, Harley;
Thronton, Gary;
Townsend, Jackie;
Traub, Wesley;
Unwin, Steve;
Valenti, Jeff;
Vanderbei, Robert;
Werner, Michael;
Wesenberg, Richard;
Wiseman, Jennifer;
Woodgate, Bruce
Submitted: 2009-04-06, last modified: 2009-05-08
The Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST) is a set of
mission concepts for the next generation of UVOIR space observatory with a
primary aperture diameter in the 8-m to 16-m range that will allow us to
perform some of the most challenging observations to answer some of our most
compelling questions, including "Is there life elsewhere in the Galaxy?" We
have identified two different telescope architectures, but with similar optical
designs, that span the range in viable technologies. The architectures are a
telescope with a monolithic primary mirror and two variations of a telescope
with a large segmented primary mirror. This approach provides us with several
pathways to realizing the mission, which will be narrowed to one as our
technology development progresses. The concepts invoke heritage from HST and
JWST design, but also take significant departures from these designs to
minimize complexity, mass, or both.
Our report provides details on the mission concepts, shows the extraordinary
scientific progress they would enable, and describes the most important
technology development items. These are the mirrors, the detectors, and the
high-contrast imaging technologies, whether internal to the observatory, or
using an external occulter. Experience with JWST has shown that determined
competitors, motivated by the development contracts and flight opportunities of
the new observatory, are capable of achieving huge advances in technical and
operational performance while keeping construction costs on the same scale as
prior great observatories.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609799 [pdf] - 85391
A Re-appraisal of the Habitability of Planets Around M Dwarf Stars
Tarter, Jill C.;
Backus, Peter R.;
Mancinelli, Rocco L.;
Aurnou, Jonathan M.;
Backman, Dana E.;
Basri, Gibor S.;
Boss, Alan P.;
Clarke, Andrew;
Deming, Drake;
Doyle, Laurance R.;
Feigelson, Eric D.;
Freund, Friedmann;
Grinspoon, David H.;
Haberle, Robert M.;
Hauck, Steven A.;
Heath, Martin J.;
Henry, Todd J.;
Hollingsworth, Jeffery L.;
Joshi, Manoj M.;
Kilston, Steven;
Liu, Michael C.;
Meikle, Eric;
Reid, I. Neill;
Rothschild, Lynn J.;
Scalo, John M.;
Segura, Antigona;
Tang, Carol M.;
Tiedje, James M.;
Turnbull, Margaret C.;
Walkowicz, Lucianne M.;
Weber, Arthur L.;
Young, Richard E.
Submitted: 2006-09-28, last modified: 2006-11-20
Stable, hydrogen-burning, M dwarf stars comprise about 75% of all stars in
the Galaxy. They are extremely long-lived and because they are much smaller in
mass than the Sun (between 0.5 and 0.08 MSun), their temperature and stellar
luminosity are low and peaked in the red. We have re-examined what is known at
present about the potential for a terrestrial planet forming within, or
migrating into, the classic liquid-surface-water habitable zone close to an M
dwarf star. Observations of protoplanetary disks suggest that planet-building
materials are common around M dwarfs, but N-body simulations differ in their
estimations of the likelihood of potentially-habitable, wet planets residing
within their habitable zones, which are only ~ 1/5 to 1/50 of the width of that
for a G star. Particularly in light of the claimed detection of the planets
with masses as small as 5.5 and 7.5 MEarth orbiting M stars, there seems no
reason to exclude the possibility of terrestrial planets. Tidally locked
synchronous rotation within the narrow habitable zone doesn't necessarily lead
to atmospheric collapse, and active stellar flaring may not be as much of an
evolutionarily disadvantageous factor as has previously been supposed. We
conclude that M dwarf stars may indeed be viable hosts for planets on which the
origin and evolution of life can occur. A number of planetary processes such as
cessation of geothermal activity, or thermal and non-thermal atmospheric loss
processes may limit the duration of planetary habitability to periods far
shorter than the extreme lifetime of the M dwarf star. Nevertheless, it makes
sense to include M dwarf stars in programs that seek to find habitable worlds
and evidence of life.