Normalized to: Kiessling, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.07281 [pdf] - 2095676
Report from the Tri-Agency Cosmological Simulation Task Force
Battaglia, Nick;
Benson, Andrew;
Eifler, Tim;
Hearin, Andrew;
Heitmann, Katrin;
Ho, Shirley;
Kiessling, Alina;
Lukic, Zarija;
Schneider, Michael;
Sellentin, Elena;
Stadel, Joachim
Submitted: 2020-05-14
The Tri-Agency Cosmological Simulations (TACS) Task Force was formed when
Program Managers from the Department of Energy (DOE), the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA), and the National Science Foundation (NSF)
expressed an interest in receiving input into the cosmological simulations
landscape related to the upcoming DOE/NSF Vera Rubin Observatory (Rubin),
NASA/ESA's Euclid, and NASA's Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST).
The Co-Chairs of TACS, Katrin Heitmann and Alina Kiessling, invited community
scientists from the USA and Europe who are each subject matter experts and are
also members of one or more of the surveys to contribute. The following report
represents the input from TACS that was delivered to the Agencies in December
2018.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.06683 [pdf] - 2037577
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Mission Concept Study Final
Report
Gaudi, B. Scott;
Seager, Sara;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Kiessling, Alina;
Warfield, Keith;
Cahoy, Kerri;
Clarke, John T.;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn;
Feinberg, Lee;
Guyon, Olivier;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Mawet, Dimitri;
Plavchan, Peter;
Robinson, Tyler;
Rogers, Leslie;
Scowen, Paul;
Somerville, Rachel;
Stapelfeldt, Karl;
Stark, Christopher;
Stern, Daniel;
Turnbull, Margaret;
Amini, Rashied;
Kuan, Gary;
Martin, Stefan;
Morgan, Rhonda;
Redding, David;
Stahl, H. Philip;
Webb, Ryan;
Alvarez-Salazar, Oscar;
Arnold, William L.;
Arya, Manan;
Balasubramanian, Bala;
Baysinger, Mike;
Bell, Ray;
Below, Chris;
Benson, Jonathan;
Blais, Lindsey;
Booth, Jeff;
Bourgeois, Robert;
Bradford, Case;
Brewer, Alden;
Brooks, Thomas;
Cady, Eric;
Caldwell, Mary;
Calvet, Rob;
Carr, Steven;
Chan, Derek;
Cormarkovic, Velibor;
Coste, Keith;
Cox, Charlie;
Danner, Rolf;
Davis, Jacqueline;
Dewell, Larry;
Dorsett, Lisa;
Dunn, Daniel;
East, Matthew;
Effinger, Michael;
Eng, Ron;
Freebury, Greg;
Garcia, Jay;
Gaskin, Jonathan;
Greene, Suzan;
Hennessy, John;
Hilgemann, Evan;
Hood, Brad;
Holota, Wolfgang;
Howe, Scott;
Huang, Pei;
Hull, Tony;
Hunt, Ron;
Hurd, Kevin;
Johnson, Sandra;
Kissil, Andrew;
Knight, Brent;
Kolenz, Daniel;
Kraus, Oliver;
Krist, John;
Li, Mary;
Lisman, Doug;
Mandic, Milan;
Mann, John;
Marchen, Luis;
Marrese-Reading, Colleen;
McCready, Jonathan;
McGown, Jim;
Missun, Jessica;
Miyaguchi, Andrew;
Moore, Bradley;
Nemati, Bijan;
Nikzad, Shouleh;
Nissen, Joel;
Novicki, Megan;
Perrine, Todd;
Pineda, Claudia;
Polanco, Otto;
Putnam, Dustin;
Qureshi, Atif;
Richards, Michael;
Riggs, A. J. Eldorado;
Rodgers, Michael;
Rud, Mike;
Saini, Navtej;
Scalisi, Dan;
Scharf, Dan;
Schulz, Kevin;
Serabyn, Gene;
Sigrist, Norbert;
Sikkia, Glory;
Singleton, Andrew;
Shaklan, Stuart;
Smith, Scott;
Southerd, Bart;
Stahl, Mark;
Steeves, John;
Sturges, Brian;
Sullivan, Chris;
Tang, Hao;
Taras, Neil;
Tesch, Jonathan;
Therrell, Melissa;
Tseng, Howard;
Valente, Marty;
Van Buren, David;
Villalvazo, Juan;
Warwick, Steve;
Webb, David;
Westerhoff, Thomas;
Wofford, Rush;
Wu, Gordon;
Woo, Jahning;
Wood, Milana;
Ziemer, John;
Arney, Giada;
Anderson, Jay;
Maíz-Apellániz, Jesús;
Bartlett, James;
Belikov, Ruslan;
Bendek, Eduardo;
Cenko, Brad;
Douglas, Ewan;
Dulz, Shannon;
Evans, Chris;
Faramaz, Virginie;
Feng, Y. Katherina;
Ferguson, Harry;
Follette, Kate;
Ford, Saavik;
García, Miriam;
Geha, Marla;
Gelino, Dawn;
Götberg, Ylva;
Hildebrandt, Sergi;
Hu, Renyu;
Jahnke, Knud;
Kennedy, Grant;
Kreidberg, Laura;
Isella, Andrea;
Lopez, Eric;
Marchis, Franck;
Macri, Lucas;
Marley, Mark;
Matzko, William;
Mazoyer, Johan;
McCandliss, Stephan;
Meshkat, Tiffany;
Mordasini, Christoph;
Morris, Patrick;
Nielsen, Eric;
Newman, Patrick;
Petigura, Erik;
Postman, Marc;
Reines, Amy;
Roberge, Aki;
Roederer, Ian;
Ruane, Garreth;
Schwieterman, Edouard;
Sirbu, Dan;
Spalding, Christopher;
Teplitz, Harry;
Tumlinson, Jason;
Turner, Neal;
Werk, Jessica;
Wofford, Aida;
Wyatt, Mark;
Young, Amber;
Zellem, Rob
Submitted: 2020-01-18, last modified: 2020-01-26
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory, or HabEx, has been designed to be the
Great Observatory of the 2030s. For the first time in human history,
technologies have matured sufficiently to enable an affordable space-based
telescope mission capable of discovering and characterizing Earthlike planets
orbiting nearby bright sunlike stars in order to search for signs of
habitability and biosignatures. Such a mission can also be equipped with
instrumentation that will enable broad and exciting general astrophysics and
planetary science not possible from current or planned facilities. HabEx is a
space telescope with unique imaging and multi-object spectroscopic capabilities
at wavelengths ranging from ultraviolet (UV) to near-IR. These capabilities
allow for a broad suite of compelling science that cuts across the entire NASA
astrophysics portfolio. HabEx has three primary science goals: (1) Seek out
nearby worlds and explore their habitability; (2) Map out nearby planetary
systems and understand the diversity of the worlds they contain; (3) Enable new
explorations of astrophysical systems from our own solar system to external
galaxies by extending our reach in the UV through near-IR. This Great
Observatory science will be selected through a competed GO program, and will
account for about 50% of the HabEx primary mission. The preferred HabEx
architecture is a 4m, monolithic, off-axis telescope that is
diffraction-limited at 0.4 microns and is in an L2 orbit. HabEx employs two
starlight suppression systems: a coronagraph and a starshade, each with their
own dedicated instrument.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.03277 [pdf] - 1942130
A Great Successor to the Hubble Space Telescope
Gaudi, B. Scott;
Clarke, John C.;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn;
Fischer, Debra;
Kiessling, Alina;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Peterson, Bradley M.;
Roberge, Aki;
Stern, Dan;
Warfield, Keith
Submitted: 2019-08-08, last modified: 2019-08-13
The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has been the most impactful science-driven
mission ever flown by NASA. However, when HST reaches the end of its life,
there will be a void due to the loss of some of the science capabilities
afforded by HST to astronomers world-wide. The previous 2010 Decadal Survey
(DS) noted this void, arguing for the need for a successor to HST with UV
capabilities in three separate places in the main report (pp. 190, 203, and
220). The large strategic missions that will follow HST, namely JWST and
WFIRST, will continue to spark the interest of the public in space-based
astronomy. In order to ensure continued US preeminence in the arena of large
space-based astrophysics missions, and a seamless transition after WFIRST, a
future flagship mission must be waiting in the wings. Anticipating this need,
NASA initiated four large strategic mission concept studies (HabEx, LUVOIR,
Lynx, and Origins), which have mature designs, including detailed technology
assessments and development plans. Two of these concepts, HabEx and LUVOIR, are
responsive to the recommendations of the previous DS regarding a UV-capable
mission. Both are more powerful successors to HST, with UV-to-optical
capabilities that range from significant enhancements to orders-of-magnitude
improvement. At the same time, technological and scientific advances over the
past decade only now make it feasible to marry such a mission with one that can
search for life outside the solar system. Acknowledging that the constraints
that the Astro2020 DS must consider may be difficult to anticipate, the HabEx
and LUVOIR studies present eleven different variants, each of which enable
groundbreaking science, including the direct imaging and characterization of
exoplanets. The HabEx and LUVOIR mission studies offer a full suite of options
to the Astro2020 DS, with corresponding flexibility in budgeting and phasing.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.01676 [pdf] - 1915228
Astro2020 APC White Paper: The Early Career Perspective on the Coming
Decade, Astrophysics Career Paths, and the Decadal Survey Process
Moravec, Emily;
Czekala, Ian;
Follette, Kate;
Ahmed, Zeeshan;
Alpaslan, Mehmet;
Amon, Alexandra;
Armentrout, Will;
Arney, Giada;
Barron, Darcy;
Bellm, Eric;
Bender, Amy;
Bridge, Joanna;
Colon, Knicole;
Datta, Rahul;
DeRoo, Casey;
Feng, Wanda;
Florian, Michael;
Gabriel, Travis;
Hall, Kirsten;
Hamden, Erika;
Hathi, Nimish;
Hawkins, Keith;
Hoadley, Keri;
Jensen-Clem, Rebecca;
Kao, Melodie;
Kara, Erin;
Karkare, Kirit;
Kiessling, Alina;
Kimball, Amy;
Kirkpatrick, Allison;
La Plante, Paul;
Leisenring, Jarron;
Li, Miao;
Lomax, Jamie;
Lund, Michael B.;
McCleary, Jacqueline;
Mills, Elisabeth;
Montiel, Edward;
Nelson, Nicholas;
Nevin, Rebecca;
Norris, Ryan;
Ntampaka, Michelle;
O'Donnell, Christine;
Peretz, Eliad;
Malagon, Andres Plazas;
Prescod-Weinstein, Chanda;
Pullen, Anthony;
Rice, Jared;
Roettenbacher, Rachael;
Sanderson, Robyn;
Simon, Jospeh;
Smith, Krista Lynne;
Stevenson, Kevin;
Veach, Todd;
Wetzel, Andrew;
Youngblood, Allison
Submitted: 2019-07-02, last modified: 2019-07-12
In response to the need for the Astro2020 Decadal Survey to explicitly engage
early career astronomers, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Medicine hosted the Early Career Astronomer and Astrophysicist Focus Session
(ECFS) on October 8-9, 2018 under the auspices of Committee of Astronomy and
Astrophysics. The meeting was attended by fifty six pre-tenure faculty,
research scientists, postdoctoral scholars, and senior graduate students, as
well as eight former decadal survey committee members, who acted as
facilitators. The event was designed to educate early career astronomers about
the decadal survey process, to solicit their feedback on the role that early
career astronomers should play in Astro2020, and to provide a forum for the
discussion of a wide range of topics regarding the astrophysics career path.
This white paper presents highlights and themes that emerged during two days
of discussion. In Section 1, we discuss concerns that emerged regarding the
coming decade and the astrophysics career path, as well as specific
recommendations from participants regarding how to address them. We have
organized these concerns and suggestions into five broad themes. These include
(sequentially): (1) adequately training astronomers in the statistical and
computational techniques necessary in an era of "big data", (2) responses to
the growth of collaborations and telescopes, (3) concerns about the adequacy of
graduate and postdoctoral training, (4) the need for improvements in equity and
inclusion in astronomy, and (5) smoothing and facilitating transitions between
early career stages. Section 2 is focused on ideas regarding the decadal survey
itself, including: incorporating early career voices, ensuring diverse input
from a variety of stakeholders, and successfully and broadly disseminating the
results of the survey.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.09674 [pdf] - 1757320
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Mission Concept Study
Interim Report
Gaudi, B. Scott;
Seager, Sara;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Kiessling, Alina;
Warfield, Keith;
Kuan, Gary;
Cahoy, Kerri;
Clarke, John T.;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn;
Feinberg, Lee;
Guyon, Olivier;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Mawet, Dimitri;
Robinson, Tyler;
Rogers, Leslie;
Scowen, Paul;
Somerville, Rachel;
Stapelfeldt, Karl;
Stark, Christopher;
Stern, Daniel;
Turnbull, Margaret;
Martin, Stefan;
Alvarez-Salazar, Oscar;
Amini, Rashied;
Arnold, William;
Balasubramanian, Bala;
Baysinger, Mike;
Blais, Lindsey;
Brooks, Thomas;
Calvet, Rob;
Cormarkovic, Velibor;
Cox, Charlie;
Danner, Rolf;
Davis, Jacqueline;
Dorsett, Lisa;
Effinger, Michael;
Eng, Ron;
Garcia, Jay;
Gaskin, Jonathan;
Harris, Joby;
Howe, Scott;
Knight, Brent;
Krist, John;
Levine, David;
Li, Mary;
Lisman, Doug;
Mandic, Milan;
Marchen, Luis;
Marrese-Reading, Colleen;
McGowen, Jim;
Miyaguchi, Andrew;
Morgan, Rhonda;
Nemati, Bijan;
Nikzad, Shouleh;
Nissen, Joel;
Novicki, Megan;
Perrine, Todd;
Redding, David;
Richards, Michael;
Rud, Mike;
Scharf, Dan;
Serabyn, Gene;
Shaklan, Stuart;
Smith, Scott;
Stahl, Mark;
Stahl, Phil;
Tang, Hao;
Van Buren, David;
Villalvazo, Juan;
Warwick, Steve;
Webb, David;
Wofford, Rush;
Woo, Jahning;
Wood, Milana;
Ziemer, John;
Douglas, Ewan;
Faramaz, Virginie;
Hildebrandt, Sergi;
Meshkat, Tiffany;
Plavchan, Peter;
Ruane, Garreth;
Turner, Neal
Submitted: 2018-09-25
For the first time in human history, technologies have matured sufficiently
to enable a mission capable of discovering and characterizing habitable planets
like Earth orbiting sunlike stars other than the Sun. At the same time, such a
platform would enable unique science not possible from ground-based facilities.
This science is broad and exciting, ranging from new investigations of our own
solar system to a full range of astrophysics disciplines.
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory, or HabEx, is one of four studies
currently being undertaken by NASA in preparation for the 2020 Astrophysics
Decadal Survey. HabEx has been designed to be the Great Observatory of the
2030s, with community involvement through a competed and funded Guest Observer
(GO) program. This interim report describes the HabEx baseline concept, which
is a space-based 4-meter diameter telescope mission concept with ultraviolet
(UV), optical, and near-infrared (near-IR) imaging and spectroscopy
capabilities.
More information on HabEx can be found at https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/habex
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.03628 [pdf] - 1663504
WFIRST Science Investigation Team "Cosmology with the High Latitude
Survey" Annual Report 2017
Doré, Olivier;
Hirata, Christopher;
Wang, Yun;
Weinberg, David;
Baronchelli, Ivano;
Benson, Andrew;
Capak, Peter;
Choi, Ami;
Eifler, Tim;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Ho, Shirley;
Izard, Albert;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kiessling, Alina;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Massara, Elena;
Masters, Dan;
Merson, Alex;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Malagon, Andres Plazas;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Samushia, Lado;
Shapiro, Chaz;
Simet, Melanie;
Spergel, David;
Teplitz, Harry;
Troxel, Michael;
Bean, Rachel;
Colbert, James;
Heinrich, Chen He;
Heitmann, Katrin;
Helou, George;
Hudson, Michael;
Huff, Eric;
Leauthaud, Alexie;
MacCrann, Niall;
Padmanabhan, Nikhil;
Pisani, Alice;
Rhodes, Jason;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Seiffert, Mike;
Smith, Kendrick;
Takada, Masahiro;
von der Linden, Anja;
Lupton, Robert;
Yoshida, Naoki;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Zu, Ying
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Cosmic acceleration is the most surprising cosmological discovery in many
decades. Testing and distinguishing among possible explanations requires
cosmological measurements of extremely high precision probing the full history
of cosmic expansion and structure growth and, ideally, compare and contrast
matter and relativistic tracers of the gravity potential. This program is one
of the defining objectives of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope
(WFIRST), as set forth in the New Worlds, New Horizons report (NWNH) in 2010.
The WFIRST mission has the ability to improve these measurements by 1-2 orders
of magnitude compared to the current state of the art, while simultaneously
extending their redshift grasp, greatly improving control of systematic
effects, and taking a unified approach to multiple probes that provide
complementary physical information and cross-checks of cosmological results. We
describe in this annual report the activities of the Science Investigation Team
(SIT) "Cosmology with the High Latitude Survey (HLS)" during the year 2017.
This team was selected by NASA in December 2015 in order to address the
stringent challenges of the WFIRST dark energy (DE) program through the
Project's formulation phase. This SIT has elected to jointly address Galaxy
Redshift Survey, Weak Lensing and Cluster Growth and thus fully embrace the
fact that the imaging and spectroscopic elements of the HLS will be realized as
an integrated observing program, and they jointly impose requirements on
performance and operations. WFIRST is designed to be able to deliver a
definitive result on the origin of cosmic acceleration. It is not optimized for
Figure of Merit sensitivity but for control of systematic uncertainties and for
having multiple techniques each with multiple cross-checks. Our SIT work
focuses on understanding the potential systematics in the WFIRST DE
measurements.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.00833 [pdf] - 1608480
Predicting H{\alpha} emission line galaxy counts for future galaxy
redshift surveys
Submitted: 2017-10-02, last modified: 2017-12-24
Knowledge of the number density of H$\alpha$ emitting galaxies is vital for
assessing the scientific impact of the Euclid and WFIRST missions. In this work
we present predictions from a galaxy formation model, Galacticus, for the
cumulative number counts of H$\alpha$-emitting galaxies. We couple Galacticus
to three different dust attenuation methods and examine the counts using each
method. A $\chi^2$ minimisation approach is used to compare the model
predictions to observed galaxy counts and calibrate the dust parameters. We
find that weak dust attenuation is required for the Galacticus counts to be
broadly consistent with the observations, though the optimum dust parameters
return large values for $\chi^2$, suggesting that further calibration of
Galacticus is necessary. The model predictions are also consistent with
observed estimates for the optical depth and the H$\alpha$ luminosity function.
Finally we present forecasts for the redshift distributions and number counts
for two Euclid-like and one WFIRST-like survey. For a Euclid-like survey with
redshift range $0.9\leqslant z\leqslant 1.8$ and H$\alpha+{\rm [NII]}$ blended
flux limit of $2\times 10^{-16}{\rm erg}\,{\rm s}^{-1}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$ we
predict a number density between 3900--4800 galaxies per square degree. For a
WFIRST-like survey with redshift range $1\leqslant z\leqslant 2$ and blended
flux limit of $1\times 10^{-16}{\rm erg}\,{\rm s}^{-1}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$ we
predict a number density between 10400--15200 galaxies per square degree.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.08489 [pdf] - 1605025
Scientific Synergy Between LSST and Euclid
Rhodes, Jason;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Aubourg, Éric;
Bean, Rachel;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Bremer, Malcolm N.;
Capak, Peter;
Cardone, Vincenzo;
Carry, Benoît;
Conselice, Christopher J.;
Connolly, Andrew J.;
Cuillandre, Jean-Charles;
Hatch, N. A.;
Helou, George;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Hildebrandt, Hendrik;
Hložek, Renée;
Jones, Lynne;
Kahn, Steven;
Kiessling, Alina;
Kitching, Thomas;
Lupton, Robert;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Markovic, Katarina;
Marshall, Phil;
Massey, Richard;
Maughan, Ben J.;
Melchior, Peter;
Mellier, Yannick;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Robertson, Brant;
Sauvage, Marc;
Schrabback, Tim;
Smith, Graham P.;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Taylor, Andy;
Von Der Linden, Anja
Submitted: 2017-10-23, last modified: 2017-11-29
Euclid and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) are poised to
dramatically change the astronomy landscape early in the next decade. The
combination of high cadence, deep, wide-field optical photometry from LSST with
high resolution, wide-field optical photometry and near-infrared photometry and
spectroscopy from Euclid will be powerful for addressing a wide range of
astrophysical questions. We explore Euclid/LSST synergy, ignoring the political
issues associated with data access to focus on the scientific, technical, and
financial benefits of coordination. We focus primarily on dark energy
cosmology, but also discuss galaxy evolution, transient objects, solar system
science, and galaxy cluster studies. We concentrate on synergies that require
coordination in cadence or survey overlap, or would benefit from pixel-level
co-processing that is beyond the scope of what is currently planned, rather
than scientific programs that could be accomplished only at the catalog level
without coordination in data processing or survey strategies. We provide two
quantitative examples of scientific synergies: the decrease in photo-z errors
(benefitting many science cases) when high resolution Euclid data are used for
LSST photo-z determination, and the resulting increase in weak lensing
signal-to-noise ratio from smaller photo-z errors. We briefly discuss other
areas of coordination, including high performance computing resources and
calibration data. Finally, we address concerns about the loss of independence
and potential cross-checks between the two missions and potential consequences
of not collaborating.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.03136 [pdf] - 1837067
Variations of cosmic large-scale structure covariance matrices across
parameter space
Submitted: 2016-07-11
The likelihood function for cosmological parameters, given by e.g. weak
lensing shear measurements, depends on contributions to the covariance induced
by the nonlinear evolution of the cosmic web. As nonlinear clustering to date
has only been described by numerical $N$-body simulations in a reliable and
sufficiently precise way, the necessary computational costs for estimating
those covariances at different points in parameter space are tremendous. In
this work we describe the change of the matter covariance and of the weak
lensing covariance matrix as a function of cosmological parameters by
constructing a suitable basis, where we model the contribution to the
covariance from nonlinear structure formation using Eulerian perturbation
theory at third order. We show that our formalism is capable of dealing with
large matrices and reproduces expected degeneracies and scaling with
cosmological parameters in a reliable way. Comparing our analytical results to
numerical simulations we find that the method describes the variation of the
covariance matrix found in the SUNGLASS weak lensing simulation pipeline within
the errors at one-loop and tree-level for the spectrum and the trispectrum,
respectively, for multipoles up to $\ell\leq 1300$. We show that it is possible
to optimize the sampling of parameter space where numerical simulations should
be carried out by minimising interpolation errors and propose a corresponding
method to distribute points in parameter space in an economical way.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.05345 [pdf] - 1360439
Bayesian hierarchical modelling of weak lensing - the golden goal
Submitted: 2016-02-17
To accomplish correct Bayesian inference from weak lensing shear data
requires a complete statistical description of the data. The natural framework
to do this is a Bayesian Hierarchical Model, which divides the chain of
reasoning into component steps. Starting with a catalogue of shear estimates in
tomographic bins, we build a model that allows us to sample simultaneously from
the the underlying tomographic shear fields and the relevant power spectra
(E-mode, B-mode, and E-B, for auto- and cross-power spectra). The procedure
deals easily with masked data and intrinsic alignments. Using Gibbs sampling
and messenger fields, we show with simulated data that the large (over
67000-)dimensional parameter space can be efficiently sampled and the full
joint posterior probability density function for the parameters can feasibly be
obtained. The method correctly recovers the underlying shear fields and all of
the power spectra, including at levels well below the shot noise.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.05456 [pdf] - 1337370
Galaxy alignments: An overview
Joachimi, Benjamin;
Cacciato, Marcello;
Kitching, Thomas D.;
Leonard, Adrienne;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Schäfer, Björn Malte;
Sifón, Cristóbal;
Hoekstra, Henk;
Kiessling, Alina;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Rassat, Anais
Submitted: 2015-04-21, last modified: 2016-01-08
The alignments between galaxies, their underlying matter structures, and the
cosmic web constitute vital ingredients for a comprehensive understanding of
gravity, the nature of matter, and structure formation in the Universe. We
provide an overview on the state of the art in the study of these alignment
processes and their observational signatures, aimed at a non-specialist
audience. The development of the field over the past one hundred years is
briefly reviewed. We also discuss the impact of galaxy alignments on
measurements of weak gravitational lensing, and discuss avenues for making
theoretical and observational progress over the coming decade.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.05546 [pdf] - 1337372
Galaxy alignments: Theory, modelling and simulations
Kiessling, Alina;
Cacciato, Marcello;
Joachimi, Benjamin;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Kitching, Thomas D.;
Leonard, Adrienne;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Schäfer, Björn Malte;
Sifón, Cristóbal;
Brown, Michael L.;
Rassat, Anais
Submitted: 2015-04-21, last modified: 2016-01-08
The shapes of galaxies are not randomly oriented on the sky. During the
galaxy formation and evolution process, environment has a strong influence, as
tidal gravitational fields in the large-scale structure tend to align nearby
galaxies. Additionally, events such as galaxy mergers affect the relative
alignments of both the shapes and angular momenta of galaxies throughout their
history. These "intrinsic galaxy alignments" are known to exist, but are still
poorly understood. This review will offer a pedagogical introduction to the
current theories that describe intrinsic galaxy alignments, including the
apparent difference in intrinsic alignment between early- and late-type
galaxies and the latest efforts to model them analytically. It will then
describe the ongoing efforts to simulate intrinsic alignments using both N-body
and hydrodynamic simulations. Due to the relative youth of this field, there is
still much to be done to understand intrinsic galaxy alignments and this review
summarises the current state of the field, providing a solid basis for future
work.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.05465 [pdf] - 1337371
Galaxy alignments: Observations and impact on cosmology
Kirk, Donnacha;
Brown, Michael L.;
Hoekstra, Henk;
Joachimi, Benjamin;
Kitching, Thomas D.;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Sifón, Cristóbal;
Cacciato, Marcello;
Choi, Ami;
Kiessling, Alina;
Leonard, Adrienne;
Rassat, Anais;
Schäfer, Björn Malte
Submitted: 2015-04-21, last modified: 2016-01-08
Galaxy shapes are not randomly oriented, rather they are statistically
aligned in a way that can depend on formation environment, history and galaxy
type. Studying the alignment of galaxies can therefore deliver important
information about the physics of galaxy formation and evolution as well as the
growth of structure in the Universe. In this review paper we summarise key
measurements of galaxy alignments, divided by galaxy type, scale and
environment. We also cover the statistics and formalism necessary to understand
the observations in the literature. With the emergence of weak gravitational
lensing as a precision probe of cosmology, galaxy alignments have taken on an
added importance because they can mimic cosmic shear, the effect of
gravitational lensing by large-scale structure on observed galaxy shapes. This
makes galaxy alignments, commonly referred to as intrinsic alignments, an
important systematic effect in weak lensing studies. We quantify the impact of
intrinsic alignments on cosmic shear surveys and finish by reviewing practical
mitigation techniques which attempt to remove contamination by intrinsic
alignments.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.07840 [pdf] - 1337382
Hierarchical Cosmic Shear Power Spectrum Inference
Submitted: 2015-05-28, last modified: 2016-01-08
We develop a Bayesian hierarchical modelling approach for cosmic shear power
spectrum inference, jointly sampling from the posterior distribution of the
cosmic shear field and its (tomographic) power spectra. Inference of the shear
power spectrum is a powerful intermediate product for a cosmic shear analysis,
since it requires very few model assumptions and can be used to perform
inference on a wide range of cosmological models \emph{a posteriori} without
loss of information. We show that joint posterior for the shear map and power
spectrum can be sampled effectively by Gibbs sampling, iteratively drawing
samples from the map and power spectrum, each conditional on the other. This
approach neatly circumvents difficulties associated with complicated survey
geometry and masks that plague frequentist power spectrum estimators, since the
power spectrum inference provides prior information about the field in masked
regions at every sampling step. We demonstrate this approach for inference of
tomographic shear $E$-mode, $B$-mode and $EB$-cross power spectra from a
simulated galaxy shear catalogue with a number of important features; galaxies
distributed on the sky and in redshift with photometric redshift uncertainties,
realistic random ellipticity noise for every galaxy and a complicated survey
mask. The obtained posterior distributions for the tomographic power spectrum
coefficients recover the underlying simulated power spectra for both $E$- and
$B$-modes.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.02192 [pdf] - 1277053
Constraining cosmology with shear peak statistics: tomographic analysis
Submitted: 2015-06-06, last modified: 2015-09-03
The abundance of peaks in weak gravitational lensing maps is a potentially
powerful cosmological tool, complementary to measurements of the shear power
spectrum. We study peaks detected directly in shear maps, rather than
convergence maps, an approach that has the advantage of working directly with
the observable quantity, the galaxy ellipticity catalog. Using large numbers of
numerical simulations to accurately predict the abundance of peaks and their
covariance, we quantify the cosmological constraints attainable by a large-area
survey similar to that expected from the Euclid mission, focussing on the
density parameter, {\Omega}m, and on the power spectrum normalization,
{\sigma}8, for illustration. We present a tomographic peak counting method that
improves the conditional (marginal) constraints by a factor 1.2 (2) over those
from a two-dimensional (i.e., non-tomographic) peak-count analysis. We find
that peak statistics provide constraints an order of magnitude less accurate
than those from the cluster sample in the ideal situation of a perfectly known
observable-mass relation; however, when the scaling relation is not known a
priori, the shear-peak constraints are twice as strong and orthogonal to the
cluster constraints, highlighting the value of using both clusters and
shear-peak statistics.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.03124 [pdf] - 1265701
Galaxy shapes and alignments in the MassiveBlack-II hydrodynamic and
dark matter-only simulations
Submitted: 2015-05-12, last modified: 2015-05-28
We compare the shapes and intrinsic alignments of galaxies in the
MassiveBlack-II cosmological hydrodynamic simulation (MBII) to those in a dark
matter-only (DMO) simulation performed with the same volume
(100$h^{-1}$Mpc)$^{3}$, cosmological parameters, and initial conditions.
Understanding the impact of baryonic physics on galaxy shapes and alignments
and their relation to the dark matter distribution should prove useful to map
the intrinsic alignments of galaxies from hydrodynamic to dark matter-only
simulations. We find that dark matter subhalos are typically rounder in MBII,
and the shapes of stellar matter in low mass galaxies are more misaligned with
the shapes of the dark matter of the corresponding subhalos in the DMO
simulation. At $z=0.06$, the fractional difference in the mean misalignment
angle between MBII and DMO simulations varies from $\sim 28 \% - 12 \%$ in the
mass range $10^{10.8} - 6.0 \times 10^{14} h^{-1}M_{\odot}$. We study the dark
matter halo shapes and alignments as a function of radius, and find that while
galaxies in MBII are more aligned with the inner parts of their dark matter
subhalos, there is no radial trend in their alignments with the corresponding
subhalo in the DMO simulation. This result highlights the importance of
baryonic physics in determining the alignment of the galaxy with respect to the
inner parts of the halo. Finally, we compare the ellipticity-direction (ED)
correlation for galaxies to that for dark matter halos, finding that it is
suppressed on all scales by stellar-dark matter misalignment. In the projected
shape-density correlation ($w_{\delta+}$), which includes ellipticity
weighting, this effect is partially canceled by the higher mean ellipticities
of the stellar component, but differences of order $30-40\%$ remain on scales
$> 1$ Mpc over a range of subhalo masses, with scale-dependent effects below
$1$ Mpc.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.6842 [pdf] - 916704
3D Cosmic Shear: Cosmology from CFHTLenS
Kitching, T. D.;
Heavens, A. F.;
Alsing, J.;
Erben, T.;
Heymans, C.;
Hildebrandt, H.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Jaffe, A.;
Kiessling, A.;
Mellier, Y.;
Miller, L.;
van Waerbeke, L.;
Benjamin, J.;
Coupon, J.;
Fu, L.;
Hudson, M. J.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kuijken, K.;
Rowe, B. T. P.;
Schrabback, T.;
Semboloni, E.;
Velander, M.
Submitted: 2014-01-27, last modified: 2015-01-05
This paper presents the first application of 3D cosmic shear to a wide-field
weak lensing survey. 3D cosmic shear is a technique that analyses weak lensing
in three dimensions using a spherical harmonic approach, and does not bin data
in the redshift direction. This is applied to CFHTLenS, a 154 square degree
imaging survey with a median redshift of 0.7 and an effective number density of
11 galaxies per square arcminute usable for weak lensing. To account for survey
masks we apply a 3D pseudo-Cl approach on weak lensing data, and to avoid
uncertainties in the highly non-linear regime, we separately analyse radial
wave numbers k<=1.5h/Mpc and k<=5.0h/Mpc, and angular wavenumbers l~400-5000.
We show how one can recover 2D and tomographic power spectra from the full 3D
cosmic shear power spectra and present a measurement of the 2D cosmic shear
power spectrum, and measurements of a set of 2-bin and 6-bin cosmic shear
tomographic power spectra; in doing so we find that using the 3D power in the
calculation of such 2D and tomographic power spectra from data naturally
accounts for a minimum scale in the matter power spectrum. We use 3D cosmic
shear to constrain cosmologies with parameters OmegaM, OmegaB, sigma8, h, ns,
w0, wa. For a non-evolving dark energy equation of state, and assuming a flat
cosmology, lensing combined with WMAP7 results in h=0.78+/-0.12,
OmegaM=0.252+/-0.079, sigma8=0.88+/-0.23 and w=-1.16+/-0.38 using only scales
k<=1.5h/Mpc. We also present results of lensing combined with first year Planck
results, where we find no tension with the results from this analysis, but we
also find no significant improvement over the Planck results alone. We find
evidence of a suppression of power compared to LCDM on small scales 1.5 < k <
5.0 h/Mpc in the lensing data, which is consistent with predictions of the
effect of baryonic feedback on the matter power spectrum.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6706 [pdf] - 789731
Airships: A New Horizon for Science
Miller, Sarah H.;
Fesen, Robert;
Hillenbrand, Lynne;
Rhodes, Jason;
Baird, Gil;
Blake, Geoffrey;
Booth, Jeff;
Carlile, David E.;
Duren, Riley;
Edworthy, Frederick G.;
Freeze, Brent;
Friedl, Randall R.;
Goldsmith, Paul F.;
Hall, Jeffery L.;
Hoffman, Scott E.;
Hovarter, Scott E.;
Jensen-Clem, Rebecca M.;
Jones, Ross M.;
Kauffmann, Jens;
Kiessling, Alina;
King, Oliver G.;
Konidaris, Nick;
Lachenmeier, Timothy L.;
Lord, Steven D.;
Neu, Jessica;
Quetin, Gregory R.;
Ram, Alan;
Sander, Stanley;
Simard, Marc;
Smith, Mike;
Smith, Steve;
Smoot, Sara;
Susca, Sara;
Swann, Abigail;
Young, Eliot F.;
Zambrano, Thomas
Submitted: 2014-02-26
The "Airships: A New Horizon for Science" study at the Keck Institute for
Space Studies investigated the potential of a variety of airships currently
operable or under development to serve as observatories and science
instrumentation platforms for a range of space, atmospheric, and Earth science.
The participants represent a diverse cross-section of the aerospace sector,
NASA, and academia. Over the last two decades, there has been wide interest in
developing a high altitude, stratospheric lighter-than-air (LTA) airship that
could maneuver and remain in a desired geographic position (i.e.,
"station-keeping") for weeks, months or even years. Our study found
considerable scientific value in both low altitude (< 40 kft) and high altitude
(> 60 kft) airships across a wide spectrum of space, atmospheric, and Earth
science programs. Over the course of the study period, we identified
stratospheric tethered aerostats as a viable alternative to airships where
station-keeping was valued over maneuverability. By opening up the sky and
Earth's stratospheric horizon in affordable ways with long-term flexibility,
airships allow us to push technology and science forward in a project-rich
environment that complements existing space observatories as well as aircraft
and high-altitude balloon missions.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.5422 [pdf] - 667633
Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope
Assets WFIRST-AFTA Final Report
Spergel, D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Breckinridge, J.;
Donahue, M.;
Dressler, A.;
Gaudi, B. S.;
Greene, T.;
Guyon, O.;
Hirata, C.;
Kalirai, J.;
Kasdin, N. J.;
Moos, W.;
Perlmutter, S.;
Postman, M.;
Rauscher, B.;
Rhodes, J.;
Wang, Y.;
Weinberg, D.;
Centrella, J.;
Traub, W.;
Baltay, C.;
Colbert, J.;
Bennett, D.;
Kiessling, A.;
Macintosh, B.;
Merten, J.;
Mortonson, M.;
Penny, M.;
Rozo, E.;
Savransky, D.;
Stapelfeldt, K.;
Zu, Y.;
Baker, C.;
Cheng, E.;
Content, D.;
Dooley, J.;
Foote, M.;
Goullioud, R.;
Grady, K.;
Jackson, C.;
Kruk, J.;
Levine, M.;
Melton, M.;
Peddie, C.;
Ruffa, J.;
Shaklan, S.
Submitted: 2013-05-23, last modified: 2013-05-24
The Astro2010 Decadal Survey recommended a Wide Field Infrared Survey
Telescope (WFIRST) as its top priority for a new large space mission. As
conceived by the decadal survey, WFIRST would carry out a dark energy science
program, a microlensing program to determine the demographics of exoplanets,
and a general observing program utilizing its ultra wide field. In October
2012, NASA chartered a Science Definition Team (SDT) to produce, in
collaboration with the WFIRST Project Office at GSFC and the Program Office at
JPL, a Design Reference Mission (DRM) for an implementation of WFIRST using one
of the 2.4-m, Hubble-quality mirror assemblies recently made available to NASA.
This DRM builds on the work of the earlier WFIRST SDT, reported by Green et al.
(2012). The 2.4-m primary mirror enables a mission with greater sensitivity and
higher angular resolution than the 1.3-m and 1.1-m designs considered
previously, increasing both the science return of the primary surveys and the
capabilities of WFIRST as a Guest Observer facility. The option of adding an
on-axis, coronagraphic instrument would enable imaging and spectroscopic
studies of planets around nearby stars. This document presents the final report
of the SDT.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.5425 [pdf] - 667634
WFIRST-2.4: What Every Astronomer Should Know
Spergel, D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Breckinridge, J.;
Donahue, M.;
Dressler, A.;
Gaudi, B. S.;
Greene, T.;
Guyon, O.;
Hirata, C.;
Kalirai, J.;
Kasdin, N. J.;
Moos, W.;
Perlmutter, S.;
Postman, M.;
Rauscher, B.;
Rhodes, J.;
Wang, Y.;
Weinberg, D.;
Centrella, J.;
Traub, W.;
Baltay, C.;
Colbert, J.;
Bennett, D.;
Kiessling, A.;
Macintosh, B.;
Merten, J.;
Mortonson, M.;
Penny, M.;
Rozo, E.;
Savransky, D.;
Stapelfeldt, K.;
Zu, Y.;
Baker, C.;
Cheng, E.;
Content, D.;
Dooley, J.;
Foote, M.;
Goullioud, R.;
Grady, K.;
Jackson, C.;
Kruk, J.;
Levine, M.;
Melton, M.;
Peddie, C.;
Ruffa, J.;
Shaklan, S.
Submitted: 2013-05-23, last modified: 2013-05-24
The Astro2010 Decadal Survey recommended a Wide Field Infrared Survey
Telescope (WFIRST) as its top priority for a new large space mission. The
report of the WFIRST-AFTA Science Definition Team (SDT) presents a Design
Reference Mission for WFIRST that employs one of the 2.4-m, Hubble-quality
mirror assemblies recently made available to NASA. The 2.4-m primary mirror
enables a mission with greater sensitivity and higher angular resolution than
the smaller aperture designs previously considered for WFIRST, increasing both
the science return of the primary surveys and the capabilities of WFIRST as a
Guest Observer facility. The option of adding an on-axis, coronagraphic
instrument would enable imaging and spectroscopic studies of planets around
nearby stars. This short article, produced as a companion to the SDT report,
summarizes the key points of the WFIRST-2.4 DRM. It highlights the remarkable
opportunity that the 2.4-m telescope affords for advances in many fields of
astrophysics and cosmology, including dark energy, the demographics and
characterization of exoplanets, the evolution of galaxies and quasars, and the
stellar populations of the Milky Way and its neighbors.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.6491 [pdf] - 1116979
COSMOS: Stochastic bias from measurements of weak lensing and galaxy
clustering
Submitted: 2012-02-29
In the theory of structure formation, galaxies are biased tracers of the
underlying matter density field. The statistical relation between galaxy and
matter density field is commonly referred as galaxy bias. In this paper, we
test the linear bias model with weak-lensing and galaxy clustering measurements
in the 2 square degrees COSMOS field (Scoville et al. 2007). We estimate the
bias of galaxies between redshifts z=0.2 and z=1, and over correlation scales
between R=0.2 h^-1 Mpc and R=15 h^-1 Mpc. We focus on three galaxy samples,
selected in flux (simultaneous cuts I_814W < 26.5 and K_s < 24), and in
stellar-mass (10^9 < M_* < 10^10 h^-2 Msun and 10^10 < M^*< 10^11 h^-2 Msun).
At scales R > 2 h^-1 Mpc, our measurements support a model of bias increasing
with redshift. The Tinker et al. (2010) fitting function provides a good fit to
the data. We find the best fit mass of the galaxy halos to be log(M_200 h^-1
Msun) = 11.7^+0.6_-1.3 and log(M_200 h^-1 Msun) = 12.4^+0.2_-2.9 respectively
for the low and high stellar-mass samples. In the halo model framework, bias is
scale-dependent with a change of slope at the transition scale between the one
and the two halo terms. We detect a scale-dependence of bias with a turn-down
at scale R=2.3\pm1.5 h^-1 Mpc, in agreement with previous galaxy clustering
studies. We find no significant amount of stochasticity, suggesting that a
linear bias model is sufficient to describe our data. We use N-body simulations
to quantify both the amount of cosmic variance and systematic errors in the
measurement.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.0779 [pdf] - 445530
Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Challenge Handbook
Kitching, Thomas;
Balan, Sreekumar;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bethge, Matthias;
Bridle, Sarah;
Courbin, Frederic;
Gentile, Marc;
Heavens, Alan;
Hirsch, Michael;
Hosseini, Reshad;
Kiessling, Alina;
Amara, Adam;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Moghaddam, Baback;
Nurbaeva, Guldariya;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Rassat, Anais;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schölkopf, Bernhard;
Shawe-Taylor, John;
Gill, Mandeep;
Shmakova, Marina;
Taylor, Andy;
Velander, Malin;
van Waerbeke, Ludovic;
Witherick, Dugan;
Wittman, David;
Harmeling, Stefan;
Heymans, Catherine;
Massey, Richard;
Rowe, Barnaby;
Schrabback, Tim;
Voigt, Lisa
Submitted: 2010-09-03, last modified: 2011-11-30
GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) is a public image
analysis challenge aimed at the development of algorithms to analyze
astronomical images. Specifically, the challenge is to measure varying image
distortions in the presence of a variable convolution kernel, pixelization and
noise. This is the second in a series of challenges set to the astronomy,
computer science and statistics communities, providing a structured environment
in which methods can be improved and tested in preparation for planned
astronomical surveys. GREAT10 extends upon previous work by introducing
variable fields into the challenge. The "Galaxy Challenge" involves the precise
measurement of galaxy shape distortions, quantified locally by two parameters
called shear, in the presence of a known convolution kernel. Crucially, the
convolution kernel and the simulated gravitational lensing shape distortion
both now vary as a function of position within the images, as is the case for
real data. In addition, we introduce the "Star Challenge" that concerns the
reconstruction of a variable convolution kernel, similar to that in a typical
astronomical observation. This document details the GREAT10 Challenge for
potential participants. Continually updated information is also available from
http://www.greatchallenges.info.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.3193 [pdf] - 429544
Euclid Definition Study Report
Laureijs, R.;
Amiaux, J.;
Arduini, S.;
Auguères, J. -L.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Cole, R.;
Cropper, M.;
Dabin, C.;
Duvet, L.;
Ealet, A.;
Garilli, B.;
Gondoin, P.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoar, J.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Holmes, R.;
Kitching, T.;
Maciaszek, T.;
Mellier, Y.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W.;
Rhodes, J.;
Criado, G. Saavedra;
Sauvage, M.;
Scaramella, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Warren, S.;
Bender, R.;
Castander, F.;
Cimatti, A.;
Fèvre, O. Le;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Levi, M.;
Lilje, P.;
Meylan, G.;
Nichol, R.;
Pedersen, K.;
Popa, V.;
Lopez, R. Rebolo;
Rix, H. -W.;
Rottgering, H.;
Zeilinger, W.;
Grupp, F.;
Hudelot, P.;
Massey, R.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Miller, L.;
Paltani, S.;
Paulin-Henriksson, S.;
Pires, S.;
Saxton, C.;
Schrabback, T.;
Seidel, G.;
Walsh, J.;
Aghanim, N.;
Amendola, L.;
Bartlett, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Beaulieu, J. -P.;
Benabed, K.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Elbaz, D.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gavazzi, G.;
Helmi, A.;
Hook, I.;
Irwin, M.;
Kneib, J. -P.;
Kunz, M.;
Mannucci, F.;
Moscardini, L.;
Tao, C.;
Teyssier, R.;
Weller, J.;
Zamorani, G.;
Osorio, M. R. Zapatero;
Boulade, O.;
Foumond, J. J.;
Di Giorgio, A.;
Guttridge, P.;
James, A.;
Kemp, M.;
Martignac, J.;
Spencer, A.;
Walton, D.;
Blümchen, T.;
Bonoli, C.;
Bortoletto, F.;
Cerna, C.;
Corcione, L.;
Fabron, C.;
Jahnke, K.;
Ligori, S.;
Madrid, F.;
Martin, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Pamplona, T.;
Prieto, E.;
Riva, M.;
Toledo, R.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Zerbi, F.;
Abdalla, F.;
Douspis, M.;
Grenet, C.;
Borgani, S.;
Bouwens, R.;
Courbin, F.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Dubath, P.;
Fontana, A.;
Frailis, M.;
Grazian, A.;
Koppenhöfer, J.;
Mansutti, O.;
Melchior, M.;
Mignoli, M.;
Mohr, J.;
Neissner, C.;
Noddle, K.;
Poncet, M.;
Scodeggio, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Shane, N.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Surace, C.;
Taylor, A.;
Verdoes-Kleijn, G.;
Vuerli, C.;
Williams, O. R.;
Zacchei, A.;
Altieri, B.;
Sanz, I. Escudero;
Kohley, R.;
Oosterbroek, T.;
Astier, P.;
Bacon, D.;
Bardelli, S.;
Baugh, C.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Benoist, C.;
Bianchi, D.;
Biviano, A.;
Branchini, E.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V.;
Clements, D.;
Colombi, S.;
Conselice, C.;
Cresci, G.;
Deacon, N.;
Dunlop, J.;
Fedeli, C.;
Fontanot, F.;
Franzetti, P.;
Giocoli, C.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gow, J.;
Heavens, A.;
Hewett, P.;
Heymans, C.;
Holland, A.;
Huang, Z.;
Ilbert, O.;
Joachimi, B.;
Jennins, E.;
Kerins, E.;
Kiessling, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kotak, R.;
Krause, O.;
Lahav, O.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lombardi, M.;
Magliocchetti, M.;
Maguire, K.;
Majerotto, E.;
Maoli, R.;
Marulli, F.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCracken, H.;
McLure, R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Merson, A.;
Moresco, M.;
Nonino, M.;
Norberg, P.;
Peacock, J.;
Pello, R.;
Penny, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Di Porto, C.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Quercellini, C.;
Radovich, M.;
Rassat, A.;
Roche, N.;
Ronayette, S.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sartoris, B.;
Schneider, P.;
Semboloni, E.;
Serjeant, S.;
Simpson, F.;
Skordis, C.;
Smadja, G.;
Smartt, S.;
Spano, P.;
Spiro, S.;
Sullivan, M.;
Tilquin, A.;
Trotta, R.;
Verde, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Williger, G.;
Zhao, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2011-10-14
Euclid is a space-based survey mission from the European Space Agency
designed to understand the origin of the Universe's accelerating expansion. It
will use cosmological probes to investigate the nature of dark energy, dark
matter and gravity by tracking their observational signatures on the geometry
of the universe and on the cosmic history of structure formation. The mission
is optimised for two independent primary cosmological probes: Weak
gravitational Lensing (WL) and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). The Euclid
payload consists of a 1.2 m Korsch telescope designed to provide a large field
of view. It carries two instruments with a common field-of-view of ~0.54 deg2:
the visual imager (VIS) and the near infrared instrument (NISP) which contains
a slitless spectrometer and a three bands photometer. The Euclid wide survey
will cover 15,000 deg2 of the extragalactic sky and is complemented by two 20
deg2 deep fields. For WL, Euclid measures the shapes of 30-40 resolved galaxies
per arcmin2 in one broad visible R+I+Z band (550-920 nm). The photometric
redshifts for these galaxies reach a precision of dz/(1+z) < 0.05. They are
derived from three additional Euclid NIR bands (Y, J, H in the range 0.92-2.0
micron), complemented by ground based photometry in visible bands derived from
public data or through engaged collaborations. The BAO are determined from a
spectroscopic survey with a redshift accuracy dz/(1+z) =0.001. The slitless
spectrometer, with spectral resolution ~250, predominantly detects Ha emission
line galaxies. Euclid is a Medium Class mission of the ESA Cosmic Vision
2015-2025 programme, with a foreseen launch date in 2019. This report (also
known as the Euclid Red Book) describes the outcome of the Phase A study.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.1399 [pdf] - 966617
Cosmological information in Gaussianised weak lensing signals
Submitted: 2011-04-07, last modified: 2011-07-29
We investigate the information on cosmology contained in Gaussianised weak
gravitational lensing convergence fields. Employing Box-Cox transformations to
determine optimal transformations to Gaussianity, we develop analytical models
for the transformed power spectrum, including effects of noise and smoothing.
We find that optimised Box-Cox transformations perform substantially better
than an offset logarithmic transformation in Gaussianising the convergence, but
both yield very similar results for the signal-to-noise and parameter
constraints. None of the transformations is capable of eliminating correlations
of the power spectra between different angular frequencies, which we
demonstrate to have a significant impact on the errors on cosmology. Analytic
models of the Gaussianised power spectrum yield good fits to the simulations
and produce unbiased parameter estimates in the majority of cases, where the
exceptions can be traced back to the limitations in modelling the higher-order
correlations of the original convergence. In the idealistic case, without
galaxy shape noise, we find an increase in cumulative signal-to-noise by a
factor of 2.6 for angular frequencies up to 1500, and a decrease in the area of
the confidence region in the Omega_m-sigma_8 plane by a factor of 4.4 in terms
of q-values for the best-performing transformation. When adding a realistic
level of shape noise, all transformations perform poorly with little
decorrelation of angular frequencies, a maximum increase in signal-to-noise of
34%, and even marginally degraded errors on cosmological parameters. We argue
that, to find Gaussianising transformations of practical use, one will need to
go beyond transformations of the one-point distribution of the convergence,
extend the analysis deeper into the non-linear regime, and resort to an
exploration of parameter space via simulations. (abridged)
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.6150 [pdf] - 1053070
Metallicity gradients of disc stars for a cosmologically simulated
galaxy
Submitted: 2011-03-31
We analyse for the first time the radial abundance gradients of the disc
stars of a disc galaxy simulated with our three dimensional, fully cosmological
chemodynamical galaxy evolution code GCD+. We study how [Fe/H], [N/O], [O/Fe],
[Mg/Fe] and [Si/Fe] vary with galactocentric radius. For the young stars of the
disc, we found a negative slope for [Fe/H] and [N/O] but a positive [O/Fe],
[Mg/Fe] and [Si/Fe] slope with radius. By analysing the star formation rate
(SFR) at different radii, we found that the simulated disc contains a greater
fraction of young stars in the outer regions, while the old stars tend to be
concentrated in the inner parts of the disc. This can explain the positive
[alpha/Fe] gradient as well as the negative [N/O] gradient with radius. This
radial trend is a natural outcome of an inside-out formation of the disc,
regardless of its size and can thus explain the recently observed positive
[alpha/Fe] gradients in the Milky Way disc open clusters.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.3245 [pdf] - 1052775
Simulating the Effect of Non-Linear Mode-Coupling in Cosmological
Parameter Estimation
Submitted: 2011-03-16
Fisher Information Matrix methods are commonly used in cosmology to estimate
the accuracy that cosmological parameters can be measured with a given
experiment, and to optimise the design of experiments. However, the standard
approach usually assumes both data and parameter estimates are
Gaussian-distributed. Further, for survey forecasts and optimisation it is
usually assumed the power-spectra covariance matrix is diagonal in
Fourier-space. But in the low-redshift Universe, non-linear mode-coupling will
tend to correlate small-scale power, moving information from lower to
higher-order moments of the field. This movement of information will change the
predictions of cosmological parameter accuracy. In this paper we quantify this
loss of information by comparing naive Gaussian Fisher matrix forecasts with a
Maximum Likelihood parameter estimation analysis of a suite of mock weak
lensing catalogues derived from N-body simulations, based on the SUNGLASS
pipeline, for a 2-D and tomographic shear analysis of a Euclid-like survey. In
both cases we find that the 68% confidence area of the Omega_m-sigma_8 plane
increases by a factor 5. However, the marginal errors increase by just 20 to
40%. We propose a new method to model the effects of nonlinear shear-power
mode-coupling in the Fisher Matrix by approximating the shear-power
distribution as a multivariate Gaussian with a covariance matrix derived from
the mock weak lensing survey. We find that this approximation can reproduce the
68% confidence regions of the full Maximum Likelihood analysis in the
Omega_m-sigma_8 plane to high accuracy for both 2-D and tomographic weak
lensing surveys. Finally, we perform a multi-parameter analysis of Omega_m,
sigma_8, h, n_s, w_0 and w_a to compare the Gaussian and non-linear
mode-coupled Fisher matrix contours. (Abridged)
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.1476 [pdf] - 1041781
SUNGLASS: A new weak lensing simulation pipeline
Submitted: 2010-11-05
A new cosmic shear analysis pipeline SUNGLASS (Simulated UNiverses for
Gravitational Lensing Analysis and Shear Surveys) is introduced. SUNGLASS is a
pipeline that rapidly generates simulated universes for weak lensing and cosmic
shear analysis. The pipeline forms suites of cosmological N-body simulations
and performs tomographic cosmic shear analysis using line-of-sight integration
through these simulations while saving the particle lightcone information.
Galaxy shear and convergence catalogues with realistic 3D galaxy redshift
distributions are produced for the purposes of testing weak lensing analysis
techniques and generating covariance matrices for data analysis and
cosmological parameter estimation. We present a suite of fast medium resolution
simulations with shear and convergence maps for a generic 100 square degree
survey out to a redshift of z = 1.5, with angular power spectra agreeing with
the theory to better than a few percent accuracy up to l = 10^3 for all source
redshifts up to z = 1.5 and wavenumbers up to l = 2000 for the source redshifts
z > 1.1. At higher wavenumbers, there is a failure of the theoretical lensing
power spectrum reflecting the known discrepancy of the Smith et al. (2003)
fitting formula at high physical wavenumbers. A two-parameter Gaussian
likelihood analysis of sigma_8 and Omega_m is also performed on the suite of
simulations, demonstrating that the cosmological parameters are recovered from
the simulations and the covariance matrices are stable for data analysis. We
find no significant bias in the parameter estimation at the level of ~ 0.02.
The SUNGLASS pipeline should be an invaluable tool in weak lensing analysis.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502280 [pdf] - 71071
Galactic Chemical Evolution Redux: Atomic Numbers 6 < Z < 15
Submitted: 2005-02-14
Motivated by the inability of Galactic chemical evolution models to reproduce
some of the observed solar neighbourhood distribution of elements (and
isotopes) with atomic numbers 6 < Z < 15, we have revisited the relevant
stellar and Galactic models as part of an ambitious new program aimed at
resolving these long-standing discrepancies. Avoiding the use of (traditional)
parametric models for low- and intermediate-mass stellar evolution, we have
generated a new, physically self-consistent, suite of stellar models and
integrated the nucleosynthetic outputs into GEtool, our semi-analytical
galactic chemical evolution software package. The predicted temporal evolution
of several light- and intermediate-mass elements (and their isotopes) in the
solar neighbourhood - from carbon to phosphorus - demonstrate the efficacy of
the new yields in reconciling theory and observation.