Normalized to: Khriplovich, I.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.1348 [pdf] - 752848
Gravitational four-fermion interaction and dynamics of the early
Universe
Submitted: 2013-03-06, last modified: 2013-11-28
If torsion exists, it generates gravitational four-fermion interaction
(GFFI), essential on the Planck scale. We analyze the influence of this
interaction on the Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker cosmology. Explicit
analytical solution is derived for the problem where both the energy-momentum
tensor generated by GFFI and the common ultrarelativistic energy-momentum
tensor are included. We demonstrate that gravitational four-fermion interaction
does not result in Big Bounce.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.7306 [pdf] - 635508
Cosmology constrains gravitational four-fermion interaction
Submitted: 2012-10-27
If torsion exists, it generates gravitational four-fermion interaction
(GFFI). This interaction gets dominating on the Planck scale. If one confines
to the regular, axial-axial part of this interaction, the results do not comply
with the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology for the spatial flat or
closed Universe. In principle, the anomalous, vector-vector interaction could
restore the agreement.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.3565 [pdf] - 635496
Difference between radiative transition rates in atoms and antiatoms
Submitted: 2012-08-17
We demonstrate that CP violation results in a difference of the partial decay
rates of atoms and antiatoms. The magnitude of this difference is estimated.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.5875 [pdf] - 1579407
Big bounce and inflation from gravitational four-fermion interaction
Submitted: 2012-03-27, last modified: 2012-07-25
The four-fermion gravitational interaction is induced by torsion, and gets
dominating on the Planck scale. The regular, axial-axial part of this
interaction by itself does not stop the gravitational compression. However, the
anomalous, vector-vector interaction results in a natural way both in big
bounce and in inflation.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.2967 [pdf] - 345981
Unusual Properties of Four-Fermion Gravitational Interaction
Submitted: 2011-04-15, last modified: 2011-04-18
This paper has been withdrawn by the author
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1005.1778 [pdf] - 163318
Comment on "Comments on recent work on dark-matter capture in the Solar
System"
Submitted: 2010-05-11
The criticism contained in the recent preprint arxiv:1004.5258 is based
essentially on misquoting the articles criticized therein. As to the conclusion
advocated in that preprint, according to which the density of dark matter bound
to the Solar System is small as compared to the dark-matter density in the
Galactic halo, it is not clear whether this claim is correct.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.3171 [pdf] - 1026389
Capture of dark matter by the Solar System. Simple estimates
Submitted: 2010-04-19
We consider the capture of galactic dark matter by the Solar System, due to
the gravitational three-body interaction of the Sun, a planet, and a dark
matter particle. Simple estimates are presented for the capture cross-section,
as well as for density and velocity distribution of captured dark matter
particles close to the Earth.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:0906.2480 [pdf] - 25234
Capture of dark matter by the Solar System
Submitted: 2009-06-13, last modified: 2009-07-01
We study the capture of galactic dark matter by the Solar System. The effect
is due to the gravitational three-body interaction between the Sun, one of the
planets, and a dark matter particle. The analytical estimate for the capture
cross-section is derived and the upper and lower bounds for the total mass of
the captured dark matter particles are found. The estimates for their density
are less reliable. The most optimistic of them give an enhancement of dark
matter density by about three orders of magnitudes compared to its value in our
Galaxy. However, even this optimistic value remains below the best present
observational upper limits by about two orders of magnitude.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:0801.4623 [pdf] - 9552
Passage of small black hole through the Earth. Is it detectable?
Submitted: 2008-01-30
We examine the energy losses of a small black hole passing through the Earth,
and in particular, the excitations created in the frequency range accessible to
modern acoustic detectors. The dominating contributions to the effect are due
to the coherent sound radiation of the Cherenkov type and to the conversion of
black hole radiation into sound waves.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:0801.1764 [pdf] - 8905
Does Cosmological Term Influence Gravitational Lensing?
Submitted: 2008-01-11
We analyze the bending of light by galaxies or clusters of galaxies in the
presence of the cosmological term. Going over to the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker
coordinates, used in fact for the description of actual observations, we
demonstrate that the cosmological constant does not influence practically the
lensing effect.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:0710.3438 [pdf] - 6154
Can one detect passage of small black hole through the Earth?
Submitted: 2007-10-18
The energy losses of a small black hole passing through the Earth are
examined. In particular, we investigate the excitations in the frequency range
accessible to modern acoustic detectors. The main contribution to the effect is
given by the coherent sound radiation of the Cherenkov type.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0702260 [pdf] - 89314
Density of dark matter in Solar system and perihelion precession of
planets
Submitted: 2007-02-09, last modified: 2007-03-15
Direct relation is pointed out between the secular perihelion precession of a
planet and the density of dark matter at its orbit. It is valid under the only
assumption that the density is spherically-symmetric, with the center
coinciding with the Sun. This relation, combined with the observational data on
perihelion precession of planets, results in upper limits on local values of
the dark matter density in the Solar system.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0604003 [pdf] - 81072
Is Radiation of Quantized Black Holes Observable?
Submitted: 2006-04-01, last modified: 2006-12-04
If primordial black holes (PBH) saturate the present upper limit on the dark
matter density in our Solar system and if their radiation spectrum is discrete,
the sensitivity of modern detectors is close to that necessary for detecting
this radiation. This conclusion is not in conflict with the upper limits on the
PBH evaporation rate.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601422 [pdf] - 260683
Upper limits on density of dark matter in Solar system
Submitted: 2006-01-19, last modified: 2006-05-11
The analysis of the observational data for the secular perihelion precession
of Mercury, Earth, and Mars, based on the EPM2004 ephemerides, results in new
upper limits on density of dark matter in the Solar system.