Normalized to: Keys, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.09188 [pdf] - 1870274
The digest2 NEO Classification Code
Submitted: 2019-04-19
We describe the digest2 software package, a fast, short-arc orbit classifier
for small Solar System bodies. The digest2 algorithm has been serving the
community for more than 13 years. The code provides a score, D2, which
represents a pseudo-probability that a tracklet belongs to a given Solar System
orbit type. digest2 is primarily used as a classifier for Near-Earth Object
(NEO) candidates, to identify those to be prioritized for follow-up
observation. We describe the historical development of digest2 and demonstrate
its use on real and synthetic data. We find that digest2 can accurately and
precisely distinguish NEOs from non- NEOs. At the time of detection, 14% of NEO
tracklets and 98.5% of non-NEOs tracklets have D2 below the critical value of
D2 = 65. 94% of our simulated NEOs achieved the maximum D2 = 100 and 99.6% of
NEOs achieved $D2 \ge 65$ at least once during the simulated 10-year timeframe.
We demonstrate that D2 varies as a function of time, rate of motion, magnitude
and sky-plane location, and show that NEOs tend to have lower D2 at low Solar
elongations close to the ecliptic. We use our findings to recommend future
development directions for the digest2 code.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.02804 [pdf] - 1697078
Unconfirmed Near-Earth Objects
Submitted: 2018-05-07, last modified: 2018-05-30
We studied the Near-Earth Asteroid (NEA) candidates posted on the Minor
Planet Center's Near-Earth Object Confirmation Page (NEOCP) between years 2013
and 2016. Out of more than 17,000 NEA candidates, while the majority became
either new discoveries or were associated with previously known objects, about
11% were unable to be followed-up or confirmed. We further demonstrate that of
the unconfirmed candidates, 926+/-50 are likely to be NEAs, representing 18% of
discovered NEAs in that period. Only 11% (~93) of the unconfirmed NEA
candidates were large (having absolute magnitude H<22). To identify the reasons
why these NEAs were not recovered, we analyzed those from the most prolific
asteroid surveys: Pan-STARRS, the Catalina Sky Survey, the Dark Energy Survey,
and the Space Surveillance Telescope. We examined the influence of plane-of-sky
positions and rates of motion, brightnesses, submission delays, and computed
absolute magnitudes, as well as correlations with the phase of the moon and
seasonal effects. We find that delayed submission of newly discovered NEA
candidate to the NEOCP drove a large fraction of the unconfirmed NEA
candidates. A high rate of motion was another significant contributing factor.
We suggest that prompt submission of suspected NEA discoveries and rapid
response to fast moving targets and targets with fast growing ephemeris
uncertainty would allow better coordination among dedicated follow-up
observers, decrease the number of unconfirmed NEA candidates, and increase the
discovery rate of NEAs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.4493 [pdf] - 1123528
CfA4: Light Curves for 94 Type Ia Supernovae
Hicken, Malcolm;
Challis, Peter;
Kirshner, Robert P.;
Rest, Armin;
Cramer, Claire E.;
Wood-Vasey, W. Michael;
Bakos, Gaspar;
Berlind, Perry;
Brown, Warren R.;
Caldwell, Nelson;
Calkins, Mike;
Currie, Thayne;
de Kleer, Kathy;
Esquerdo, Gil;
Everett, Mark;
Falco, Emilio;
Fernandez, Jose;
Friedman, Andrew S.;
Groner, Ted;
Hartman, Joel;
Holman, Matthew J.;
Hutchins, Robert;
Keys, Sonia;
Kipping, David;
Latham, Dave;
Marion, George H.;
Narayan, Gautham;
Pahre, Michael;
Pal, Andras;
Peters, Wayne;
Perumpilly, Gopakumar;
Ripman, Ben;
Sipocz, Brigitta;
Szentgyorgyi, Andrew;
Tang, Sumin;
Torres, Manuel A. P.;
Vaz, Amali;
Wolk, Scott;
Zezas, Andreas
Submitted: 2012-05-21
We present multi-band optical photometry of 94 spectroscopically-confirmed
Type Ia supernovae (SN Ia) in the redshift range 0.0055 to 0.073, obtained
between 2006 and 2011. There are a total of 5522 light curve points. We show
that our natural system SN photometry has a precision of roughly 0.03 mag or
better in BVr'i', 0.06 mag in u', and 0.07 mag in U for points brighter than
17.5 mag and estimate that it has a systematic uncertainty of 0.014, 0.010,
0.012, 0.014, 0.046, and 0.073 mag in BVr'i'u'U, respectively. Comparisons of
our standard system photometry with published SN Ia light curves and comparison
stars reveal mean agreement across samples in the range of ~0.00-0.03 mag. We
discuss the recent measurements of our telescope-plus-detector throughput by
direct monochromatic illumination by Cramer et al (in prep.). This technique
measures the whole optical path through the telescope, auxiliary optics,
filters, and detector under the same conditions used to make SN measurements.
Extremely well-characterized natural-system passbands (both in wavelength and
over time) are crucial for the next generation of SN Ia photometry to reach the
0.01 mag accuracy level. The current sample of low-z SN Ia is now sufficiently
large to remove most of the statistical sampling error from the dark energy
error budget. But pursuing the dark-energy systematic errors by determining
highly-accurate detector passbands, combining optical and near-infrared (NIR)
photometry and spectra, using the nearby sample to illuminate the population
properties of SN Ia, and measuring the local departures from the Hubble flow
will benefit from larger, carefully measured nearby samples.