The new technique of Speckle Stabilization has great potential to provide optical imaging data at the highest angular resolutions from the ground. While Speckle Stabilization was initially conceived for integral field spectroscopic analyses, the technique shares many similarities with speckle imaging (specifically shift-and-add and Lucky Imaging). Therefore, it is worth comparing the two for imaging applications. We have modeled observations on a 2.5-meter class telescope to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the two techniques. While the differences are relatively minor, we find that Speckle Stabilization is a viable competitor to current Lucky Imaging systems. Specifically, we find that Speckle Stabilization is 3.35 times more efficient (where efficiency is defined as signal-to-noise per observing interval) than shift-and-add and able to detect targets 1.42 magnitudes fainter when using a standard system. If we employ a high-speed shutter to compare to Lucky Imaging at 1% image selection, Speckle Stabilization is 1.28 times more efficient and 0.31 magnitudes more sensitive. However, when we incorporate potential modifications to Lucky Imaging systems we find the advantages are significantly mitigated and even reversed in the 1% frame selection cases. In particular, we find that in the limiting case of Optimal Lucky Imaging, that is zero read noise {\it and} photon counting, we find Lucky Imaging is 1.80 times more efficient and 0.96 magnitudes more sensitive than Speckle Stabilization. For the cases in between, we find there is a gradation in advantages to the different techniques depending on target magnitude, fraction of frames used and system modifications.

We present our discovery of a narrow-line Baldwin effect, an anti-correlation between the equivalent width (EW) of a line and the flux of the associated continuum, in 5-20$\mu$m mid-infared lines from a sample of 68 Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), located at z$<$0.5, observed with the Infrared Spectrograph on the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}. Our analysis reveals a clear anti-correlation between the EW of the [SIV] 10.51$\mu$m, [NeII] 12.81$\mu$m, and [NeIII] 15.56$\mu$m lines and their mid-IR continuum luminosities, while the Baldwin effect for [NeV] 14.32$\mu$m is not as obvious. We suggest that this anti-correlation is driven by the central AGN and not circumnuclear star formation in the host galaxy. We also find that the slope of the narrow-line Baldwin effect in the mid-infrared does not appear to steepen with increasing ionization potential. Examining the dependence of the EW to the Eddington Ratio ($L/L_{Edd}$) we find no strong relationship for mid-IR lines. Our study indicates that the narrow-line mid-infrared Baldwin Effect is quite different from the broad-line optical/UV Baldwin effect and it is possible that the two effects are unrelated. The discovered anti-correlations open new possibilities in the understanding the physics of the ionizing region and the continuum reprocessing by dust.