Normalized to: Kengkriangkrai, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.07892 [pdf] - 1546358
SDSS J105754.25+275947.5: a period-bounce eclipsing cataclysmic variable
with the lowest-mass donor yet measured
McAllister, M. J.;
Littlefair, S. P.;
Dhillon, V. S.;
Marsh, T. R.;
Gänsicke, B. T.;
Bochinksi, J.;
Bours, M. C. P.;
Breedt, E.;
Hardy, L. K.;
Hermes, J. J.;
Kengkriangkrai, S.;
Kerry, P.;
Parsons, S. G.;
Rattanasoon, S.
Submitted: 2017-01-26
We present high-speed, multicolour photometry of the faint, eclipsing
cataclysmic variable (CV) SDSS J105754.25+275947.5. The light from this system
is dominated by the white dwarf. Nonetheless, averaging many eclipses reveals
additional features from the eclipse of the bright spot. This enables the
fitting of a parameterised eclipse model to these average light curves,
allowing the precise measurement of system parameters. We find a mass ratio of
q = 0.0546 $\pm$ 0.0020 and inclination i = 85.74 $\pm$ 0.21$^{\circ}$. The
white dwarf and donor masses were found to be M$_{\mathrm{w}}$ = 0.800 $\pm$
0.015 M$_{\odot}$ and M$_{\mathrm{d}}$ = 0.0436 $\pm$ 0.0020 M$_{\odot}$,
respectively. A temperature T$_{\mathrm{w}}$ = 13300 $\pm$ 1100 K and distance
d = 367 $\pm$ 26 pc of the white dwarf were estimated through fitting model
atmosphere predictions to multicolour fluxes. The mass of the white dwarf in
SDSS 105754.25+275947.5 is close to the average for CV white dwarfs, while the
donor has the lowest mass yet measured in an eclipsing CV. A low-mass donor and
an orbital period (90.44 min) significantly longer than the period minimum
strongly suggest that this is a bona fide period-bounce system, although
formation from a white dwarf/brown dwarf binary cannot be ruled out. Very few
period-minimum/period-bounce systems with precise system parameters are
currently known, and as a consequence the evolution of CVs in this regime is
not yet fully understood.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.06143 [pdf] - 1513693
Using Gaussian processes to model light curves in the presence of
flickering: the eclipsing cataclysmic variable ASASSN-14ag
McAllister, M. J.;
Littlefair, S. P.;
Dhillon, V. S.;
Marsh, T. R.;
Ashley, R. P.;
Bours, M. C. P.;
Breedt, E.;
Hardy, L. K.;
Hermes, J. J.;
Kengkriangkrai, S.;
Kerry, P.;
Rattanasoon, S.;
Sahman, D. I.
Submitted: 2016-09-20
The majority of cataclysmic variable (CV) stars contain a stochastic noise
component in their light curves, commonly referred to as flickering. This can
significantly affect the morphology of CV eclipses and increases the difficulty
in obtaining accurate system parameters with reliable errors through eclipse
modelling. Here we introduce a new approach to eclipse modelling, which models
CV flickering with the help of Gaussian processes (GPs). A parameterised
eclipse model - with an additional GP component - is simultaneously fit to 8
eclipses of the dwarf nova ASASSN-14ag and system parameters determined. We
obtain a mass ratio $q$ = 0.149 $\pm$ 0.016 and inclination $i$ = 83.4
$^{+0.9}_{-0.6}$ $^{\circ}$. The white dwarf and donor masses were found to be
$M_{w}$ = 0.63 $\pm$ 0.04 $M_{\odot}$ and $M_{d}$ = 0.093 $^{+0.015}_{-0.012}$
$M_{\odot}$, respectively. A white dwarf temperature $T_{w}$ = 14000
$^{+2200}_{-2000}$ K and distance $d$ = 146 $^{+24}_{-20}$ pc were determined
through multicolour photometry. We find GPs to be an effective way of modelling
flickering in CV light curves and plan to use this new eclipse modelling
approach going forward.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.05144 [pdf] - 1183018
A double white dwarf with a paradoxical origin?
Bours, M. C. P.;
Marsh, T. R.;
Gaensicke, B. T.;
Tauris, T. M.;
Istrate, A. G.;
Badenes, C.;
Dhillon, V. S.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Hermes, J. J.;
Kengkriangkrai, S.;
Kilic, M.;
Koester, D.;
Mullally, F.;
Prasert, N.;
Steeghs, D.;
Thompson, S. E.;
Thorstensen, J. R.
Submitted: 2015-05-19
We present Hubble Space Telescope UV spectra of the 4.6 h period double white
dwarf SDSS J125733.63+542850.5. Combined with Sloan Digital Sky Survey optical
data, these reveal that the massive white dwarf (secondary) has an effective
temperature T2 = 13030 +/- 70 +/- 150 K and a surface gravity log g2 = 8.73 +/-
0.05 +/- 0.05 (statistical and systematic uncertainties respectively), leading
to a mass of M2 = 1.06 Msun. The temperature of the extremely low-mass white
dwarf (primary) is substantially lower at T1 = 6400 +/- 37 +/- 50 K, while its
surface gravity is poorly constrained by the data. The relative flux
contribution of the two white dwarfs across the spectrum provides a radius
ratio of R1/R2 = 4.2, which, together with evolutionary models, allows us to
calculate the cooling ages. The secondary massive white dwarf has a cooling age
of about 1 Gyr, while that of the primary low-mass white dwarf is likely to be
much longer, possibly larger than 5 Gyrs, depending on its mass and the
strength of chemical diffusion. These results unexpectedly suggest that the
low-mass white dwarf formed long before the massive white dwarf, a puzzling
discovery which poses a paradox for binary evolution.