The calculation of distances is of fundamental importance in extragalactic astronomy and cosmology. However, no practical implementation for the general case has previously been available. We derive a second-order differential equation for the angular size distance valid not only in all em homogeneous Friedmann-Lemaitre cosmological models, parametrised by $\lambda_{0}$ and $\Omega_{0}$, but also in inhomogeneous `on-average' Friedmann-Lemaitre models, where the inhomogeneity is given by the (in the general case redshift-dependent) parameter $\eta$. Since most other cosmological distances can be obtained trivially from the angular size distance, and since the differential equation can be efficiently solved numerically, this offers for the first time a practical method for calculating distances in a large class of cosmological models. We also briefly discuss our numerical implementation, which is publicly available.

We reanalyse the spectra used by D.-E. Liebscher (no relation) et al with the same goal -- determining the cosmological parameters -- and basically the same assumptions but with a different statistical method, which does not rely on binning the data. Also, we correct for selection effects. We basically confirm their result, with somewhat larger but still very small (formal) errors. However, all world models within the 99% confidence region are ruled out because a firm lower limit on $\Omega_{0}$ is significantly larger. This directly demonstrates for the first time the existence of intrinsic evolution in the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest.

For known gravitational lens systems the redshift distribution of the lenses is compared with theoretical expectations for $10^{4}$~Friedmann-Lema\^\i tre~cosmological models, which more than cover the range of possible cases. The comparison is used for assigning a relative probability to each of the models. The entire procedure is repeated for different values of the inhomogeneity parameter~$\eta$ and the limiting spectroscopic magnitude~$m_{\rm lim}$, which is important for selection effects. The dependence on these two parameters is examined in more detail for the special cases~$\lambda_{0}=0$ and $k=0$. Previous results that this method is a better probe for~$\lambda_{0}$ than $\Omega_{0}$ are confirmed, but it appears that the low probability of models with large~$\lambda_{0}$~values found using similar methods is due to a selection effect. The power of this method to discriminate between cosmological models can of course be improved if more gravitational lens systems are found. However, our numerical simulations indicate that a reasonable number of observed systems cannot deliver interesting constraints on the cosmological parameters.

We present a new analysis of the presently available photometric data for the gravitationally lensed quasar 0957+561 A,B with the aim of determining the time delay between its two images. The basic method used is the dispersion estimation technique. Even by using the simplest non-parametric form of our method we can convincingly rule out a time delay near 536 days and show that the time delay is in the vicinity of 420 days. We then introduce refinements to our method in order to get a stable and reliable result for the time delay independent of high frequency noise in the data and sampling errors. Our best result for the time delay, checked by various statistical tests and using bootstrap error estimates, is 423 +/- 6 days. We furthermore confirm our earlier result that the radio data are compatible with this value. Using the best available model for the mass distribution in the lensing galaxy and cluster, our result for the time delay constrains the Hubble parameter to be smaller than 70 km/(s Mpc).

The recent proposal by Kellermann (1993) to use the angular size/redshift relation of compact radio sources to obtain information on the value of cosmological parameters has provoked considerable discussion in the astronomical community. I present here a careful re-analysis of the angular size/redshift data of radio jets used by Kellermann (1993), using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to check the independence of the distribution of linear jet sizes from redshift under the assumption that no evolution is present in the sources. The test takes into account biasing of the sample due to the limited resolution. While the data are compatible with an Einstein-de~Sitter Universe ($P=0.2$), they are not sufficient to rule out a significant part of the $(\Omega_0,\lambda_0)$-plane.

We introduce a new complex formalism to describe arclet fields in clusters of galaxies and derive the appropriate inversion techniques to find the related mass distribution of the lensing cluster. Applying the complex formalism to the statistics of lensed background sources shows that the mean of the axial ratios of locally lensed isotropically distributed elliptical sources is {\em not} influenced by the intrinsic ellipticity distribution, if the cluster is subcritical in that region.

Clusters of galaxies acting as gravitational lenses deform the images of background galaxies. For small galaxies the deformation is determined by the local properties of the lens (shear, convergence). Small circular shaped galaxies are seen as small ellipses. The orientation and axial ratio of the ellipses could then be used to trace the properties of the lens. We introduce and solve an ordinary homogeneous linear first order differential equation which describes completely the radial cluster lens. It can be used to reconstruct the lens mappeing from the measured axial ratios of lensed background galaxies.

We present a new analysis of previously published optical and radio data sets of the gravitationally lensed quasar 0957+561 A,B with the aim of determining the time delay between its two images. We use a non-parametric estimate of the dispersion of the combined data set where, however, we only make use of alternating neighbours in order to avoid windowing effects. From the optical data a time delay of (415 $\pm$ 32) days and from the radio data a delay of (409 $\pm$ 23) days is suggested. We demonstrate a considerable sensitivity of different delay estimation procedures against the removal of only a few observational data points or against smoothing or detrending of the original data sets. The radio data give us formally a slightly more precise value for the time delay than the optical data. Also, due to the lack of windowing effects, the result obtained for the radio data can be considered as somewhat more reliable than the delay determined from the optical data.