Normalized to: Kasliwal, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.04058 [pdf] - 1587069
Science-Driven Optimization of the LSST Observing Strategy
LSST Science Collaboration;
Marshall, Phil;
Anguita, Timo;
Bianco, Federica B.;
Bellm, Eric C.;
Brandt, Niel;
Clarkson, Will;
Connolly, Andy;
Gawiser, Eric;
Ivezic, Zeljko;
Jones, Lynne;
Lochner, Michelle;
Lund, Michael B.;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Nidever, David;
Olsen, Knut;
Ridgway, Stephen;
Rhodes, Jason;
Shemmer, Ohad;
Trilling, David;
Vivas, Kathy;
Walkowicz, Lucianne;
Willman, Beth;
Yoachim, Peter;
Anderson, Scott;
Antilogus, Pierre;
Angus, Ruth;
Arcavi, Iair;
Awan, Humna;
Biswas, Rahul;
Bell, Keaton J.;
Bennett, David;
Britt, Chris;
Buzasi, Derek;
Casetti-Dinescu, Dana I.;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Claver, Chuck;
Cook, Kem;
Davenport, James;
Debattista, Victor;
Digel, Seth;
Doctor, Zoheyr;
Firth, R. E.;
Foley, Ryan;
Fong, Wen-fai;
Galbany, Lluis;
Giampapa, Mark;
Gizis, John E.;
Graham, Melissa L.;
Grillmair, Carl;
Gris, Phillipe;
Haiman, Zoltan;
Hartigan, Patrick;
Hawley, Suzanne;
Hlozek, Renee;
Jha, Saurabh W.;
Johns-Krull, C.;
Kanbur, Shashi;
Kalogera, Vassiliki;
Kashyap, Vinay;
Kasliwal, Vishal;
Kessler, Richard;
Kim, Alex;
Kurczynski, Peter;
Lahav, Ofer;
Liu, Michael C.;
Malz, Alex;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Matheson, Tom;
McEwen, Jason D.;
McGehee, Peregrine;
Meibom, Soren;
Meyers, Josh;
Monet, Dave;
Neilsen, Eric;
Newman, Jeffrey;
O'Dowd, Matt;
Peiris, Hiranya V.;
Penny, Matthew T.;
Peters, Christina;
Poleski, Radoslaw;
Ponder, Kara;
Richards, Gordon;
Rho, Jeonghee;
Rubin, David;
Schmidt, Samuel;
Schuhmann, Robert L.;
Shporer, Avi;
Slater, Colin;
Smith, Nathan;
Soares-Santos, Marcelles;
Stassun, Keivan;
Strader, Jay;
Strauss, Michael;
Street, Rachel;
Stubbs, Christopher;
Sullivan, Mark;
Szkody, Paula;
Trimble, Virginia;
Tyson, Tony;
de Val-Borro, Miguel;
Valenti, Stefano;
Wagoner, Robert;
Wood-Vasey, W. Michael;
Zauderer, Bevin Ashley
Submitted: 2017-08-14
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope is designed to provide an unprecedented
optical imaging dataset that will support investigations of our Solar System,
Galaxy and Universe, across half the sky and over ten years of repeated
observation. However, exactly how the LSST observations will be taken (the
observing strategy or "cadence") is not yet finalized. In this
dynamically-evolving community white paper, we explore how the detailed
performance of the anticipated science investigations is expected to depend on
small changes to the LSST observing strategy. Using realistic simulations of
the LSST schedule and observation properties, we design and compute diagnostic
metrics and Figures of Merit that provide quantitative evaluations of different
observing strategies, analyzing their impact on a wide range of proposed
science projects. This is work in progress: we are using this white paper to
communicate to each other the relative merits of the observing strategy choices
that could be made, in an effort to maximize the scientific value of the
survey. The investigation of some science cases leads to suggestions for new
strategies that could be simulated and potentially adopted. Notably, we find
motivation for exploring departures from a spatially uniform annual tiling of
the sky: focusing instead on different parts of the survey area in different
years in a "rolling cadence" is likely to have significant benefits for a
number of time domain and moving object astronomy projects. The communal
assembly of a suite of quantified and homogeneously coded metrics is the vital
first step towards an automated, systematic, science-based assessment of any
given cadence simulation, that will enable the scheduling of the LSST to be as
well-informed as possible.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01617 [pdf] - 1586797
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Galaxies Science Roadmap
Robertson, Brant E.;
Banerji, Manda;
Cooper, Michael C.;
Davies, Roger;
Driver, Simon P.;
Ferguson, Annette M. N.;
Ferguson, Henry C.;
Gawiser, Eric;
Kaviraj, Sugata;
Knapen, Johan H.;
Lintott, Chris;
Lotz, Jennifer;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Norman, Dara J.;
Padilla, Nelson;
Schmidt, Samuel J.;
Smith, Graham P.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Verma, Aprajita;
Zehavi, Idit;
Armus, Lee;
Avestruz, Camille;
Barrientos, L. Felipe;
Bowler, Rebecca A. A.;
Bremer, Malcom N.;
Conselice, Christopher J.;
Davies, Jonathan;
Demarco, Ricardo;
Dickinson, Mark E.;
Galaz, Gaspar;
Grazian, Andrea;
Holwerda, Benne W.;
Jarvis, Matt J.;
Kasliwal, Vishal;
Lacerna, Ivan;
Loveday, Jon;
Marshall, Phil;
Merlin, Emiliano;
Napolitano, Nicola R.;
Puzia, Thomas H.;
Robotham, Aaron;
Salim, Samir;
Sereno, Mauro;
Snyder, Gregory F.;
Stott, John P.;
Tissera, Patricia B.;
Werner, Norbert;
Yoachim, Peter;
Borne, Kirk D.;
Collaboration, Members of the LSST Galaxies Science
Submitted: 2017-08-04
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will enable revolutionary studies
of galaxies, dark matter, and black holes over cosmic time. The LSST Galaxies
Science Collaboration has identified a host of preparatory research tasks
required to leverage fully the LSST dataset for extragalactic science beyond
the study of dark energy. This Galaxies Science Roadmap provides a brief
introduction to critical extragalactic science to be conducted ahead of LSST
operations, and a detailed list of preparatory science tasks including the
motivation, activities, and deliverables associated with each. The Galaxies
Science Roadmap will serve as a guiding document for researchers interested in
conducting extragalactic science in anticipation of the forthcoming LSST era.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.04299 [pdf] - 1580068
Extracting Information from AGN Variability
Submitted: 2016-07-14, last modified: 2017-06-13
AGN exhibit rapid, high amplitude stochastic flux variations across the
entire electromagnetic spectrum on timescales ranging from hours to years. The
cause of this variability is poorly understood. We present a Green's
Function-based method for using variability to (1) measure the time-scales on
which flux perturbations evolve and (2) characterize the driving flux
perturbations. We model the observed light curve of an AGN as a linear
differential equation driven by stochastic impulses. We analyze the light curve
of the Kepler AGN Zw 229-15 and find that the observed variability behavior can
be modeled as a damped harmonic oscillator perturbed by a colored noise
process. The model powerspectrum turns over on time-scale $385$~d. On shorter
time-scales, the log-powerspectrum slope varies between $2$ and $4$, explaining
the behavior noted by previous studies. We recover and identify both the
$5.6$~d and $67$~d timescales reported by previous work using the Green's
Function of the C-ARMA equation rather than by directly fitting the
powerspectrum of the light curve. These are the timescales on which flux
perturbations grow, and on which flux perturbations decay back to the
steady-state flux level respectively. We make the software package KALI used to
study light curves using our method available to the community.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.07914 [pdf] - 1938162
The LSST Data Management System
Jurić, Mario;
Kantor, Jeffrey;
Lim, K-T;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Dubois-Felsmann, Gregory;
Jenness, Tim;
Axelrod, Tim S.;
Aleksić, Jovan;
Allsman, Roberta A.;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Alt, Jason;
Armstrong, Robert;
Basney, Jim;
Becker, Andrew C.;
Becla, Jacek;
Bickerton, Steven J.;
Biswas, Rahul;
Bosch, James;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Ciardi, David R.;
Connolly, Andrew J.;
Daniel, Scott F.;
Daues, Gregory E.;
Economou, Frossie;
Chiang, Hsin-Fang;
Fausti, Angelo;
Fisher-Levine, Merlin;
Freemon, D. Michael;
Gee, Perry;
Gris, Philippe;
Hernandez, Fabio;
Hoblitt, Joshua;
Ivezić, Željko;
Jammes, Fabrice;
Jevremović, Darko;
Jones, R. Lynne;
Kalmbach, J. Bryce;
Kasliwal, Vishal P.;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Lang, Dustin;
Lurie, John;
Lust, Nate B.;
Mullally, Fergal;
MacArthur, Lauren A.;
Melchior, Peter;
Moeyens, Joachim;
Nidever, David L.;
Owen, Russell;
Parejko, John K;
Peterson, J. Matt;
Petravick, Donald;
Pietrowicz, Stephen R.;
Price, Paul A.;
Reiss, David J.;
Shaw, Richard A.;
Sick, Jonathan;
Slater, Colin T.;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Sullivan, Ian S.;
Swinbank, John D.;
Van Dyk, Schuyler;
Vujčić, Veljko;
Withers, Alexander;
Yoachim, Peter
Submitted: 2015-12-24
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is a large-aperture, wide-field,
ground-based survey system that will image the sky in six optical bands from
320 to 1050 nm, uniformly covering approximately $18,000$deg$^2$ of the sky
over 800 times. The LSST is currently under construction on Cerro Pach\'on in
Chile, and expected to enter operations in 2022. Once operational, the LSST
will explore a wide range of astrophysical questions, from discovering "killer"
asteroids to examining the nature of Dark Energy.
The LSST will generate on average 15 TB of data per night, and will require a
comprehensive Data Management system to reduce the raw data to scientifically
useful catalogs and images with minimum human intervention. These reductions
will result in a real-time alert stream, and eleven data releases over the
10-year duration of LSST operations. To enable this processing, the LSST
project is developing a new, general-purpose, high-performance, scalable, well
documented, open source data processing software stack for O/IR surveys.
Prototypes of this stack are already capable of processing data from existing
cameras (e.g., SDSS, DECam, MegaCam), and form the basis of the Hyper-Suprime
Cam (HSC) Survey data reduction pipeline.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.04251 [pdf] - 1268633
Do the Kepler AGN Light Curves Need Re-processing?
Submitted: 2015-07-15
We gauge the impact of spacecraft-induced effects on the inferred variability
properties of the light curve of the Seyfert 1 AGN Zw 229-15 observed by
\Kepler. We compare the light curve of Zw 229-15 obtained from the Kepler MAST
database with a re-processed light curve constructed from raw pixel data
(Williams & Carini, 2015). We use the first-order structure function,
$SF(\delta t)$, to fit both light curves to the damped power-law PSD of
Kasliwal, Vogeley & Richards, 2015. On short timescales, we find a steeper
log-PSD slope ($\gamma = 2.90$ to within $10$ percent) for the re-processed
light curve as compared to the light curve found on MAST ($\gamma = 2.65$ to
within $10$ percent)---both inconsistent with a damped random walk which
requires $\gamma = 2$. The log-PSD slope inferred for the re-processed light
curve is consistent with previous results (Carini & Ryle, 2012, Williams &
Carini, 2015) that study the same re-processed light curve. The turnover
timescale is almost identical for both light curves ($27.1$ and $27.5$~d for
the reprocessed and MAST database light curves). Based on the obvious visual
difference between the two versions of the light curve and on the PSD model
fits, we conclude that there remain significant levels of spacecraft-induced
effects in the standard pipeline reduction of the Kepler data. Re-processing
the light curves will change the model inferenced from the data but is unlikely
to change the overall scientific conclusion reached by Kasliwal et al.
2015---not all AGN light curves are consistent with the DRW.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.01195 [pdf] - 1327399
Thirty Meter Telescope Detailed Science Case: 2015
Skidmore, Warren;
Dell'Antonio, Ian;
Fukugawa, Misato;
Goswami, Aruna;
Hao, Lei;
Jewitt, David;
Laughlin, Greg;
Steidel, Charles;
Hickson, Paul;
Simard, Luc;
Schöck, Matthias;
Treu, Tommaso;
Cohen, Judith;
Anupama, G. C.;
Dickinson, Mark;
Harrison, Fiona;
Kodama, Tadayuki;
Lu, Jessica R.;
Macintosh, Bruce;
Malkan, Matt;
Mao, Shude;
Narita, Norio;
Sekiguchi, Tomohiko;
Subramaniam, Annapurni;
Tanaka, Masaomi;
Tian, Feng;
A'Hearn, Michael;
Akiyama, Masayuki;
Ali, Babar;
Aoki, Wako;
Bagchi, Manjari;
Barth, Aaron;
Bhalerao, Varun;
Bradac, Marusa;
Bullock, James;
Burgasser, Adam J.;
Chapman, Scott;
Chary, Ranga-Ram;
Chiba, Masashi;
Cooper, Michael;
Cooray, Asantha;
Crossfield, Ian;
Currie, Thayne;
Das, Mousumi;
Dewangan, G. C.;
de Grijs, Richard;
Do, Tuan;
Dong, Subo;
Evslin, Jarah;
Fang, Taotao;
Fang, Xuan;
Fassnacht, Christopher;
Fletcher, Leigh;
Gaidos, Eric;
Gal, Roy;
Ghez, Andrea;
Giavalisco, Mauro;
Grady, Carol A.;
Greathouse, Thomas;
Gogoi, Rupjyoti;
Guhathakurta, Puragra;
Ho, Luis;
Hasan, Priya;
Herczeg, Gregory J.;
Honda, Mitsuhiko;
Imanishi, Masa;
Inami, Hanae;
Iye, Masanori;
Kalirai, Jason;
Kamath, U. S.;
Kane, Stephen;
Kashikawa, Nobunari;
Kasliwal, Mansi;
Kasliwal, Vishal;
Kirby, Evan;
Konopacky, Quinn M.;
Lepine, Sebastien;
Li, Di;
Li, Jianyang;
Liu, Junjun;
Liu, Michael C.;
Lopez-Rodriguez, Enrigue;
Lotz, Jennifer;
Lubin, Philip;
Macri, Lucas;
Maeda, Keiichi;
Marchis, Franck;
Marois, Christian;
Marscher, Alan;
Martin, Crystal;
Matsuo, Taro;
Max, Claire;
McConnachie, Alan;
McGough, Stacy;
Melis, Carl;
Meyer, Leo;
Mumma, Michael;
Muto, Takayuki;
Nagao, Tohru;
Najita, Joan R.;
Navarro, Julio;
Pierce, Michael;
Prochaska, Jason X.;
Oguri, Masamune;
Ojha, Devendra K.;
Okamoto, Yoshiko K.;
Orton, Glenn;
Otarola, Angel;
Ouchi, Masami;
Packham, Chris;
Padgett, Deborah L.;
Pandey, Shashi Bhushan;
Pilachowsky, Catherine;
Pontoppidan, Klaus M.;
Primack, Joel;
Puthiyaveettil, Shalima;
Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico;
Reddy, Naveen;
Rich, Michael;
Richter, Matthew J.;
Schombert, James;
Sen, Anjan Ananda;
Shi, Jianrong;
Sheth, Kartik;
Srianand, R.;
Tan, Jonathan C.;
Tanaka, Masayuki;
Tanner, Angelle;
Tominaga, Nozomu;
Tytler, David;
U, Vivian;
Wang, Lingzhi;
Wang, Xiaofeng;
Wang, Yiping;
Wilson, Gillian;
Wright, Shelley;
Wu, Chao;
Wu, Xufeng;
Xu, Renxin;
Yamada, Toru;
Yang, Bin;
Zhao, Gongbo;
Zhao, Hongsheng
Submitted: 2015-05-05, last modified: 2015-06-03
The TMT Detailed Science Case describes the transformational science that the
Thirty Meter Telescope will enable. Planned to begin science operations in
2024, TMT will open up opportunities for revolutionary discoveries in
essentially every field of astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology, seeing much
fainter objects much more clearly than existing telescopes. Per this
capability, TMT's science agenda fills all of space and time, from nearby
comets and asteroids, to exoplanets, to the most distant galaxies, and all the
way back to the very first sources of light in the Universe.
More than 150 astronomers from within the TMT partnership and beyond offered
input in compiling the new 2015 Detailed Science Case. The contributing
astronomers represent the entire TMT partnership, including the California
Institute of Technology (Caltech), the Indian Institute of Astrophysics (IIA),
the National Astronomical Observatories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
(NAOC), the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ), the University
of California, the Association of Canadian Universities for Research in
Astronomy (ACURA) and US associate partner, the Association of Universities for
Research in Astronomy (AURA).
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.00360 [pdf] - 1240919
Are the Variability Properties of the Kepler AGN Light Curves Consistent
with a Damped Random Walk?
Submitted: 2015-05-02, last modified: 2015-06-02
We test the consistency of active galactic nuclei (AGN) optical flux
variability with the $\textit{damped random walk}$ (DRW) model. Our sample
consists of 20 multi-quarter $\textit{Kepler}$ AGN light curves including both
Type 1 and 2 Seyferts, radio-loud and -quiet AGN, quasars, and blazars.
$\textit{Kepler}$ observations of AGN light curves offer a unique insight into
the variability properties of AGN light curves because of the very rapid
($11.6-28.6$ min) and highly uniform rest-frame sampling combined with a
photometric precision of $1$ part in $10^{5}$ over a period of 3.5 yr. We
categorize the light curves of all 20 objects based on visual similarities and
find that the light curves fall into 5 broad categories. We measure the first
order structure function of these light curves and model the observed light
curve with a general broken power-law PSD characterized by a short-timescale
power-law index $\gamma$ and turnover timescale $\tau$. We find that less than
half the objects are consistent with a DRW and observe variability on short
timescales ($\sim 2$ h). The turnover timescale $\tau$ ranges from $\sim
10-135$ d. Interesting structure function features include pronounced dips on
rest-frame timescales ranging from $10-100$ d and varying slopes on different
timescales. The range of observed short-timescale PSD slopes and the presence
of dip and varying slope features suggests that the DRW model may not be
appropriate for all AGN. We conclude that AGN variability is a complex
phenomenon that requires a more sophisticated statistical treatment.