Normalized to: Karakci, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06205 [pdf] - 2009439
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-12-03
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying
the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009.
It scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August
2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine
frequency bands from 30 to 857GHz. This paper presents the cosmological legacy
of Planck, which currently provides our strongest constraints on the parameters
of the standard cosmological model and some of the tightest limits available on
deviations from that model. The 6-parameter LCDM model continues to provide an
excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift,
describing the cosmological information in over a billion map pixels with just
six parameters. With 18 peaks in the temperature and polarization angular power
spectra constrained well, Planck measures five of the six parameters to better
than 1% (simultaneously), with the best-determined parameter (theta_*) now
known to 0.03%. We describe the multi-component sky as seen by Planck, the
success of the LCDM model, and the connection to lower-redshift probes of
structure formation. We also give a comprehensive summary of the major changes
introduced in this 2018 release. The Planck data, alone and in combination with
other probes, provide stringent constraints on our models of the early Universe
and the large-scale structure within which all astrophysical objects form and
evolve. We discuss some lessons learned from the Planck mission, and highlight
areas ripe for further experimental advances.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06209 [pdf] - 1965163
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lemos, P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-09-20
We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck
measurements of the CMB anisotropies. We find good consistency with the
standard spatially-flat 6-parameter $\Lambda$CDM cosmology having a power-law
spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base $\Lambda$CDM" in this
paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in
combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density $\Omega_c h^2 =
0.120\pm 0.001$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001$, scalar
spectral index $n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004$, and optical depth $\tau = 0.054\pm
0.007$ (in this abstract we quote $68\,\%$ confidence regions on measured
parameters and $95\,\%$ on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is
measured to $0.03\,\%$ precision, with $100\theta_*=1.0411\pm 0.0003$. These
results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable,
with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions.
Assuming the base-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the inferred late-Universe parameters
are: Hubble constant $H_0 = (67.4\pm 0.5)$km/s/Mpc; matter density parameter
$\Omega_m = 0.315\pm 0.007$; and matter fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8 =
0.811\pm 0.006$. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the
base-$\Lambda$CDM model. Combining with BAO we constrain the effective extra
relativistic degrees of freedom to be $N_{\rm eff} = 2.99\pm 0.17$, and the
neutrino mass is tightly constrained to $\sum m_\nu< 0.12$eV. The CMB spectra
continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base
-$\Lambda$CDM at over $2\,\sigma$, which pulls some parameters that affect the
lensing amplitude away from the base-$\Lambda$CDM model; however, this is not
supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the
background geometry) BAO data. (Abridged)
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06210 [pdf] - 1924023
Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-07-29
We present measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing
potential using the final $\textit{Planck}$ 2018 temperature and polarization
data. We increase the significance of the detection of lensing in the
polarization maps from $5\,\sigma$ to $9\,\sigma$. Combined with temperature,
lensing is detected at $40\,\sigma$. We present an extensive set of tests of
the robustness of the lensing-potential power spectrum, and construct a
minimum-variance estimator likelihood over lensing multipoles $8 \le L \le
400$. We find good consistency between lensing constraints and the results from
the $\textit{Planck}$ CMB power spectra within the $\rm{\Lambda CDM}$ model.
Combined with baryon density and other weak priors, the lensing analysis alone
constrains $\sigma_8 \Omega_{\rm m}^{0.25}=0.589\pm 0.020$ ($1\,\sigma$
errors). Also combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data, we find
tight individual parameter constraints, $\sigma_8=0.811\pm0.019$,
$H_0=67.9_{-1.3}^{+1.2}\,\text{km}\,\text{s}^{-1}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$, and
$\Omega_{\rm m}=0.303^{+0.016}_{-0.018}$. Combining with $\textit{Planck}$ CMB
power spectrum data, we measure $\sigma_8$ to better than $1\,\%$ precision,
finding $\sigma_8=0.811\pm 0.006$. We find consistency with the lensing results
from the Dark Energy Survey, and give combined lensing-only parameter
constraints that are tighter than joint results using galaxy clustering. Using
$\textit{Planck}$ cosmic infrared background (CIB) maps we make a combined
estimate of the lensing potential over $60\,\%$ of the sky with considerably
more small-scale signal. We demonstrate delensing of the $\textit{Planck}$
power spectra, detecting a maximum removal of $40\,\%$ of the lensing-induced
power in all spectra. The improvement in the sharpening of the acoustic peaks
by including both CIB and the quadratic lensing reconstruction is detected at
high significance (abridged).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.05652 [pdf] - 1766444
PASIPHAE: A high-Galactic-latitude, high-accuracy optopolarimetric
survey
Tassis, Konstantinos;
Ramaprakash, Anamparambu N.;
Readhead, Anthony C. S.;
Potter, Stephen B.;
Wehus, Ingunn K.;
Panopoulou, Georgia V.;
Blinov, Dmitry;
Eriksen, Hans Kristian;
Hensley, Brandon;
Karakci, Ata;
Kypriotakis, John A.;
Maharana, Siddharth;
Ntormousi, Evangelia;
Pavlidou, Vasiliki;
Pearson, Timothy J.;
Skalidis, Raphael
Submitted: 2018-10-12
PASIPHAE (the Polar-Areas Stellar Imaging in Polarization High-Accuracy
Experiment) is an optopolarimetric survey aiming to measure the linear
polarization from millions of stars, and use these to create a
three-dimensional tomographic map of the magnetic field threading dust clouds
within the Milky Way. This map will provide invaluable information for future
CMB B-mode experiments searching for inflationary gravitational waves,
providing unique information regarding line-of-sight integration effects.
Optical polarization observations of a large number of stars at known
distances, tracing the same dust that emits polarized microwaves, can map the
magnetic field between them. The Gaia mission is measuring distances to a
billion stars, providing an opportunity to produce a tomographic map of
Galactic magnetic field directions, using optical polarization of starlight.
Such a map will not only boost CMB polarization foreground removal, but it will
also have a profound impact in a wide range of astrophysical research,
including interstellar medium physics, high-energy astrophysics, and evolution
of the Galaxy. Taking advantage of the novel technology implemented in our
high-accuracy Wide-Area Linear Optical Polarimeters (WALOPs) currently under
construction at IUCAA, India, we will engage in a large-scale optopolarimetric
program that can meet this challenge: a survey of both northern and southern
Galactic polar regions targeted by CMB experiments, covering over 10,000 square
degrees, which will measure linear optical polarization of over 360 stars per
square degree (over 3.5 million stars, a 1000-fold increase over the state of
the art). The survey will be conducted concurrently from the South African
Astronomical Observatory in Sutherland, South Africa in the southern
hemisphere, and the Skinakas Observatory in Crete, Greece, in the north.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06206 [pdf] - 1747982
Planck 2018 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Argüeso, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Peel, M.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2018-09-11
We present a final description of the data-processing pipeline for the
Planck, Low Frequency Instrument (LFI), implemented for the 2018 data release.
Several improvements have been made with respect to the previous release,
especially in the calibration process and in the correction of instrumental
features such as the effects of nonlinearity in the response of the
analogue-to-digital converters. We provide a brief pedagogical introduction to
the complete pipeline, as well as a detailed description of the important
changes implemented. Self-consistency of the pipeline is demonstrated using
dedicated simulations and null tests. We present the final version of the LFI
full sky maps at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, both in temperature and polarization,
together with a refined estimate of the Solar dipole and a final assessment of
the main LFI instrumental parameters.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06208 [pdf] - 1717311
Planck 2018 results. IV. Diffuse component separation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oppizzi, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Peel, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Thommesen, H.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17
We present full-sky maps of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and
polarized synchrotron and thermal dust emission, derived from the third set of
Planck frequency maps. These products have significantly lower contamination
from instrumental systematic effects than previous versions. The methodologies
used to derive these maps follow closely those described in earlier papers,
adopting four methods (Commander, NILC, SEVEM, and SMICA) to extract the CMB
component, as well as three methods (Commander, GNILC, and SMICA) to extract
astrophysical components. Our revised CMB temperature maps agree with
corresponding products in the Planck 2015 delivery, whereas the polarization
maps exhibit significantly lower large-scale power, reflecting the improved
data processing described in companion papers; however, the noise properties of
the resulting data products are complicated, and the best available end-to-end
simulations exhibit relative biases with respect to the data at the few percent
level. Using these maps, we are for the first time able to fit the spectral
index of thermal dust independently over 3 degree regions. We derive a
conservative estimate of the mean spectral index of polarized thermal dust
emission of beta_d = 1.55 +/- 0.05, where the uncertainty marginalizes both
over all known systematic uncertainties and different estimation techniques.
For polarized synchrotron emission, we find a mean spectral index of beta_s =
-3.1 +/- 0.1, consistent with previously reported measurements. We note that
the current data processing does not allow for construction of unbiased
single-bolometer maps, and this limits our ability to extract CO emission and
correlated components. The foreground results for intensity derived in this
paper therefore do not supersede corresponding Planck 2015 products. For
polarization the new results supersede the corresponding 2015 products in all
respects.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06207 [pdf] - 1717310
Planck 2018 results. III. High Frequency Instrument data processing and
frequency maps
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17
This paper presents the High Frequency Instrument (HFI) data processing
procedures for the Planck 2018 release. Major improvements in mapmaking have
been achieved since the previous 2015 release. They enabled the first
significant measurement of the reionization optical depth parameter using HFI
data. This paper presents an extensive analysis of systematic effects,
including the use of simulations to facilitate their removal and characterize
the residuals. The polarized data, which presented a number of known problems
in the 2015 Planck release, are very significantly improved. Calibration, based
on the CMB dipole, is now extremely accurate and in the frequency range 100 to
353 GHz reduces intensity-to-polarization leakage caused by calibration
mismatch. The Solar dipole direction has been determined in the three lowest
HFI frequency channels to within one arc minute, and its amplitude has an
absolute uncertainty smaller than $0.35\mu$K, an accuracy of order $10^{-4}$.
This is a major legacy from the HFI for future CMB experiments. The removal of
bandpass leakage has been improved by extracting the bandpass-mismatch
coefficients for each detector as part of the mapmaking process; these values
in turn improve the intensity maps. This is a major change in the philosophy of
"frequency maps", which are now computed from single detector data, all
adjusted to the same average bandpass response for the main foregrounds.
Simulations reproduce very well the relative gain calibration of detectors, as
well as drifts within a frequency induced by the residuals of the main
systematic effect. Using these simulations, we measure and correct the small
frequency calibration bias induced by this systematic effect at the $10^{-4}$
level. There is no detectable sign of a residual calibration bias between the
first and second acoustic peaks in the CMB channels, at the $10^{-3}$ level.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.04162 [pdf] - 1626258
A 3-D model of polarised dust emission in the Milky Way
Submitted: 2017-06-13, last modified: 2018-01-23
We present a three-dimensional model of polarised galactic dust emission that
takes into account the variation of the dust density, spectral index and
temperature along the line of sight, and contains randomly generated small
scale polarisation fluctuations. The model is constrained to match observed
dust emission on large scales, and match on smaller scales extrapolations of
observed intensity and polarisation power spectra. This model can be used to
investigate the impact of plausible complexity of the polarised dust foreground
emission on the analysis and interpretation of future CMB polarisation
observations.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.04146 [pdf] - 1342757
Bayesian semi-blind component separation for foreground removal in
interferometric 21-cm observations
Submitted: 2015-05-15, last modified: 2016-01-11
We present in this paper a new Bayesian semi-blind approach for foreground
removal in observations of the 21-cm signal with interferometers. The
technique, which we call HIEMICA (HI Expectation-Maximization Independent
Component Analysis), is an extension of the Independent Component Analysis
(ICA) technique developed for two-dimensional (2D) CMB maps to
three-dimensional (3D) 21-cm cosmological signals measured by interferometers.
This technique provides a fully Bayesian inference of power spectra and maps
and separates the foregrounds from signal based on the diversity of their power
spectra. Only relying on the statistical independence of the components, this
approach can jointly estimate the 3D power spectrum of the 21-cm signal and,
the 2D angular power spectrum and the frequency dependence of each foreground
component, without any prior assumptions about foregrounds. This approach has
been tested extensively by applying it to mock data from interferometric 21-cm
intensity mapping observations under idealized assumptions of instrumental
effects. We also discuss the impact when the noise properties are not known
completely. As a first step toward solving the 21 cm power spectrum analysis
problem we compare the semi-blind HIEMICA technique with the commonly used
Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Under the same idealized circumstances the
proposed technique provides significantly improved recovery of the power
spectrum. This technique can be applied straightforwardly to all 21-cm
interferometric observations, including epoch of reionization measurements, and
can be extended to single-dish observations as well.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.06348 [pdf] - 1483215
Planck 2015 results. XII. Full Focal Plane simulations
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-09-21
We present the 8th Full Focal Plane simulation set (FFP8), deployed in
support of the Planck 2015 results. FFP8 consists of 10 fiducial mission
realizations reduced to 18144 maps, together with the most massive suite of
Monte Carlo realizations of instrument noise and CMB ever generated, comprising
$10^4$ mission realizations reduced to about $10^6$ maps. The resulting maps
incorporate the dominant instrumental, scanning, and data analysis effects;
remaining subdominant effects will be included in future updates. Generated at
a cost of some 25 million CPU-hours spread across multiple
high-performance-computing (HPC) platforms, FFP8 is used for the validation and
verification of analysis algorithms, as well as their implementations, and for
removing biases from and quantifying uncertainties in the results of analyses
of the real data.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01582 [pdf] - 1486774
Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P. R. M.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Feeney, S.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Florido, E.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jin, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Müenchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nastasi, A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamaie, M.;
Oppermann, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Pelkonen, V. -M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rumsey, C.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanghera, H. S.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Sauvé, A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schammel, M. P.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shimwell, T. W.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Smith, K.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Stern, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Strong, A. W.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Troja, A.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vidal, M.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Walter, B.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2015-08-09
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early
Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14~May 2009 and scanned the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12~August 2009 and
23~October 2013. In February~2015, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released
the second set of cosmology products based on data from the entire Planck
mission, including both temperature and polarization, along with a set of
scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This
paper gives an overview of the main characteristics of the data and the data
products in the release, as well as the associated cosmological and
astrophysical science results and papers. The science products include maps of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect,
and diffuse foregrounds in temperature and polarization, catalogues of compact
Galactic and extragalactic sources (including separate catalogues of
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters and Galactic cold clumps), and extensive simulations
of signals and noise used in assessing the performance of the analysis methods
and assessment of uncertainties. The likelihood code used to assess
cosmological models against the Planck data are described, as well as a CMB
lensing likelihood. Scientific results include cosmological parameters deriving
from CMB power spectra, gravitational lensing, and cluster counts, as well as
constraints on inflation, non-Gaussianity, primordial magnetic fields, dark
energy, and modified gravity.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.00612 [pdf] - 980227
A Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data
BICEP2/Keck;
Collaborations, Planck;
:;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Aikin, R. W.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Arnaud, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barkats, D.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benton, S. J.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bischoff, C. A.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Brevik, J. A.;
Bucher, M.;
Buder, I.;
Bullock, E.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Buza, V.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Connors, J.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dowell, C. D.;
Duband, L.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dvorkin, C.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Filippini, J. P.;
Finelli, F.;
Fliescher, S.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Gjerløw, E.;
Golwala, S. R.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Halpern, M.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hasselfield, M.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hilton, G. C.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hovest, W.;
Hristov, V. V.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hui, H.;
Hurier, G.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Karkare, K. S.;
Kaufman, J. P.;
Keating, B. G.;
Kefeli, S.;
Keihänen, E.;
Kernasovskiy, S. A.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kovac, J. M.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kuo, C. L.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Leonardi, R.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Lueker, M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Mason, P.;
Matarrese, S.;
Megerian, K. G.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nguyen, H. T.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Brient, R.;
Ogburn, R. W.;
Orlando, A.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Pryke, C.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Richter, S.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schwarz, R.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Sheehy, C. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Staniszewski, Z. K.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Teply, G. P.;
Terenzi, L.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tolan, J. E.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Turner, A. D.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Weber, A. C.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Willmert, J.;
Wong, C. L.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-02, last modified: 2015-04-14
We report the results of a joint analysis of data from BICEP2/Keck Array and
Planck. BICEP2 and Keck Array have observed the same approximately 400 deg$^2$
patch of sky centered on RA 0h, Dec. $-57.5\deg$. The combined maps reach a
depth of 57 nK deg in Stokes $Q$ and $U$ in a band centered at 150 GHz. Planck
has observed the full sky in polarization at seven frequencies from 30 to 353
GHz, but much less deeply in any given region (1.2 $\mu$K deg in $Q$ and $U$ at
143 GHz). We detect 150$\times$353 cross-correlation in $B$-modes at high
significance. We fit the single- and cross-frequency power spectra at
frequencies $\geq 150$ GHz to a lensed-$\Lambda$CDM model that includes dust
and a possible contribution from inflationary gravitational waves (as
parameterized by the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$), using a prior on the
frequency spectral behavior of polarized dust emission from previous \planck\
analysis of other regions of the sky. We find strong evidence for dust and no
statistically significant evidence for tensor modes. We probe various model
variations and extensions, including adding a synchrotron component in
combination with lower frequency data, and find that these make little
difference to the $r$ constraint. Finally we present an alternative analysis
which is similar to a map-based cleaning of the dust contribution, and show
that this gives similar constraints. The final result is expressed as a
likelihood curve for $r$, and yields an upper limit $r_{0.05}<0.12$ at 95%
confidence. Marginalizing over dust and $r$, lensing $B$-modes are detected at
$7.0\,\sigma$ significance.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.3305 [pdf] - 850940
Simulation of the analysis of interferometric microwave background
polarization data
Submitted: 2014-07-11
We present results from an end-to-end simulation pipeline interferometric
observations of cosmic microwave background polarization. We use both
maximum-likelihood and Gibbs sampling techniques to estimate the power
spectrum. In addition, we use Gibbs sampling for image reconstruction from
interferometric visibilities. The results indicate the level to which various
systematic errors (e.g., pointing errors, gain errors, beam shape errors,
cross- polarization) must be controlled in order to successfully detect and
characterize primordial B modes as well as other scientific goals. In addition,
we show that Gibbs sampling is an effective method of image reconstruction for
interferometric data in other astrophysical contexts.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.1469 [pdf] - 1179043
Probabilistic image reconstruction for radio interferometers
Submitted: 2013-09-05, last modified: 2013-11-28
We present a novel, general-purpose method for deconvolving and denoising
images from gridded radio interferometric visibilities using Bayesian inference
based on a Gaussian process model. The method automatically takes into account
incomplete coverage of the uv-plane, signal mode coupling due to the primary
beam, and noise mode coupling due to uv sampling. Our method uses Gibbs
sampling to efficiently explore the full posterior distribution of the
underlying signal image given the data. We use a set of widely diverse mock
images with a realistic interferometer setup and level of noise to assess the
method. Compared to results from a proxy for point source- based CLEAN method
we find that in terms of RMS error and signal-to-noise ratio our approach
performs better than traditional deconvolution techniques, regardless of the
structure of the source image in our test suite. Our implementation scales as
O(np log np), provides full statistical and uncertainty information of the
reconstructed image, requires no supervision, and provides a robust, consistent
framework for incorporating noise and parameter marginalizations and foreground
removal.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.2676 [pdf] - 676214
Maximum likelihood analysis of systematic errors in interferometric
observations of the cosmic microwave background
Submitted: 2012-09-12, last modified: 2013-06-05
We investigate the impact of instrumental systematic errors in
interferometric measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature and polarization power spectra. We simulate interferometric CMB
observations to generate mock visibilities and estimate power spectra using the
statistically optimal maximum likelihood technique. We define a quadratic error
measure to determine allowable levels of systematic error that do not induce
power spectrum errors beyond a given tolerance. As an example, in this study we
focus on differential pointing errors. The effects of other systematics can be
simulated by this pipeline in a straightforward manner. We find that, in order
to accurately recover the underlying B-modes for r=0.01 at 28<l<384,
Gaussian-distributed pointing errors must be controlled to 0.7^\circ rms for an
interferometer with an antenna configuration similar to QUBIC, in agreement
with analytical estimates. Only the statistical uncertainty for 28<l<88 would
be changed at ~10% level. With the same instrumental configuration, we find the
pointing errors would slightly bias the 2-\sigma upper limit of the
tensor-to-scalar ratio r by ~10%. We also show that the impact of pointing
errors on the TB and EB measurements is negligibly small.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1302.6608 [pdf] - 1164875
Systematic Effects in Interferometric Observations of the CMB
Polarization
Submitted: 2013-02-26
The detection of the primordial $B$-mode spectrum of the polarized cosmic
microwave background (CMB) signal may provide a probe of inflation. However,
observation of such a faint signal requires excellent control of systematic
errors. Interferometry proves to be a promising approach for overcoming such a
challenge. In this paper we present a complete simulation pipeline of
interferometric observations of CMB polarization, including systematic errors.
We employ two different methods for obtaining the power spectra from mock data
produced by simulated observations: the maximum likelihood method and the
method of Gibbs sampling. We show that the results from both methods are
consistent with each other, as well as, within a factor of 6, with analytical
estimates. Several categories of systematic errors are considered: instrumental
errors, consisting of antenna gain and antenna coupling errors, and beam
errors, consisting of antenna pointing errors, beam cross-polarization and beam
shape (and size) errors. In order to recover the tensor-to-scalar ratio, $r$,
within a 10% tolerance level, which ensures the experiment is sensitive enough
to detect the $B$-signal at $r=0.01$ in the multipole range $28 < \ell < 384$,
we find that, for a QUBIC-like experiment, Gaussian-distributed systematic
errors must be controlled with precisions of $|g_{rms}| = 0.1$ for antenna
gain, $|\epsilon_{rms}| = 5 \times 10^{-4}$ for antenna coupling, $\delta_{rms}
\approx 0.7^\circ$ for pointing, $\zeta_{rms} \approx 0.7^\circ$ for beam
shape, and $\mu_{rms} = 5 \times 10^{-4}$ for beam cross-polarization.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.2930 [pdf] - 617164
Bayesian Inference of Polarized CMB Power Spectra from Interferometric
Data
Submitted: 2012-09-13, last modified: 2013-01-21
Detection of B-mode polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
radiation is one of the frontiers of observational cosmology. Because they are
an order of magnitude fainter than E-modes, it is quite a challenge to detect
B-modes. Having more manageable systematics, interferometers prove to have a
substantial advantage over imagers in detecting such faint signals. Here, we
present a method for Bayesian inference of power spectra and signal
reconstruction from interferometric data of the CMB polarization signal by
using the technique of Gibbs sampling. We demonstrate the validity of the
method in the flat-sky approximation for a simulation of an interferometric
observation on a finite patch with incomplete uv-plane coverage, a finite beam
size and a realistic noise model. With a computational complexity of
O(n^{3/2}), n being the data size, Gibbs sampling provides an efficient method
for analyzing upcoming cosmology observations.