Consistency checks of cosmological data sets are an important tool because they may suggest systematic errors or the type of modifications to \lcdm\ necessary to resolve current tensions. In this work, we derive an analytic method for calculating the level of correlations between model parameters from two correlated cosmological data sets, which complements more computationally expensive simulations. This method is an extension of the Fisher analysis that assumes a Gaussian likelihood and a known data covariance matrix. We apply this method to the SPTpol temperature and polarization CMB spectra (TE and EE). We find weak correlations between \lcdm\ parameters with a 9$\%$ correlation between the TE-only and EE-only constraints on $H_0$ and a 25$\%$ and 32$\%$ correlation for log($A_s$) and $n_s$ respectively. Despite the negative correlations between the TE and EE power spectra, the correlations in the parameters are positive. The TE-EE parameter differences are consistent with zero, with a PTE of 0.53, in contrast to the PTE of 0.017 reported by SPTpol for the consistency of the TE and EE power spectra with \lcdm. Using simulations we find that the results of these two tests are independent and that this difference can arise simply from statistical fluctuations. Ignoring correlations in the TT-TE and TE-EE comparisons biases the $\chi^2$ low, artificially making parameters look more consistent. Therefore, we conclude that these correlations need to be accounted for when performing internal consistency checks of the TT vs TE vs EE power spectra for future CMB analyses.

We revisit the degeneracy between the Hubble constant, $H_0$, and matter density, $\Omega_m$, for current cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations within the standard $\Lambda CDM$ model. We show that Planck, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), South Pole Telescope (SPT), and Atacama Cosmology Telescope Polarimeter (ACTPol) temperature power spectra produce different values of the exponent $x$ from minimizing the variance of the product $\Omega_mH_0^x$. The distribution of $x$ from the different data sets does not follow the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) best-fit values for $H_0$ or $\Omega_m$. Particularly striking is the difference between Planck multipoles $\ell\leq800$ ($x=2.81$), and WMAP ($x = 2.94$), despite very similar best-fit cosmologies. We use a Fisher matrix analysis to show that, in fact, this range in exponent values is exactly as expected in $\Lambda CDM$ given the multipole coverage and power spectrum uncertainties for each experiment. We show that the difference in $x$ from the Planck $\ell \leq 800$ and WMAP data is explained by a turning point in the relationship between $x$ and the maximum effective multipole, at around $\ell=700$. The value of $x$ is determined by several physical effects, and we highlight the significant impact of gravitational lensing for the high-multipole measurements. Despite the spread of $H_0$ values from different CMB experiments, the experiments are consistent with their sampling of the $\Omega_m-H_0$ degeneracy and do not show evidence for the need for new physics or for the presence of significant underestimated systematics according to these tests. The Fisher calculations can be used to predict the $\Omega_m-H_0$ degeneracy of future experiments.