Normalized to: J~oeveer, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609749 [pdf] - 85341
Superclusters of galaxies in the 2dF redshift survey. III. The
properties of galaxies in superclusters
Einasto, M.;
Einasto, J.;
Tago, E.;
Saar, E.;
Liivam"agi, L. J.;
J~oeveer, M.;
H"utsi, G.;
Hein"am"aki, P.;
M"uller, V.;
Tucker, D.
Submitted: 2006-09-27
We use catalogues of superclusters of galaxies from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift
Survey to study the properties of galaxies in superclusters. We compare the
properties of galaxies in high and low density regions of rich superclusters,
in poor superclusters and in the field, as well as in groups, and of isolated
galaxies in superclusters of various richness. We show that in rich
superclusters the values of the luminosity density smoothed on a scale of 8
\Mpc are higher than in poor superclusters: the median density in rich
superclusters is $\delta \approx 7.5$, in poor superclusters $\delta \approx
6.0$. Rich superclusters contain high density cores with densities $\delta >
10$ while in poor superclusters such high density cores are absent. The
properties of galaxies in rich and poor superclusters and in the field are
different: the fraction of early type, passive galaxies in rich superclusters
is slightly larger than in poor superclusters, and is the smallest among the
field galaxies. Most importantly, in high density cores of rich superclusters
($\delta > 10$) there is an excess of early type, passive galaxies in groups
and clusters, as well as among those which do not belong to groups or clusters.
The main galaxies of superclusters have a rather limited range of absolute
magnitudes. The main galaxies of rich superclusters have larger luminosities
than those of poor superclusters and of groups in the field. Our results show
that both the local (group/cluster) environments and global (supercluster)
environments influence galaxy morphologies and their star formation activity.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605393 [pdf] - 82081
Luminous superclusters: remnants from inflation
Einasto, J.;
Einasto, M.;
Saar, E.;
Tago, E.;
Liivam"agi, L. J.;
J~oeveer, M.;
Suhhonenko, I.;
H"utsi, G.;
Jaaniste, J.;
Hein"am"aki, P.;
M"uller, V.;
Knebe, A.;
Tucker, D.
Submitted: 2006-05-16
We derive the luminosity and multiplicity functions of superclusters compiled
for the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Data Release
4), and for three samples of simulated superclusters. We find for all
supercluster samples Density Field (DF) clusters, which represent high-density
peaks of the class of Abell clusters, and use median luminosities/masses of
richness class 1 DF-clusters to calculate relative luminosity/mass functions.
We show that the fraction of very luminous (massive) superclusters in real
samples is more than tenfolds greater than in simulated samples. Superclusters
are generated by large-scale density perturbations which evolve very slowly.
The absence of very luminous superclusters in simulations can be explained
either by non-proper treatment of large-scale perturbations, or by some yet
unknown processes in the very early Universe.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0604539 [pdf] - 81608
Superclusters of galaxies from the 2dF redshift survey. II. Comparison
with simulations
Einasto, J.;
Einasto, M.;
Saar, E.;
Tago, E.;
Liivam"agi, L. J.;
J~oeveer, M.;
Suhhonenko, I.;
H"utsi, G.;
Jaaniste, J.;
Hein"am"aki, P.;
M"uller, V.;
Knebe, A.;
Tucker, D.
Submitted: 2006-04-26
We investigate properties of superclusters of galaxies found on the basis of
the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, and compare them with properties of
superclusters from the Millennium Simulation. We study the dependence of
various characteristics of superclusters on their distance from the observer,
on their total luminosity, and on their multiplicity. The multiplicity is
defined by the number of Density Field (DF) clusters in superclusters. Using
the multiplicity we divide superclusters into four richness classes: poor,
medium, rich and extremely rich. We show that superclusters are asymmetrical
and have multi-branching filamentary structure, with the degree of asymmetry
and filamentarity being higher for the more luminous and richer superclusters.
The comparison of real superclusters with Millennium superclusters shows that
most properties of simulated superclusters agree very well with real data, the
main differences being in the luminosity and multiplicity distributions.