Normalized to: Johansson, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.02610 [pdf] - 1362688
A self-consistent analytical magnetar model: The luminosity of
$\gamma$-ray burst supernovae is powered by radioactivity
Submitted: 2016-01-11
We present an analytical model that considers energy arising from a magnetar
central engine. The results of fitting this model to the optical and X-ray
light curves (LCs) of five long-duration $\gamma$-ray bursts (LGRBs) and two
ultra-long GRBs (ULGRBs), including their associated supernovae (SNe), show
that emission from a magnetar central engine cannot be solely responsible for
powering an LGRB-SN. While the early AG-dominated phase can be well described
with our model, the predicted SN luminosity is underluminous by a factor of
$3-17$. We use this as compelling evidence that additional sources of heating
must be present to power an LGRB-SN, which we argue must be radioactive
heating. Our self-consistent modelling approach was able to successfully
describe all phases of ULGRB 111209A / SN 2011kl, from the early afterglow to
the later SN, where we determined for the magnetar central engine a magnetic
field strength of $1.1-1.3\times10^{15}$ G, an initial spin period of
$11.5-13.0$ ms, a spin-down time of $4.8-6.5$ d, and an initial energy of
$1.2-1.6\times10^{50}$ erg. These values are entirely consistent with those
determined by other authors. The luminosity of a magnetar-powered SN is
directly related to how long the central engine is active, where central
engines with longer durations give rise to brighter SNe. The spin-down
timescales of superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) are of order months to years,
which provides a natural explanation as to why SN 2011kl was less luminous than
SLSNe that are also powered by emission from magnetar central engines.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.3114 [pdf] - 862776
A Trio of GRB-SNe: GRB 120729A, GRB 130215A / SN 2013ez and GRB 130831A
/ SN 2013fu
Cano, Z.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Pozanenko, A.;
Butler, N.;
Thone, C. C.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Kruhler, T.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Leloudas, G.;
Malesani, D.;
Hjorth, J.;
Melandri, A.;
Mundell, C.;
Wiersema, K.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Schulze, S.;
Gomboc, A.;
Johansson, A.;
Zheng, W.;
Kann, D. A.;
Knust, F.;
Varela, K.;
Akerlof, C. W.;
Bloom, J.;
Burkhonov, O.;
Cooke, E.;
de Diego, J. A.;
Dhungana, G.;
Farina, C.;
Ferrante, F. V.;
Flewelling, H. A.;
Fox, O. D.;
Fynbo, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Georgiev, L.;
Gonzalez, J. J.;
Greiner, J.;
Guver, T.;
Hartoog, O.;
Hatch, N.;
Jelinek, M;
Kehoe, R.;
Klose, S.;
Klunko, E.;
Kopac, D.;
Kutyrev, A.;
Krugl, Y.;
Lee, W. H.;
Levan, A.;
Linkov, V.;
Matkin, A.;
Minikulov, N.;
Molotov, I.;
Prochaska, J. Xavier;
Richer, M. G.;
Roman-Zuniga, C. G.;
Rumyantsev, V.;
Sanchez-Ramirez, R.;
Steele, I.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Volnova, A.;
Watson, A. M.;
Xu, D.;
Yuan, F.
Submitted: 2014-05-13
We present optical and near-infrared (NIR) photometry for three gamma-ray
burst supernovae (GRB-SNe): GRB 120729A, GRB 130215A / SN 2013ez and GRB
130831A / SN 2013fu. In the case of GRB 130215A / SN 2013ez, we also present
optical spectroscopy at t-t0=16.1 d, which covers rest-frame 3000-6250
Angstroms. Based on Fe II (5169) and Si (II) (6355), our spectrum indicates an
unusually low expansion velocity of 4000-6350 km/s, the lowest ever measured
for a GRB-SN. Additionally, we determined the brightness and shape of each
accompanying SN relative to a template supernova (SN 1998bw), which were used
to estimate the amount of nickel produced via nucleosynthesis during each
explosion. We find that our derived nickel masses are typical of other GRB-SNe,
and greater than those of SNe Ibc that are not associated with GRBs. For GRB
130831A / SN 2013fu, we use our well-sampled R-band light curve (LC) to
estimate the amount of ejecta mass and the kinetic energy of the SN, finding
that these too are similar to other GRB-SNe. For GRB 130215A, we take advantage
of contemporaneous optical/NIR observations to construct an optical/NIR
bolometric LC of the afterglow. We fit the bolometric LC with the millisecond
magnetar model of Zhang & Meszaros (2001), which considers dipole radiation as
a source of energy injection to the forward shock powering the optical/NIR
afterglow. Using this model we derive an initial spin period of P=12 ms and a
magnetic field of B=1.1 x 10^15 G, which are commensurate with those found for
proposed magnetar central engines of other long-duration GRBs.