sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Jia, X.

Normalized to: Jia, X.

7 article(s) in total. 139 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 4,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.01927  [pdf] - 2107386
Incorporating Physical Knowledge into Machine Learning for Planetary Space Physics
Comments: 25 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences for the Research Topic of Machine Learning in Heliophysics at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2020.00036
Submitted: 2020-06-02
Recent improvements in data collection volume from planetary and space physics missions have allowed the application of novel data science techniques. The Cassini mission for example collected over 600 gigabytes of scientific data from 2004 to 2017. This represents a surge of data on the Saturn system. Machine learning can help scientists work with data on this larger scale. Unlike many applications of machine learning, a primary use in planetary space physics applications is to infer behavior about the system itself. This raises three concerns: first, the performance of the machine learning model, second, the need for interpretable applications to answer scientific questions, and third, how characteristics of spacecraft data change these applications. In comparison to these concerns, uses of black box or un-interpretable machine learning methods tend toward evaluations of performance only either ignoring the underlying physical process or, less often, providing misleading explanations for it. We build off a previous effort applying a semi-supervised physics-based classification of plasma instabilities in Saturn's magnetosphere. We then use this previous effort in comparison to other machine learning classifiers with varying data size access, and physical information access. We show that incorporating knowledge of these orbiting spacecraft data characteristics improves the performance and interpretability of machine learning methods, which is essential for deriving scientific meaning. Building on these findings, we present a framework on incorporating physics knowledge into machine learning problems targeting semi-supervised classification for space physics data in planetary environments. These findings present a path forward for incorporating physical knowledge into space physics and planetary mission data analyses for scientific discovery.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2003.09991  [pdf] - 2089165
Magnetohydrodynamic modelling of star-planet interaction and associated auroral radio emission
Comments: 13 pages, 10 figures
Submitted: 2020-03-22
We present calculations of auroral radio powers of magnetised hot Jupiters orbiting Sun-like stars, computed using global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modelling of the magnetospheric and ionospheric convection arising from the interaction between the magnetosphere and the stellar wind. Exoplanetary auroral radio powers are traditionally estimated using empirical or analytically-derived relations, such as the Radiometric Bode's Law (RBL), which relates radio power to the magnetic or kinetic energy dissipated in the stellar wind-planet interaction. Such methods risk an oversimplification of the magnetospheric electrodynamics giving rise to radio emission. As the next step toward a self-consistent picture, we model the stellar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling currents using a 3D MHD model. We compute electron-cyclotron maser instability-driven emission from the calculated ionospheric field-aligned current density. We show that the auroral radio power is highly sensitive to interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) strength, and that the emission is saturated for plausible hot Jupiter Pedersen conductances, indicating that radio power may be largely independent of ionospheric conductance. We estimate peak radio powers of $10^{14}$ W from a planet exposed to an IMF strength of $10^3$ nT, implying flux densities at a distance of 15 pc from Earth potentially detectable with current and future radio telescopes. We also find a relation between radio power and planetary orbital distance that is broadly consistent with results from previous analytic models of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling at hot Jupiters, and indicates that the RBL likely overestimates the radio powers by up to two orders of magnitude in the hot Jupiter regime
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:2002.01150  [pdf] - 2057012
Locating the Source Field Lines of Jovian Decametric Radio Emissions
Comments: accepted by Earth and Planetary Physics, 10 pages, 9 figures and 1 table
Submitted: 2020-02-04
Decametric (DAM) radio emissions are one of the main windows through which one can reveal and understand the Jovian magnetospheric dynamics and its interaction with the moons. DAMs are generated by energetic electrons through cyclotron-maser instability. For Io (the most active moon) related DAMs, the energetic electrons are sourced from Io volcanic activities, and quickly trapped by neighboring Jovian magnetic field. To properly interpret the physical processes behind DAMs, it is important to precisely locate the source field lines from which DAMs are emitted. Following the work by Hess et al. [2008, 2010], we develop a method to locate the source region as well as the associated field lines for any given DAM emission recorded in a radio dynamic spectrum by, e.g., Wind/WAVES or STEREO/WAVES. The field lines are calculated by the state-of-art analytical model, called JRM09 [Connerney et al., 2018]. By using this method, we may also derive the emission cone angle and the energy of associated electrons. If multiple radio instruments at different perspectives saw the same DAM event, the evolution of its source region and associated field lines is able to be revealed. We apply the method to an Io-DAM event, and find that the method is valid and reliable. Some physical processes behind the DAM event are also discussed.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.03573  [pdf] - 1663501
Solar System Ice Giants: Exoplanets in our Backyard
Rymer, Abigail; Mandt, Kathleen; Hurley, Dana; Lisse, Carey; Izenberg, Noam; Smith, H. Todd; Westlake, Joseph; Bunce, Emma; Arridge, Christopher; Masters, Adam; Hofstadter, Mark; Simon, Amy; Brandt, Pontus; Clark, George; Cohen, Ian; Allen, Robert; Vine, Sarah; Hansen, Kenneth; Hospodarsky, George; Kurth, William; Romani, Paul; Lamy, Laurent; Zarka, Philippe; Cao, Hao; Paty, Carol; Hedman, Matthew; Roussos, Elias; Cruikshank, Dale; Farrell, William; Fieseler, Paul; Coates, Andrew; Yelle, Roger; Parkinson, Christopher; Militzer, Burkhard; Grodent, Denis; Kollmann, Peter; McNutt, Ralph; André, Nicolas; Strange, Nathan; Barnes, Jason; Dones, Luke; Denk, Tilmann; Rathbun, Julie; Lunine, Jonathan; Desai, Ravi; Cochrane, Corey; Sayanagi, Kunio M.; Postberg, Frank; Ebert, Robert; Hill, Thomas; Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo; Regoli, Leonardo; Pontius, Duane; Stanley, Sabine; Greathouse, Thomas; Saur, Joachim; Marouf, Essam; Bergman, Jan; Higgins, Chuck; Johnson, Robert; Thomsen, Michelle; Soderlund, Krista; Jia, Xianzhe; Wilson, Robert; Englander, Jacob; Burch, Jim; Nordheim, Tom; Grava, Cesare; Baines, Kevin; Quick, Lynnae; Russell, Christopher; Cravens, Thomas; Cecconi, Baptiste; Aslam, Shahid; Bray, Veronica; Garcia-Sage, Katherine; Richardson, John; Clark, John; Hsu, Sean; Achterberg, Richard; Sergis, Nick; Paganelli, Flora; Kempf, Sasha; Orton, Glenn; Portyankina, Ganna; Jones, Geraint; Economou, Thanasis; Livengood, Timothy; Krimigi, Stamatios; Szalay, James; Jackman, Catriona; Valek, Phillip; Lecacheux, Alain; Colwell, Joshua; Jasinski, Jamie; Tosi, Federico; Sulaiman, Ali; Galand, Marina; Kotova, Anna; Khurana, Krishan; Kivelson, Margaret; Strobel, Darrell; Radiota, Aikaterina; Estrada, Paul; Livi, Stefano; Azari, Abigail; Yates, Japheth; Allegrini, Frederic; Vogt, Marissa; Felici, Marianna; Luhmann, Janet; Filacchione, Gianrico; Moore, Luke
Comments: Exoplanet Science Strategy White Paper, submitted to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Space Studies Board, 9 March 2018
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior, and what implications does that field have for the structure of the magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1801.03991  [pdf] - 1617216
Hall Effect in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
Comments: 23 pages, 6 figurs
Submitted: 2018-01-11
Magnetohydrodynamics simulations have been carried out in studying the solar wind and cometary plasma interactions for decades. Various plasma boundaries have been simulated and compared well with observations for comet 1P/Halley. The Rosetta mission, which studies comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, challenges our understanding of the solar wind and comet interactions. The Rosetta Plasma Consortium observed regions of very weak magnetic field outside the predicted diamagnetic cavity. In this paper, we simulate the inner coma with the Hall magnetohydrodynamics equations and show that the Hall effect is important in the inner coma environment. The magnetic field topology becomes complex and magnetic reconnection occurs on the dayside when the Hall effect is taken into account. The magnetic reconnection on the dayside can generate weak magnetic filed regions outside the global diamagnetic cavity, which may explain the Rosetta Plasma Consortium observations. We conclude that the substantial change in the inner coma environment is due to the fact that the ion inertial length (or gyro radius) is not much smaller than the size of the diamagnetic cavity.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1512.06980  [pdf] - 1331208
Cassini in situ observations of long-duration magnetic reconnection in Saturn's magnetotail
Comments: Initially submitted version (submitted 24 March 2015), published online in Nature Physics 30 November 2015
Submitted: 2015-12-22
Magnetic reconnection is a fundamental process in solar system and astrophysical plasmas, through which stored magnetic energy associated with current sheets is converted into thermal, kinetic and wave energy. Magnetic reconnection is also thought to be a key process involved in shedding internally produced plasma from the giant magnetospheres at Jupiter and Saturn through topological reconfiguration of the magnetic field. The region where magnetic fields reconnect is known as the diffusion region and in this letter we report on the first encounter of the Cassini spacecraft with a diffusion region in Saturn's magnetotail. The data also show evidence of magnetic reconnection over a period of 19 h revealing that reconnection can, in fact, act for prolonged intervals in a rapidly rotating magnetosphere. We show that reconnection can be a significant pathway for internal plasma loss at Saturn. This counters the view of reconnection as a transient method of internal plasma loss at Saturn. These results, although directly relating to the magnetosphere of Saturn, have applications in the understanding of other rapidly rotating magnetospheres, including that of Jupiter and other astrophysical bodies.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1502.05504  [pdf] - 937801
The magnetic structure of Saturn's magnetosheath
Comments:
Submitted: 2015-02-19
A planet's magnetosheath extends from downstream of its bow shock up to the magnetopause where the solar wind flow is deflected around the magnetosphere and the solar wind embedded magnetic field lines are draped. This makes the region an important site for plasma turbulence, instabilities, reconnection and plasma depletion layers. A relatively high Alfv\'en Mach number solar wind and a polar-flattened magnetosphere make the magnetosheath of Saturn both physically and geometrically distinct from the Earth's. The polar flattening is predicted to affect the magnetosheath magnetic field structure and thus the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction. Here we investigate the magnetic field in the magnetosheath with the expectation that polar flattening is manifested in the overall draping pattern. We compare an accumulation of Cassini data between 2004 and 2010 with global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations and an analytical model representative of a draped field between axisymmetric boundaries. The draping patterns measured are well captured and in broad agreement for given upstream conditions with those of the MHD simulations (which include polar flattening). The deviations from the analytical model, based on no polar flattening, suggest that non-axisymmetry is invariably a key feature of the magnetosphere's global structure. Our results show a comprehensive overview of the configuration of the magnetic field in a non-axisymmetric magnetosheath as revealed by Cassini. We anticipate our assessment to provide an insight to this barely studied interface between a high Alfv\'enic bow shock and a dynamic magnetosphere.