Normalized to: Jia, X.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.01927 [pdf] - 2107386
Incorporating Physical Knowledge into Machine Learning for Planetary
Space Physics
Submitted: 2020-06-02
Recent improvements in data collection volume from planetary and space
physics missions have allowed the application of novel data science techniques.
The Cassini mission for example collected over 600 gigabytes of scientific data
from 2004 to 2017. This represents a surge of data on the Saturn system.
Machine learning can help scientists work with data on this larger scale.
Unlike many applications of machine learning, a primary use in planetary space
physics applications is to infer behavior about the system itself. This raises
three concerns: first, the performance of the machine learning model, second,
the need for interpretable applications to answer scientific questions, and
third, how characteristics of spacecraft data change these applications. In
comparison to these concerns, uses of black box or un-interpretable machine
learning methods tend toward evaluations of performance only either ignoring
the underlying physical process or, less often, providing misleading
explanations for it. We build off a previous effort applying a semi-supervised
physics-based classification of plasma instabilities in Saturn's magnetosphere.
We then use this previous effort in comparison to other machine learning
classifiers with varying data size access, and physical information access. We
show that incorporating knowledge of these orbiting spacecraft data
characteristics improves the performance and interpretability of machine
learning methods, which is essential for deriving scientific meaning. Building
on these findings, we present a framework on incorporating physics knowledge
into machine learning problems targeting semi-supervised classification for
space physics data in planetary environments. These findings present a path
forward for incorporating physical knowledge into space physics and planetary
mission data analyses for scientific discovery.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.09991 [pdf] - 2089165
Magnetohydrodynamic modelling of star-planet interaction and associated
auroral radio emission
Submitted: 2020-03-22
We present calculations of auroral radio powers of magnetised hot Jupiters
orbiting Sun-like stars, computed using global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD)
modelling of the magnetospheric and ionospheric convection arising from the
interaction between the magnetosphere and the stellar wind. Exoplanetary
auroral radio powers are traditionally estimated using empirical or
analytically-derived relations, such as the Radiometric Bode's Law (RBL), which
relates radio power to the magnetic or kinetic energy dissipated in the stellar
wind-planet interaction. Such methods risk an oversimplification of the
magnetospheric electrodynamics giving rise to radio emission. As the next step
toward a self-consistent picture, we model the stellar
wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling currents using a 3D MHD model. We
compute electron-cyclotron maser instability-driven emission from the
calculated ionospheric field-aligned current density. We show that the auroral
radio power is highly sensitive to interplanetary magnetic field (IMF)
strength, and that the emission is saturated for plausible hot Jupiter Pedersen
conductances, indicating that radio power may be largely independent of
ionospheric conductance. We estimate peak radio powers of $10^{14}$ W from a
planet exposed to an IMF strength of $10^3$ nT, implying flux densities at a
distance of 15 pc from Earth potentially detectable with current and future
radio telescopes. We also find a relation between radio power and planetary
orbital distance that is broadly consistent with results from previous analytic
models of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling at hot Jupiters, and indicates that
the RBL likely overestimates the radio powers by up to two orders of magnitude
in the hot Jupiter regime
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.01150 [pdf] - 2057012
Locating the Source Field Lines of Jovian Decametric Radio Emissions
Submitted: 2020-02-04
Decametric (DAM) radio emissions are one of the main windows through which
one can reveal and understand the Jovian magnetospheric dynamics and its
interaction with the moons. DAMs are generated by energetic electrons through
cyclotron-maser instability. For Io (the most active moon) related DAMs, the
energetic electrons are sourced from Io volcanic activities, and quickly
trapped by neighboring Jovian magnetic field. To properly interpret the
physical processes behind DAMs, it is important to precisely locate the source
field lines from which DAMs are emitted. Following the work by Hess et al.
[2008, 2010], we develop a method to locate the source region as well as the
associated field lines for any given DAM emission recorded in a radio dynamic
spectrum by, e.g., Wind/WAVES or STEREO/WAVES. The field lines are calculated
by the state-of-art analytical model, called JRM09 [Connerney et al., 2018]. By
using this method, we may also derive the emission cone angle and the energy of
associated electrons. If multiple radio instruments at different perspectives
saw the same DAM event, the evolution of its source region and associated field
lines is able to be revealed. We apply the method to an Io-DAM event, and find
that the method is valid and reliable. Some physical processes behind the DAM
event are also discussed.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.03573 [pdf] - 1663501
Solar System Ice Giants: Exoplanets in our Backyard
Rymer, Abigail;
Mandt, Kathleen;
Hurley, Dana;
Lisse, Carey;
Izenberg, Noam;
Smith, H. Todd;
Westlake, Joseph;
Bunce, Emma;
Arridge, Christopher;
Masters, Adam;
Hofstadter, Mark;
Simon, Amy;
Brandt, Pontus;
Clark, George;
Cohen, Ian;
Allen, Robert;
Vine, Sarah;
Hansen, Kenneth;
Hospodarsky, George;
Kurth, William;
Romani, Paul;
Lamy, Laurent;
Zarka, Philippe;
Cao, Hao;
Paty, Carol;
Hedman, Matthew;
Roussos, Elias;
Cruikshank, Dale;
Farrell, William;
Fieseler, Paul;
Coates, Andrew;
Yelle, Roger;
Parkinson, Christopher;
Militzer, Burkhard;
Grodent, Denis;
Kollmann, Peter;
McNutt, Ralph;
André, Nicolas;
Strange, Nathan;
Barnes, Jason;
Dones, Luke;
Denk, Tilmann;
Rathbun, Julie;
Lunine, Jonathan;
Desai, Ravi;
Cochrane, Corey;
Sayanagi, Kunio M.;
Postberg, Frank;
Ebert, Robert;
Hill, Thomas;
Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo;
Regoli, Leonardo;
Pontius, Duane;
Stanley, Sabine;
Greathouse, Thomas;
Saur, Joachim;
Marouf, Essam;
Bergman, Jan;
Higgins, Chuck;
Johnson, Robert;
Thomsen, Michelle;
Soderlund, Krista;
Jia, Xianzhe;
Wilson, Robert;
Englander, Jacob;
Burch, Jim;
Nordheim, Tom;
Grava, Cesare;
Baines, Kevin;
Quick, Lynnae;
Russell, Christopher;
Cravens, Thomas;
Cecconi, Baptiste;
Aslam, Shahid;
Bray, Veronica;
Garcia-Sage, Katherine;
Richardson, John;
Clark, John;
Hsu, Sean;
Achterberg, Richard;
Sergis, Nick;
Paganelli, Flora;
Kempf, Sasha;
Orton, Glenn;
Portyankina, Ganna;
Jones, Geraint;
Economou, Thanasis;
Livengood, Timothy;
Krimigi, Stamatios;
Szalay, James;
Jackman, Catriona;
Valek, Phillip;
Lecacheux, Alain;
Colwell, Joshua;
Jasinski, Jamie;
Tosi, Federico;
Sulaiman, Ali;
Galand, Marina;
Kotova, Anna;
Khurana, Krishan;
Kivelson, Margaret;
Strobel, Darrell;
Radiota, Aikaterina;
Estrada, Paul;
Livi, Stefano;
Azari, Abigail;
Yates, Japheth;
Allegrini, Frederic;
Vogt, Marissa;
Felici, Marianna;
Luhmann, Janet;
Filacchione, Gianrico;
Moore, Luke
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough
investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can
the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior,
and what implications does that field have for the structure of the
magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for
example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface
oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote
observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only
laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet
formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03991 [pdf] - 1617216
Hall Effect in the coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
Huang, Z.;
Toth, G.;
Gombosi, T. I.;
Jia, X.;
Combi, M. R.;
Hansen, K. C.;
Fougere, N.;
Shou, Y.;
Tenishev, V.;
Altwegg, K.;
Rubin, M.
Submitted: 2018-01-11
Magnetohydrodynamics simulations have been carried out in studying the solar
wind and cometary plasma interactions for decades. Various plasma boundaries
have been simulated and compared well with observations for comet 1P/Halley.
The Rosetta mission, which studies comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, challenges
our understanding of the solar wind and comet interactions. The Rosetta Plasma
Consortium observed regions of very weak magnetic field outside the predicted
diamagnetic cavity. In this paper, we simulate the inner coma with the Hall
magnetohydrodynamics equations and show that the Hall effect is important in
the inner coma environment. The magnetic field topology becomes complex and
magnetic reconnection occurs on the dayside when the Hall effect is taken into
account. The magnetic reconnection on the dayside can generate weak magnetic
filed regions outside the global diamagnetic cavity, which may explain the
Rosetta Plasma Consortium observations. We conclude that the substantial change
in the inner coma environment is due to the fact that the ion inertial length
(or gyro radius) is not much smaller than the size of the diamagnetic cavity.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.06980 [pdf] - 1331208
Cassini in situ observations of long-duration magnetic reconnection in
Saturn's magnetotail
Arridge, Christopher S.;
Eastwood, Jonathan P.;
Jackman, Caitriona M.;
Poh, Gang-Kai;
Slavin, James A.;
Thomsen, Michelle F.;
André, Nicolas;
Jia, Xianzhe;
Kidder, Ariah;
Lamy, Laurent;
Radioti, Aikaterina;
Reisenfeld, Dan B.;
Sergis, Nick;
Volwerk, Martin;
Walsh, Andrew P.;
Zarka, Philippe;
Coates, Andrew J.;
Dougherty, Michele K.
Submitted: 2015-12-22
Magnetic reconnection is a fundamental process in solar system and
astrophysical plasmas, through which stored magnetic energy associated with
current sheets is converted into thermal, kinetic and wave energy. Magnetic
reconnection is also thought to be a key process involved in shedding
internally produced plasma from the giant magnetospheres at Jupiter and Saturn
through topological reconfiguration of the magnetic field. The region where
magnetic fields reconnect is known as the diffusion region and in this letter
we report on the first encounter of the Cassini spacecraft with a diffusion
region in Saturn's magnetotail. The data also show evidence of magnetic
reconnection over a period of 19 h revealing that reconnection can, in fact,
act for prolonged intervals in a rapidly rotating magnetosphere. We show that
reconnection can be a significant pathway for internal plasma loss at Saturn.
This counters the view of reconnection as a transient method of internal plasma
loss at Saturn. These results, although directly relating to the magnetosphere
of Saturn, have applications in the understanding of other rapidly rotating
magnetospheres, including that of Jupiter and other astrophysical bodies.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.05504 [pdf] - 937801
The magnetic structure of Saturn's magnetosheath
Submitted: 2015-02-19
A planet's magnetosheath extends from downstream of its bow shock up to the
magnetopause where the solar wind flow is deflected around the magnetosphere
and the solar wind embedded magnetic field lines are draped. This makes the
region an important site for plasma turbulence, instabilities, reconnection and
plasma depletion layers. A relatively high Alfv\'en Mach number solar wind and
a polar-flattened magnetosphere make the magnetosheath of Saturn both
physically and geometrically distinct from the Earth's. The polar flattening is
predicted to affect the magnetosheath magnetic field structure and thus the
solar wind-magnetosphere interaction. Here we investigate the magnetic field in
the magnetosheath with the expectation that polar flattening is manifested in
the overall draping pattern. We compare an accumulation of Cassini data between
2004 and 2010 with global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations and an
analytical model representative of a draped field between axisymmetric
boundaries. The draping patterns measured are well captured and in broad
agreement for given upstream conditions with those of the MHD simulations
(which include polar flattening). The deviations from the analytical model,
based on no polar flattening, suggest that non-axisymmetry is invariably a key
feature of the magnetosphere's global structure. Our results show a
comprehensive overview of the configuration of the magnetic field in a
non-axisymmetric magnetosheath as revealed by Cassini. We anticipate our
assessment to provide an insight to this barely studied interface between a
high Alfv\'enic bow shock and a dynamic magnetosphere.