Normalized to: Jewell, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.07742 [pdf] - 1938551
Enabling the next generation of scientific discoveries by embracing
photonic technologies
Jovanovic, Nemanja;
Beichman, Charles;
Blake, Cullen;
Bottom, Michael;
Chilcote, Jeffrey;
Coker, Carl;
Crass, Jonathan;
Crepp, Justin R.;
Cvetojevic, Nick;
Daal, Miguel;
Dagenais, Mario;
Davis, Kristina;
Dekany, Richard;
Figer, Don;
Fitzgerald, Michael P.;
Gatkine, Pradip;
Guyon, Olivier;
Halverson, Sam;
Harris, Robert J.;
Hinz, Philip M.;
Hover, David;
Howard, Andrew W.;
Jensen-Clem, Rebecca;
Jewell, Jeffrey;
Jurgenson, Colby;
Leifer, Stephanie;
Lozi, Julien;
Martin, Stefan;
Martinache, Frantz;
Mawet, Dimitri;
Mazin, Ben;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Moreira, Renan;
Pezzato, Jacklyn;
Plavchan, Peter;
Porter, Michael D.;
Ruane, Garreth;
Redding, David;
Sahoo, Ananya;
Schwab, Christian;
Serabyn, Eugene;
Skidmore, Warren;
Skemer, Andrew;
Van Buren, David;
Vasisht, Gautam;
Veilleux, Sylvain;
Vievard, Sebastien;
Wang, Jason;
Wang, Ji
Submitted: 2019-07-17, last modified: 2019-08-13
The fields of Astronomy and Astrophysics are technology limited, where the
advent and application of new technologies to astronomy usher in a flood of
discoveries altering our understanding of the Universe (e.g., recent cases
include LIGO and the GRAVITY instrument at the VLTI). Currently, the field of
astronomical spectroscopy is rapidly approaching an impasse: the size and cost
of instruments, especially multi-object and integral field spectrographs for
extremely large telescopes (ELTs), are pushing the limits of what is feasible,
requiring optical components at the very edge of achievable size and
performance. For these reasons, astronomers are increasingly looking for
innovative solutions like photonic technologies that promote instrument
miniaturization and simplification, while providing superior performance.
Astronomers have long been aware of the potential of photonic technologies.
The goal of this white paper is to draw attention to key photonic technologies
and developments over the past two decades and demonstrate there is new
momentum in this arena. We outline where the most critical efforts should be
focused over the coming decade in order to move towards realizing a fully
photonic instrument. A relatively small investment in this technology will
advance astronomical photonics to a level where it can reliably be used to
solve challenging instrument design limitations. For the benefit of both ground
and space borne instruments alike, an endorsement from the National Academy of
Sciences decadal survey will ensure that such solutions are set on a path to
their full scientific exploitation, which may one day address a broad range of
science cases outlined in the KSPs.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.01907 [pdf] - 1929968
Astro2020 APC White Paper: The need for better tools to design future
CMB experiments
Rocha, G.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. Belen;
Challinor, A.;
Górski, K. M.;
Hensley, B.;
Jaffe, T.;
Jewell, J.;
Keating, B.;
Kogut, A.;
Lawrence, C.;
Panopoulou, G.;
Partridge, B.;
Pearson, T.;
Silk, J.;
Steinhardt, P.;
Whehus, I.;
Bock, J.;
Crill, B.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Doré, O.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Ijjas, A.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kritsuk, A.;
Mangilli, A.;
Moncelsi, L.;
Myers, S.;
Steinbach, B.;
Tristram, M.
Submitted: 2019-08-05
This white paper addresses key challenges for the design of next-decade
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) experiments, and for assessing their
capability to extract cosmological information from CMB polarization. We focus
here on the challenges posed by foreground emission, CMB lensing, and
instrumental systematics to detect the signal that arises from gravitational
waves sourced by inflation and parameterized by $r$, at the level of $r \sim
10^{-3}$ or lower, as proposed for future observational efforts. We argue that
more accurate and robust analysis and simulation tools are required for these
experiments to realize their promise. We are optimistic that the capability to
simulate the joint impact of foregrounds, CMB lensing, and systematics can be
developed to the level necessary to support the design of a space mission at $r
\sim 10^{-4}$ in a few years. We make the case here for supporting such work.
Although ground-based efforts present additional challenges (e.g., atmosphere,
ground pickup), which are not addressed here, they would also benefit from
these improved simulation capabilities.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.06816 [pdf] - 1850865
On the Use of Planetary Science Data for Studying Extrasolar Planets
Submitted: 2019-03-15
There is an opportunity to advance both solar system and extrasolar planetary
studies that does not require the construction of new telescopes or new
missions but better use and access to inter-disciplinary data sets. This
approach leverages significant investment from NASA and international space
agencies in exploring this solar system and using those discoveries as "ground
truth" for the study of extrasolar planets. This white paper illustrates the
potential, using phase curves and atmospheric modeling as specific examples. A
key advance required to realize this potential is to enable seamless discovery
and access within and between planetary science and astronomical data sets.
Further, seamless data discovery and access also expands the availability of
science, allowing researchers and students at a variety of institutions,
equipped only with Internet access and a decent computer to conduct
cutting-edge research.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06761 [pdf] - 1814026
Characterization of microdot apodizers for imaging exoplanets with
next-generation space telescopes
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2018-07-18
A major science goal of future, large-aperture, optical space telescopes is
to directly image and spectroscopically analyze reflected light from
potentially habitable exoplanets. To accomplish this, the optical system must
suppress diffracted light from the star to reveal point sources approximately
ten orders of magnitude fainter than the host star at small angular separation.
Coronagraphs with microdot apodizers achieve the theoretical performance needed
to image Earth-like planets with a range of possible telescope designs,
including those with obscured and segmented pupils. A test microdot apodizer
with various bulk patterns (step functions, gradients, and sinusoids) and 4
different dot sizes (3, 5, 7, and 10 $\mu$m) made of small chrome squares on
anti-reflective glass was characterized with microscopy, optical laser
interferometry, as well as transmission and reflectance measurements at
wavelengths of 600 and 800 nm. Microscopy revealed the microdots were
fabricated to high precision. Results from laser interferometry showed that the
phase shifts observed in reflection vary with the local microdot fill factor.
Transmission measurements showed that microdot fill factor and transmission
were linearly related for dot sizes >5 $\mu$m. However, anomalously high
transmittance was measured when the dot size is <5x the wavelength and the fill
factor is approximately 50%, where the microdot pattern becomes periodic. The
transmission excess is not as prominent in the case of larger dot sizes
suggesting that it is likely to be caused by the interaction between the
incident field and electronic resonances in the surface of the metallic
microdots. We used our empirical models of the microdot apodizers to optimize a
second generation of reflective apodizer designs and confirmed that the
amplitude and phase of the reflected beam closely matches the ideal wavefront.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07100 [pdf] - 1719096
Review of high-contrast imaging systems for current and future
ground-based and space-based telescopes III. Technology opportunities and
pathways
Snik, Frans;
Absil, Olivier;
Baudoz, Pierre;
Beaulieu, Mathilde;
Bendek, Eduardo;
Cady, Eric;
Carlomagno, Brunella;
Carlotti, Alexis;
Cvetojevic, Nick;
Doelman, David;
Fogarty, Kevin;
Galicher, Raphaël;
Guyon, Olivier;
Haffert, Sebastiaan;
Huby, Elsa;
Jewell, Jeffrey;
Jovanovic, Nemanja;
Keller, Christoph;
Kenworthy, Matthew;
Knight, Justin;
Kühnn, Jonas;
Mazoyer, Johan;
Miller, Kelsey;
N'Diaye, Mamadou;
Norris, Barnaby;
Por, Emiel;
Pueyo, Laurent;
Riggs, A J Eldorado;
Ruane, Garreth;
Sirbu, Dan;
Wallace, J. Kent;
Wilby, Michael;
Ygouf, Marie
Submitted: 2018-07-18
The Optimal Optical CoronagraphWorkshop at the Lorentz Center in September
2017 in Leiden, the Netherlands gathered a diverse group of 25 researchers
working on exoplanet instrumentation to stimulate the emergence and sharing of
new ideas. This contribution is the final part of a series of three papers
summarizing the outcomes of the workshop, and presents an overview of novel
optical technologies and systems that are implemented or considered for
high-contrast imaging instruments on both ground-based and space telescopes.
The overall objective of high contrast instruments is to provide direct
observations and characterizations of exoplanets at contrast levels as extreme
as 10^-10. We list shortcomings of current technologies, and identify
opportunities and development paths for new technologies that enable quantum
leaps in performance. Specifically, we discuss the design and manufacturing of
key components like advanced deformable mirrors and coronagraphic optics, and
their amalgamation in "adaptive coronagraph" systems. Moreover, we discuss
highly integrated system designs that combine contrast-enhancing techniques and
characterization techniques (like high-resolution spectroscopy) while
minimizing the overall complexity. Finally, we explore extreme implementations
using all-photonics solutions for ground-based telescopes and dedicated huge
apertures for space telescopes.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07043 [pdf] - 1718662
Review of high-contrast imaging systems for current and future
ground-based and space-based telescopes II. Common path wavefront
sensing/control and Coherent Differential Imaging
Jovanovic, Nemanja;
Absil, Olivier;
Baudoz, Pierre;
Beaulieu, Mathilde;
Bottom, Michael;
Cady, Eric;
Carlomagno, Brunella;
Carlotti, Alexis;
Doelman, David;
Fogarty, Kevin;
Galicher, Raphael;
Guyon, Olivier;
Haffert, Sebastiaan;
Huby, Elsa;
Jewell, Jeffrey;
Keller, Christoph;
Kenworthy, Matthew A.;
Knight, Justin;
Kuhn, Jonas;
Miller, Kelsey;
Mazoyer, Johan;
N'Diaye, Mamadou;
Por, Emiel;
Pueyo, Laurent;
Riggs, A J Eldorado;
Ruane, Garreth;
Sirbu, Dan;
Snik, Frans;
Wallace, J. Kent;
Wilby, Michael;
Ygouf, Marie
Submitted: 2018-07-18
The Optimal Optical Coronagraph (OOC) Workshop held at the Lorentz Center in
September 2017 in Leiden, the Netherlands, gathered a diverse group of 25
researchers working on exoplanet instrumentation to stimulate the emergence and
sharing of new ideas. In this second installment of a series of three papers
summarizing the outcomes of the OOC workshop (see
also~\citenum{ruane2018,snik2018}), we present an overview of common path
wavefront sensing/control and Coherent Differential Imaging techniques,
highlight the latest results, and expose their relative strengths and
weaknesses. We layout critical milestones for the field with the aim of
enhancing future ground/space based high contrast imaging platforms. Techniques
like these will help to bridge the daunting contrast gap required to image a
terrestrial planet in the zone where it can retain liquid water, in reflected
light around a G type star from space.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07042 [pdf] - 1782818
Review of high-contrast imaging systems for current and future ground-
and space-based telescopes I. Coronagraph design methods and optical
performance metrics
Ruane, G.;
Riggs, A.;
Mazoyer, J.;
Por, E. H.;
N'Diaye, M.;
Huby, E.;
Baudoz, P.;
Galicher, R.;
Douglas, E.;
Knight, J.;
Carlomagno, B.;
Fogarty, K.;
Pueyo, L.;
Zimmerman, N.;
Absil, O.;
Beaulieu, M.;
Cady, E.;
Carlotti, A.;
Doelman, D.;
Guyon, O.;
Haffert, S.;
Jewell, J.;
Jovanovic, N.;
Keller, C.;
Kenworthy, M. A.;
Kühn, J.;
Miller, K.;
Sirbu, D.;
Snik, F.;
Wallace, J. Kent;
Wilby, M.;
Ygouf, M.
Submitted: 2018-07-18
The Optimal Optical Coronagraph (OOC) Workshop at the Lorentz Center in
September 2017 in Leiden, the Netherlands gathered a diverse group of 25
researchers working on exoplanet instrumentation to stimulate the emergence and
sharing of new ideas. In this first installment of a series of three papers
summarizing the outcomes of the OOC workshop, we present an overview of design
methods and optical performance metrics developed for coronagraph instruments.
The design and optimization of coronagraphs for future telescopes has
progressed rapidly over the past several years in the context of space mission
studies for Exo-C, WFIRST, HabEx, and LUVOIR as well as ground-based
telescopes. Design tools have been developed at several institutions to
optimize a variety of coronagraph mask types. We aim to give a broad overview
of the approaches used, examples of their utility, and provide the optimization
tools to the community. Though it is clear that the basic function of
coronagraphs is to suppress starlight while maintaining light from off-axis
sources, our community lacks a general set of standard performance metrics that
apply to both detecting and characterizing exoplanets. The attendees of the OOC
workshop agreed that it would benefit our community to clearly define
quantities for comparing the performance of coronagraph designs and systems.
Therefore, we also present a set of metrics that may be applied to theoretical
designs, testbeds, and deployed instruments. We show how these quantities may
be used to easily relate the basic properties of the optical instrument to the
detection significance of the given point source in the presence of realistic
noise.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06758 [pdf] - 1741286
Fast Linearized Coronagraph Optimizer (FALCO) IV. Coronagraph design
survey for obstructed and segmented apertures
Submitted: 2018-07-17
Coronagraph instruments on future space telescopes will enable the direct
detection and characterization of Earth-like exoplanets around Sun-like stars
for the first time. The quest for the optimal optical coronagraph designs has
made rapid progress in recent years thanks to the Segmented Coronagraph Design
and Analysis (SCDA) initiative led by the Exoplanet Exploration Program at
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. As a result, several types of
high-performance designs have emerged that make use of dual deformable mirrors
to (1) correct for optical aberrations and (2) suppress diffracted starlight
from obstructions and discontinuities in the telescope pupil. However, the
algorithms used to compute the optimal deformable mirror surface tend to be
computationally intensive, prohibiting large scale design surveys. Here, we
utilize the Fast Linearized Coronagraph Optimizer (FALCO), a tool that allows
for rapid optimization of deformable mirror shapes, to explore trade-offs in
coronagraph designs for obstructed and segmented space telescopes. We compare
designs for representative shaped pupil Lyot and vortex coronagraphs, two of
the most promising concepts for the LUVOIR space mission concept. We analyze
the optical performance of each design, including their throughput and ability
to passively suppress light from partially resolved stars in the presence of
low-order aberrations. Our main result is that deformable mirror based
apodization can sufficiently suppress diffraction from support struts and
inter-segment gaps whose widths are on the order of $\sim$0.1% of the primary
mirror diameter to detect Earth-sized planets within a few tens of
milliarcseconds from the star.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.03909 [pdf] - 1666860
Vortex coronagraphs for the Habitable Exoplanet Imaging Mission (HabEx)
concept: theoretical performance and telescope requirements
Submitted: 2018-03-11
The Habitable Exoplanet Imaging Mission (HabEx) concept requires an optical
coronagraph that provides deep starlight suppression over a broad spectral
bandwidth, high throughput for point sources at small angular separation, and
insensitivity to temporally-varying, low-order aberrations. Vortex coronagraphs
are a promising solution that perform optimally on off-axis, monolithic
telescopes and may also be designed for segmented telescopes with minor losses
in performance. We describe the key advantages of vortex coronagraphs on
off-axis telescopes: 1) Unwanted diffraction due to aberrations is passively
rejected in several low-order Zernike modes relaxing the wavefront stability
requirements for imaging Earth-like planets from <10 to >100 pm rms. 2) Stars
with angular diameters >0.1 $\lambda/D$ may be sufficiently suppressed. 3) The
absolute planet throughput is >10%, even for unfavorable telescope
architectures. 4) Broadband solutions ($\Delta\lambda/\lambda>0.1$) are readily
available for both monolithic and segmented apertures. The latter make use of
grayscale apodizers in an upstream pupil plane to provide suppression of
diffracted light from amplitude discontinuities in the telescope pupil without
inducing additional stroke on the deformable mirrors. We set wavefront
stability requirements on the telescope, based on a stellar irradiance
threshold set at an angular separation of 3$\pm$0.5 $\lambda/D$ from the star,
and discuss how some requirements may be relaxed by trading robustness to
aberrations for planet throughput.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.02042 [pdf] - 1599829
Segmented coronagraph design and analysis (SCDA): an initial design
study of apodized vortex coronagraphs
Submitted: 2017-12-06
The segmented coronagraph design and analysis (SCDA) study is a coordinated
effort, led by Stuart Shaklan (JPL) and supported by NASA's Exoplanet
Exploration Program (ExEP), to provide efficient coronagraph design concepts
for exoplanet imaging with future segmented aperture space telescopes. This
document serves as an update on the apodized vortex coronagraph designs devised
by the Caltech/JPL SCDA team. Apodized vortex coronagraphs come in two flavors,
where the apodization is achieved either by use of 1) a gray-scale
semi-transparent pupil mask or 2) a pair of deformable mirrors in series. Each
approach has attractive benefits. This document presents a comprehensive review
of the former type. Future theoretical investigations will further explore the
use of deformable mirrors for apodization.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.05787 [pdf] - 1587273
Performance and sensitivity of vortex coronagraphs on segmented space
telescopes
Submitted: 2017-08-18
The detection of molecular species in the atmospheres of earth-like
exoplanets orbiting nearby stars requires an optical system that suppresses
starlight and maximizes the sensitivity to the weak planet signals at small
angular separations. Achieving sufficient contrast performance on a segmented
aperture space telescope is particularly challenging due to unwanted
diffraction within the telescope from amplitude and phase discontinuities in
the pupil. Apodized vortex coronagraphs are a promising solution that
theoretically meet the performance needs for high contrast imaging with future
segmented space telescopes. We investigate the sensitivity of apodized vortex
coronagraphs to the expected aberrations, including segment co-phasing errors
in piston and tip/tilt as well as other low-order and mid-spatial frequency
aberrations. Coronagraph designs and their associated telescope requirements
are identified for conceptual HabEx and LUVOIR telescope designs.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.06400 [pdf] - 1443009
Apodized vortex coronagraph designs for segmented aperture telescopes
Submitted: 2016-07-21
Current state-of-the-art high contrast imaging instruments take advantage of
a number of elegant coronagraph designs to suppress starlight and image nearby
faint objects, such as exoplanets and circumstellar disks. The ideal
performance and complexity of the optical systems depends strongly on the shape
of the telescope aperture. Unfortunately, large primary mirrors tend to be
segmented and have various obstructions, which limit the performance of most
conventional coronagraph designs. We present a new family of vortex
coronagraphs with numerically-optimized gray-scale apodizers that provide the
sensitivity needed to directly image faint exoplanets with large, segmented
aperture telescopes, including the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) as well as
potential next-generation space telescopes.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.06619 [pdf] - 1381542
Cosmological Parameters from CMB Maps without Likelihood Approximation
Submitted: 2015-12-21, last modified: 2016-03-28
We propose an efficient Bayesian MCMC algorithm for estimating cosmological
parameters from CMB data without use of likelihood approximations. It builds on
a previously developed Gibbs sampling framework that allows for exploration of
the joint CMB sky signal and power spectrum posterior, P(s,Cl|d), and addresses
a long-standing problem of efficient parameter estimation simultaneously in
high and low signal-to-noise regimes. To achieve this, our new algorithm
introduces a joint Markov Chain move in which both the signal map and power
spectrum are synchronously modified, by rescaling the map according to the
proposed power spectrum before evaluating the Metropolis-Hastings accept
probability. Such a move was already introduced by Jewell et al. (2009), who
used it to explore low signal-to-noise posteriors. However, they also found
that the same algorithm is inefficient in the high signal-to-noise regime,
since a brute-force rescaling operation does not account for phase information.
This problem is mitigated in the new algorithm by subtracting the Wiener filter
mean field from the proposed map prior to rescaling, leaving high
signal-to-noise information invariant in the joint step, and effectively only
rescaling the low signal-to-noise component. To explore the full posterior, the
new joint move is then interleaved with a standard conditional Gibbs sky map
move. We apply our new algorithm to simplified simulations for which we can
evaluate the exact posterior to study both its accuracy and performance, and
find good agreement with the exact posterior; marginal means agree to less than
0.006 sigma, and standard deviations to better than 3%. The Markov Chain
correlation length is of the same order of magnitude as those obtained by other
standard samplers in the field.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.2544 [pdf] - 1294532
A CMB Gibbs sampler for localized secondary anisotropies
Submitted: 2014-10-09, last modified: 2015-10-15
As well as primary fluctuations, CMB temperature maps contain a wealth of
additional information in the form of secondary anisotropies. Secondary effects
that can be identified with individual objects, such as the thermal and kinetic
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effects due to galaxy clusters, are difficult to
unambiguously disentangle from foreground contamination and the primary CMB
however. We develop a Bayesian formalism for rigorously characterising
anisotropies that are localised on the sky, taking the TSZ and KSZ effects as
an example. Using a Gibbs sampling scheme, we are able to efficiently sample
from the joint posterior distribution for a multi-component model of the sky
with many thousands of correlated physical parameters. The posterior can then
be exactly marginalised to estimate properties of the secondary anisotropies,
fully taking into account degeneracies with the other signals in the CMB map.
We show that this method is computationally tractable using a simple
implementation based on the existing Commander component separation code, and
also discuss how other types of secondary anisotropy can be accommodated within
our framework.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.00922 [pdf] - 1354774
Planck intermediate results. XXXIV. The magnetic field structure in the
Rosette Nebula
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arzoumanian, D.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Ferrière, K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Guillet, V.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Juvela, M.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oppermann, N.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Soler, J. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Wiesemeyer, H.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-01-05, last modified: 2015-09-15
Planck has mapped the polarized dust emission over the whole sky, making it
possible to trace the Galactic magnetic field structure that pervades the
interstellar medium (ISM). We combine polarization data from Planck with
rotation measure (RM) observations towards a massive star-forming region, the
Rosette Nebula in the Monoceros molecular cloud, to study its magnetic field
structure and the impact of an expanding HII region on the morphology of the
field. We derive an analytical solution for the magnetic field, assumed to
evolve from an initially uniform configuration following the expansion of
ionized gas and the formation of a shell of swept-up ISM. From the RM data we
estimate a mean value of the line-of-sight component of the magnetic field of
about 3microG (towards the observer) in the Rosette Nebula, for a uniform
electron density of about 12cm-3. The dust shell that surrounds the Rosette HII
region is clearly observed in the Planck intensity map at 353 GHz, with a
polarization signal significantly different from that of the local background
when considered as a whole. The Planck observations constrain the
plane-of-the-sky orientation of the magnetic field in the Rosette's parent
molecular cloud to be mostly aligned with the large-scale field along the
Galactic plane. The Planck data are compared with the analytical model, which
predicts the mean polarization properties of a spherical and uniform dust shell
for a given orientation of the field. This comparison leads to an upper limit
of about 45degr on the angle between the line of sight and the magnetic field
in the Rosette complex, for an assumed intrinsic dust polarization fraction of
4%. This field direction can reproduce the RM values detected in the ionized
region if the magnetic field strength in the Monoceros molecular cloud is in
the range 6.5--9microG.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.04273 [pdf] - 1311948
Optimized Large-Scale CMB Likelihood And Quadratic Maximum Likelihood
Power Spectrum Estimation
Submitted: 2015-06-13, last modified: 2015-09-10
We revisit the problem of exact CMB likelihood and power spectrum estimation
with the goal of minimizing computational cost through linear compression. This
idea was originally proposed for CMB purposes by Tegmark et al.\ (1997), and
here we develop it into a fully working computational framework for large-scale
polarization analysis, adopting \WMAP\ as a worked example. We compare five
different linear bases (pixel space, harmonic space, noise covariance
eigenvectors, signal-to-noise covariance eigenvectors and signal-plus-noise
covariance eigenvectors) in terms of compression efficiency, and find that the
computationally most efficient basis is the signal-to-noise eigenvector basis,
which is closely related to the Karhunen-Loeve and Principal Component
transforms, in agreement with previous suggestions. For this basis, the
information in 6836 unmasked \WMAP\ sky map pixels can be compressed into a
smaller set of 3102 modes, with a maximum error increase of any single
multipole of 3.8\% at $\ell\le32$, and a maximum shift in the mean values of a
joint distribution of an amplitude--tilt model of 0.006$\sigma$. This
compression reduces the computational cost of a single likelihood evaluation by
a factor of 5, from 38 to 7.5 CPU seconds, and it also results in a more robust
likelihood by implicitly regularizing nearly degenerate modes. Finally, we use
the same compression framework to formulate a numerically stable and
computationally efficient variation of the Quadratic Maximum Likelihood
implementation that requires less than 3 GB of memory and 2 CPU minutes per
iteration for $\ell \le 32$, rendering low-$\ell$ QML CMB power spectrum
analysis fully tractable on a standard laptop.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.00612 [pdf] - 980227
A Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data
BICEP2/Keck;
Collaborations, Planck;
:;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Aikin, R. W.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Arnaud, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barkats, D.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benton, S. J.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bischoff, C. A.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Brevik, J. A.;
Bucher, M.;
Buder, I.;
Bullock, E.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Buza, V.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Connors, J.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dowell, C. D.;
Duband, L.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dvorkin, C.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Filippini, J. P.;
Finelli, F.;
Fliescher, S.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Gjerløw, E.;
Golwala, S. R.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Halpern, M.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hasselfield, M.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hilton, G. C.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hovest, W.;
Hristov, V. V.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hui, H.;
Hurier, G.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Karkare, K. S.;
Kaufman, J. P.;
Keating, B. G.;
Kefeli, S.;
Keihänen, E.;
Kernasovskiy, S. A.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kovac, J. M.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kuo, C. L.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Leonardi, R.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Lueker, M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Mason, P.;
Matarrese, S.;
Megerian, K. G.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nguyen, H. T.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Brient, R.;
Ogburn, R. W.;
Orlando, A.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Pryke, C.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Richter, S.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schwarz, R.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Sheehy, C. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Staniszewski, Z. K.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Teply, G. P.;
Terenzi, L.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tolan, J. E.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Turner, A. D.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Weber, A. C.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Willmert, J.;
Wong, C. L.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-02, last modified: 2015-04-14
We report the results of a joint analysis of data from BICEP2/Keck Array and
Planck. BICEP2 and Keck Array have observed the same approximately 400 deg$^2$
patch of sky centered on RA 0h, Dec. $-57.5\deg$. The combined maps reach a
depth of 57 nK deg in Stokes $Q$ and $U$ in a band centered at 150 GHz. Planck
has observed the full sky in polarization at seven frequencies from 30 to 353
GHz, but much less deeply in any given region (1.2 $\mu$K deg in $Q$ and $U$ at
143 GHz). We detect 150$\times$353 cross-correlation in $B$-modes at high
significance. We fit the single- and cross-frequency power spectra at
frequencies $\geq 150$ GHz to a lensed-$\Lambda$CDM model that includes dust
and a possible contribution from inflationary gravitational waves (as
parameterized by the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$), using a prior on the
frequency spectral behavior of polarized dust emission from previous \planck\
analysis of other regions of the sky. We find strong evidence for dust and no
statistically significant evidence for tensor modes. We probe various model
variations and extensions, including adding a synchrotron component in
combination with lower frequency data, and find that these make little
difference to the $r$ constraint. Finally we present an alternative analysis
which is similar to a map-based cleaning of the dust contribution, and show
that this gives similar constraints. The final result is expressed as a
likelihood curve for $r$, and yields an upper limit $r_{0.05}<0.12$ at 95%
confidence. Marginalizing over dust and $r$, lensing $B$-modes are detected at
$7.0\,\sigma$ significance.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.5738 [pdf] - 1354768
Planck intermediate results. XXX. The angular power spectrum of
polarized dust emission at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Guillet, V.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Soler, J. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2014-09-19, last modified: 2014-12-08
The polarized thermal emission from Galactic dust is the main foreground
present in measurements of the polarization of the cosmic microwave background
(CMB) at frequencies above 100GHz. We exploit the Planck HFI polarization data
from 100 to 353GHz to measure the dust angular power spectra $C_\ell^{EE,BB}$
over the range $40<\ell<600$ well away from the Galactic plane. These will
bring new insights into interstellar dust physics and a precise determination
of the level of contamination for CMB polarization experiments. We show that
statistical properties of the emission can be characterized over large
fractions of the sky using $C_\ell$. For the dust, they are well described by
power laws in $\ell$ with exponents $\alpha^{EE,BB}=-2.42\pm0.02$. The
amplitudes of the polarization $C_\ell$ vary with the average brightness in a
way similar to the intensity ones. The dust polarization frequency dependence
is consistent with modified blackbody emission with $\beta_d=1.59$ and
$T_d=19.6$K. We find a systematic ratio between the amplitudes of the Galactic
$B$- and $E$-modes of 0.5. We show that even in the faintest dust-emitting
regions there are no "clean" windows where primordial CMB $B$-mode polarization
could be measured without subtraction of dust emission. Finally, we investigate
the level of dust polarization in the BICEP2 experiment field. Extrapolation of
the Planck 353GHz data to 150GHz gives a dust power
$\ell(\ell+1)C_\ell^{BB}/(2\pi)$ of $1.32\times10^{-2}\mu$K$_{CMB}^2$ over the
$40<\ell<120$ range; the statistical uncertainty is $\pm0.29$ and there is an
additional uncertainty (+0.28,-0.24) from the extrapolation, both in the same
units. This is the same magnitude as reported by BICEP2 over this $\ell$ range,
which highlights the need for assessment of the polarized dust signal even in
the cleanest windows of the sky.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.1300 [pdf] - 1453153
Planck 2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission
Planck Collaboration;
Abergel, A.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Aniano, G.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Draine, B. T.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Guillet, V.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Joncas, G.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Verstraete, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Welikala, N.;
Ysard, N.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca., A.
Submitted: 2013-12-04, last modified: 2014-09-23
This paper presents an all-sky model of dust emission from the Planck 857,
545 and 353 GHz, and IRAS 100 micron data. Using a modified black-body fit to
the data we present all-sky maps of the dust optical depth, temperature, and
spectral index over the 353-3000 GHz range. This model is a tight
representation of the data at 5 arc min. It shows variations of the order of 30
% compared with the widely-used model of Finkbeiner, Davis, and Schlegel. The
Planck data allow us to estimate the dust temperature uniformly over the whole
sky, providing an improved estimate of the dust optical depth compared to
previous all-sky dust model, especially in high-contrast molecular regions. An
increase of the dust opacity at 353 GHz, tau_353/N_H, from the diffuse to the
denser interstellar medium (ISM) is reported. It is associated with a decrease
in the observed dust temperature, T_obs, that could be due at least in part to
the increased dust opacity. We also report an excess of dust emission at HI
column densities lower than 10^20 cm^-2 that could be the signature of dust in
the warm ionized medium. In the diffuse ISM at high Galactic latitude, we
report an anti-correlation between tau_353/N_H and T_obs while the dust
specific luminosity, i.e., the total dust emission integrated over frequency
(the radiance) per hydrogen atom, stays about constant. The implication is that
in the diffuse high-latitude ISM tau_353 is not as reliable a tracer of dust
column density as we conclude it is in molecular clouds where the correlation
of tau_353 with dust extinction estimated using colour excess measurements on
stars is strong. To estimate Galactic E(B-V) in extragalactic fields at high
latitude we develop a new method based on the thermal dust radiance, instead of
the dust optical depth, calibrated to E(B-V) using reddening measurements of
quasars deduced from Sloan Digital Sky Survey data.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5066 [pdf] - 1453142
Planck 2013 results. V. LFI calibration
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Peel, M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-08-20
We discuss the methods employed to photometrically calibrate the data
acquired by the Low Frequency Instrument on Planck. Our calibration is based on
a combination of the Orbital Dipole plus the Solar Dipole, caused respectively
by the motion of the Planck spacecraft with respect to the Sun and by motion of
the Solar System with respect to the CMB rest frame. The latter provides a
signal of a few mK with the same spectrum as the CMB anisotropies and is
visible throughout the mission. In this data release we rely on the
characterization of the Solar Dipole as measured by WMAP. We also present
preliminary results (at 44GHz only) on the study of the Orbital Dipole, which
agree with the WMAP value of the Solar System speed within our uncertainties.
We compute the calibration constant for each radiometer roughly once per hour,
in order to keep track of changes in the detectors' gain. Since non-idealities
in the optical response of the beams proved to be important, we implemented a
fast convolution algorithm which considers the full beam response in estimating
the signal generated by the dipole. Moreover, in order to further reduce the
impact of residual systematics due to sidelobes, we estimated time variations
in the calibration constant of the 30GHz radiometers (the ones with the largest
sidelobes) using the signal of a reference load. We have estimated the
calibration accuracy in two ways: we have run a set of simulations to assess
the impact of statistical errors and systematic effects in the instrument and
in the calibration procedure, and we have performed a number of consistency
checks on the data and on the brightness temperature of Jupiter. Calibration
errors for this data release are expected to be about 0.6% at 44 and 70 GHz,
and 0.8% at 30 GHz. (Abriged.)
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5062 [pdf] - 832330
Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Aussel, H.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Barrena, R.;
Bartelmann, M.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bethermin, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Blanchard, A.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bourdin, H.;
Bowyer, J. W.;
Bridges, M.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burenin, R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carr, R.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casale, M.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Churazov, E.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Déchelette, T.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dick, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fabre, O.;
Falgarone, E.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Filliard, C.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Foley, S.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Freschi, M.;
Fromenteau, S.;
Frommert, M.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gallegos, J.;
Galli, S.;
Gandolfo, B.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Gilfanov, M.;
Girard, D.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Haissinski, J.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hansen, M.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Hempel, A.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Ho, S.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hou, Z.;
Hovest, W.;
Huey, G.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jasche, J.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kalberla, P.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Kerp, J.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Khamitov, I.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lavabre, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Leroy, C.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lewis, A.;
Li, C.;
Liddle, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lowe, S.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matsumura, T.;
Matthai, F.;
Maurin, L.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McDonald, A.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Menegoni, E.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Millea, M.;
Miniscalco, R.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Nesvadba, N. P. H.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
North, C.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Orieux, F.;
Osborne, S.;
O'Sullivan, C.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Paykari, P.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Pullen, A. R.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Rahlin, A.;
Räth, C.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Riazuelo, A.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ringeval, C.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salerno, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanselme, L.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schiavon, F.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Smith, K.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Tuttlebee, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vibert, L.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, C.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Winkel, B.;
Xia, J. -Q.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-06-05
The ESA's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early Universe and its
subsequent evolution, was launched 14 May 2009 and has been scanning the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously since 12 August 2009. This paper
gives an overview of the mission and its performance, the processing, analysis,
and characteristics of the data, the scientific results, and the science data
products and papers in the release. The science products include maps of the
CMB and diffuse extragalactic foregrounds, a catalogue of compact Galactic and
extragalactic sources, and a list of sources detected through the SZ effect.
The likelihood code used to assess cosmological models against the Planck data
and a lensing likelihood are described. Scientific results include robust
support for the standard six-parameter LCDM model of cosmology and improved
measurements of its parameters, including a highly significant deviation from
scale invariance of the primordial power spectrum. The Planck values for these
parameters and others derived from them are significantly different from those
previously determined. Several large-scale anomalies in the temperature
distribution of the CMB, first detected by WMAP, are confirmed with higher
confidence. Planck sets new limits on the number and mass of neutrinos, and has
measured gravitational lensing of CMB anisotropies at greater than 25 sigma.
Planck finds no evidence for non-Gaussianity in the CMB. Planck's results agree
well with results from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. Planck
finds a lower Hubble constant than found in some more local measures. Some
tension is also present between the amplitude of matter fluctuations derived
from CMB data and that derived from SZ data. The Planck and WMAP power spectra
are offset from each other by an average level of about 2% around the first
acoustic peak.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5064 [pdf] - 888433
Planck 2013 results. III. LFI systematic uncertainties
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dick, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Peel, M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-03-27
We present the current estimate of instrumental and systematic effect
uncertainties for the Planck-Low Frequency Instrument relevant to the first
release of the Planck cosmological results. We give an overview of the main
effects and of the tools and methods applied to assess residuals in maps and
power spectra. We also present an overall budget of known systematic effect
uncertainties, which are dominated sidelobe straylight pick-up and imperfect
calibration. However, even these two effects are at least two orders of
magnitude weaker than the cosmic microwave background (CMB) fluctuations as
measured in terms of the angular temperature power spectrum. A residual signal
above the noise level is present in the multipole range $\ell<20$, most notably
at 30 GHz, and is likely caused by residual Galactic straylight contamination.
Current analysis aims to further reduce the level of spurious signals in the
data and to improve the systematic effects modelling, in particular with
respect to straylight and calibration uncertainties.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5076 [pdf] - 1165431
Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Haissinski, J.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hou, Z.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Menegoni, E.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-03-20
We present the first results based on Planck measurements of the CMB
temperature and lensing-potential power spectra. The Planck spectra at high
multipoles are extremely well described by the standard spatially-flat
six-parameter LCDM cosmology. In this model Planck data determine the
cosmological parameters to high precision. We find a low value of the Hubble
constant, H0=67.3+/-1.2 km/s/Mpc and a high value of the matter density
parameter, Omega_m=0.315+/-0.017 (+/-1 sigma errors) in excellent agreement
with constraints from baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) surveys. Including
curvature, we find that the Universe is consistent with spatial flatness to
percent-level precision using Planck CMB data alone. We present results from an
analysis of extensions to the standard cosmology, using astrophysical data sets
in addition to Planck and high-resolution CMB data. None of these models are
favoured significantly over standard LCDM. The deviation of the scalar spectral
index from unity is insensitive to the addition of tensor modes and to changes
in the matter content of the Universe. We find a 95% upper limit of r<0.11 on
the tensor-to-scalar ratio. There is no evidence for additional neutrino-like
relativistic particles. Using BAO and CMB data, we find N_eff=3.30+/-0.27 for
the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom, and an upper limit of
0.23 eV for the summed neutrino mass. Our results are in excellent agreement
with big bang nucleosynthesis and the standard value of N_eff=3.046. We find no
evidence for dynamical dark energy. Despite the success of the standard LCDM
model, this cosmology does not provide a good fit to the CMB power spectrum at
low multipoles, as noted previously by the WMAP team. While not of decisive
significance, this is an anomaly in an otherwise self-consistent analysis of
the Planck temperature data.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5065 [pdf] - 1165427
Planck 2013 results. IV. Low Frequency Instrument beams and window
functions
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-02-28
This paper presents the characterization of the in-flight beams, the beam
window functions and the associated uncertainties for the Planck Low Frequency
Instrument (LFI). Knowledge of the beam profiles is necessary for determining
the transfer function to go from the observed to the actual sky anisotropy
power spectrum. The main beam distortions affect the beam window function,
complicating the reconstruction of the anisotropy power spectrum at high
multipoles, whereas the sidelobes affect the low and intermediate multipoles.
The in-flight assessment of the LFI main beams relies on the measurements
performed during Jupiter observations. By stacking the data from multiple
Jupiter transits, the main beam profiles are measured down to -20 dB at 30 and
44 GHz, and down to -25 dB at 70 GHz. The main beam solid angles are determined
to better than 0.2% at each LFI frequency band. The Planck pre-launch optical
model is conveniently tuned to characterize the main beams independently of any
noise effects. This approach provides an optical model whose beams fully
reproduce the measurements in the main beam region, but also allows a
description of the beams at power levels lower than can be achieved by the
Jupiter measurements themselves. The agreement between the simulated beams and
the measured beams is better than 1% at each LFI frequency band. The simulated
beams are used for the computation of the window functions for the effective
beams. The error budget for the window functions is estimated from both main
beam and sidelobe contributions, and accounts for the radiometer bandshapes.
The total uncertainties in the effective beam window functions are: 2% and 1.2%
at 30 and 44 GHz, respectively (at $\ell \approx 600$), and 0.7% at 70 GHz (at
$\ell \approx 1000$).
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.5299 [pdf] - 788139
A multi-level solver for Gaussian constrained CMB realizations
Submitted: 2013-08-24, last modified: 2014-02-24
We present a multi-level solver for drawing constrained Gaussian realizations
or finding the maximum likelihood estimate of the CMB sky, given noisy sky maps
with partial sky coverage. The method converges substantially faster than
existing Conjugate Gradient (CG) methods for the same problem. For instance,
for the 143 GHz Planck frequency channel, only 3 multi-level W-cycles result in
an absolute error smaller than 1 microKelvin in any pixel. Using 16 CPU cores,
this translates to a computational expense of 6 minutes wall time per
realization, plus 8 minutes wall time for a power spectrum-dependent
precomputation. Each additional W-cycle reduces the error by more than an order
of magnitude, at an additional computational cost of 2 minutes. For comparison,
we have never been able to achieve similar absolute convergence with
conventional CG methods for this high signal-to-noise data set, even after
thousands of CG iterations and employing expensive preconditioners. The solver
is part of the Commander 2 code, which is available with an open source license
at http://commander.bitbucket.org/.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5063 [pdf] - 888432
Planck 2013 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peel, M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salerno, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-02-02
We describe the data processing pipeline of the Planck Low Frequency
Instrument (LFI) data processing centre (DPC) to create and characterize
full-sky maps based on the first 15.5 months of operations at 30, 44 and 70
GHz. In particular, we discuss the various steps involved in reducing the data,
starting from telemetry packets through to the production of cleaned,
calibrated timelines and calibrated frequency maps. Data are continuously
calibrated using the modulation induced on the mean temperature of the cosmic
microwave background radiation by the proper motion of the spacecraft. Sky
signals other than the dipole are removed by an iterative procedure based on
simultaneous fitting of calibration parameters and sky maps. Noise properties
are estimated from time-ordered data after the sky signal has been removed,
using a generalized least square map-making algorithm. A destriping code
(Madam) is employed to combine radiometric data and pointing information into
sky maps, minimizing the variance of correlated noise. Noise covariance
matrices, required to compute statistical uncertainties on LFI and Planck
products, are also produced. Main beams are estimated down to the -20 dB level
using Jupiter transits, which are also used for the geometrical calibration of
the focal plane.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.0315 [pdf] - 1165637
CMB likelihood approximation for banded probability distributions
Gjerløw, E.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Górski, K. M.;
Huey, G.;
Jewell, J. B.;
Næss, S. K.;
Rocha, G.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Wehus, I. K.
Submitted: 2013-04-01
We investigate sets of random variables that can be arranged sequentially
such that a given variable only depends conditionally on its immediate
predecessor. For such sets, we show that the full joint probability
distribution may be expressed exclusively in terms of uni- and bivariate
marginals. Under the assumption that the CMB power spectrum likelihood only
exhibits correlations within a banded multipole range, \Delta l, we apply this
expression to two outstanding problems in CMB likelihood analysis. First, we
derive a statistically well-defined hybrid likelihood estimator, merging two
independent (e.g., low- and high-l) likelihoods into a single expression that
properly accounts for correlations between the two. Applying this expression to
the WMAP likelihood, we verify that the effect of correlations on cosmological
parameters in the transition region is negligible in terms of cosmological
parameters for WMAP; the largest relative shift seen for any parameter is
0.06\sigma. However, because this may not hold for other experimental setups
(e.g., for different instrumental noise properties or analysis masks), but must
rather be verified on a case-by-case basis, we recommend our new hybridization
scheme for future experiments for statistical self-consistency reasons. Second,
we use the same expression to improve the convergence rate of the Blackwell-Rao
likelihood estimator, reducing the required number of Monte Carlo samples by
several orders of magnitude, and thereby extend it to high-l applications.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5073 [pdf] - 888438
Planck 2013 results. XIII. Galactic CO emission
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigaluppi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Dempsey, J. T.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enblin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fukui, Y.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Handa, T.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hily-Blant, P.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leon-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moore, T. J. T.;
Morgante, G.;
Morino, J.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Nakajima, T.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Okuda, T.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Preezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Thomas, H. S.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torii, K.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Yoda, H. Yamamoto T.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2013-03-25
Rotational transition lines of CO play a major role in molecular radio
astronomy and in particular in the study of star formation and the Galactic
structure. Although a wealth of data exists in the Galactic plane and some
well-known molecular clouds, there is no available CO high sensitivity all-sky
survey to date.
Such all-sky surveys can be constructed using the \Planck\ HFI data because
the three lowest CO rotational transition lines at 115, 230 and 345 GHz
significantly contribute to the signal of the 100, 217 and 353 GHz HFI channels
respectively. Two different component separation methods are used to extract
the CO maps from Planck HFI data. The maps obtained are then compared to one
another and to existing external CO surveys. From these quality checks the best
CO maps in terms of signal to noise and/or residual foreground contamination
are selected. Three sets of velocity-integrated CO emission maps are produced:
Type 1 maps of the CO (1-0), (2-1), and (3-2) rotational transitions with low
foreground contamination but moderate signal-to-noise ratio; Type 2 maps for
the (1-0) and (2-1) transitions with a better signal-to-noise ratio; and one
Type 3 map, a line composite map with the best signal-to-noise ratio in order
to locate the faintest molecular regions. The maps are described in detail.
They are shown to be fully compatible with previous surveys of parts of the
Galactic Plane and also of fainter regions out of the Galactic plane. The
Planck HFI velocity-integrated CO maps for the (1-0), (2-1), and (3-2)
rotational transitions provide an unprecedented all-sky CO view of the Galaxy.
These maps are also of great interest to monitor potential CO contamination on
CMB \Planck\ studies.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5075 [pdf] - 888440
Planck 2013 results. XV. CMB power spectra and likelihood
Planck collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Gjerlow, E.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leon-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Menegoni, E.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Orieux, F.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Paykari, P.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rahlin, A.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ringeval, C.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanselme, L.;
Santos, D.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Turler, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2013-03-25
We present the Planck likelihood, a complete statistical description of the
two-point correlation function of the CMB temperature fluctuations. We use this
likelihood to derive the Planck CMB power spectrum over three decades in l,
covering 2 <= l <= 2500. The main source of error at l <= 1500 is cosmic
variance. Uncertainties in small-scale foreground modelling and instrumental
noise dominate the error budget at higher l's. For l < 50, our likelihood
exploits all Planck frequency channels from 30 to 353 GHz through a physically
motivated Bayesian component separation technique. At l >= 50, we employ a
correlated Gaussian likelihood approximation based on angular cross-spectra
derived from the 100, 143 and 217 GHz channels. We validate our likelihood
through an extensive suite of consistency tests, and assess the impact of
residual foreground and instrumental uncertainties on cosmological parameters.
We find good internal agreement among the high-l cross-spectra with residuals
of a few uK^2 at l <= 1000. We compare our results with foreground-cleaned CMB
maps, and with cross-spectra derived from the 70 GHz Planck map, and find broad
agreement in terms of spectrum residuals and cosmological parameters. The
best-fit LCDM cosmology is in excellent agreement with preliminary Planck
polarisation spectra. The standard LCDM cosmology is well constrained by Planck
by l <= 1500. For example, we report a 5.4 sigma deviation from n_s /= 1.
Considering various extensions beyond the standard model, we find no indication
of significant departures from the LCDM framework. Finally, we report a tension
between the best-fit LCDM model and the low-l spectrum in the form of a power
deficit of 5-10% at l <~ 40, significant at 2.5-3 sigma. We do not elaborate
further on its cosmological implications, but note that this is our most
puzzling finding in an otherwise remarkably consistent dataset. (Abridged)
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5072 [pdf] - 888437
Planck 2013 results. XII. Component separation
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huey, G.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salerno, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savini, G.;
Schiavon, F.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Xia, J. -Q.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20
Planck has produced detailed all-sky observations over nine frequency bands
between 30 and 857 GHz. These observations allow robust reconstruction of the
primordial cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature fluctuations over
nearly the full sky, as well as new constraints on Galactic foregrounds. This
paper describes the component separation framework adopted by Planck. We test
four foreground-cleaned CMB maps derived using qualitatively different
component separation algorithms. The quality of our reconstructions is
evaluated through detailed simulations and internal comparisons, and shown
through various tests to be internally consistent and robust for CMB power
spectrum and cosmological parameter estimation up to l = 2000. The parameter
constraints on LambdaCDM cosmologies derived from these maps are consistent
with those presented in the cross-spectrum based Planck likelihood analysis. We
choose two of the CMB maps for specific scientific goals. We also present maps
and frequency spectra of the Galactic low-frequency, CO, and thermal dust
emission. The component maps are found to provide a faithful representation of
the sky, as evaluated by simulations. For the low-frequency component, the
spectral index varies widely over the sky, ranging from about beta = -4 to -2.
Considering both morphology and prior knowledge of the low frequency
components, the index map allows us to associate a steep spectral index (beta <
-3.2) with strong anomalous microwave emission, corresponding to a spinning
dust spectrum peaking below 20 GHz, a flat index of beta > -2.3 with strong
free-free emission, and intermediate values with synchrotron emission.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.5418 [pdf] - 543093
Analysis of WMAP 7-year Temperature Data: Astrophysics of the Galactic
Haze
Pietrobon, Davide;
Gorski, Krzysztof M.;
Bartlett, James;
Banday, Anthony J.;
Dobler, Gregory;
Colombo, Loris P. L.;
Pagano, Luca;
Rocha, Graca;
Saha, Rajib;
Jewell, Jeffrey B.;
Hildebrandt, Sergi R.;
Eriksen, Hans Kristian;
Lawrence, Charles R.
Submitted: 2011-10-25, last modified: 2012-07-30
We analyse WMAP 7-year temperature data, jointly modeling the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) and Galactic foreground emission. We use the
Commander code based on Gibbs sampling. Thus, from the WMAP7 data, we derive
simultaneously the CMB and Galactic components on scales larger than 1deg with
sensitivity improved relative to previous work. We conduct a detailed study of
the low-frequency foreground with particular focus on the "microwave haze"
emission around the Galactic center. We demonstrate improved performance in
quantifying the diffuse galactic emission when Haslam 408MHz data are included
together with WMAP7, and the spinning and thermal dust emission is modeled
jointly. We also address the question of whether the hypothetical galactic haze
can be explained by a spatial variation of the synchrotron spectral index. The
excess of emission around the Galactic center appears stable with respect to
variations of the foreground model that we study. Our results demonstrate that
the new galactic foreground component - the microwave haze - is indeed present.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2038 [pdf] - 955981
Planck early results. III. First assessment of the Low Frequency
Instrument in-flight performance
Mennella, A.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Butler, R. C.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
Dick, J.;
Frailis, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lowe, S.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Morgante, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Perrotta, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Poutanen, T.;
Sandri, M.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Valiviita, J.;
Villa, F.;
Watson, R.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.;
Aja, B.;
Artal, E.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaglia, P.;
Bennett, K.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabella, P.;
Cappellini, B.;
Chen, X.;
Colombo, L.;
Cruz, M.;
Danese, L.;
D'Arcangelo, O.;
Davies, R. D.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Finelli, F.;
Foley, S.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
George, D.;
Gómez, F.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Herreros, J. M.;
Hoyland, R. J.;
Hughes, N.;
Jewell, J.;
Jukkala, P.;
Juvela, M.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kilpia, V. -H.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Laaninen, M.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Leutenegger, P.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Malaspina, M.;
Marinucci, D.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Miccolis, M.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nesti, R.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Pospieszalski, M.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prina, M.;
Procopio, P.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Quercellini, C.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Roddis, N.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Silvestri, R.;
Simonetto, A.;
Sjoman, P.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Sozzi, C.;
Stringhetti, L.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tofani, G.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Watson, C.;
White, S. D. M.;
Winder, F.
Submitted: 2011-01-11, last modified: 2011-12-19
The scientific performance of the Planck Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) after
one year of in-orbit operation is presented. We describe the main optical
parameters and discuss photometric calibration, white noise sensitivity, and
noise properties. A preliminary evaluation of the impact of the main systematic
effects is presented. For each of the performance parameters, we outline the
methods used to obtain them from the flight data and provide a comparison with
pre-launch ground assessments, which are essentially confirmed in flight.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2040 [pdf] - 1453868
Planck Early Results. V. The Low Frequency Instrument data processing
Zacchei, A.;
Maino, D.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Zotti, G.;
Dick, J.;
Frailis, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Matthai, F.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Natoli, P.;
Pasian, F.;
Perrotta, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Poutanen, T.;
Reinecke, M.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Rohlfs, R.;
Sandri, M.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Valiviita, J.;
Villa, F.;
Zonca, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Bedini, L.;
Bennett, K.;
Binko, P.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bremer, M.;
Cabella, P.;
Cappellini, B.;
Chen, X.;
Colombo, L.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Troia, G.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dörl, U.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Finelli, F.;
Franceschi, E.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Gasparo, F.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Giardino, G.;
Gómez, F.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hell, R.;
Herranz, D.;
Hovest, W.;
Huynh, M.;
Jewell, J.;
Juvela, M.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Maggio, G.;
Marinucci, D.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Meharga, M. T.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Moss, A.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pearson, D.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Prézeau, G.;
Procopio, P.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Quercellini, C.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Salerno, E.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Silk, J. I.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Sternberg, J.;
Stivoli, F.;
Stompor, R.;
Tofani, G.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Vielva, P.;
Vittorio, N.;
Vuerli, C.;
Wade, L. A.;
Watson, R.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.
Submitted: 2011-01-11, last modified: 2011-12-07
We describe the processing of data from the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI)
used in production of the Planck Early Release Compact Source Catalogue
(ERCSC). In particular, we discuss the steps involved in reducing the data from
telemetry packets to cleaned, calibrated, time-ordered data (TOD) and frequency
maps. Data are continuously calibrated using the modulation of the temperature
of the cosmic microwave background radiation induced by the motion of the
spacecraft. Noise properties are estimated from TOD from which the sky signal
has been removed using a generalized least square map-making algorithm.
Measured 1/f noise knee-frequencies range from 100mHz at 30GHz to a few tens of
mHz at 70GHz. A destriping code (Madam) is employed to combine radiometric data
and pointing information into sky maps, minimizing the variance of correlated
noise. Noise covariance matrices required to compute statistical uncertainties
on LFI and Planck products are also produced. Main beams are estimated down to
the approx -10dB level using Jupiter transits, which are also used for
geometrical calibration of the focal plane.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.2554 [pdf] - 23396
Bayesian analysis of white noise levels in the 5-year WMAP data
Submitted: 2009-04-16, last modified: 2009-06-19
We develop a new Bayesian method for estimating white noise levels in CMB sky
maps, and apply this algorithm to the 5-year WMAP data. We assume that the
amplitude of the noise RMS is scaled by a constant value, alpha, relative to a
pre-specified noise level. We then derive the corresponding conditional
density, P(alpha | s, Cl, d), which is subsequently integrated into a general
CMB Gibbs sampler. We first verify our code by analyzing simulated data sets,
and then apply the framework to the WMAP data. For the foreground-reduced
5-year WMAP sky maps and the nominal noise levels initially provided in the
5-year data release, we find that the posterior means typically range between
alpha=1.005 +- 0.001 and alpha=1.010 +- 0.001 depending on differencing
assembly, indicating that the noise level of these maps are biased low by
0.5-1.0%. The same problem is not observed for the uncorrected WMAP sky maps.
After the preprint version of this letter appeared on astro-ph., the WMAP team
has corrected the values presented on their web page, noting that the initially
provided values were in fact estimates from the 3-year data release, not from
the 5-year estimates. However, internally in their 5-year analysis the correct
noise values were used, and no cosmological results are therefore compromised
by this error. Thus, our method has already been demonstrated in practice to be
both useful and accurate.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.4311 [pdf] - 22728
Bayesian component separation and CMB estimation for the 5-year WMAP
temperature data
Submitted: 2009-03-25
A well-tested and validated Gibbs sampling code, that performs component
separation and CMB power spectrum estimation, was applied to the {\it WMAP}
5-yr data. Using a simple model consisting of CMB, noise, monopoles and
dipoles, a ``per pixel'' low-frequency power-law (fitting for both amplitude
and spectral index), and a thermal dust template with fixed spectral index, we
found that the low-$\ell$ ($\ell < 50$) CMB power spectrum is in good agreement
with the published {\it WMAP}5 results. Residual monopoles and dipoles were
found to be small ($\lesssim 3 \mu$K) or negligible in the 5-yr data. We
comprehensively tested the assumptions that were made about the foregrounds
(e.g. dust spectral index, power-law spectral index prior, templates), and
found that the CMB power spectrum was insensitive to these choices. We confirm
the asymmetry of power between the north and south ecliptic hemispheres, which
appears to be robust against foreground modeling. The map of low frequency
spectral indices indicates a steeper spectrum on average ($\beta=-2.97\pm0.21$)
relative to those found at low ($\sim$GHz) frequencies.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:0810.4527 [pdf] - 17807
Towards Real-time Classification of Astronomical Transients
Mahabal, A.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Williams, R.;
Drake, A.;
Donalek, C.;
Graham, M.;
Moghaddam, B.;
Turmon, M.;
Jewell, J.;
Khosla, A.;
Hensley, B.
Submitted: 2008-10-24
Exploration of time domain is now a vibrant area of research in astronomy,
driven by the advent of digital synoptic sky surveys. While panoramic surveys
can detect variable or transient events, typically some follow-up observations
are needed; for short-lived phenomena, a rapid response is essential. Ability
to automatically classify and prioritize transient events for follow-up studies
becomes critical as the data rates increase. We have been developing such
methods using the data streams from the Palomar-Quest survey, the Catalina Sky
Survey and others, using the VOEventNet framework. The goal is to automatically
classify transient events, using the new measurements, combined with archival
data (previous and multi-wavelength measurements), and contextual information
(e.g., Galactic or ecliptic latitude, presence of a possible host galaxy
nearby, etc.); and to iterate them dynamically as the follow-up data come in
(e.g., light curves or colors). We have been investigating Bayesian
methodologies for classification, as well as discriminated follow-up to
optimize the use of available resources, including Naive Bayesian approach, and
the non-parametric Gaussian process regression. We will also be deploying
variants of the traditional machine learning techniques such as Neural Nets and
Support Vector Machines on datasets of reliably classified transients as they
build up.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.4624 [pdf] - 315127
CMB likelihood approximation by a Gaussianized Blackwell-Rao estimator
Submitted: 2008-09-26
We introduce a new CMB temperature likelihood approximation called the
Gaussianized Blackwell-Rao (GBR) estimator. This estimator is derived by
transforming the observed marginal power spectrum distributions obtained by the
CMB Gibbs sampler into standard univariate Gaussians, and then approximate
their joint transformed distribution by a multivariate Gaussian. The method is
exact for full-sky coverage and uniform noise, and an excellent approximation
for sky cuts and scanning patterns relevant for modern satellite experiments
such as WMAP and Planck. A single evaluation of this estimator between l=2 and
200 takes ~0.2 CPU milliseconds, while for comparison, a single pixel space
likelihood evaluation between l=2 and 30 for a map with ~2500 pixels requires
~20 seconds. We apply this tool to the 5-year WMAP temperature data, and
re-estimate the angular temperature power spectrum, $C_{\ell}$, and likelihood,
L(C_l), for l<=200, and derive new cosmological parameters for the standard
six-parameter LambdaCDM model. Our spectrum is in excellent agreement with the
official WMAP spectrum, but we find slight differences in the derived
cosmological parameters. Most importantly, the spectral index of scalar
perturbations is n_s=0.973 +/- 0.014, 1.9 sigma away from unity and 0.6 sigma
higher than the official WMAP result, n_s = 0.965 +/- 0.014. This suggests that
an exact likelihood treatment is required to higher l's than previously
believed, reinforcing and extending our conclusions from the 3-year WMAP
analysis. In that case, we found that the sub-optimal likelihood approximation
adopted between l=12 and 30 by the WMAP team biased n_s low by 0.4 sigma, while
here we find that the same approximation between l=30 and 200 introduces a bias
of 0.6 sigma in n_s.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.0624 [pdf] - 314979
A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithm for analysis of low signal-to-noise
CMB data
Submitted: 2008-07-03
We present a new Monte Carlo Markov Chain algorithm for CMB analysis in the
low signal-to-noise regime. This method builds on and complements the
previously described CMB Gibbs sampler, and effectively solves the low
signal-to-noise inefficiency problem of the direct Gibbs sampler. The new
algorithm is a simple Metropolis-Hastings sampler with a general proposal rule
for the power spectrum, C_l, followed by a particular deterministic rescaling
operation of the sky signal. The acceptance probability for this joint move
depends on the sky map only through the difference of chi-squared between the
original and proposed sky sample, which is close to unity in the low
signal-to-noise regime. The algorithm is completed by alternating this move
with a standard Gibbs move. Together, these two proposals constitute a
computationally efficient algorithm for mapping out the full joint CMB
posterior, both in the high and low signal-to-noise regimes.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.3199 [pdf] - 1937497
Automated Probabilistic Classification of Transients and Variables
Submitted: 2008-02-21
There is an increasing number of large, digital, synoptic sky surveys, in
which repeated observations are obtained over large areas of the sky in
multiple epochs. Likewise, there is a growth in the number of (often automated
or robotic) follow-up facilities with varied capabilities in terms of
instruments, depth, cadence, wavelengths, etc., most of which are geared toward
some specific astrophysical phenomenon. As the number of detected transient
events grows, an automated, probabilistic classification of the detected
variables and transients becomes increasingly important, so that an optimal use
can be made of follow-up facilities, without unnecessary duplication of effort.
We describe a methodology now under development for a prototype event
classification system; it involves Bayesian and Machine Learning classifiers,
automated incorporation of feedback from follow-up observations, and
discriminated or directed follow-up requests. This type of methodology may be
essential for the massive synoptic sky surveys in the future.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:0709.1058 [pdf] - 260094
Joint Bayesian component separation and CMB power spectrum estimation
Submitted: 2007-09-07, last modified: 2007-11-05
We describe and implement an exact, flexible, and computationally efficient
algorithm for joint component separation and CMB power spectrum estimation,
building on a Gibbs sampling framework. Two essential new features are 1)
conditional sampling of foreground spectral parameters, and 2) joint sampling
of all amplitude-type degrees of freedom (e.g., CMB, foreground pixel
amplitudes, and global template amplitudes) given spectral parameters. Given a
parametric model of the foreground signals, we estimate efficiently and
accurately the exact joint foreground-CMB posterior distribution, and therefore
all marginal distributions such as the CMB power spectrum or foreground
spectral index posteriors. The main limitation of the current implementation is
the requirement of identical beam responses at all frequencies, which restricts
the analysis to the lowest resolution of a given experiment. We outline a
future generalization to multi-resolution observations. To verify the method,
we analyse simple models and compare the results to analytical predictions. We
then analyze a realistic simulation with properties similar to the 3-yr WMAP
data, downgraded to a common resolution of 3 degree FWHM. The results from the
actual 3-yr WMAP temperature analysis are presented in a companion Letter.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:0709.1037 [pdf] - 260093
The joint large-scale foreground-CMB posteriors of the 3-year WMAP data
Submitted: 2007-09-07
Using a Gibbs sampling algorithm for joint CMB estimation and component
separation, we compute the large-scale CMB and foreground posteriors of the
3-yr WMAP temperature data. Our parametric data model includes the cosmological
CMB signal and instrumental noise, a single power law foreground component with
free amplitude and spectral index for each pixel, a thermal dust template with
a single free overall amplitude, and free monopoles and dipoles at each
frequency. This simple model yields a surprisingly good fit to the data over
the full frequency range from 23 to 94 GHz. We obtain a new estimate of the CMB
sky signal and power spectrum, and a new foreground model, including a
measurement of the effective spectral index over the high-latitude sky. A
particularly significant result is the detection of a common spurious offset in
all frequency bands of ~ -13muK, as well as a dipole in the V-band data.
Correcting for these is essential when determining the effective spectral index
of the foregrounds. We find that our new foreground model is in good agreement
with template-based model presented by the WMAP team, but not with their MEM
reconstruction. We believe the latter may be at least partially compromised by
the residual offsets and dipoles in the data. Fortunately, the CMB power
spectrum is not significantly affected by these issues, as our new spectrum is
in excellent agreement with that published by the WMAP team. The corresponding
cosmological parameters are also virtually unchanged.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:0705.3643 [pdf] - 260061
Bayesian analysis of the low-resolution polarized 3-year WMAP sky maps
Submitted: 2007-05-24
We apply a previously developed Gibbs sampling framework to the foreground
corrected 3-yr WMAP polarization data and compute the power spectrum and
residual foreground template amplitude posterior distributions. We first
analyze the co-added Q- and V-band data, and compare our results to the
likelihood code published by the WMAP team. We find good agreement, and thus
verify the numerics and data processing steps of both approaches. However, we
also analyze the Q- and V-bands separately, allowing for non-zero EB
cross-correlations and including two individual foreground template amplitudes
tracing synchrotron and dust emission. In these analyses, we find tentative
evidence of systematics: The foreground tracers correlate with each of the Q-
and V-band sky maps individually, although not with the co-added QV map; there
is a noticeable negative EB cross-correlation at l <~ 16 in the V-band map; and
finally, when relaxing the constraints on EB and BB, noticeable differences are
observed between the marginalized band powers in the Q- and V-bands. Further
studies of these features are imperative, given the importance of the low-l EE
spectrum on the optical depth of reionization tau and the spectral index of
scalar perturbations n_s.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0606088 [pdf] - 82528
A re-analysis of the three-year WMAP temperature power spectrum and
likelihood
Eriksen, H. K.;
Huey, Greg;
Saha, R.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Dick, J.;
Banday, A. J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Jain, P.;
Jewell, J. B.;
Knox, L.;
Larson, D. L.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Souradeep, T.;
Wandelt, B. D.
Submitted: 2006-06-05, last modified: 2006-10-02
We analyze the three-year WMAP temperature anisotropy data seeking to confirm
the power spectrum and likelihoods published by the WMAP team. We apply five
independent implementations of four algorithms to the power spectrum estimation
and two implementations to the parameter estimation. Our single most important
result is that we broadly confirm the WMAP power spectrum and analysis. Still,
we do find two small but potentially important discrepancies: On large angular
scales there is a small power excess in the WMAP spectrum (5-10% at l<~30)
primarily due to likelihood approximation issues between 13 <= l <~30. On small
angular scales there is a systematic difference between the V- and W-band
spectra (few percent at l>~300). Recently, the latter discrepancy was explained
by Huffenberger et al. (2006) in terms of over-subtraction of unresolved point
sources. As far as the low-l bias is concerned, most parameters are affected by
a few tenths of a sigma. The most important effect is seen in n_s. For the
combination of WMAP, Acbar and BOOMERanG, the significance of n_s =/ 1 drops
from ~2.7 sigma to ~2.3 sigma when correcting for this bias. We propose a few
simple improvements to the low-l WMAP likelihood code, and introduce two
important extensions to the Gibbs sampling method that allows for proper
sampling of the low signal-to-noise regime. Finally, we make the products from
the Gibbs sampling analysis publically available, thereby providing a fast and
simple route to the exact likelihood without the need of expensive matrix
inversions.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0608007 [pdf] - 83884
Estimation of Polarized Power Spectra by Gibbs sampling
Submitted: 2006-07-31, last modified: 2006-10-02
Earlier papers introduced a method of accurately estimating the angular
cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature power spectrum based on Gibbs
sampling. Here we extend this framework to polarized data. All advantages of
the Gibbs sampler still apply, and exact analysis of mega-pixel polarized data
sets is thus feasible. These advantages may be even more important for
polarization measurements than for temperature measurements. While approximate
methods can alias power from the larger E-mode spectrum into the weaker B-mode
spectrum, the Gibbs sampler (or equivalently, exact likelihood evaluations)
allows for a statistically optimal separation of these modes in terms of power
spectra. To demonstrate the method, we analyze two simulated data sets: 1) a
hypothetical future CMBPol mission, with the focus on B-mode estimation; and 2)
a Planck-like mission, to highlight the computational feasibility of the
method.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407027 [pdf] - 65869
Bayesian Power Spectrum Analysis of the First-Year WMAP data
Submitted: 2004-07-01, last modified: 2004-12-07
We present the first results from a Bayesian analysis of the WMAP first year
data using a Gibbs sampling technique. Using two independent, parallel
supercomputer codes we analyze the WMAP Q, V and W bands. The analysis results
in a full probabilistic description of the information the WMAP data set
contains about the power spectrum and the all-sky map of the cosmic microwave
background anisotropies. We present the complete probability distributions for
each C_l including any non-Gaussianities of the power spectrum likelihood.
While we find good overall agreement with the previously published WMAP
spectrum, our analysis uncovers discrepancies in the power spectrum estimates
at low l multipoles. For example we claim the best-fit Lambda-CDM model is
consistent with the C_2 inferred from our combined Q+V+W analysis with a 10%
probability of an even larger theoretical C_2. Based on our exact analysis we
can therefore attribute the "low quadrupole issue" to a statistical
fluctuation.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0411737 [pdf] - 405172
Cosmological Parameter Constraints as Derived from the Wilkinson
Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data via Gibbs Sampling and the Blackwell-Rao
Estimator
Submitted: 2004-11-26
We study the Blackwell-Rao (BR) estimator of the probability distribution of
the angular power spectrum, P(C_l|d), by applying it to samples of full-sky
no-noise CMB maps generated via Gibbs sampling. We find the estimator, given a
set of samples, to be very fast and also highly accurate, as determined by
tests with simulated data. We also find that the number of samples required for
convergence of the BR estimate rises rapidly with increasing l, at least at low
l. Our existing sample chains are only long enough to achieve convergence at l
less than about 40. In comparison with P(C_l|d) as reported by the WMAP team we
find significant differences at these low l values. These differences lead to
up to approximately 0.5 sigma shifts in the estimates of parameters in a
7-parameter Lambda CDM model with non-zero dn_s/dln(k). Fixing dn_s/dln(k)= 0
makes these shifts much less significant.
Unlike existing analytic approximations, the BR estimator can be
straightforwardly extended for the case of power spectra from correlated
fields, such as temperature and polarization. We discuss challenges to
extending the procedure to higher l and provide some solutions.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407028 [pdf] - 65870
Power spectrum estimation from high-resolution maps by Gibbs sampling
Submitted: 2004-07-01, last modified: 2004-08-23
We revisit a recently introduced power spectrum estimation technique based on
Gibbs sampling, with the goal of applying it to the high-resolution WMAP data.
In order to facilitate this analysis, a number of sophistications have to be
introduced, each of which is discussed in detail. We have implemented two
independent versions of the algorithm to cross-check the computer codes, and to
verify that a particular solution to any given problem does not affect the
scientific results. We then apply these programs to simulated data with known
properties at intermediate (N_side = 128) and high (N_side = 512) resolutions,
to study effects such as incomplete sky coverage and white vs. correlated
noise. From these simulations we also establish the Markov chain correlation
length as a function of signal-to-noise ratio, and give a few comments on the
properties of the correlation matrices involved. Parallelization issues are
also discussed, with emphasis on real-world limitations imposed by current
super-computer facilities. The scientific results from the analysis of the
first-year WMAP data are presented in a companion letter.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0209560 [pdf] - 1468449
Application of Monte Carlo Algorithms to the Bayesian Analysis of the
Cosmic Microwave Background
Submitted: 2002-09-26
Power spectrum estimation and evaluation of associated errors in the presence
of incomplete sky coverage; non-homogeneous, correlated instrumental noise; and
foreground emission is a problem of central importance for the extraction of
cosmological information from the cosmic microwave background. We develop a
Monte Carlo approach for the maximum likelihood estimation of the power
spectrum. The method is based on an identity for the Bayesian posterior as a
marginalization over unknowns. Maximization of the posterior involves the
computation of expectation values as a sample average from maps of the cosmic
microwave background and foregrounds given some current estimate of the power
spectrum or cosmological model, and some assumed statistical characterization
of the foregrounds. Maps of the CMB are sampled by a linear transform of a
Gaussian white noise process, implemented numerically with conjugate gradient
descent. For time series data with N_{t} samples, and N pixels on the sphere,
the method has a computational expense $KO[N^{2} +- N_{t} +AFw-log N_{t}],
where K is a prefactor determined by the convergence rate of conjugate gradient
descent. Preconditioners for conjugate gradient descent are given for scans
close to great circle paths, and the method allows partial sky coverage for
these cases by numerically marginalizing over the unobserved, or removed,
region.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9903201 [pdf] - 105605
Bayesian Approach to Foreground Removal
Submitted: 1999-03-12, last modified: 1999-03-16
Our ability to extract the maximal amount of information from future
observations at gigahertz frequencies depends on our ability to separate the
underlying cosmic microwave background (CMB) from galactic and extragalactic
foregrounds. We review the separation problem and its formulation within
Bayesian inference, give examples of specific solutions with particular choices
of prior density, and finally comment on the generalization of Bayesian methods
to a multi-resolution framework. We propose a strategy for the regularization
of solutions allowing a spatially varying spectral index, and discuss possible
computational approaches such as multi-scale stochastic relaxation.