sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Jendreieck, A.

Normalized to: Jendreieck, A.

2 article(s) in total. 16 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 4,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1402.6339  [pdf] - 1203566
Old puzzle, new insights: a lithium rich giant quietly burning helium in its core
Comments: 16 pages, 4 figures, 1 table, accepted in ApJ Letters
Submitted: 2014-02-25
About 1% of giant stars have been shown to have large surface Li abundances, which is unexpected according to standard stellar evolution models. Several scenarios for lithium production have been proposed, but it is still unclear why these Li-rich giants exist. A missing piece in this puzzle is the knowledge of the exact stage of evolution of these stars. Using low-and-high-resolution spectroscopic observations, we have undertaken a survey of lithium-rich giants in the Kepler field. In this letter, we report the finding of the first confirmed Li-rich core-helium-burning giant, as revealed by asteroseismic analysis. The evolutionary timescales constrained by its mass suggest that Li-production most likely took place through non-canonical mixing at the RGB-tip, possibly during the helium flash.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1210.6495  [pdf] - 1152405
Red Giant Oscillations: Stellar Models and Mode Frequency Calculations
Comments: 3 pages, 3 figures, Proceedings of the ESF Conference The Modern Era of Helio- and Asteroseismology
Submitted: 2012-10-24, last modified: 2012-11-09
We present preliminary results on modelling KIC 7693833, the so far most metal-poor red-giant star observed by {\it Kepler}. From time series spanning several months, global oscillation parameters and individual frequencies were obtained and compared to theoretical calculations. Evolution models are calculated taking into account spectroscopic and asteroseismic constraints. The oscillation frequencies of the models were computed and compared to the {\it Kepler} data. In the range of mass computed, there is no preferred model, giving an uncertainty of about 30 K in $T_eff$, 0.02 dex in $\log g$, $0.7 \,R_\odot$ in radius and of about 2.5 Gyr in age.