Normalized to: Jayawardene, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.07034 [pdf] - 1899349
A Multi-Year Search For Transits Of Proxima Centauri. II: No Evidence
For Transit Events With Periods Between 1-30 Days
Feliz, Dax L.;
Blank, David L.;
Collins, Karen A.;
White, Graeme L.;
Stassun, Keivan G.;
Curtis, Ivan A.;
Hart, Rhodes;
Kielkopf, John F.;
Nelson, Peter;
Relles, Howard;
Stockdale, Christopher;
Jayawardene, Bandupriya;
Shankland, Paul;
Reichart, Daniel E.;
Haislip, Joshua B.;
Kouprianov, Vladimir V.
Submitted: 2019-01-21, last modified: 2019-04-08
Using a global network of small telescopes, we have obtained light curves of
Proxima Centauri at 329 observation epochs from 2006 - 2017. The planet Proxima
b discovered by Anglada-Escude et al. (2016) with an orbital period of 11.186 d
has an a priori transit probability of ~1.5%; if it transits, the predicted
transit depth is about 5 millimagnitudes. In Blank et al. (2018), we analyzed
96 of our light curves that overlapped with predicted transit ephemerides from
previously published tentative transit detections, and found no evidence in our
data that would corroborate claims of transits with a period of 11.186 d. Here
we broaden our analysis, using 262 high-quality light curves from our data set
to search for any periodic transit-like events over a range of periods from 1 -
30 d. We also inject a series of simulated planet transits and find that our
data are sufficiently sensitive to have detected transits of 5 millimagnitude
depth, with recoverability ranging from ~100% for an orbital period of 1 d to
~20% for an orbital period of 20 d for the parameter spaces tested.
Specifically at the 11.186 d period and 5 millimagnitude transit depth, we rule
out transits in our data with high confidence. We are able to rule out
virtually all transits of other planets at periods shorter than 5 d and depths
greater than 3 millimagnitudes; however, we cannot confidently rule out
transits at the period of Proxima b due to incomplete orbital phase coverage
and a lack of sensitivity to transits shallower than 4 millimagnitudes.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.04284 [pdf] - 1682578
A Multi-Year Search For Transits Of Proxima Centauri. I: Light Curves
Corresponding To Published Ephemerides
Blank, David L.;
Feliz, Dax;
Collins, Karen A.;
White, Graeme L.;
Stassun, Keivan G.;
Curtis, Ivan A.;
Hart, Rhodes;
Kielkopf, John F.;
Nelson, Peter;
Relles, Howard;
Stockdale, Christopher;
Jayawardene, Bandupriya;
Pennypacker, Carlton R.;
Shankland, Paul;
Reichart, Daniel E.;
Haislip, Joshua B.;
Kouprianov, Vladimir V.
Submitted: 2018-02-12, last modified: 2018-05-14
Proxima Centauri has become the subject of intense study since the
radial-velocity discovery by Anglada-Escud\'e et al. 2016 of a planet orbiting
this nearby M-dwarf every ~ 11.2 days. If Proxima Centauri b transits its host
star, independent confirmation of its existence is possible, and its mass and
radius can be measured in units of the stellar host mass and radius. To date,
there have been three independent claims of possible transit-like event
detections in light curve observations obtained by the MOST satellite (in
2014-15), the BSST telescope in Antarctica (in 2016), and the Las Campanas
Observatory (in 2016). The claimed possible detections are tentative, due in
part to the variability intrinsic to the host star, and in the case of the
ground-based observations, also due to the limited duration of the light curve
observations. Here, we present preliminary results from an extensive
photometric monitoring campaign of Proxima Centauri, using telescopes around
the globe and spanning from 2006 to 2017, comprising a total of 329
observations. Considering our data that coincide directly and/or phased with
the previously published tentative transit detections, we are unable to
independently verify those claims. We do, however, verify the previously
reported ubiquitous and complex variability of the host star. We discuss
possible interpretations of the data in light of the previous claims, and we
discuss future analyses of these data that could more definitively verify or
refute the presence of transits associated with the radial-velocity discovered
planet.