sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Jarvinen, A. S.

Normalized to: Jarvinen, A.

3 article(s) in total. 43 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 8,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1509.03099  [pdf] - 1300301
Limits on optical polarization during the prompt phase of GRB 140430A
Comments: 13 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2015-09-10
Gamma-ray burst GRB 140430A was detected by the Swift satellite and observed promptly with the imaging polarimeter RINGO3 mounted on the Liverpool Telescope, with observations beginning while the prompt $\gamma$-ray emission was still ongoing. In this paper, we present densely sampled (10-second temporal resolution) early optical light curves in 3 optical bands and limits to the degree of optical polarization. We compare optical, X-ray and gamma-ray properties and present an analysis of the optical emission during a period of high-energy flaring. The complex optical light curve cannot be explained merely with a combination of forward and reverse shock emission from a standard external shock, implying additional contribution of emission from internal shock dissipation. We estimate an upper limit for time averaged optical polarization during the prompt phase to be as low as P < 12% (1$\sigma$). This suggests that the optical flares and early afterglow emission in this GRB are not highly polarized. Alternatively, time averaging could mask the presence of otherwise polarized components of distinct origin at different polarization position angles.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:0706.1188  [pdf] - 2018
GRB 060206 and the quandary of achromatic breaks in afterglow light curves
Comments: 5 pages including 1 figure; accepted for publication in MNRAS Letters after minor revisions
Submitted: 2007-06-08, last modified: 2007-07-19
Gamma-ray burst afterglow observations in the Swift era have a perceived lack of achromatic jet breaks compared to the BeppoSAX era. We present our multi-wavelength analysis of GRB 060206 as an illustrative example of how inferences of jet breaks from optical and X-ray data might differ. The results of temporal and spectral analyses are compared, and attempts are made to fit the data within the context of the standard blast wave model. We find that while the break appears more pronounced in the optical and evidence for it from the X-ray alone is weak, the data are actually consistent with an achromatic break at about 16 hours. This break and the light curves fit standard blast wave models, either as a jet break or as an injection break. As the pre-Swift sample of afterglows are dominated by optical observations, and in the Swift era most well sampled light curves are in the X-ray, caution is needed when making a direct comparison between the two samples, and when making definite statements on the absence of achromatic breaks.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0305283  [pdf] - 56756
Spin up in RX J0806+15 - the shortest period binary
Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS letters
Submitted: 2003-05-15
RX J0806+15 has recently been identified as the binary system with the shortest known orbital period. We present a series of observations of RX J0806+15 including new optical observations taken one month apart. Using these observations and archival data we find that the period of this system is decreasing over time. Our measurements imply f_dot = 6.11x10^-16 Hz/s, which is in agreement with a rate expected from the gravitational radiation for two white dwarfs orbiting at a given period. However, a smaller value of f_dot = 3.14x10^-16 Hz/s cannot be ruled out. Our result supports the idea that the 321.5 s period is the orbital period and that the system is the shortest period binary known so far and that it is one of the strongest sources of constant gravitational radiation in the sky. Furthermore, the decrease of the period strongly favours the unipolar inductor (or electric star) model rather than the accretion models.