Normalized to: Janett, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.08891 [pdf] - 1853678
Discontinuities in numerical radiative transfer
Submitted: 2019-03-21
Observations and magnetohydrodynamic simulations of solar and stellar
atmospheres reveal an intermittent behavior or steep gradients in physical
parameters, such as magnetic field, temperature, and bulk velocities. The
numerical solution of the stationary radiative transfer equation is
particularly challenging in such situations, because standard numerical methods
may perform very inefficiently in the absence of local smoothness. However, a
rigorous investigation of the numerical treatment of the radiative transfer
equation in discontinuous media is still lacking. The aim of this work is to
expose the limitations of standard convergence analyses for this problem and to
identify the relevant issues. Moreover, specific numerical tests are performed.
These show that discontinuities in the atmospheric physical parameters
effectively induce first-order discontinuities in the radiative transfer
equation, reducing the accuracy of the solution and thwarting high-order
convergence. In addition, a survey of the existing numerical schemes for
discontinuous ordinary differential systems and interpolation techniques for
discontinuous discrete data is given, evaluating their applicability to the
radiative transfer problem.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.06604 [pdf] - 1752066
Formal Solutions for Polarized Radiative Transfer. IV. Numerical
Performances in Practical Problems
Submitted: 2018-09-18
The numerical computation of reliable and accurate Stokes profiles is of
great relevance in solar physics. In the synthesis process, many actors play a
relevant role: among them the formal solver, the discrete atmospheric model,
and the spectral line. This paper tests the performances of different numerical
schemes in the synthesis of polarized spectra for different spectral lines and
atmospheric models. The hierarchy between formal solvers is enforced, stressing
the peculiarities of high-order and low-order formal solvers. The density of
grid points necessary for reaching a given accuracy requirement is
quantitatively described for specific situations.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.10945 [pdf] - 1674994
Formal solutions for polarized radiative transfer. III. Stiffness and
instability
Submitted: 2018-03-29
Efficient numerical approximation of the polarized radiative transfer
equation is challenging because this system of ordinary differential equations
exhibits stiff behavior, which potentially results in numerical instability.
This negatively impacts the accuracy of formal solvers, and small step-sizes
are often necessary to retrieve physical solutions. This work presents
stability analyses of formal solvers for the radiative transfer equation of
polarized light, identifies instability issues, and suggests practical
remedies. In particular, the assumptions and the limitations of the stability
analysis of Runge-Kutta methods play a crucial role. On this basis, a suitable
and pragmatic formal solver is outlined and tested. An insightful comparison to
the scalar radiative transfer equation is also presented.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.01274 [pdf] - 1587924
Formal Solutions for Polarized Radiative Transfer. I. The DELO Family
Submitted: 2017-09-05
The discussion regarding the numerical integration of the polarized radiative
transfer equation is still open and the comparison between the different
numerical schemes proposed by different authors in the past is not fully clear.
Aiming at facilitating the comprehension of the advantages and drawbacks of the
different formal solvers, this work presents a reference paradigm for their
characterization based on the concepts of order of accuracy, stability, and
computational cost. Special attention is paid to understand the numerical
methods belonging to the Diagonal Element Lambda Operator family, in an attempt
to highlight their specificities.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.01280 [pdf] - 1587927
Formal Solutions for Polarized Radiative Transfer. II. High-order
Methods
Submitted: 2017-09-05
When integrating the radiative transfer equation for polarized light, the
necessity of high-order numerical methods is well known. In fact,
well-performing high-order formal solvers enable higher accuracy and the use of
coarser spatial grids. Aiming to provide a clear comparison between formal
solvers, this work presents different high-order numerical schemes and applies
the systematic analysis proposed by Janett et al. (2017), emphasizing their
advantages and drawbacks in terms of order of accuracy, stability, and
computational cost.