sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Jakimiec, J.

Normalized to: Jakimiec, J.

5 article(s) in total. 2 co-authors, from 1 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1312.5771  [pdf] - 1202386
Investigation of the X-ray Emission of the Large Arcade Flare of 2 March 1993
Comments: 21 pages, 12 figures, accepted for Solar Physics
Submitted: 2013-12-19
A large arcade flare of 2 March 1993 has been investigated using X-ray observations recorded by the {\sl Yohkoh} and GOES satellites and the {\sl Compton Gamma Ray Observatory}. We analyzed quasi-periodicity of the hard-X-ray (HXR) pulses in the flare impulsive phase and found close similarity between the quasi-periodic sequence of the pulses with that observed in another large arcade flare of 2 November 1991. This similarity helped to explain the strong HXR pulses which were recorded at the end of the impulsive phase, as due to an inflow of dense plasma (coming from the chromospheric evaporation) into the acceleration volume inside the cusp. In HXR images a high flaring loop was seen with a triangular cusp structure at the top, where the electrons were efficiently accelerated. The sequence of HXR images allowed us to investigate complicated changes in the precipitation of the accelerated electrons toward the flare footpoints. We have shown that all these impulsive-phase observations can be easily explained in terms of the model of electron acceleration in oscillating magnetic traps located within the cusp structure. Some soft-X-ray (SXR) images were available for the late decay phase. They show a long arcade of SXR loops. Important information about the evolution of the flare during the slow decay phase is contained in the time variation of the temperature, $T(t)$, and emission measure, EM$(t)$. This information is the following: i) weak heating occurs during the slow decay phase and it slowly decreases; ii) the decrease in the heating determines slow and smooth decrease in EM; iii) the coupling between the heating and the amount of the hot plasma makes the flare evolve along a sequence of quasi-steady states during the slow decay phase (QSS evolution).
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1303.0977  [pdf] - 1165005
Quasi-periodic Variations in the Hard X-ray emission of a Large Arcade Flare
Comments: 18 pages, 12 figures, accepted by Solar Physics
Submitted: 2013-03-05
Quasi-periodic oscillations of the hard X-ray (HXR) emission of the large flare of 2 November 1991 have been investigated using HXR light curves and soft X-ray and HXR images recorded by the {\sl Yohkoh} X-ray telescopes. The results of the analysis of these observations are the following: i) The observations confirm that electrons are accelerated in oscillating magnetic traps which are contained within the cusp magnetic structure. ii) The amplitude of the HXR pulses increase due to the increase in the amplitude of the magnetic trap oscillations and the increase in the density within the traps caused by the chromospheric evaporation upflow. iii) The increase in the amplitude of the HXR pulses terminates when further increase in the density inside the traps inhibits the acceleration of electrons. iv) The model of oscillating magnetic traps is able to explain time variation of the electron precipitation, strong asymmetry in precipitation of accelerated electrons, and systematic differences in the precipitation of 15 and 25 keV electrons. v) We have obtained a direct observational evidence that strong HXR pulses are the result of the inflow of dense plasma coming from the chromospheric evaporation, into the acceleration volume.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1104.0845  [pdf] - 1053169
Determination of electron density and filling factor for soft X-ray flare kernels
Comments: Accepted for publication in Solar Physics
Submitted: 2011-04-05
In a standard method of determining electron density for soft X-ray (SXR) flare kernels it is necessary to assume what is the extension of a kernel along the line of sight. This is a source of significant uncertainty of the obtained densities. In our previous paper (Bak-Steslicka and Jakimiec, 2005) we have worked out another method of deriving electron density, in which it is not necessary to assume what is the extension of a kernel along the line of sight. The point is that many flares, during their decay phase, evolve along the sequence of steady-state models [quasi-steady-state (QSS) evolution] and then the scaling law, derived for steady-state models, can be used to determine the electron density. The aim of the present paper is: (1) to improve the two methods of density determination, (2) to compare the densities obtained with the two methods. We have selected a number of flares which showed QSS evolution during the decay phase. For these flares the electron density, N, has been derived by means of standard method and with our QSS method. Comparison of the N values obtained with the two different methods allowed us: (1) to test the obtained densities, (2) to evaluate the volume filling factor of the SXR emitting plasma. Generally, we have found good agreement (no large systematic difference) between the values of electron density obtained with the two methods, but for some cases the values can differ by a factor up to 2. For most flare kernels estimated filling factor turned out to be about 1, near the flare maximum.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1103.3165  [pdf] - 1178686
Investigation of quasi-periodic variations in hard X-rays of solar flares. II. Further investigation of oscillating magnetic traps
Comments: 18 pages, 14 figures, submitted to Solar Physics
Submitted: 2011-03-16
In our recent paper (Solar Physics 261, 233) we investigated quasi-periodic oscillations of hard X-rays during impulsive phase of solar flares. We have come to conclusion that they are caused by magnetosonic oscillations of magnetic traps within the volume of hard-X-ray (HXR) loop-top sources. In the present paper we investigate four flares which show clear quasi-periodic sequences of HXR pulses. We also describe our phenomenological model of oscillating magnetic traps to show that it can explain observed properties of HXR oscillations. Main results are the following: 1. We have found that low-amplitude quasi-periodic oscillations occur before impulsive phase of some flares. 2. We have found that quasi-period of the oscillations can change in some flares. We interpret this as being due to changes of the length of oscillating magnetic traps. 3. During impulsive phase a significant part of the energy of accelerated (non-thermal) electrons is deposited within the HXR loop-top source. 4. Our analysis suggests that quick development of impulsive phase is due to feedback between pulses of the pressure of accelerated electrons and the amplitude of magnetic-trap oscillation. 5. We have also determined electron number density and magnetic filed strength for HXR loop-top sources of several flares. The values fall within the limits of $N \approx (2 -15) \times 10^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$, $B \approx (45 - 130)$ gauss.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:0908.0656  [pdf] - 1003289
Investigation of quasi-periodic varaiations in hard X-rays of solar flares
Comments: 21 pages, 11 figures, 3 tables, submitted to Solar Physics
Submitted: 2009-08-05
The aim of the present paper is to use quasi-periodic oscillations in hard X-rays (HXRs) of solar flares as a diagnostic tool for investigation of impulsive electron acceleration. We have selected a number of flares which showed quasi-periodic oscillations in hard X-rays and their loop-top sources could be easily recognized in HXR images. We have considered MHD standing waves to explain the observed HXR oscillations. We interpret these HXR oscillations as being due to oscillations of magnetic traps within cusp-like magnetic structures. This is confirmed by a good correlation between periods of the oscillations and the sizes of the loop-top sources. We argue that a model of oscillating magnetic traps is adequate to explain the observations. During the compressions of a trap particles are accelerated, but during its expansions plasma, coming from chromospheric evaporation, fills the trap, which explains the large number of electrons being accelerated during a sequence of strong impulses. The advantage of our model of oscillating magnetic traps is that it can explain both the impulses of electron acceleration and quasi-periodicity of their distribution in time.