Normalized to: Jacobsen, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.11141 [pdf] - 2070172
An Effective Field Theory Analysis of the First LUX Dark Matter Search
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Baxter, A.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Leason, E.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nilima, A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Vacheret, A.;
Velan, V.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2020-03-24
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) dark matter search was a 250-kg active mass
dual-phase time projection chamber that operated by detecting light and
ionization signals from particles incident on a xenon target. In December 2015,
LUX reported a minimum 90% upper C.L. of 6e-46 cm^2 on the spin-independent
WIMP-nucleon elastic scattering cross section based on a 1.4e4 kg*day exposure
in its first science run. Tension between experiments and the absence of a
definitive positive detection suggest it would be prudent to search for WIMPs
outside the standard spin-independent/spin-dependent paradigm. Recent
theoretical work has identified a complete basis of 14 independent effective
field theory (EFT) operators to describe WIMP-nucleon interactions. In addition
to spin-independent and spin-dependent nuclear responses, these operators can
produce novel responses such as angular-momentum-dependent and spin-orbit
couplings. Here we report on a search for all 14 of these EFT couplings with
data from LUX's first science run. Limits are placed on each coupling as a
function of WIMP mass.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.06272 [pdf] - 2050176
Extending light WIMP searches to single scintillation photons in LUX
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Baxter, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Grace, E.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazka, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Leason, E.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Levy, C.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
López-Paredes, B.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nilima, A.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Reichhart, L.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Vacheret, A.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2019-07-14, last modified: 2019-12-27
We present a novel analysis technique for liquid xenon time projection
chambers that allows for a lower threshold by relying on events with a prompt
scintillation signal consisting of single detected photons. The energy
threshold of the LUX dark matter experiment is primarily determined by the
smallest scintillation response detectable, which previously required a 2-fold
coincidence signal in its photomultiplier arrays, enforced in data analysis.
The technique presented here exploits the double photoelectron emission effect
observed in some photomultiplier models at vacuum ultraviolet wavelengths. We
demonstrate this analysis using an electron recoil calibration dataset and
place new constraints on the spin-independent scattering cross section of
weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) down to 2.5 GeV/c$^2$ WIMP mass
using the 2013 LUX dataset. This new technique is promising to enhance light
WIMP and astrophysical neutrino searches in next-generation liquid xenon
experiments.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.11241 [pdf] - 1981692
Results of a Search for Sub-GeV Dark Matter Using 2013 LUX Data
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2018-11-27, last modified: 2019-10-16
The scattering of dark matter (DM) particles with sub-GeV masses off nuclei
is difficult to detect using liquid xenon-based DM search instruments because
the energy transfer during nuclear recoils is smaller than the typical detector
threshold. However, the tree-level DM-nucleus scattering diagram can be
accompanied by simultaneous emission of a Bremsstrahlung photon or a so-called
"Migdal" electron. These provide an electron recoil component to the
experimental signature at higher energies than the corresponding nuclear
recoil. The presence of this signature allows liquid xenon detectors to use
both the scintillation and the ionization signals in the analysis where the
nuclear recoil signal would not be otherwise visible. We report constraints on
spin-independent DM-nucleon scattering for DM particles with masses of 0.4-5
GeV/c$^2$ using 1.4$\times10^4$ kg$\cdot$day of search exposure from the 2013
data from the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment for four different
classes of mediators. This analysis extends the reach of liquid xenon-based DM
search instruments to lower DM masses than has been achieved previously.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.12372 [pdf] - 1916847
Improved Measurements of the \b{eta}-Decay Response of Liquid Xenon with
the LUX Detector
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Baxter, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Leason, E.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nilima, A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Vacheret, A.;
Velan, V.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2019-03-29, last modified: 2019-06-07
We report results from an extensive set of measurements of the \b{eta}-decay
response in liquid xenon.These measurements are derived from high-statistics
calibration data from injected sources of both $^{3}$H and $^{14}$C in the LUX
detector. The mean light-to-charge ratio is reported for 13 electric field
values ranging from 43 to 491 V/cm, and for energies ranging from 1.5 to 145
keV.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07113 [pdf] - 1758152
Search for annual and diurnal rate modulations in the LUX experiment
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2018-07-18, last modified: 2018-09-27
Various dark matter models predict annual and diurnal modulations of dark
matter interaction rates in Earth-based experiments as a result of the Earth's
motion in the halo. Observation of such features can provide generic evidence
for detection of dark matter interactions. This paper reports a search for both
annual and diurnal rate modulations in the LUX dark matter experiment using
over 20 calendar months of data acquired between 2013 and 2016. This search
focuses on electron recoil events at low energies, where leptophilic dark
matter interactions are expected to occur and where the DAMA experiment has
observed a strong rate modulation for over two decades. By using the innermost
volume of the LUX detector and developing robust cuts and corrections, we
obtained a stable event rate of 2.3$\pm$0.2~cpd/keV$_{\text{ee}}$/tonne, which
is among the lowest in all dark matter experiments. No statistically
significant annual modulation was observed in energy windows up to
26~keV$_{\text{ee}}$. Between 2 and 6~keV$_{\text{ee}}$, this analysis
demonstrates the most sensitive annual modulation search up to date, with
9.2$\sigma$ tension with the DAMA/LIBRA result. We also report no observation
of diurnal modulations above 0.2~cpd/keV$_{\text{ee}}$/tonne amplitude between
2 and 6~keV$_{\text{ee}}$.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.07117 [pdf] - 1721172
Using Machine Learning Methods to Forecast If Solar Flares Will Be
Associated with CMEs and SEPs
Submitted: 2018-06-19
Among the eruptive activity phenomena observed on the Sun, the most
technology threatening ones are flares with associated coronal mass ejections
(CMEs) and solar energetic particles (SEPs). Flares with associated CMEs and
SEPs are produced by magnetohydrodynamical processes in magnetically active
regions (ARs) on the Sun. However, these ARs do not only produce flares with
associated CMEs and SEPs, they also lead to flares and CMEs, which are not
associated with any other event. In an attempt to distinguish flares with
associated CMEs and SEPs from flares and CMEs, which are unassociated with any
other event, we investigate the performances of two machine learning
algorithms. To achieve this objective, we employ support vector machines (SVMs)
and multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) using data from the Space Weather Database of
Notification, Knowledge, Information (DONKI) of NASA Space Weather Center, {\it
the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite} ({\it GOES}), and the
Space-Weather Heliospheric and Magnetic Imager Active Region Patches (SHARPs).
We show that True Skill Statistics (TSS) and Heidke Skill Scores (HSS)
calculated for SVMs are slightly better than those from the MLPs. We also show
that the forecasting time frame of 96 hours provides the best results in
predicting if a flare will be associated with CMEs and SEPs (TSS=0.92$\pm$0.09
and HSS=0.92$\pm$0.08). Additionally, we obtain the maximum TSS and HSS values
of 0.91$\pm$0.06 for predicting that a flare will not be associated with CMEs
and SEPs for the 36 hour forecast window, while the 108 hour forecast window
give the maximum TSS and HSS values for predicting CMEs will not be
accompanying any events (TSS=HSS=0.98$\pm$0.02).
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00800 [pdf] - 1611913
Ultra-Low Energy Calibration of LUX Detector using $^{127}$Xe Electron
Capture
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2017-09-03
We report an absolute calibration of the ionization yields($\textit{Q$_y$})$
and fluctuations for electronic recoil events in liquid xenon at discrete
energies between 186 eV and 33.2 keV. The average electric field applied across
the liquid xenon target is 180 V/cm. The data are obtained using low energy
$^{127}$Xe electron capture decay events from the 95.0-day first run from LUX
(WS2013) in search of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). The
sequence of gamma-ray and X-ray cascades associated with $^{127}$I
de-excitations produces clearly identified 2-vertex events in the LUX detector.
We observe the K- (binding energy, 33.2 keV), L- (5.2 keV), M- (1.1 keV), and
N- (186 eV) shell cascade events and verify that the relative ratio of observed
events for each shell agrees with calculations. The N-shell cascade analysis
includes single extracted electron (SE) events and represents the lowest-energy
electronic recoil $\textit{in situ}$ measurements that have been explored in
liquid xenon.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.02297 [pdf] - 1582421
First Searches for Axions and Axion-Like Particles with the LUX
Experiment
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Aquino, C.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2017-04-07, last modified: 2017-06-30
The first searches for axions and axion-like particles with the Large
Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment are presented. Under the assumption of an
axio-electric interaction in xenon, the coupling constant between axions and
electrons, gAe is tested, using data collected in 2013 with an exposure
totalling 95 live-days $\times$ 118 kg. A double-sided, profile likelihood
ratio statistic test excludes gAe larger than 3.5 $\times$ 10$^{-12}$ (90%
C.L.) for solar axions. Assuming the DFSZ theoretical description, the upper
limit in coupling corresponds to an upper limit on axion mass of 0.12
eV/c$^{2}$, while for the KSVZ description masses above 36.6 eV/c$^{2}$ are
excluded. For galactic axion-like particles, values of gAe larger than 4.2
$\times$ 10$^{-13}$ are excluded for particle masses in the range 1-16
keV/c$^{2}$. These are the most stringent constraints to date for these
interactions.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.03380 [pdf] - 1583256
Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the
complete LUX exposure
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2017-05-09, last modified: 2017-06-23
We present experimental constraints on the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon
elastic cross sections from the total 129.5 kg-year exposure acquired by the
Large Underground Xenon experiment (LUX), operating at the Sanford Underground
Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota (USA). A profile likelihood ratio
analysis allows 90% CL upper limits to be set on the WIMP-neutron (WIMP-proton)
cross section of $\sigma_n$ = 1.6$\times 10^{-41}$ cm$^{2}$ ($\sigma_p$ =
5$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^{2}$) at 35 GeV$c^{-2}$, almost a sixfold improvement
over the previous LUX spin-dependent results. The spin-dependent WIMP-neutron
limit is the most sensitive constraint to date.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.07648 [pdf] - 1531370
Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bramante, R.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O`Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2016-08-26, last modified: 2017-01-13
We report constraints on spin-independent weakly interacting massive particle
(WIMP)-nucleon scattering using a 3.35e4 kg-day exposure of the Large
Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment. A dual-phase xenon time projection chamber
with 250 kg of active mass is operated at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility under Lead, South Dakota (USA). With roughly fourfold improvement in
sensitivity for high WIMP masses relative to our previous results, this search
yields no evidence of WIMP nuclear recoils. At a WIMP mass of 50 GeV/c^2,
WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross sections above 2.2e-46 cm^2 are excluded at
the 90% confidence level. When combined with the previously reported LUX
exposure, this exclusion strengthens to 1.1e-46 cm^2 at 50 GeV/c^2.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.05381 [pdf] - 1503451
Low-energy (0.7-74 keV) nuclear recoil calibration of the LUX dark
matter experiment using D-D neutron scattering kinematics
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bradley, A.;
Bramante, R.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Malling, D. C.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C. A.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2016-08-18, last modified: 2016-10-26
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment is a dual-phase liquid xenon
time projection chamber (TPC) operating at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility in Lead, South Dakota. A calibration of nuclear recoils in liquid
xenon was performed $\textit{in situ}$ in the LUX detector using a collimated
beam of mono-energetic 2.45 MeV neutrons produced by a deuterium-deuterium
(D-D) fusion source. The nuclear recoil energy from the first neutron scatter
in the TPC was reconstructed using the measured scattering angle defined by
double-scatter neutron events within the active xenon volume. We measured the
absolute charge ($Q_{y}$) and light ($L_{y}$) yields at an average electric
field of 180 V/cm for nuclear recoil energies spanning 0.7 to 74 keV and 1.1 to
74 keV, respectively. This calibration of the nuclear recoil signal yields will
permit the further refinement of liquid xenon nuclear recoil signal models and,
importantly for dark matter searches, clearly demonstrates measured ionization
and scintillation signals in this medium at recoil energies down to
$\mathcal{O}$(1 keV).
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.03506 [pdf] - 1406496
Improved Limits on Scattering of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles
from Reanalysis of 2013 LUX data
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bradley, A.;
Bramante, R.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Malling, D. C.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O`Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Ott, R. A.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2015-12-10, last modified: 2016-05-16
We present constraints on weakly interacting massive particles (WIMP)-nucleus
scattering from the 2013 data of the Large Underground Xenon dark matter
experiment, including $1.4\times10^{4}\;\mathrm{kg\; day}$ of search exposure.
This new analysis incorporates several advances: single-photon calibration at
the scintillation wavelength, improved event-reconstruction algorithms, a
revised background model including events originating on the detector walls in
an enlarged fiducial volume, and new calibrations from decays of an injected
tritium $\beta$ source and from kinematically constrained nuclear recoils down
to 1.1 keV. Sensitivity, especially to low-mass WIMPs, is enhanced compared to
our previous results which modeled the signal only above a 3 keV minimum
energy. Under standard dark matter halo assumptions and in the mass range above
4 $\mathrm{GeV}\,c^{-2}$, these new results give the most stringent direct
limits on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross section. The 90% C.L. upper
limit has a minimum of 0.6 zb at 33 $\mathrm{GeV}\,c^{-2}$ WIMP mass.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.03133 [pdf] - 1402511
Tritium calibration of the LUX dark matter experiment
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bradley, A.;
Bramante, R.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Malling, D. C.;
Manalaysay, A. G.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O`Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Ott, R. A.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2015-12-09, last modified: 2016-05-05
We present measurements of the electron-recoil (ER) response of the LUX dark
matter detector based upon 170,000 highly pure and spatially-uniform tritium
decays. We reconstruct the tritium energy spectrum using the combined energy
model and find good agreement with expectations. We report the average charge
and light yields of ER events in liquid xenon at 180 V/cm and 105 V/cm and
compare the results to the NEST model. We also measure the mean charge
recombination fraction and its fluctuations, and we investigate the location
and width of the LUX ER band. These results provide input to a re-analysis of
the LUX Run3 WIMP search.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.02910 [pdf] - 1286987
LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Conceptual Design Report
The LZ Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Akerlof, C. W.;
Akimov, D. Yu.;
Alsum, S. K.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Balashov, S.;
Barry, M. J.;
Bauer, P.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boast, K. E.;
Bolozdynya, A. I.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bramante, R.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Bugaev, V. V.;
Bunker, R.;
Burdin, S.;
Busenitz, J. K.;
Carels, C.;
Carlsmith, D. L.;
Carlson, B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Cascella, M.;
Chan, C.;
Cherwinka, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Craddock, W. W.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
da Cunha, J. P.;
Dahl, C. E.;
Dasu, S.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edberg, T. K.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Edwards, W. R.;
Elnimr, M. M.;
Emmet, W. T.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Ford, P.;
Francis, V. B.;
Fu, C.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gantos, N. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Gerhard, R. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gomber, B.;
Hall, C. R.;
Harris, A.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hoff, M. D.;
Holbrook, B.;
Holtom, E.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Hurteau, T. W.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Ji, X.;
Johnson, M.;
Ju, Y.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Khazov, A.;
Khromov, A. V.;
Konovalov, A. M.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kraus, H.;
Krebs, H. J.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Kumpan, A. V.;
Kyre, S.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, F. -T.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lippincott, W. H.;
Liu, J.;
Liu, X.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Lorenzon, W.;
Luitz, S.;
Majewski, P.;
Malling, D. C.;
Manalaysay, A. G.;
Manenti, L.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Markley, D. J.;
Martin, T. J.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Meng, Y.;
Miller, E. H.;
Mock, J.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nikkel, J. A.;
O'Neill, F. G.;
O'Dell, J.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Olevitch, M. A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Patton, S. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Piepke, A.;
Powell, S.;
Preece, R. M.;
Pushkin, K.;
Ratcliff, B. N.;
Reichenbacher, J.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rodrigues, J. P.;
Rose, H. J.;
Rosero, R.;
Saba, J. S.;
Sarychev, M.;
Schnee, R. W.;
Schubnell, M. S. G.;
Scovell, P. R.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Skarpaas, K.;
Skulski, W.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sosnovtsev, V. V.;
Stancu, I.;
Stark, M. R.;
Stephenson, S.;
Stiegler, T. M.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Sundarnath, K.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Thomas, K. J.;
Thomson, J. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tomás, A.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tull, C. E.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Va'vra, J.;
van der Grinten, M. G. D.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Vuosalo, C. O.;
Waldron, W. L.;
Wang, L.;
Webb, R. C.;
Wei, W. -Z.;
While, M.;
White, D. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Wisniewski, W. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woods, E.;
Woodward, D.;
Worm, S. D.;
Yeh, M.;
Yin, J.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2015-09-09, last modified: 2015-09-23
The design and performance of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) detector is described as of
March 2015 in this Conceptual Design Report. LZ is a second-generation
dark-matter detector with the potential for unprecedented sensitivity to weakly
interacting massive particles (WIMPs) of masses from a few GeV/c2 to hundreds
of TeV/c2. With total liquid xenon mass of about 10 tonnes, LZ will be the most
sensitive experiment for WIMPs in this mass region by the end of the decade.
This report describes in detail the design of the LZ technical systems.
Expected backgrounds are quantified and the performance of the experiment is
presented. The LZ detector will be located at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility in South Dakota. The organization of the LZ Project and a summary of
the expected cost and current schedule are given.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.1299 [pdf] - 862558
Radiogenic and Muon-Induced Backgrounds in the LUX Dark Matter Detector
Akerib, D. S.;
Araujo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Bernard, E.;
Bernstein, A.;
Bradley, A.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Coffey, T.;
Currie, A.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Flores, C.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Malling, D. C.;
Mannino, R.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H.;
Neves, F.;
Ott, R. A.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Parker, P. D.;
Pease, E. K.;
Pech, K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Shutt, T.;
Silva, C.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D.;
Tennyson, B.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
Tripathi, M.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Walsh, N.;
Webb, R.;
White, J. T.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woods, M.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2014-03-05
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) dark matter experiment aims to detect rare
low-energy interactions from Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). The
radiogenic backgrounds in the LUX detector have been measured and compared with
Monte Carlo simulation. Measurements of LUX high-energy data have provided
direct constraints on all background sources contributing to the background
model. The expected background rate from the background model for the 85.3 day
WIMP search run is
$(2.6\pm0.2_{\textrm{stat}}\pm0.4_{\textrm{sys}})\times10^{-3}$~events~keV$_{ee}^{-1}$~kg$^{-1}$~day$^{-1}$
in a 118~kg fiducial volume. The observed background rate is
$(3.6\pm0.4_{\textrm{stat}})\times10^{-3}$~events~keV$_{ee}^{-1}$~kg$^{-1}$~day$^{-1}$,
consistent with model projections. The expectation for the radiogenic
background in a subsequent one-year run is presented.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.3731 [pdf] - 788195
A Detailed Look at the First Results from the Large Underground Xenon
(LUX) Dark Matter Experiment
Szydagis, M.;
Akerib, D. S.;
Araujo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Bernard, E.;
Bernstein, A.;
Bradley, A.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Coffey, T.;
Currie, A.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Flores, C.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Malling, D. C.;
Mannino, R.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H.;
Neves, F.;
Ott, R. A.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Parker, P. D.;
Pease, E. K.;
Pech, K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Shutt, T.;
Silva, C.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Sumner, T.;
Taylor, D.;
Tennyson, B.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
Tripathi, M.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Walsh, N.;
Webb, R.;
White, J. T.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woods, M.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2014-02-15, last modified: 2014-02-25
LUX, the world's largest dual-phase xenon time-projection chamber, with a
fiducial target mass of 118 kg and 10,091 kg-days of exposure thus far, is
currently the most sensitive direct dark matter search experiment. The initial
null-result limit on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section
was released in October 2013, with a primary scintillation threshold of 2 phe,
roughly 3 keVnr for LUX. The detector has been deployed at the Sanford
Underground Research Facility (SURF) in Lead, South Dakota, and is the first
experiment to achieve a limit on the WIMP cross-section lower than $10^{-45}$
cm$^{2}$. Here we present a more in-depth discussion of the novel energy scale
employed to better understand the nuclear recoil light and charge yields, and
of the calibration sources, including the new internal tritium source. We found
the LUX data to be in conflict with low-mass WIMP signal interpretations of
other results.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.8214 [pdf] - 795009
First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford
Underground Research Facility
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Araujo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Bedikian, S.;
Bernard, E.;
Bernstein, A.;
Bolozdynya, A.;
Bradley, A.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Clark, K.;
Coffey, T.;
Currie, A.;
Curioni, A.;
Dazeley, S.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J.;
Dragowsky, E. M.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Flores, C.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Kastens, L.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Knoche, R.;
Kyre, S.;
Lander, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Leonard, D. S.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Malling, D. C.;
Mannino, R.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J.;
Morii, M.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H.;
Neves, F.;
Nikkel, J. A.;
Ott, R. A.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Parker, P. D.;
Pease, E. K.;
Pech, K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Shutt, T.;
Silva, C.;
Skulski, W.;
Sofka, C. J.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stiegler, T.;
O`Sullivan, K.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Svoboda, R.;
Sweany, M.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D.;
Tennyson, B.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
Tripathi, M.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Walsh, N.;
Webb, R.;
White, J. T.;
White, D.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wlasenko, M.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woods, M.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2013-10-30, last modified: 2014-02-05
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment, a dual-phase xenon
time-projection chamber operating at the Sanford Underground Research Facility
(Lead, South Dakota), was cooled and filled in February 2013. We report results
of the first WIMP search dataset, taken during the period April to August 2013,
presenting the analysis of 85.3 live-days of data with a fiducial volume of 118
kg. A profile-likelihood analysis technique shows our data to be consistent
with the background-only hypothesis, allowing 90% confidence limits to be set
on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon elastic scattering with a minimum upper limit
on the cross section of $7.6 \times 10^{-46}$ cm$^{2}$ at a WIMP mass of 33
GeV/c$^2$. We find that the LUX data are in strong disagreement with low-mass
WIMP signal interpretations of the results from several recent direct detection
experiments.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.8327 [pdf] - 741475
Snowmass CF1 Summary: WIMP Dark Matter Direct Detection
Cushman, P.;
Galbiati, C.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Robertson, H.;
Tait, T. M. P.;
Bauer, D.;
Borgland, A.;
Cabrera, B.;
Calaprice, F.;
Cooley, J.;
Empl, T.;
Essig, R.;
Figueroa-Feliciano, E.;
Gaitskell, R.;
Golwala, S.;
Hall, J.;
Hill, R.;
Hime, A.;
Hoppe, E.;
Hsu, L.;
Hungerford, E.;
Jacobsen, R.;
Kelsey, M.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lippincott, W. H.;
Loer, B.;
Luitz, S.;
Mandic, V.;
Mardon, J.;
Maricic, J.;
Maruyama, R.;
Mahapatra, R.;
Nelson, H.;
Orrell, J.;
Palladino, K.;
Pantic, E.;
Partridge, R.;
Ryd, A.;
Saab, T.;
Sadoulet, B.;
Schnee, R.;
Shepherd, W.;
Sonnenschein, A.;
Sorensen, P.;
Szydagis, M.;
Volansky, T.;
Witherell, M.;
Wright, D.;
Zurek, K.
Submitted: 2013-10-30, last modified: 2013-11-03
As part of the Snowmass process, the Cosmic Frontier WIMP Direct Detection
subgroup (CF1) has drawn on input from the Cosmic Frontier and the broader
Particle Physics community to produce this document. The charge to CF1 was (a)
to summarize the current status and projected sensitivity of WIMP direct
detection experiments worldwide, (b) motivate WIMP dark matter searches over a
broad parameter space by examining a spectrum of WIMP models, (c) establish a
community consensus on the type of experimental program required to explore
that parameter space, and (d) identify the common infrastructure required to
practically meet those goals.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.2272 [pdf] - 873784
An Ultra-Low Background PMT for Liquid Xenon Detectors
Akerib, D. S.;
Bai, X.;
Bernard, E.;
Bernstein, A.;
Bradley, A.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Carr, D.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chan, Y-D.;
Clark, K.;
Coffey, T.;
deViveiros, L.;
Dragowsky, M.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Hall, C.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Holbrook, B.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Kastens, L.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Larsen, N.;
Lee, C.;
Lesko, K.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Malling, D. C.;
Mannino, R.;
McKinsey, D.;
Mei, D.;
Mock, J.;
Morii, M.;
Nelson, H.;
Neves, F.;
Nikkel, J. A.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Pech, K.;
Phelps, P.;
Shutt, T.;
Silva, C.;
Skulski, W.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Spaans, J.;
Stiegler, T.;
Sweany, M.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D.;
Thomson, J.;
Tripathi, M.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Walsh, N.;
Webb, R.;
White, J. T.;
Wlasenko, M.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woods, M.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2012-05-10, last modified: 2013-06-24
Results are presented from radioactivity screening of two models of
photomultiplier tubes designed for use in current and future liquid xenon
experiments. The Hamamatsu 5.6 cm diameter R8778 PMT, used in the LUX dark
matter experiment, has yielded a positive detection of four common radioactive
isotopes: 238U, 232Th, 40K, and 60Co. Screening of LUX materials has rendered
backgrounds from other detector materials subdominant to the R8778
contribution. A prototype Hamamatsu 7.6 cm diameter R11410 MOD PMT has also
been screened, with benchmark isotope counts measured at <0.4 238U / <0.3 232Th
/ <8.3 40K / 2.0+-0.2 60Co mBq/PMT. This represents a large reduction, equal to
a change of \times 1/24 238U / \times 1/9 232Th / \times 1/8 40K per PMT,
between R8778 and R11410 MOD, concurrent with a doubling of the photocathode
surface area (4.5 cm to 6.4 cm diameter). 60Co measurements are comparable
between the PMTs, but can be significantly reduced in future R11410 MOD units
through further material selection. Assuming PMT activity equal to the measured
90% upper limits, Monte Carlo estimates indicate that replacement of R8778 PMTs
with R11410 MOD PMTs will change LUX PMT electron recoil background
contributions by a factor of \times1/25 after further material selection for
60Co reduction, and nuclear recoil backgrounds by a factor of \times 1/36. The
strong reduction in backgrounds below the measured R8778 levels makes the
R11410 MOD a very competitive technology for use in large-scale liquid xenon
detectors.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.4569 [pdf] - 630139
Technical Results from the Surface Run of the LUX Dark Matter Experiment
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Bai, X.;
Bernard, E.;
Bernstein, A.;
Bradley, A.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Coffey, T.;
Dobi, A.;
Dragowsky, E.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M.;
Hall, C.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Kastens, L.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N.;
Lee, C.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Malling, D. C.;
Mannino, R.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morii, M.;
Nelson, H.;
Neves, F.;
Nikkel, J. A.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Pech, K.;
Phelps, P.;
Rodionov, A.;
Shutt, T.;
Silva, C.;
Skulski, W.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stiegler, T.;
Sweany, M.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D.;
Tripathi, M.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Walsh, N.;
Webb, R.;
White, J. T.;
Wlasenko, M.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woods, M.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2012-10-16, last modified: 2013-02-22
We present the results of the three-month above-ground commissioning run of
the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment at the Sanford Underground
Research Facility located in Lead, South Dakota, USA. LUX is a 370 kg liquid
xenon detector that will search for cold dark matter in the form of Weakly
Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). The commissioning run, conducted with
the detector immersed in a water tank, validated the integration of the various
sub-systems in preparation of the underground deployment. Using the data
collected, we report excellent light collection properties, achieving 8.4
photoelectrons per keV for 662 keV electron recoils without an applied electric
field, measured in the center of the WIMP target. We also find good energy and
position resolution in relatively high-energy interactions from a variety of
internal and external sources. Finally, we have used the commissioning data to
tune the optical properties of our simulation and report updated sensitivity
projections for spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.0103 [pdf] - 967104
After LUX: The LZ Program
Malling, D. C.;
Akerib, D. S.;
Araujo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bedikian, S.;
Bernard, E.;
Bernstein, A.;
Bradley, A.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Carr, D.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Clark, K.;
Classen, T.;
Coffey, T.;
Curioni, A.;
Currie, A.;
Dazeley, S.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dragowsky, M.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Hall, C.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Holbrook, B.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Kastens, L.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Lander, R.;
Larsen, N.;
Lee, C.;
Leonard, D.;
Lesko, K.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Majewski, P.;
Mannino, R.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Mock, J.;
Morii, M.;
Murphy, A. St J.;
Nelson, H.;
Neves, F.;
Nikkel, J. A.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Shutt, T.;
Silva, C.;
Skulski, W.;
Solovov, V.;
Sorensen, P.;
Spaans, J.;
Stiegler, T.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Svoboda, R.;
Sweany, M.;
Szydagis, M.;
Thomson, J.;
Tripathi, M.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Walsh, N.;
Webb, R.;
White, J. T.;
Wlasenko, M.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woods, M.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2011-10-01, last modified: 2011-10-13
The LZ program consists of two stages of direct dark matter searches using
liquid Xe detectors. The first stage will be a 1.5-3 tonne detector, while the
last stage will be a 20 tonne detector. Both devices will benefit tremendously
from research and development performed for the LUX experiment, a 350 kg liquid
Xe dark matter detector currently operating at the Sanford Underground
Laboratory. In particular, the technology used for cryogenics and electrical
feedthroughs, circulation and purification, low-background materials and
shielding techniques, electronics, calibrations, and automated control and
recovery systems are all directly scalable from LUX to the LZ detectors.
Extensive searches for potential background sources have been performed, with
an emphasis on previously undiscovered background sources that may have a
significant impact on tonne-scale detectors. The LZ detectors will probe
spin-independent interaction cross sections as low as 5E-49 cm2 for 100 GeV
WIMPs, which represents the ultimate limit for dark matter detection with
liquid xenon technology.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.1836 [pdf] - 1083296
Data Acquisition and Readout System for the LUX Dark Matter Experiment
Akerib, D. S.;
Bai, X.;
Bedikian, S.;
Bernard, E.;
Bernstein, A.;
Bradley, A.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Carr, D.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Clark, K.;
Classen, T.;
Coffey, T.;
Curioni, A.;
Dazeley, S.;
deViveiros, L.;
Dragowsky, M.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Hall, C.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Holbrook, B.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Kastens, L.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Lander, R.;
Larsen, N.;
Lee, C.;
Leonard, D.;
Lesko, K.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Malling, D. C.;
Mannino, R.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D.;
Mock, J.;
Morii, M.;
Nelson, H.;
Nikkel, J. A.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Phelps, P.;
Shutt, T.;
Skulski, W.;
Sorensen, P.;
Spaans, J.;
Stiegler, T.;
Svoboda, R.;
Sweany, M.;
Szydagis, M.;
Thomson, J.;
Tripathi, M.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Walsh, N.;
Webb, R.;
White, J. T.;
Wlasenko, M.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woods, M.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2011-08-08, last modified: 2011-08-09
LUX is a two-phase (liquid/gas) xenon time projection chamber designed to
detect nuclear recoils from interactions with dark matter particles. Signals
from the LUX detector are processed by custom-built analog electronics which
provide properly shaped signals for the trigger and data acquisition (DAQ)
systems. The DAQ is comprised of commercial digitizers with firmware customized
for the LUX experiment. Data acquisition systems in rare-event searches must
accommodate high rate and large dynamic range during precision calibrations
involving radioactive sources, while also delivering low threshold for maximum
sensitivity. The LUX DAQ meets these challenges using real-time baseline sup-
pression that allows for a maximum event acquisition rate in excess of 1.5 kHz
with virtually no deadtime. This paper describes the LUX DAQ and the novel
acquisition techniques employed in the LUX experiment.