Normalized to: Ivie, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.06769 [pdf] - 1917086
Astro2020: Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in Astronomy Graduate
Education: an Astro2020 APC White Paper by the AAS Taskforce on Diversity and
Inclusion in Astronomy Graduate Education
Rudolph, Alexander;
Basri, Gibor;
Agüeros, Marcel;
Bertschinger, Ed;
Coble, Kim;
Donahue, Megan;
Monkiewicz, Jackie;
Speck, Angela;
Ivie, Rachel;
Pfund, Christine;
Posselt, Julie
Submitted: 2019-07-15
The purpose of this white paper is to provide guidance to funding agencies,
leaders in the discipline, and its constituent departments about strategies for
(1) improving access to advanced education for people from populations that
have long been underrepresented and (2) improving the climates of departments
where students enroll. The twin goals of improving access to increase diversity
and improving climate to enhance inclusiveness are mutually reinforcing, and
they are both predicated on a fundamental problem of inequality in
participation. This white paper has been endorsed by the Board of Trustees of
the AAS.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.11836 [pdf] - 1791743
Three years later: gender differences in the advisor's impact on career
choices in astronomy and astrophysics
Submitted: 2018-11-28
The Longitudinal Study of Astronomy Graduate Students (LSAGS) arose from the
2003 Women in Astronomy Conference, where it was noted that a majority of young
members of the American Astronomical Society were women. The astronomy
community wishes to make every effort to retain young women in astronomy, so
they commissioned a longitudinal study to be conducted that would pinpoint the
factors that contribute to retention in general, with a focus on differences
between women and men. The LSAGS follows a cohort of people who were graduate
students in astronomy or astrophysics during 2006-07. The first survey was
conducted during 2007-08, the second during 2012-13, and the third during 2015.
The analysis presented in this paper, which is an update to our previous paper
on this topic, used a subset of the respondents, all of whom had PhDs in
astronomy, astrophysics, or a related field at the time of the third survey. We
tested the effects of four major concepts on attrition from physics and
astronomy. These concepts included: the imposter syndrome, mentoring and
advising during graduate school, the so-called "two-body problem" that occurs
when a couple needs to find two jobs in the same geographic area, and gender of
the respondent. Having a mentor in grad school did not contribute to working
outside of physics or astronomy. Showing characteristics of the imposter
syndrome and gender of the respondent had indirect effects on working outside
the field. Encouragement of the graduate advisor, the two-body problem, and
completing a postdoc, had significant direct effects on working in physics or
astronomy. This research identifies specific areas of concern that can be
addressed by the scientific community to increase the retention of all people,
but especially women, in astronomy and astrophysics.